CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02478359Updated Feb 19, 2020Results posted

Walk On! Physical Activity Coaching

An interventional study of Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 41 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-19.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,707
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
41 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of the death in the US. The personal, social and economic costs of the disease are tremendous, with annual expenditures of nearly $50 billion, mostly from hospitalizations for exacerbations of COPD and associated sequelae. For the vast majority of patients, despite optimal pharmacological therapy, living with COPD is characterized by unrelieved dyspnea, physical inactivity, deconditioning, and an insidious downward spiral of social isolation and depression that has a profound impact on the lives of patients and their caregivers. There is mounting evidence that physical inactivity is significantly associated with more frequent hospitalizations and increased mortality in COPD even after adjusting for disease severity.

While practice guidelines recommend regular physical activity for all patients with COPD, health systems are challenged in operationalizing an effective and sustainable approach to assist patients in being physically active. The investigators propose a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a 12-month physical activity coaching intervention (Walk On!) compared to standard care for 1,650 COPD patients from a large integrated health care system.

Read the detailed description

Physical inactivity is significantly associated with more frequent hospitalizations and increased mortality in COPD even after adjusting for disease severity. While practice guidelines recommend regular physical activity for all patients with COPD, health systems are challenged in operationalizing an effective and sustainable approach to assist patients in being physically active.

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial design will be used to determine the effectiveness of a 12-month home and community-based physical activity coaching intervention (Walk On!) compared to standard care for 2,700 COPD patients from a large integrated health care system. Eligible patients with a COPD-related hospitalization, emergency department visit, or observational stay in the previous 12 months will be automatically identified from the electronic medical records (EMR) system and randomized to treatment arms. The Walk On! intervention includes collaborative monitoring of step counts, semi-automated step goal recommendations, individualized reinforcement from a physical activity coach, and peer/family support.

The primary composite outcome includes all-cause hospitalizations, emergency department visits, observational stays, and death in the 12 months following randomization. Secondary outcomes include COPD-related utilization, cardio-metabolic markers, physical activity, symptoms, and health-related quality of life. With the exception of patient reported outcomes, all utilization and clinical variables will be automatically captured from the EMR.

If successful, findings from this multi-stakeholder driven trial of a generalizable and scalable physical activity intervention model, carefully designed with sufficient flexibility, intensity, duration, and support for a large ethnically diverse sample could re-define the standard of care to effectively address physical inactivity in COPD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
03

In context

Lung Diseases, Obstructive

2,592 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases, Obstructive; 198 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,707 is above the median of 66 across 1,837 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases, Obstructive.

Browse Lung Diseases, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 385 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
41 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with any COPD-related hospitalization, emergency department visit or observational stay in the previous 12 months are eligible for the study. COPD-related encounters are defined according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and National Quality Forum (NQF) criteria for the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. The following principal discharge diagnoses of COPD (ICD-9 codes: 491.21, 491.22, 491.8, 491.9, 492.8, 493.20, 493.21, 493.22, and 496) or respiratory failure (ICD-9 codes: 518.81, 518.82, 518.84, 799.1) with a secondary diagnosis of COPD exacerbation (ICD-9 codes: 491.21, 491.22, 493.21, 493.22) will be used
  • Age >40 years
  • On at least a bronchodilator or steroid inhaler prior to the encounter or if not on an inhaler, had a previous COPD diagnosis
  • Continuous health plan membership in the 12 months prior to the encounter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • FEV1/FVC ratio >0.70 at any point in the past year for those with spirometry data
  • Discharged to hospice, a skilled nursing facility, long term-care or another acute care hospital during the index admission
  • Level of function at admission or discharge during the index admission is bed bound
  • Has Alzheimers disease, dementia or metastatic cancer
  • Morbidly obese (BMI >40)
  • Completed pulmonary rehabilitation in the last 6 months
  • Deceased
  • Dis-enrolled from the health plan
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,707 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    Standard care patients received their routine care from Kaiser Permanente Southern California and had access to all health services in accordance with their health plan

  • Experimental
    Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)

    The 12-month Walk On! intervention included a baseline in-person assessment, collaborative monitoring of steps using two types of activity sensors, semi-automated step goal recommendations using an interactive voice response system or web application, ongoing individualized reinforcement from a physical activity coach, and peer/family support.

    Behavioral: Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)

Interventions

  • BehavioralPhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)

    The 12-month Walk On! intervention included a baseline in-person assessment, collaborative monitoring of steps using two types of activity sensors, semi-automated step goal recommendations using an interactive voice response system or web application, ongoing individualized reinforcement from a physical activity coach, and peer/family support.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays, and Deaths

    Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Deaths Among Participants

    Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  2. Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations

    Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  3. Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits

    Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  4. Number of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays

    Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  5. Number of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays

    Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  6. Number of Participants With COPD Exacerbation

    COPD exacerbations were ascertained via pharmacy records and utilization data. An outpatient COPD exacerbation will be defined as a care touch (clinic visit, phone, or secure message encounter) with a diagnosis of COPD accompanied by a prescription of either an oral steroid or an antibiotic within 2 days

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  7. COPD Assessment Test, CAT - 12 Months

    The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months scores for the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT). Score range is 0-40. A negative change score indicates fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Physical Activity

    Patients were categorized as being: completely inactive (0 mins/week), insufficiently active (1-149 mins/week) or active, meeting national physical activity recommendations (\>150 mins/week) of moderate to vigorous physical activity.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Personal Health Questionnaire, PHQ8 - 12 Months

    The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months scores. Score range is 0-24. A negative change score indicates less depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. General Anxiety Disorder, GAD-7 - 12 Months

    The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months scores. Score range is 0-21. A negative change score indicates less anxiety.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. PROMIS-10 HRQL , Physical Health - 12 Months

    The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months T-scores. Score range is 16-68. A positive change score reflects better physical functioning.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. PROMIS-10 HRQL , Mental Health - 12 Months

    The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months T-scores. Score range is 21-68. A positive change score reflects better mental health.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  14. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  15. HbA1c Levels

    HbA1c levels were obtained only from diabetics and on values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  16. LDL Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  17. HDL Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  18. Total Cholesterol Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

  19. Triglycerides Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months post randomization

  20. Body Mass Index

    Body mass index measurements were based on values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months following randomization

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays and Deaths

    As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 to 12 months following randomization

  2. Number of Deaths Among Participants

    As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 to 12 months following randomization

  3. Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations

    As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 to 12 months following randomization

  4. Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits

    As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 to 12 months following randomization

  5. Number of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays

    As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 to 12 months following randomization

  6. Number of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays

    As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

    Time frame: 2 to 12 months randomization

  7. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

    Time frame: 6-12 months following randomization

  8. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

    Time frame: 6-12 months following randomization

  9. HbA1c Levels

    HbA1c levels were obtained only from diabetics and on values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. LDL Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. HDL Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Total Cholesterol Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Triglycerides Levels

    Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Feb 19, 2020
Limitations and caveats
It is important to note the low uptake/participation in the Walk On! intervention and its effects on the primary, intention to treat analyses, as well, the sub-optimal baseline and follow-up response rates to the patient-reported outcomes.

Participant flow

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to Walk On! or Standard Care arm at the point of identification of eligibility based on EMR data.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Started13491358
Intention-to-treat population month 1212431293
Completed12431293
Not completed10665
Withdrew: Disenrolled from health plan10665

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays, and Deaths

Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays, and Deaths
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays, and Deaths864883
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.33 · Odds ratio (or): 1.09 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.28
SecondaryNumber of Deaths Among Participants

Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Deaths Among Participants
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Deaths Among Participants117117
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.88 · Odds ratio (or): 1.02 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.36
SecondaryNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations

Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations499502
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.53 · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.89 to 1.24
SecondaryNumber of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits

Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits694702
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.73 · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.20
SecondaryNumber of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays

Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays269295
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.21 · Odds ratio (or): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.37
SecondaryNumber of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays

Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays398411
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.26 · Odds ratio (or): 1.10 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.31
SecondaryNumber of Participants With COPD Exacerbation

COPD exacerbations were ascertained via pharmacy records and utilization data. An outpatient COPD exacerbation will be defined as a care touch (clinic visit, phone, or secure message encounter) with a diagnosis of COPD accompanied by a prescription of either an oral steroid or an antibiotic within 2 days

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With COPD Exacerbation
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With COPD Exacerbation706689
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.41
SecondaryCOPD Assessment Test, CAT - 12 Months

The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months scores for the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT). Score range is 0-40. A negative change score indicates fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
COPD Assessment Test, CAT - 12 Months
score on a scaleStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Baseline20.5 ± 8.4718.0 ± 7.28
12 months19.9 ± 8.0317.8 ± 7.48
Change at 12 months from baseline-0.56 ± 6.46-0.15 ± 6.22
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.55
SecondaryPhysical Activity

Patients were categorized as being: completely inactive (0 mins/week), insufficiently active (1-149 mins/week) or active, meeting national physical activity recommendations (\>150 mins/week) of moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Physical Activity
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Inactive (0 mins/wk) Baseline890911
Inactive (0 mins/wk) 12 Months819808
Insufficiently Active (1-149 mins/wk) Baseline262245
Insufficiently Active (1-149 mins/wk) 12 Months243268
Active (>=150 mins/wk) Baseline160174
Active (>=150 mins/wk) 12 Months171182
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.34 (adjusted p values)
SecondaryPersonal Health Questionnaire, PHQ8 - 12 Months

The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months scores. Score range is 0-24. A negative change score indicates less depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Personal Health Questionnaire, PHQ8 - 12 Months
score on a scaleStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Baseline6.6 ± 6.004.9 ± 4.22
12 months6.3 ± 5.404.8 ± 4.10
Change at 12 months from Baseline-0.30 ± 4.66-0.06 ± 3.90
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.60
SecondaryGeneral Anxiety Disorder, GAD-7 - 12 Months

The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months scores. Score range is 0-21. A negative change score indicates less anxiety.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
General Anxiety Disorder, GAD-7 - 12 Months
score on a scaleStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Baseline5.2 ± 5.814.0 ± 4.05
12 months4.5 ± 5.083.8 ± 4.25
Changes at 12 months from Baseline-0.63 ± 4.44-0.21 ± 3.63
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.32
SecondaryPROMIS-10 HRQL , Physical Health - 12 Months

The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months T-scores. Score range is 16-68. A positive change score reflects better physical functioning.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
PROMIS-10 HRQL , Physical Health - 12 Months
score on a scaleStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Baseline39.8 ± 8.6240.7 ± 6.95
12 months40.3 ± 8.0641.7 ± 7.18
Change at 12 months from Baseline0.49 ± 6.720.97 ± 5.99
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.47
SecondaryPROMIS-10 HRQL , Mental Health - 12 Months

The reported mean change between the baseline and 12 Months T-scores. Score range is 21-68. A positive change score reflects better mental health.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
PROMIS-10 HRQL , Mental Health - 12 Months
score on a scaleStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Baseline45.3 ± 8.9447.7 ± 8.80
12 months46.0 ± 8.6547.9 ± 8.04
Changes at 12 months from Baseline0.69 ± 7.390.26 ± 6.77
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.33
SecondaryDiastolic Blood Pressure

Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Diastolic Blood Pressure
mmHgStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Diastolic Blood Pressure70.5 ± 9.5970.1 ± 9.63
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.87 (Adjusted P value)
SecondarySystolic Blood Pressure

Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Systolic Blood Pressure130.8 ± 14.54130.7 ± 14.19
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.70 (Adjusted P value)
SecondaryHbA1c Levels

HbA1c levels were obtained only from diabetics and on values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin,
HbA1c Levels
percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin,Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
HbA1c Levels7.1 ± 1.457.2 ± 1.36
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.35Adjusted P Values
SecondaryLDL Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
LDL Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
LDL Levels91.0 ± 36.9686.6 ± 32.51
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.09 (Adjusted P Values)
SecondaryHDL Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
HDL Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
HDL Levels54.3 ± 18.2853.1 ± 17.60
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.82 (Adjusted P Values)
SecondaryTotal Cholesterol Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Total Cholesterol Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Total Cholesterol Levels168.8 ± 44.91162.3 ± 41.82
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.16 (Adjusted P values)
SecondaryTriglycerides Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months post randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Triglycerides Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Triglycerides Levels128.3 ± 102.36119.0 ± 65.60
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.86 (Adjusted P values)
SecondaryBody Mass Index

Body mass index measurements were based on values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
Body Mass Index
kg/m^2Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Body Mass Index26.9 ± 5.9427.07 ± 5.90
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.57
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays and Deaths

As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

Time frame:
2 to 12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays and Deaths
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalization, Emergency Department (ED) Visits, Observation Stays and Deaths781185
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.69 · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.35
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Deaths Among Participants

As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

Time frame:
2 to 12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Deaths Among Participants
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Deaths Among Participants9513
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.11 · Odds ratio (or): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.35 to 1.11
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations

As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

Time frame:
2 to 12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations43391
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.21 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.10
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits

As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

Time frame:
2 to 12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits610144
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.60 · Odds ratio (or): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.36
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays

As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

Time frame:
2 to 12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With All-cause Observation Stays23053
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.63 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.28
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays

As-treated analyses using logistic regression models that included stabilized propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics (socio-demographics, health behaviors, disease severity, comorbidities, inhalers/medications, and health care utilization in the prior year) between patients who participated in Walk On! intervention and the SC group. The first 2 months after randomization were excluded because it was expected that it would take approximately 2 months form the date of randomization to start the intervention.

Time frame:
2 to 12 months randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays
ParticipantsStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Number of Participants With COPD-Related Hospitalizations, ED Visits, and Observation Stays19548
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.80 · Odds ratio (or): 0.96 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.35
Other pre-specifiedDiastolic Blood Pressure

Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

Time frame:
6-12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Diastolic Blood Pressure
mmHgStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Diastolic Blood Pressure70.5 ± 9.5969.6 ± 8.85
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.06 (Adjusted P value)
Other pre-specifiedSystolic Blood Pressure

Average of all routine clinic blood pressure reading taken between 6 and 12-months post randomization. BP obtained with temperatures of \>100F and those obtained in urgent care were excluded.

Time frame:
6-12 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Systolic Blood Pressure130.8 ± 14.54128.8 ± 13.02
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.07 (Adjusted P value)
Other pre-specifiedHbA1c Levels

HbA1c levels were obtained only from diabetics and on values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
HbA1c Levels
percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
HbA1c Levels7.1 ± 1.457.2 ± 1.40
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.67 (Adjusted P value)
Other pre-specifiedLDL Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
LDL Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
LDL Levels91.0 ± 36.9685.8 ± 29.92
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.13 (Adjusted P value)
Other pre-specifiedHDL Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
HDL Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
HDL Levels54.3 ± 18.2852.8 ± 16.55
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.34 (Adjusted P value)
Other pre-specifiedTotal Cholesterol Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · md/dL
Total Cholesterol Levels
md/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Total Cholesterol Levels168.8 ± 44.91161.4 ± 38.31
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.11 (Adjusted P value)
Other pre-specifiedTriglycerides Levels

Cholesterol levels were obtained from values closest to the 12 months post randomization

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Triglycerides Levels
mg/dLStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Triglycerides Levels128.03 ± 102.36116.2 ± 61.36
Statistical analysis
  • Standard Care vs Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.83 (Adjusted P value)

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Care117/1,349 (8.7%)499/1,349 (37%)963/1,349 (71.4%)
Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)117/1,358 (8.6%)502/1,358 (37%)997/1,358 (73.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
All-cause hospitalizationsInvestigations499/1349502/1358
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Emergency Department VisitsInvestigations694/1349702/1358
Observational StaysInvestigations269/1349295/1358

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants randomized into the study.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years300305605
>=65 years104910532102
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
Mean72.4 ± 10.1472.4 ± 10.2472.4 ± 10.19
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
Female7397161455
Male6106421252
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native448
Asian5981140
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander61319
Black or African American188187375
White10219892010
More than one race437
Unknown or Not Reported6781148
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
United States134913582707
Smoking Status
Smoking Status(Participants)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
Never162169331
Former9339351868
Current243238481
Unknown111627
Body mass Index (BMI)
Body mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
Mean27 ± 627.1 ± 5.927.1 ± 5.9
Pulmonary Rehabilitation (up to past 3 years)
Pulmonary Rehabilitation (up to past 3 years)(Participants)Standard CarePhysical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)Total
Count of participants8287169

7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaiser Permanente Southern California
    Pasadena, California 91101, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Nguyen HQ, Bailey A, Coleman KJ, Desai S, Fan VS, Gould MK, Maddock L, Miller K, Towner W, Xiang AH, Moy ML. Patient-centered physical activity coaching in COPD (Walk On!): A study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jan;46:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 24. PubMed 26597414 ↗
  • Nguyen HQ, Moy ML, Fan VS, Gould MK, Xiang A, Bailey A, Desai S, Coleman KJ. Applying the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary to the implementation of a physical activity coaching trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nurs Outlook. 2018 Sep;66(5):455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jul 12. PubMed 30144938 ↗
  • Nguyen HQ, Moy ML, Liu IA, Fan VS, Gould MK, Desai SA, Towner WJ, Yuen G, Lee JS, Park SJ, Xiang AH. Effect of Physical Activity Coaching on Acute Care and Survival Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199657. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9657. PubMed 31418811 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 1, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02478359
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Responsible party
Huong Q2 Nguyen (Research Scientist, Kaiser Permanente) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2015
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Aug 2018
Completion
Dec 2018
Results posted
Feb 19, 2020
Last update
Feb 19, 2020

Study contacts

Huong Q Nguyen, PhD, RN
principal investigator · Research Scientist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion