CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02445794Updated Nov 27, 2020Results posted

A First in Human Study of RT001 in Patients With Friedreich's Ataxia

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Low dose cohort and High dose cohort in Friedreich's Ataxia, sponsored by Retrotope, Inc.. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-27.

Sponsored by Retrotope, Inc. · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of RT001 in patients with Friedreich's ataxia.

Read the detailed description

Study RT001-002 is a randomized, double-blind, controlled, ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, disease state, and exploratory endpoints in patients with Friedreich's ataxia after oral administration. The study includes 2 dose levels of RT001.

02

Conditions studied

  • Friedreich's Ataxia
03

In context

Ataxia

295 studies on the registry are indexed under Ataxia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 26 across 216 interventional studies indexed under Ataxia.

Browse Ataxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Retrotope, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female 18 to 50 years of age
  2. Medical history consistent with the symptoms of FRDA at ≤ 25 years of age
  3. Homozygous for GAA repeat expansions in the Frataxin gene in the affected range for FRDA
  4. FARS-Neurological score of 20-90 points
  5. Ambulatory (with or without assistive device) and capable of performing assessments/evaluations
  6. Body Mass Index ≤ 29.9 kg/m2
  7. Agrees to dietary restrictions and agrees to receive calls from a dietary coach
  8. Signed the informed consent form prior to entry into the study
  9. Agrees to spend the required number of overnight clinic days
  10. Able to provide the necessary repeated blood samples

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Received treatment with other experimental therapies within the last 30 days prior to the first dose
  2. Known point mutation in the FXN gene
  3. History of malignancies (other than basal cell carcinomas)
  4. Impaired renal function at screening
  5. Alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) laboratory values > 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening
  6. Known hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, or known or suspected active hepatitis C infection, or is known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
  7. Female who is breastfeeding or has a positive pregnancy test
  8. Male participant or female participant of child bearing potential, who is sexually active and unwilling/unable to use a medically acceptable and effective double barrier birth control method throughout the study
  9. Unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol
  10. Clinically significant cardiac abnormalities at screening that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for enrollment
  11. Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or 2)
  12. Suicidal ideation as determined by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale
  13. History, within the last 2 years, of alcohol abuse, significant mental illness, or physical opioid dependence
  14. Cannot adhere to the dietary guidance required to be followed by the protocol
  15. Cannot take the medication due to impairment in swallowing capsules
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RT001, oral, 1.8 g/day

    RT001, oral, 1.8 g QD for 28 days or matching comparator

    Drug: Low dose cohort · Drug: High dose cohort

  • Experimental
    RT001, oral, 9 g/day

    RT001, oral, 4.5 g BID for 28 days or matching comparator

    Drug: Low dose cohort · Drug: High dose cohort

Interventions

  • DrugLow dose cohort

    RT001 is encapsulated di-deutero synthetic homologue of linoleic acid ethyl ester. Each capsule contains 900 mg of RT001.

    Also known as: RT001 1.8 g/d (2 capsule per day), RT001 comparator 1.8 g/d (2 capsule per day)

  • DrugHigh dose cohort

    RT001 comparator is encapsulated non-deuterated linoleic acid ethyl ester.

    Also known as: RT001 9.0 g/d (9 capsule per day), RT001 comparator 9.0 g/d (9 capsule per day)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Adverse Events

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pharmacokinetics - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve After a Single Dose

    AUC 0-24 hours post-dose (Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 2: 24 hours following dosing on Day 1 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast, pre-dose) was measured for the low and high dose cohorts after a single dose of RT001

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Pharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose

    Plasma levels were measured for the following time points: Day 1: Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 2: 24 hours following dosing on Day 1 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast, pre-dose) PK curves were constructed from these data and CMax measured on the curves for the low and high dose cohorts

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Pharmacokinetics - Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose

    TMax measured for the low and high dose cohorts

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Pharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After Final Dose on Day 28

    After 28 days of dosing, the final dose of RT001 was administered, and PK samples were obtained at the following timepoints (all timepoints refer to final dose on Day 28): Day 28: Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose on Day 28), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 29: Hours 24 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) and 32 (± 30 min) hours following final dose on Day 28 Day 30: 48 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) Day 31: 72 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) PK curves were constructed, and CMax at 28 days was determined from these curves

    Time frame: Day 28-Day 31 (3 days)

  5. Pharmacokinetics - Terminal Half-life Estimation After Final Dose on Day 28

    After 28 days of dosing, the final dose of RT001 was administered, and PK samples were obtained at the following timepoints (all timepoints refer to final dose on Day 28): Day 28: Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose on Day 28), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 29: Hours 24 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) and 32 (± 30 min) hours following final dose on Day 28 Day 30: 48 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) Day 31: 72 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) PK curves were constructed, and T1/2 at 28 days was determined from these curves

    Time frame: Day 28-Day 31 (3 days)

  6. Change From Baseline at 28 Days in the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW)

    The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-foot walk. T25FW was measured at baseline and at 28 days. These data were compared.

    Time frame: 28 days

  7. Change From Baseline at 28 Days in the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) - Neurological Score (Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 125, Lower is Better)

    The FARS-neurological rating scale specifically developed and validated for Friedreich's Ataxia. The FARS-Neurological included evaluations of the neurological signs that specifically reflect neural substrates affected in patients with FA. Based on a neurological examination bulbar (11 points), upper limb coordination (36 points), lower limb coordination (16 points), peripheral nervous system (26 points), and upright stability (36 points) functions were assessed for individual sub-scores (11, 36, 16, 26, and 36) with a maximum score of 125 (Friedreich's Ataxia Study Group, Subramony et al., 2005, Lynch et al., 2006). FARS-Neurologic examinations were conducted by a qualified physician or health professional trained in the use of the FARS format. A lower score is better. The minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 125.

    Time frame: 28 days

  8. Change From Baseline at 28 Days in Peak Workload for the Treated Population vs. the Comparator Population

    Peak workload was measured using cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after 28 days of treatment. The results of treatment were compared to baseline examination.

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Results

Posted Nov 27, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)Cohort 2 - Comparator
Started6373
Completed6353
Not completed0020
Withdrew: Adverse event0020

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With Adverse Events
Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events
participantsCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)Cohort 2 - Comparator
Number of Patients With Adverse Events5252
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve After a Single Dose

AUC 0-24 hours post-dose (Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 2: 24 hours following dosing on Day 1 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast, pre-dose) was measured for the low and high dose cohorts after a single dose of RT001

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · ug*h/mL
Pharmacokinetics - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve After a Single Dose
ug*h/mLRT001, Oral, 1.8 g/DayRT001, Oral, 9 g/Day
Pharmacokinetics - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve After a Single Dose524 ± 86915 ± 251
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose

Plasma levels were measured for the following time points: Day 1: Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 2: 24 hours following dosing on Day 1 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast, pre-dose) PK curves were constructed from these data and CMax measured on the curves for the low and high dose cohorts

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · ug/mL
Pharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose
ug/mLCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)
Pharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose35.9 ± 9.858.6 ± 16
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose

TMax measured for the low and high dose cohorts

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · h
Pharmacokinetics - Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose
hCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)
Pharmacokinetics - Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration After a Single Dose6.05 ± 08.0 ± 0
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After Final Dose on Day 28

After 28 days of dosing, the final dose of RT001 was administered, and PK samples were obtained at the following timepoints (all timepoints refer to final dose on Day 28): Day 28: Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose on Day 28), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 29: Hours 24 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) and 32 (± 30 min) hours following final dose on Day 28 Day 30: 48 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) Day 31: 72 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) PK curves were constructed, and CMax at 28 days was determined from these curves

Time frame:
Day 28-Day 31 (3 days)
Reported as:
Mean · ug/mL
Pharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After Final Dose on Day 28
ug/mLCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)
Pharmacokinetics - Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration After Final Dose on Day 2891 ± 44.6359.9 ± 31.6
SecondaryPharmacokinetics - Terminal Half-life Estimation After Final Dose on Day 28

After 28 days of dosing, the final dose of RT001 was administered, and PK samples were obtained at the following timepoints (all timepoints refer to final dose on Day 28): Day 28: Hours -1.0 to -0.5 (pre-breakfast, pre-dose on Day 28), 0.5 (± 5 min), 1 (± 5 min), 1.5 (± 5 min), 2 (± 10 min), 4 (± 10 min) (pre-lunch), 6 (± 10 min), 8 (± 10 min), 12 (± 10 min), and 16 (± 30 min) Day 29: Hours 24 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) and 32 (± 30 min) hours following final dose on Day 28 Day 30: 48 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) Day 31: 72 hours following final dose on Day 28 (± 30 min; pre-breakfast) PK curves were constructed, and T1/2 at 28 days was determined from these curves

Time frame:
Day 28-Day 31 (3 days)
Reported as:
Mean · h
Pharmacokinetics - Terminal Half-life Estimation After Final Dose on Day 28
hCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)
Pharmacokinetics - Terminal Half-life Estimation After Final Dose on Day 2842.3 ± 9.7730.3 ± 18.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline at 28 Days in the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW)

The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-foot walk. T25FW was measured at baseline and at 28 days. These data were compared.

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Mean · sec
Change From Baseline at 28 Days in the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW)
secCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)Cohort 2 - Comparator
Change From Baseline at 28 Days in the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW).503 ± 3.7751-1.87 ± 1.1653-7.475 ± 28.6458.608 ± 2.4182
SecondaryChange From Baseline at 28 Days in the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) - Neurological Score (Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 125, Lower is Better)

The FARS-neurological rating scale specifically developed and validated for Friedreich's Ataxia. The FARS-Neurological included evaluations of the neurological signs that specifically reflect neural substrates affected in patients with FA. Based on a neurological examination bulbar (11 points), upper limb coordination (36 points), lower limb coordination (16 points), peripheral nervous system (26 points), and upright stability (36 points) functions were assessed for individual sub-scores (11, 36, 16, 26, and 36) with a maximum score of 125 (Friedreich's Ataxia Study Group, Subramony et al., 2005, Lynch et al., 2006). FARS-Neurologic examinations were conducted by a qualified physician or health professional trained in the use of the FARS format. A lower score is better. The minimum score is 0, the maximum score is 125.

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale maximum 125
Change From Baseline at 28 Days in the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) - Neurological Score (Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 125, Lower is Better)
units on a scale maximum 125Cohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)Cohort 2 - Comparator
Change From Baseline at 28 Days in the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) - Neurological Score (Minimum Score 0, Maximum Score 125, Lower is Better)-6.22 ± 2.796-6.47 ± 4.768-3.3 ± 2.080-2 ± 3.464
SecondaryChange From Baseline at 28 Days in Peak Workload for the Treated Population vs. the Comparator Population

Peak workload was measured using cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after 28 days of treatment. The results of treatment were compared to baseline examination.

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Median · watts/kg
Change From Baseline at 28 Days in Peak Workload for the Treated Population vs. the Comparator Population
watts/kgRT001Cohort 1 - Comparator
Change From Baseline at 28 Days in Peak Workload for the Treated Population vs. the Comparator Population.08 (-.1 to .34)-.08 (-.3 to 0)
Statistical analysis
  • RT001 vs Cohort 1 - Comparator · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = .008

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)5/6 (83.3%)
Cohort 1 - Comparator0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)
Cohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)0/7 (0%)1/7 (14.3%)5/7 (71.4%)
Cohort 2 - Comparator0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)Cohort 2 - Comparator
Steatorrhea requiring overnight hospitalizationGastrointestinal disorders0/60/31/70/3
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1 - RT001 (1.8 g/Day)Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001 (9 g/Day)Cohort 2 - Comparator
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/60/34/71/3
ConjunctivitisInfections and infestations0/61/30/70/3
muscle strainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/61/30/70/3
palpitationsCardiac disorders0/60/30/71/3
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders1/60/30/70/3
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders1/60/30/70/3
sinusitisInfections and infestations1/60/30/70/3
dysgeusiaNervous system disorders1/60/30/70/3
facial fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/60/30/70/3
abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/60/31/70/3

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort 1 - RT001Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001Cohort 2 - ComparatorTotal
Mean39.5 ± 7.6145.3 ± 2.0828.6 ± 7.4626.3 ± 4.1634.3 ± 9.47
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1 - RT001Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001Cohort 2 - ComparatorTotal
Female315110
Male32229
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Cohort 1 - RT001Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001Cohort 2 - ComparatorTotal
White637319
American Indian or Alaska Native00101
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Cohort 1 - RT001Cohort 1 - ComparatorCohort 2 - RT001Cohort 2 - ComparatorTotal
Mean22.82 ± 3.85726.17 ± 2.79821.63 ± 3.09624.63 ± 7.93123.47 ± 4.128
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02445794
Lead sponsor
Retrotope, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 15, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Results posted
Nov 27, 2020
Last update
Nov 27, 2020

Study contacts

Curtis Scribner, MD
study director · Retrotope, Inc.
Theresa Zesiewicz, MD
principal investigator · USF Ataxia Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion