CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02416531VLSCBCPPTLILUpdated Oct 26, 2017

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Comparison Between Clobetasol Propionate, Photodynamic Therapy and Low-Intensity Laser

An interventional study of Clobetasol propionate and Photodynamic therapy in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, sponsored by Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-26.

Sponsored by Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a lymphocyte-mediated disease of unknown etiology that can cause intense itching as well stenosis, hindering the evacuation and urination. It can also limit the sex life due to severe local pruritus, pain and dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse). The standard treatment for this disease is the use of topical corticosteroids to reduce the clinical symptoms and to try to increase disease-free intervals. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a treatment that associates a light radiation with a photosensitizing agent and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) are therapies that can promote effective immunomodulatory responses at the application site by means of photophysical and photochemical phenomena from the molecular to the systemic level, which promote their use in chronic dermatoses. The aim is to study and compare the effects of PDT, LLLT, and topical corticosteroid in VLS evaluating clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and spectroscopic responses. The study will be prospective, randomized, and controlled, in a population of 60 women with histological diagnoses of VLS, enrolled on the outpatient clinic of Genitoscopy Department of the Pérola Byington Hospital in São Paulo. There will be 3 treatments groups: PDT, LLLT and topical corticosteroid, where will be allocated by randomization 20 patients in each one. The clinical course will be monitored by measuring local temperature, itching, clamping (atrophy), and the appearance of the lesion. Histologically, the slides will be classified according to the Hewitt grading and will have the ordering of collagen fibers quantified. Immunohistochemical analysis will be done using the markers IFN-γ, TGF-β, CD4, CD8, IL-1, p53 and Ki-67. Finally, the spectroscopic evaluation will be done by reflectance. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses will be conducted to compare the groups and for associations between different responses.

Read the detailed description

Dosimetry and Experimental Groups: There is no dosimetric protocol established for the treatment of VLS with PDT, nor with LLLT. According to the literature, energy densities range from 9 to 150 J/cm2 and power densities from 40 to 700 mW/cm2, not to mention work that do not report the dosimetry used. As such, the dosimetry to be used in this study is based on a pilot clinical study performed by our group.

The patients will be randomized into 3 groups with 20 patients in each one:

Group GC: Corticosteroid over the whole vulva. Clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment applied once daily at a dose of 1 g/application (1 g sachets) for 4 weeks.

Group GPDT: Localized photodynamic therapy at 8 points of the vulva. Methylene blue 0.01% intralesional, λ = 660 ± 10 nm, P = 100 mW, PD = 510 mW/cm2, E = 4 J, ED = 20 J/cm2, t = 40 s, once a week for 4 weeks.

Group GLLLT: Localized low-level laser therapy at 8 points of the vulva. The same parameters as for GPDT, except for the methylene blue, once a week for 4 weeks.

Analyses: The histological and immunohistochemical analyses will be performed before and 30 days after the start of treatment, whereas clinical analysis will be performed weekly on treatment days for the GPDT and GLLLT groups. The control group will not be seen weekly because the standard treatment is performed by the patients themselves, in their own homes, for 30 days as recommended by the International Society for the Study of Vulvar Disease (ISSVD).

After treatments the patients will be followed for verification of recorrence during one year, at minimum.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

Keywords

  • Vulvar lichen sclerosus
  • Photodynamic therapy
  • Low-level laser therapy
  • Clobetasol propionate
03

In context

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 38 across 33 interventional studies indexed under Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus.

Browse Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • adult female patients (aged over 18 years);
  • vulvar lichen sclerosus diagnosed histologically;
  • normal level of cortisol confirmed by blood test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • adult female patients under the age of 18;
  • patients with any kind of ongoing cancer and/or AIDS or coagulopathy, pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • patients using corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or anticoagulants;
  • patients with renal, hepatic or pulmonary-cardiovascular failure;
  • patients who have undergone any kind of organ transplantation in the last three years.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Corticosteroid

    Clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment applied once daily at a dose of 1 g/application (1 g sachets) for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Clobetasol propionate

  • Experimental
    Photodynamic therapy

    Methylene blue 0.01% intralesional, λ = 660 ± 10 nm, P = 100 mW, PD = 510 mW/cm2, E = 4 J, ED = 20 J/cm2, t = 40 s, once a week for 4 weeks.

    Radiation: Photodynamic therapy

  • Experimental
    Low level laser therapy

    λ = 660 ± 10 nm, P = 100 mW, PD = 510 mW/cm2, E = 4 J, ED = 20 J/cm2, t = 40 s, once a week for 4 weeks.

    Radiation: Low level laser therapy

Interventions

  • DrugClobetasol propionate

    Clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment applied once daily at a dose of 1 g/application (1 g sachets) for 4 weeks.

    Also known as: Corticosteroid

  • RadiationPhotodynamic therapy

    Methylene blue 0.01% intralesional, λ = 660 ± 10 nm, P = 100 mW, PD = 510 mW/cm2, E = 4 J, ED = 20 J/cm2, t = 40 s, once a week for 4 weeks

    Also known as: PDT

  • RadiationLow level laser therapy

    λ = 660 ± 10 nm, P = 100 mW, PD = 510 mW/cm2, E = 4 J, ED = 20 J/cm2, t = 40 s, once a week for 4 weeks

    Also known as: LLLT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in biopsies at 1 month.

    Biopsies will be performed at two points: at baseline to confirm the VLS and subsequent inclusion in the research protocol, and at the end of 30 days to investigate the prognosis after treatment.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Count cells per mm2 by immunohistochemical reaction of IFN-γ, TGF-β, CD4, CD8, IL-1, p53 and Ki-67.

    Once deparaffinized, the tissue samples will be subjected to antigen retrieval, endogenous enzyme blocking, background blocking, incubations of antibodies, and counter-staining according to the instructions of the manufacturers. The cells that are positively stained by the immunohistochemical reaction will be counted with the aid of ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) by two independent pathologists without prior knowledge of the experimental groups.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

  2. Percentage of relative reflectance as assessed by In-Vivo Reflectance Spectroscopy.

    A portable spectrophotometer (400-900 nm) comprising a light source and a fiber-optic probe will be used directly on the surface of the vulvar skin in areas affected by VLS and in healthy areas of the same patients. Relative spectra will be obtained for the wavelengths corresponding to those of the therapeutic window, and the percentage of relative reflectance will be calculated.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

  3. Temperature, as assessed by infrared thermographic camera, in Celsius degrees.

    Measurements will be recorded as images in all sessions before, during, and after irradiation to observe the thermal fluctuation in the procedures.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

  4. Itching, as assessed by Visual Analog Scale.

    In each session, the patients will be asked about the intensity of vulvar itching to assess its severity and duration, before and after irradiation, according to a visual analog scale.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

  5. Clamping, as assessed by digital caliper, in mm.

    The clamping of the lesion to monitor skin atrophy will be done before irradiation at each session, using a digital caliper, transversely and longitudinally in relation to the labia majora.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

  6. Area, as assessed by digital camera, in cm2.

    The appearance and area of the lesion will be monitored with a digital camera at every session, before irradiation. To facilitate measurements, a metric scale will be rested on all vulvas for the photos. The areas of the lesions will be quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA).

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

  7. Collagen birefringence, as assessed by polarized light microscope, in nm.

    The correlation between birefringence and collagen ordering has been used since the 1960s. To the present date, polarized-light microscopy is an efficient method to quantify the change in collagen birefringence due to the effects of different agents. Since atrophy of the skin is a characteristic symptom of patients with VLS, the more detailed study of collagen fibers will elucidate the interaction of radiation with this type of tissue.

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for 1 month during VLS's treatment.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Pérola Byington
    São Paulo, SP 01314000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kreuter A, Wischnewski J, Terras S, Altmeyer P, Stucker M, Gambichler T. Coexistence of lichen sclerosus and morphea: a retrospective analysis of 472 patients with localized scleroderma from a German tertiary referral center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Dec;67(6):1157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 24. PubMed 22533994 ↗
  • Oyama N, Chan I, Neill SM, Hamada T, South AP, Wessagowit V, Wojnarowska F, D'Cruz D, Hughes GJ, Black MM, McGrath JA. Autoantibodies to extracellular matrix protein 1 in lichen sclerosus. Lancet. 2003 Jul 12;362(9378):118-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13863-9. PubMed 12867112 ↗
  • Gambichler T, Kammann S, Tigges C, Kobus S, Skrygan M, Meier JJ, Kohler CU, Scola N, Stucker M, Bechara FG, Altmeyer P, Kreuter A. Cell cycle regulation and proliferation in lichen sclerosus. Regul Pept. 2011 Apr 11;167(2-3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Feb 15. PubMed 21329728 ↗
  • Terlou A, Santegoets LA, van der Meijden WI, Heijmans-Antonissen C, Swagemakers SM, van der Spek PJ, Ewing PC, van Beurden M, Helmerhorst TJ, Blok LJ. An autoimmune phenotype in vulvar lichen sclerosus and lichen planus: a Th1 response and high levels of microRNA-155. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Mar;132(3 Pt 1):658-66. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.369. Epub 2011 Nov 24. PubMed 22113482 ↗
  • Gambichler T, Terras S, Kreuter A, Skrygan M. Altered global methylation and hydroxymethylation status in vulvar lichen sclerosus: further support for epigenetic mechanisms. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Mar;170(3):687-93. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12702. PubMed 24164308 ↗
  • Perez-Lopez FR, Ceausu I, Depypere H, Erel CT, Lambrinoudaki I, Rees M, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Tremollieres F, van der Schouw YT, Simoncini T; EMAS, Spanish Menopause society. EMAS clinical guide: vulvar lichen sclerosus in peri and postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2013 Mar;74(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Jan 3. PubMed 23291001 ↗
  • Murphy R. Lichen sclerosus. Dermatol Clin. 2010 Oct;28(4):707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2010.07.006. PubMed 20883914 ↗
  • Selim MA, Hoang MP. A histologic review of vulvar inflammatory dermatoses and intraepithelial neoplasm. Dermatol Clin. 2010 Oct;28(4):649-67. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Aug 30. PubMed 20883910 ↗
  • Monsalvez V, Rivera R, Vanaclocha F. [Lichen sclerosus]. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010 Jan-Feb;101(1):31-8. Spanish. PubMed 20109390 ↗
  • Brodrick B, Belkin ZR, Goldstein AT. Influence of treatments on prognosis for vulvar lichen sclerosus: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013 Nov-Dec;31(6):780-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.017. PubMed 24160287 ↗
  • Hantschmann P, Sterzer S, Jeschke U, Friese K. P53 expression in vulvar carcinoma, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, squamous cell hyperplasia and lichen sclerosus. Anticancer Res. 2005 May-Jun;25(3A):1739-45. PubMed 16033093 ↗
  • Thorstensen KA, Birenbaum DL. Recognition and management of vulvar dermatologic conditions: lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, and lichen simplex chronicus. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 May-Jun;57(3):260-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00175.x. PubMed 22594865 ↗
  • Lipkin D, Kwon Y. Therapies and nursing care of women with vulvar dermatologic disorders. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 Mar-Apr;43(2):246-52. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12286. Epub 2014 Feb 6. PubMed 24502413 ↗
  • Burrows LJ, Creasey A, Goldstein AT. The treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus and female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2011 Jan;8(1):219-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02077.x. Epub 2010 Oct 18. PubMed 20955314 ↗
  • Terras S, Gambichler T, Moritz RK, Stucker M, Kreuter A. UV-A1 phototherapy vs clobetasol propionate, 0.05%, in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Jun;150(6):621-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.7733. PubMed 24696010 ↗
  • Olejek A, Steplewska K, Gabriel A, Kozak-Darmas I, Jarek A, Kellas-Sleczka S, Bydlinski F, Sieron-Stoltny K, Horak S, Chelmicki A, Sieron A. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in vulvar lichen sclerosus treatment based on immunohistochemical analysis of CD34, CD44, myelin basic protein, and Ki67 antibodies. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Jul;20(5):879-87. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d94f05. PubMed 20606538 ↗
  • Osiecka BJ, Nockowski P, Jurczyszyn K, Ziolkowski P. Photodynamic therapy of vulvar lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in a woman with hypothyreosis--case report. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2012 Jun;9(2):186-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Mar 27. PubMed 22594990 ↗
  • Romero A, Hernandez-Nunez A, Cordoba-Guijarro S, Arias-Palomo D, Borbujo-Martinez J. Treatment of recalcitrant erosive vulvar lichen sclerosus with photodynamic therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 Aug;57(2 Suppl):S46-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.04.005. No abstract available. PubMed 17637374 ↗
  • Hillemanns P, Untch M, Prove F, Baumgartner R, Hillemanns M, Korell M. Photodynamic therapy of vulvar lichen sclerosus with 5-aminolevulinic acid. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;93(1):71-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00321-4. PubMed 9916959 ↗
  • Sotiriou E, Panagiotidou D, Ioannidis D. An open trial of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for vulvar lichen sclerosus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Dec;141(2):187-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Sep 7. No abstract available. PubMed 18778886 ↗
  • Biniszkiewicz T, Olejek A, Kozak-Darmas I, Sieron A. Therapeutic effects of 5-ALA-induced photodynamic therapy in vulvar lichen sclerosus. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2005 Jun;2(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00062-1. Epub 2005 Aug 3. PubMed 25048675 ↗
  • Belotto RA, Chavantes MC, Tardivo JP, Euzebio Dos Santos R, Fernandes RCM, Horliana ACRT, Pavani C, Teixeira da Silva DF. Therapeutic comparison between treatments for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: study protocol of a randomized prospective and controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0414-y. PubMed 28793884 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02416531
Lead sponsor
Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva
Collaborators
Hospital Perola Byington
Responsible party
Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva (Professor of Postgraduate program in Biophotonics applied to HealthSciences, University of Nove de Julho) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 15, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Oct 2017
Last update
Oct 26, 2017

Study contacts

Daniela FT Silva, PhD
principal investigator · University of Nove de Julho

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion