CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02402127Updated Sep 2, 2016Results posted

Lubricity Post-Wear - Competitive Lenses Pilot

An interventional study of Narafilcon A contact lenses and Stenfilcon A contact lenses in Refractive Error, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-02.

Sponsored by Alcon Research · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to measure the coefficient of friction of three silicone hydrogel, daily disposable contact lenses after 16 hours of wear.

Read the detailed description

In this 3-treatment, 3-period, 6-sequence crossover study, each participant will wear all 3 products in randomized order, 1 product at a time, with a washout period of up to 7 days between treatment periods. Lenses will be collected for ex-vivo lubricity analysis. The ex-vivo lubricity analysis will be conducted under a separate non-clinical protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractive Error

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Contact lenses
  • Lubricity
03

In context

Refractive Errors

413 studies on the registry are indexed under Refractive Errors; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 82 across 296 interventional studies indexed under Refractive Errors.

Browse Refractive Errors studies →

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 109 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 99 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Must sign an informed consent form.
  • Soft contact lens wearer (both eyes).
  • Willing to wear study lenses at least 16 waking hours and attend all study visits.
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular anterior segment infection, inflammation, abnormality, or active disease that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Use of systemic or ocular medications for which contact lens wear could be contraindicated.
  • Use of artificial tears and rewetting drops during the study.
  • Monocular (only 1 eye with functional vision) or fit with only 1 lens.
  • History of herpetic keratitis, ocular surgery, or irregular cornea.
  • Pregnant.
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    TruEye, MyDay, clariti 1day

    Narafilcon A contact lenses in Period 1, followed by stenfilcon A contact lenses in Period 2 and somofilcon A contact lenses in Period 3. Each product worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 1 day (16 hours).

    Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses · Device: Stenfilcon A contact lenses · Device: Somofilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    TruEye, clariti 1day, MyDay

    Narafilcon A contact lenses in Period 1, followed by somofilcon A contact lenses in Period 2 and stenfilcon A contact lenses in Period 3. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 day (16 hours).

    Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses · Device: Stenfilcon A contact lenses · Device: Somofilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    MyDay, TruEye, clariti 1day

    Stenfilcon A contact lenses in Period 1, followed by narafilcon A contact lenses in Period 2 and somofilcon A contact lenses in Period 3. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 day (16 hours).

    Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses · Device: Stenfilcon A contact lenses · Device: Somofilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    MyDay, clariti 1day, TruEye

    Stenfilcon A contact lenses in Period 1, followed by somofilcon A contact lenses in Period 2 and narafilcon A contact lenses in Period 3. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 day (16 hours).

    Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses · Device: Stenfilcon A contact lenses · Device: Somofilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    Clariti 1day, TruEye, MyDay

    Somofilcon A contact lenses in Period 1, followed by narafilcon A contact lenses in Period 2 and stenfilcon A contact lenses in Period 3. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 day (16 hours).

    Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses · Device: Stenfilcon A contact lenses · Device: Somofilcon A contact lenses

  • Other
    Clariti 1day, MyDay, TruEye

    Somofilcon A contact lenses in Period 1, followed by stenfilcon A contact lenses in Period 2 and narafilcon A contact lenses in Period 3. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 day (16 hours).

    Device: Narafilcon A contact lenses · Device: Stenfilcon A contact lenses · Device: Somofilcon A contact lenses

Interventions

  • DeviceNarafilcon A contact lenses

    Silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: 1-DAY ACUVUE® TruEye® (TruEye)

  • DeviceStenfilcon A contact lenses

    Silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: MyDay™

  • DeviceSomofilcon A contact lenses

    Silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily disposable wear

    Also known as: clariti® 1day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Coefficient of Friction of Worn Lenses at 16 Hours

    Worn contact lenses were removed from the participant's eye and the coefficient of friction was measured by the inclined plane method. A lower coefficient of friction may indicate higher contact lens lubricity. The ex-vivo lubricity was carried out on one lens (one eye) only.

    Time frame: Day 1, Hour 16, each product

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Coefficient of Friction of Unworn Lenses

    Unworn contact lenses were removed from the commercial packaging and the coefficient of friction of the unworn lenses was measured by the inclined plane method. A lower coefficient of friction may indicate higher contact lens lubricity.

    Time frame: Day 1 (each product)

07

Results

Posted Sep 2, 2016

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from three investigational centers located in the United States.

First Wear Period (1 Day)
Participant flow — First Wear Period (1 Day)
MilestoneTruEye, MyDay, Clariti 1dayTruEye, Clariti 1day, MyDayMyDay, TruEye, Clariti 1dayMyDay, Clariti 1day, TruEyeClariti 1day, TruEye, MyDayClariti 1day, MyDay, TruEye
Started444444
Randomized and treated444444
Completed444444
Not completed000000
Second Wear Period (1 Day)
Participant flow — Second Wear Period (1 Day)
MilestoneTruEye, MyDay, Clariti 1dayTruEye, Clariti 1day, MyDayMyDay, TruEye, Clariti 1dayMyDay, Clariti 1day, TruEyeClariti 1day, TruEye, MyDayClariti 1day, MyDay, TruEye
Started444444
Completed444444
Not completed000000
Third Wear Period (1 Day)
Participant flow — Third Wear Period (1 Day)
MilestoneTruEye, MyDay, Clariti 1dayTruEye, Clariti 1day, MyDayMyDay, TruEye, Clariti 1dayMyDay, Clariti 1day, TruEyeClariti 1day, TruEye, MyDayClariti 1day, MyDay, TruEye
Started444444
Completed444444
Not completed000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage Coefficient of Friction of Worn Lenses at 16 Hours

Worn contact lenses were removed from the participant's eye and the coefficient of friction was measured by the inclined plane method. A lower coefficient of friction may indicate higher contact lens lubricity. The ex-vivo lubricity was carried out on one lens (one eye) only.

Time frame:
Day 1, Hour 16, each product
Reported as:
Mean · unitless
Average Coefficient of Friction of Worn Lenses at 16 Hours
unitlessTruEyeMyDayClariti 1day
Average Coefficient of Friction of Worn Lenses at 16 Hours0.0602 ± 0.004740.0576 ± 0.003380.0578 ± 0.00439
SecondaryAverage Coefficient of Friction of Unworn Lenses

Unworn contact lenses were removed from the commercial packaging and the coefficient of friction of the unworn lenses was measured by the inclined plane method. A lower coefficient of friction may indicate higher contact lens lubricity.

Time frame:
Day 1 (each product)
Reported as:
Mean · unitless
Average Coefficient of Friction of Unworn Lenses
unitlessTruEyeMyDayClariti 1day
Average Coefficient of Friction of Unworn Lenses0.0571 ± 0.003240.0571 ± 0.002600.0552 ± 0.00305

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were collected for the duration of the study from the signing of informed consent (up to 17 days). This analysis population includes all participants exposed to investigational product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TruEye—0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
MyDay—0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
Clariti 1day—0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Intention to treat, defined as the set of all randomized participants

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TruEye, MyDay, Clariti 1dayTruEye, Clariti 1day, MyDayMyDay, TruEye, Clariti 1dayMyDay, Clariti 1day, TruEyeClariti 1day, TruEye, MyDayClariti 1day, MyDay, TruEyeTotal
Mean34.0 ± 9.627.5 ± 4.033.0 ± 7.335.3 ± 4.626.3 ± 6.224.3 ± 2.430.0 ± 6.9
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)TruEye, MyDay, Clariti 1dayTruEye, Clariti 1day, MyDayMyDay, TruEye, Clariti 1dayMyDay, Clariti 1day, TruEyeClariti 1day, TruEye, MyDayClariti 1day, MyDay, TruEyeTotal
18-64 years44444424
≥65 years0000000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TruEye, MyDay, Clariti 1dayTruEye, Clariti 1day, MyDayMyDay, TruEye, Clariti 1dayMyDay, Clariti 1day, TruEyeClariti 1day, TruEye, MyDayClariti 1day, MyDay, TruEyeTotal
Female22324215
Male2212029
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02402127
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 30, 2015
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Results posted
Sep 2, 2016
Last update
Sep 2, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Manager, Vision Care, Global Medical Affairs
study director · Alcon Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion