CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02381522RIPC-SAHUpdated Oct 29, 2021

Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

An interventional study of Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning and Sham RIPC in Brain Aneurysms, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-29.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate if briefly stopping blood flow to the patient's leg will lead to the patient's body being better able to tolerate possible decreased blood flow to regions of the brain which otherwise frequently happens after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Previous studies show that various organs such as the heart, brain or kidney can tolerate longer periods of decreased blood flow if prior to that insult shorter periods of decreased blood flow were experienced.

Read the detailed description

Rupture of brain aneurysms is a common cause of death and disability, accounting for as many as 10% of stroke cases in the United States. While much of the resulting injury to the nervous system is caused by the initial bleeding from the aneurysm, many of these patients develop cerebral vasospasm, pathological constriction of the blood vessels supplying the brain, several days following hemorrhage. As many as a third of patients can suffer a resulting neurological deficit and stroke, presumably caused by the decreased blood flow to the brain (ischemia). This delayed brain injury accounts for a significant percentage of poor outcomes following aneurysm rupture. Remote ischemic preconditioning by transient limb ischemia (produced by inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm or leg) has been shown to minimize ischemic injury to other organs, most notably the heart. This "remote ischemic preconditioning" has the promise of protecting the brain from ischemic injury. Whereas in other forms of stroke the onset of ischemia cannot be predicted in the general population, following aneurysm rupture the investigators know patient's risk of developing vasospasm. Therefore, ischemic preconditioning following aneurysm rupture may help prevent some of the ischemic injury caused by vasospasm. One small study has shown decrease in vasospasm and metabolic products of ischemia in patients treated with remote ischemic preconditioning after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Decreased vasospasm due to remote ischemic preconditioning of the brain following aneurysm rupture still needs to be validated and question remains if that shows a mortality and morbidity benefit.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) Procedure: Following enrollment, computer generated randomization will be done to see if the patient gets RIPC or sham-RIPC procedure. Patients will receive four cycles of lower limb remote ischemic preconditioning, starting at the earliest post-hemorrhage day. The remote ischemic preconditioning will typically take place on post-hemorrhage day 2 - 12. Each cycle of RIPC will consist of four 5-minute cycles of lower limb ischemia followed by 5-minute periods of reperfusion. A large manual bedside blood pressure cuff will be wrapped around the upper thigh of one leg. The cuff will be inflated to a pressure 20 mm Hg greater than the systolic arterial blood pressure measured by the patient's arterial line or upper limb blood pressure cuff. The adequate level of inflation will be confirmed by the absence of pulse in the ipsilateral pedal artery as detected by Doppler. The cuff will remain inflated for 5 minutes. The cuff will then be deflated and the limb will be allowed to re-perfuse for at least 5 minutes. After the cuff is deflated, the same procedure will then be repeated three times for a total of four cycles. Patients receiving the sham-RIPC procedure will have the cuff inflated to a pressure of 20 mmHg lower than systolic, hence to not occlude blood flow or cause ischemia. The rest of the study will be conducted similarly in both groups. Research staff will be aware if the patient is in the sham or treatment group. Patient, their nurse, treating physicians, lab technicians and Transcranial Doppler (TCD) technicians will not be made aware if the patient is receiving sham or treatment procedure.

Evaluation of Tolerance to the RIPC Maneuvers: The patient will be continuously monitored for pain and discomfort during the RIPC session. If the patient pain is more than 6 in the traditional 1-10 scale or if the patient expresses their desire to stop the maneuver, the procedure will be stopped, and the data regarding number and duration of the maneuvers will be recorded. A down-escalation of the treatment will be proposed, by reducing the number of cuff inflations to 3 or 2, as tolerated.

Hemodynamic evaluation of the effect of RIPC Maneuvers: Intracranial pressure (if bolt or external ventricular vein (EVD) present), blood pressure, oxygen saturation and heart rate will be monitored through the pre-conditioning process. If heart rate or BP changes greater than 20% of baseline and cannot be attributed to anything else the preconditioning will be stopped and allowed to normalize before retrying or be aborted based on bedside nurse, physicians, or research staff discretion. Oxygen saturation will also need to be above 92% at all times and ICP\<20 when starting or at discretion of the bedside nurse or physician. Glascow Coma Score (GSC) will be monitored by nursing staff and recorded per ICU protocol. (TCD) measurements will be performed per ICU protocol.

Clinical assessments of the patients will be performed daily and at discharge from the ICU as per protocol. Modified Rankin Scale will be performed by research staff on arrival, Day 14, discharge, and by telephone at 1 and 6 months.

Data gathered from patients' chart will include location of aneurysm, interventions performed, Hunt \& Hess score, Fisher grade determined by CT-head, PT/PTT/INR, chemistries and CBC (standard of care labs). Also information regarding ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, Transcranial Doppler measurements, GCS during stay, mortality and demographics data will be gathered (includes age, sex, race, prior to admission Rankin score).

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Aneurysms

Keywords

  • remote ischemic preconditioning
03

In context

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

509 studies on the registry are indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; 124 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 52 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Browse Subarachnoid Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 297 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. > 18 years of age
  2. Diagnosis of recent aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a known history of lower limb vascular disease, lower limb vascular bypass surgery and/or peripheral neuropathy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning

    Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning group will receive 4 cycles of lower extremity occlusion of perfusion by blood pressure cuff inflated to 20 mmHg higher than systolic and confirmed by doppler.

    Other: Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning

  • Sham comparator
    Sham RIPC

    Sham procedure group will receive 4 cycles of inflation of lower extremity blood pressure cuff but it will be 20mmhg lower than systolic BP and hence not occlude the vessel.

    Other: Sham RIPC

Interventions

  • OtherRemote Ischemic Pre-conditioning
  • OtherSham RIPC
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Remote Ischemic Pre-Conditioning's effect on cerebral vasospasm as measured by Transcrananial Doppler (TCD) velocities.

    RIPC or Sham RIPC will be done for two weeks or duration of patients hospital stay if shorter than 2 weeks. TCD measurements will be done during that time.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on functional outcome measured by Rankin Score

    Rankin score will be assessed at 2 weeks, and by phone at one and six months.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on complete blood count (CBC)

    RIPC or Sham RIPC will be done for two weeks or duration of patients hospital stay if shorter than 2 weeks. CBC measurements will be done during that time.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on basic metabolic panel (BMP)

    RIPC or Sham RIPC will be done for two weeks or duration of patients hospital stay if shorter than 2 weeks. BMP measurements will be done during that time.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on coagulation parameters

    RIPC or Sham RIPC will be done for two weeks or duration of patients hospital stay if shorter than 2 weeks. Coagulation parameter measurements will be done during that time.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on GCS

    RIPC or Sham RIPC will be done for two weeks or duration of patients hospital stay if shorter than 2 weeks. GCS measurements will be done per ICU protocol during that time and they will be recorded.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on mortality

    Total six months of follow up will be done and this will be the time mortality is assessed.

    Time frame: 2 years

  7. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on needing additional angiographic intervention

    RIPC or Sham RIPC will be done for two weeks or duration of patients hospital stay if shorter than 2 weeks. Need for additional angiographic intervention during this period will be recorded.

    Time frame: 2 years

  8. Remote Ischemic Pre-conditioning's effect on additional neurological events

    Total six months of follow up will be done and additional neurological events during this time period will be recorded.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Loma Linda University
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02381522
Lead sponsor
Loma Linda University
Responsible party
Ronak Raval (Principal Investigator, Loma Linda University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2015
Start date
Mar 1, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2017
Completion
Dec 20, 2017
Last update
Oct 29, 2021

Study contacts

Ronak Raval, MD
principal investigator · Loma Linda University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion