CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02387398PEARLUpdated Jan 14, 2022

Early Coronary Angiography Versus Delayed Coronary Angiography

An interventional study of Early Angiography in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Hypothermia and Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by University of Arizona. Terminated at 6 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-14.

Sponsored by University of Arizona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Funded study period, including a one-year no cost extension, completed.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a pilot, multi-centered, randomized, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing early Coronary Angiography (CAG) versus no early CAG in post-cardiac arrest patients without ST segment elevation. Safety will be assessed by evaluating the association of major adverse events (re-arrest, bleeding, pulmonary edema, hypotension, acute renal insufficiency, and pneumonia) with early coronary angiogram. Efficacy will be assessed by a composite endpoint of improved left ventricular regional and global function (both regional wall motion analysis and left ventricular ejection fraction) as measured by echocardiography prior to hospital discharge and favourable neurological function (Cerebral Performance Categories 1 or 2) at discharge.

Read the detailed description

Cardiac arrest is a major public health issue. Arizona has been a leader in improving long-term survival by introducing new and innovative resuscitation approaches including "Chest Compression-Only CPR" and "Cardiocerebral Resuscitation". Post-resuscitation care is the next great opportunity for further improvements. Early coronary angiography (CAG) combined with therapeutic hypothermia has become the recommended standard of care for post-cardiac arrest patients manifesting ST segment elevation on their electrocardiogram (ECG). However, the majority of cardiac arrest victims do not have ST segment elevation. There is clinical equipoise as to whether these patients will benefit from early CAG.

Subjects who are qualified for the study will be randomized 1:1 to one of two groups.

° Intervention Group-Early coronary angiography (door-to-angiography) within 120 minutes of admission to Emergency Department.

or

° Control Group-No early coronary angiography (within the first six hours from admission)

All enrolled patients, will be treated with therapeutic hypothermia which is standard of care, beginning simultaneously with both groups or within at least 2 hours of hospital arrival.

Subject will be followed for 180 days for safety and long-term survival.

02

Conditions studied

  • Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
  • Hypothermia
  • Cardiac Arrest
03

In context

Heart Arrest

966 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is close to the median of 100 across 557 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arizona is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 47 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (62%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. All successfully resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with a suspected cardiac etiology for their non-traumatic arrest
  2. Age greater than 18 years
  3. The post resuscitation ECG shows no evidence of ST segment elevation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-resuscitated (no sustained pulse and BP)
  2. Presence ST segment elevation or new left bundle branch block present on the post-resuscitation ECG
  3. Suspected non-cardiac etiology for their arrest such as respiratory failure, asphyxia, pulmonary embolus, shock, trauma, drug overdose, or CNS bleed as likely cause of the cardiac arrest
  4. Known "Do Not Resuscitate" status
  5. Minors (\<18 years old)
  6. Prisoners
  7. Significant bleeding or blunt trauma
  8. Known or confirmed pregnancy test by urinalysis
  9. Patients who are known to have received any other investigational therapies within the 30 days prior to enrollment or during study duration will be excluded unless these studies have been reviewed and approved by the Study Steering Committee.
  10. Known "opt out" choice; wearing Opt-out band for any EFIC approved study or on an "Opt-out" list
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Interventional

    Early Angiography with purpose of coronary revascularization within 120 minutes of admission to ED, post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, suspicious for cardiac etiology and no ST segment elevation on ECG

    Procedure: Early Angiography

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Standard of care treatment including therapeutic hypothermia in subjects post resuscitation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, suspicious for cardiac etiology and no ST segment elevation on ECG.

Interventions

  • ProcedureEarly Angiography

    Coronary Angiography within 120 minutes of admission for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety and Efficacy of early coronary angiography in the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient population.

    Safety will be assessed by evaluating any association of major adverse events (re-arrest, bleeding, pulmonary edema, hypotension, acute renal insufficiency, and pneumonia) with early coronary angiography.

    Time frame: 180 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival from hospital at: 30 days post discharge and 180 days post discharge

    Composite endpoint of improved left ventricular regional and global function (both regional wall motion analysis and left ventricular ejection fraction) as measured by echocardiography prior to hospital discharge, survival to discharge and favourable. Left ventricular regional function and left ventricular ejection fraction as measured by echocardiography will be measured prior to discharge or up to 180 days post hospital discharge.

    Time frame: 30 days and 180 days

  2. Cognitive functional status

    As measured by Modified Rankin Score (mRS) and Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at multiple points up to 180 days post hospital discharge

    Time frame: 180 days

  3. Neurocognitive Testing

    Neurocognitive function will be assessed at various time points utilizing a variety of tests from ICU discharge to 180 days post hospital discharge such as MMSE, MOCA, HADS, and IQCODE

    Time frame: 180 days

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Banner University Medical Center-South Campus
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Banner University Medical Center-Tucson Campus
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Tufts University School of Medicine, Maine Medical Center
    Portland, Maine 04103, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Research Unit
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Alfred Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
  • University Medical Center Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kern KB, Radsel P, Jentzer JC, Seder DB, Lee KS, Lotun K, Janardhanan R, Stub D, Hsu CH, Noc M. Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial of Early Coronary Angiography Versus No Early Coronary Angiography After Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation: The PEARL Study. Circulation. 2020 Nov 24;142(21):2002-2012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049569. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Erratum In: Circulation. 2020 Nov 24;142(21):e374. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000941. PubMed 32985249 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02387398
Lead sponsor
University of Arizona
Collaborators
MaineHealth, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Mayo Clinic, The Alfred
Responsible party
Karl Kern (MD, University of Arizona) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2015
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2018
Completion
Apr 30, 2019
Last update
Jan 14, 2022

Study contacts

Karl B Kern, MD
principal investigator · University of Arizona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion