ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02483689Updated May 2, 2018

Evaluation of Local Anesthetic at Incision Site

An interventional study of Pre Incisional Local Anesthetic and Pre-Incisional Saline in Post Operative Pain and Appendicitis, sponsored by Valley Anesthesiology Consultants. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 17 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-02.

Sponsored by Valley Anesthesiology Consultants · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patient will have usual appendectomy surgery with an injection of local or saline at incision site either before or after the incision at random.

The clinical hypothesis of this trial is that pediatric patients who undergo a local anesthetic pre-incisional and/or post-incisional will reduce the amount of postoperative pain and therefore reduce the amount of analgesics required to keep the patient satisfied.

Primary: To determine if local anesthetic reduces postoperative pain. Secondary: To assess the timing of local anesthetic injection affects postoperative pain.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective randomized-controlled pilot study of 100 pediatric subjects, recruited through Phoenix Children's Hospital and Pediatric Surgeons of Phoenix, who will undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute non-perforated appendicitis. The reviewer and subject will be blind to the treatment to help prevent bias. The subjects will be randomized by envelope using a random number generator, and the infiltrated solution will be given to the surgeon by the pharmacy.

The subjects will be approached preoperatively and will be divided into three groups: pre-incisional injection of local anesthetic, post-incisional injection of local anesthetic, and (pre or post) injection of saline as the control.

All patients will have a standard 3 port laparoscopic appendectomy, port placement, port and instrument type, and operative technique will be determined by the surgeon's usual practice.

On induction, the following protocol will be utilized: a 2 mg/kg bolus of propofol, 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine, 0.1 mg/kg of morphine, and 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium. A standardized anesthetic, using a mixture of sevoflurane in oxygen and air, will be utilized. Once the appendectomy is complete, a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg of ketorolac will be given prior to extubation. A total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine or saline, up to a maximum of 30 cc, will be injected using a 22g needle. Pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure.

The subjects will be assessed for postoperative pain immediately upon wakening, and then 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after the LA procedure by the bedside nurse by using the VAS and by measuring the total amount of opioid use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Operative Pain
  • Appendicitis

Keywords

  • Post Operative Pain
  • Appendicitis
  • Appendectomy
  • Local Anesthetic
  • Saline
  • Pain Management
  • Surgery
  • Recovery
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Valley Anesthesiology Consultants is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing Appendectomy for acute non-perforated appendicitis Must be between 9-17 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • n/a
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline

    Patient will be given saline with a maximum of 30 cc either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

    Other: Pre-Incisional Saline · Other: Post-Closure Saline

  • Experimental
    Local

    Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

    Drug: Pre Incisional Local Anesthetic · Drug: Post-Closure Local Anesthetic

Interventions

  • Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

    Also known as: Bupivicaine

  • OtherPre-Incisional Saline

    Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle to area of incision.

  • Patient will be given a total of 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% Bupivicaine either pre-incision: local will be to be given intradermally and onto the peritoneum under direct vision; or post-closure local will be injected intradermally after closure

    Also known as: Bupivicaine

  • OtherPost-Closure Saline

    Patient will be given a max of 30 cc injected through a 22g needle after closing sutures were made.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Amount of Post Operative Pain Patients Experience

    The subjects will be assessed for post-operative pain immediately upon wakening, then at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after procedure.

    Time frame: 12 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. The total amount of opioid use

    This will be completed by looking at the total amount of morphine equivalants given to the patient during the first 24 hours of their hospital stay.

    Time frame: 24 Hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734. PubMed 2239906 ↗
  • Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9. PubMed 22099604 ↗
  • Edwards TJ, Carty SJ, Carr AS, Lambert AW. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy: a randomised controlled trial: Time to stop using local anaesthetic wound infiltration following paediatric appendicectomy? Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):314-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.012. Epub 2011 Feb 13. PubMed 21324384 ↗
  • Kang H, Kim BG. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2010 May-Jun;38(3):821-32. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800309. PubMed 20819419 ↗
  • Liu Y, Seipel C, Lopez ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML, Fallon SC, Manyang PA, Tjia IM, Baijal RG, Watcha MF. A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Dec;23(12):1187-92. doi: 10.1111/pan.12271. Epub 2013 Sep 25. PubMed 24112856 ↗
  • Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004-2011. Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1074-7. PubMed 25264663 ↗
  • Oravsky M, Bak V, Schnorrer M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in treatment of acute appendicitis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2014;115(10):660-2. doi: 10.4149/bll_2014_127. PubMed 25573735 ↗
  • Palmes D, Rottgermann S, Classen C, Haier J, Horstmann R. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of intraperitoneal local anaesthesia on pain after laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Jul;94(7):824-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5810. PubMed 17571296 ↗
  • Reynolds SL, Jaffe DM. Diagnosing abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1992 Jun;8(3):126-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199206000-00003. PubMed 1614900 ↗
  • Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP, Dittus RS. Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):680-5. PubMed 8885946 ↗
  • Thanapal MR, Tata MD, Tan AJ, Subramaniam T, Tong JM, Palayan K, Rampal S, Gurunathan R. Pre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthesia: an effective method in immediate post-operative pain management and metabolic stress response in laparoscopic appendicectomy, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):47-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06210.x. Epub 2012 Oct 11. PubMed 23057502 ↗
  • Tomecka MJ, Bortsov AV, Miller NR, Solano N, Narron J, McNaull PP, Ricketts KJ, Lupa CM, McLean SA. Substantial postoperative pain is common among children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03711.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29. PubMed 21958060 ↗
  • Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8. doi: 10.1038/306686a0. PubMed 6656869 ↗
  • Wright JE. Controlled trial of wound infiltration with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after appendicectomy in children. Br J Surg. 1993 Jan;80(1):110-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800136. PubMed 8428267 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2015, a primary completion of Jul 2020 and a completion of Jul 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 22, 2015
First posted
Jun 29, 2015
Start
Aug 2015
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2020
CompletionEst.
Jul 2020
Last update
May 2, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02483689
Lead sponsor
Valley Anesthesiology Consultants
Responsible party
Neil Raj Singhal (Doctor, Valley Anesthesiology Consultants) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 2, 2018

Study contacts

Raj Singhal, MD
Contact
rsinghal@valley.md
Vanessa Pohl, BS
Contact
vpohl@phoenixchildrens.com
6029334482

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion