CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02461628Updated Oct 29, 2019Results posted

Innovative Public-private Partnership to Target Subsidized Antimalarials in the Retail Sector (Aim 2)

An interventional study of Malaria RDT & conditional voucher for ACT from retail sector in Fever and Malaria, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in Kenya. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-29.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40,340
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the public health impact of targeted antimalarials subsidies through scale-up by determining the community-wide effects of targeting an antimalarial subsidy through a partnership between Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) and the private retail sector. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that offering a fixed-price voucher that reduces the cost for artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) purchase in the retail sector conditional on a positive malaria test (targeted subsidy) can improve uptake of testing for malaria and will increase the proportion of fevers tested for malaria before treatment. The study will be carried out in two sub-counties in Kenya with similar malaria burden but different access to health services; the investigators will use a cluster-randomized design to assign community units (CUs) in each sub-county to either an intervention or control arm. CHVs will be trained to use malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to diagnose malaria in household members with documented or reported fever; households in intervention CUs will be informed of the intervention and encouraged to contact the CHV for any febrile illness in the home. There are minimal risks associated with receiving an RDT. Households with a positive RDT will be given a serialized voucher that will entitle the holder to purchase a quality assured ACT in the retail sector at a reduced, fixed price. The primary and secondary outcome measures will be compared at baseline and 12 months post-baseline through population-based surveying. The primary aim is to determine whether there is significant difference between the 2 study arms in the proportion of clients with fever who are tested prior to any treatment after adjusting for relevant covariates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fever
  • Malaria

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Antimalarial subsidy
  • Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT)
  • Public-private partnership
  • Community health workers
03

In context

Malaria

1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40,340 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.

Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Intervention participation criteria:

  • Client is older than 1 year
  • Client has fever or history of fever or feeling unwell with a malaria-like illness within the last 2 days
  • Client or their parent/legal guardian (if under 18) consents to participate

Cross sectional survey participation criteria:

  • Household representative in the intervention or control arm
  • At least one member in the respondent's household with a history of fever or feeling unwell with a malaria like illness within the last four weeks
  • Respondent is older than 18 years

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Intervention exclusion criteria:

  • Client has signs of severe disease or other problem requiring immediate referral to a health facility
  • Client has already visited a health facility, taken or purchased antimalarials for the current illness.

Cross sectional survey exclusion criteria:

  • Households not in the intervention or control arms
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40,340 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Malaria RDT & conditional voucher

    In the intervention arm, trained community health volunteers (CHVs) will offer eligible household members a free malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and a voucher allowing the purchase of a qualified artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) at a reduced fixed price in the retail sector conditional on a positive test.

    Behavioral: Malaria RDT & conditional voucher for ACT from retail sector

  • No intervention
    Comparison Arm

    Individuals in the comparison arm will only receive standard community health volunteer (CHV) visits.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMalaria RDT & conditional voucher for ACT from retail sector

    Trained community health volunteers will offer eligible household members free malaria rapid diagnostic tests and a voucher allowing the purchase of a qualified ACT at a reduced fixed price in the retail sector conditional on a positive test

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With a Fever Who Receive a Malaria Test From Any Source

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Using ACT Who Had a Positive Test

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  2. Number of Participants Using an ACT Who Did Not Have a Test

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  3. Number of Subjects Who Received a Correct Dose of AL (Artemether Lumefantrine)

    Denominator is all those who took AL. Artemether lumefantrine is one type of ACT.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  4. Number of Subjects With Fever That Received Correct Treatment

    The number of people with fever that report receiving correct treatment with regards to malaria (i.e., received an RDT test and took ACTs if the result was positive, or did not take ACTs if the test result was negative).

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 29, 2019

Participant flow

A total of 40340 participants signed consent. This is a cluster randomized trial with repeated measures; the repeated measures are independent cross-sectional samples of the population in each cluster. Participants at different time points are different participants who signed separate consent forms.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMalaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison Arm
Started37333632
Baseline survey1038974
6 month survey814832
12 month survey882914
18 month survey995905
Completed37293625
Not completed47
Withdrew: Refused to complete survey47

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Subjects With a Fever Who Receive a Malaria Test From Any Source
Time frame:
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With a Fever Who Receive a Malaria Test From Any Source
ParticipantsMalaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison Arm
6 Months384402
12 Months443391
18 months547406
SecondaryNumber of Participants Using ACT Who Had a Positive Test
Time frame:
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Using ACT Who Had a Positive Test
ParticipantsMalaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison Arm
6 Months234305
12 Months280286
18 months426302
SecondaryNumber of Participants Using an ACT Who Did Not Have a Test
Time frame:
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Using an ACT Who Did Not Have a Test
ParticipantsMalaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison Arm
6 Months252237
12 Months260363
18 months271354
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Received a Correct Dose of AL (Artemether Lumefantrine)

Denominator is all those who took AL. Artemether lumefantrine is one type of ACT.

Time frame:
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects Who Received a Correct Dose of AL (Artemether Lumefantrine)
ParticipantsMalaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison Arm
6 Months338352
12 Months376391
18 months496410
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Fever That Received Correct Treatment

The number of people with fever that report receiving correct treatment with regards to malaria (i.e., received an RDT test and took ACTs if the result was positive, or did not take ACTs if the test result was negative).

Time frame:
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Fever That Received Correct Treatment
ParticipantsMalaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison Arm
6 Months309340
12 Months344306
18 months462321

Adverse events

Collected over 18 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Malaria RDT & Conditional Voucher0/3,729 (0%)0/3,729 (0%)0/3,729 (0%)
Comparison Arm0/3,625 (0%)0/3,625 (0%)0/3,625 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All participants who completed the survey.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Malaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison ArmTotal
Age — Under 5 years8367881624
Age — 5 to 17 years155314803033
Age — 18 years and above134013572697
Age — Data missing000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Malaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison ArmTotal
Female222521984423
Male150414272931
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Malaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino000
Unknown or Not Reported372936257354
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Malaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported372936257354
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Malaria RDT & Conditional VoucherComparison ArmTotal
Kenya372936257354
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Moi University
    Eldoret, Kenya
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Prudhomme O'Meara W, Menya D, Laktabai J, Platt A, Saran I, Maffioli E, Kipkoech J, Mohanan M, Turner EL. Improving rational use of ACTs through diagnosis-dependent subsidies: Evidence from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in western Kenya. PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 17;15(7):e1002607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002607. eCollection 2018 Jul. PubMed 30016316 ↗
  • Laktabai J, Lesser A, Platt A, Maffioli E, Mohanan M, Menya D, Prudhomme O'Meara W, Turner EL. Innovative public-private partnership to target subsidised antimalarials: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate a community intervention in Western Kenya. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e013972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013972. PubMed 28320794 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 23, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02461628
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Moi University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
May 26, 2017
Completion
Jul 12, 2017
Results posted
Oct 29, 2019
Last update
Oct 29, 2019

Study contacts

Wendy O'Meara, PhD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion