CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02371369ENLIVENUpdated May 11, 2022Results posted

Phase 3 Study of Pexidartinib for Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCT-TS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pexidartinib and Placebo in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, Giant Cell Tumors of the Tendon Sheath and Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo. Completed at 39 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-11.

Sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 3 clinical study, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an investigational drug called pexidartinib for the treatment of certain tumors for which surgical removal could cause more harm than good.

The main purpose of this study is to gather information about the investigational drug pexidartinib, which may help to treat tumors of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCT-TS).

The study consists of two parts with a follow-up period. In Part 1, eligible study participants will be assigned to receive either pexidartinib or matching placebo for 24 weeks. A number of assessments will be carried out during the course of the study, including physical examinations, blood tests, imaging studies, electrocardiograms, and questionnaires. MRI scans will be used to evaluate the response of the tumors to the treatment. Some subjects, assigned to placebo in Part 1 transitioned to pexidartinib for Part 2.

Then a protocol amendment was written to allow only pexidartinib patients to continue into Part 2. Part 2 is a long-term treatment phase in which all participants receive open-label pexidartinib. There was also a follow-up period added to Part 2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
  • Giant Cell Tumors of the Tendon Sheath
  • Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor

Keywords

  • PLX3397
  • Pexidartinib
  • Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF-1R) inhibitor
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. A diagnosis of PVNS or GCT-TS (i) that has been histologically confirmed either by a pathologist at the treating institution or a central pathologist, and (ii) where surgical resection would be associated with potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity (locally advanced disease), with morbidity determined consensually by qualified personnel (eg, two surgeons or a multi-disciplinary tumor board).
  3. Measurable disease of at least 2 cm and otherwise based on RECIST 1.1, assessed from MRI scans by a central radiologist.
  4. Symptomatic disease because of active PVNS or GCT-TS, defined as one or more of the following:

    1. a worst pain of at least 4 at any time during the week preceding the Screening Visit (based on scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing "pain as bad as you can imagine").
    2. a worst stiffness of at least 4 at any time during the week preceding the Screening Visit (based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing "stiffness as bad as you can imagine").
  5. Stable prescription of analgesic regimen during the 2 weeks prior to randomization.
  6. During the 2 weeks prior to randomization, at least 4 of 7 consecutive days of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) items and Worst Stiffness NRS items completed correctly.
  7. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within the 14-day period prior to randomization. (Where demanded by local regulations, this test may be required within 72 hours of randomization.)
  8. Males and females of childbearing potential are permitted in the study so long as they consent to avoid getting their partner pregnant or becoming pregnant, respectively, by using a highly effective contraception method, as described below, throughout the study and for up to 90 days after completion. Highly effective methods of contraception include: intra-uterine device (non-hormonal or hormonal), bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomy, sexual abstinence, or barrier methods (eg, condom, diaphragm) used in combination with hormonal methods associated with inhibition of ovulation. Women of non-childbearing potential may be included if they are either surgically sterile or have been postmenopausal for ≥ 1 year. Women who have documentation of at least 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and have a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level > 40 milli-International units (mIU/mL) will be considered postmenopausal.
  9. Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function, defined by:

    • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 10\^9/L
    • aspartate aminotransferase/alanine (AST/ALT) ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × ULN
    • Platelet count ≥ 100 × 10\^9/L
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN
  10. Willingness and ability to complete the Worst Pain NRS item, Worst Stiffness NRS item, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Scale, and other self-assessment instruments throughout the study.
  11. Willingness and ability to use an electronic diary.
  12. Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures and to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Investigational drug use within 28 days of randomization.
  2. Previous use of pexidartinib or any biologic treatment targeting CSF-1 or the CSF-1R; previous use of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors, eg, imatinib or nilotinib, are allowed.
  3. Active cancer (either concurrent or within the last year of starting study treatment) that requires therapy (eg, surgical, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy), with the exception of adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in-situ, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or breast, or prostate carcinoma with a prostate-specific antigen value \<0.2 ng/mL.
  4. Known metastatic PVNS/GCT-TS.
  5. Active or chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus or known active or chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus.
  6. Known active tuberculosis.
  7. Significant concomitant arthropathy in the affected joint, serious illness, uncontrolled infection, or a medical or psychiatric history that, in the Investigator's opinion, would likely interfere with the person's study participation or the interpretation of his or her results.
  8. Women who are breastfeeding.
  9. A screening Fridericia corrected QT interval (QTcF) ≥ 450 ms (men) or ≥ 470 ms (women).
  10. MRI contraindications.
  11. History of hypersensitivity to any excipients in the investigational product.
  12. Inability to swallow capsules.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1 - Pexidartinib

    Participants received blinded treatment of pexidartinib,1000 mg (5 capsules per day ) for 2 weeks, then 800 mg (4 capsules per day) for 22 weeks

    Drug: Pexidartinib

  • Placebo comparator
    Part 1 - Placebo

    Participants received blinded treatment of matching placebo (5 capsules per day) for 2 weeks, then matching placebo (4 capsules per day) for 22 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Part 2 - All Pexidartinib

    Participants received pexidartinib in Part 1 and in Part 2 at their prescribed dose

    Drug: Pexidartinib

  • Experimental
    Part 2 - Placebo-Pexidartinib

    Participants received placebo in Part 1 and pexidartinib in Part 2 at their prescribed dose

    Drug: Pexidartinib · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugPexidartinib

    Each capsule contains 200 mg of pexidartinib for oral administration

    Also known as: PLX3397, Pexidartinib hydrochloride (HCl)

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsule matching pexidartinib capsule for oral administration

    Also known as: Placebo Capsule

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25

    Complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

    Time frame: Week 25

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

    Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, and Week 25

  2. Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25

    Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were assessed using tumor volume score (TVS). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. TVS is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.

    Time frame: Week 25

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

    The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: at Week 9 , Week 17, and Week 25

  4. Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

    The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 9, Week 17, and Week 25

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    Time frame: Week 25

  6. Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression

    Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined as the date of the first recorded response to the first date of documented disease progression. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.

    Time frame: By Week 96

  7. Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume Score

    Tumor Volume Score (TVS) is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.

    Time frame: By Week 120

  8. Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1

    Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.

    Time frame: Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)

  9. Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)

    Duration of response (DOR) based on TVS is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.

    Time frame: Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)

  10. Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred Term

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of treatment and within 28 days after the last dose. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade adverse events. Any Grade and Grade ≥3 (severe) TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were coded using MedDRA version 17.1.

    Time frame: After the first dose of treatment up to 28 days after the last dose

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49

    Complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

    Time frame: By Week 49

  2. Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

    Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

    Time frame: By Week 49

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

    The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: By Week 49

  4. Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

    The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 25, and Week 49

  5. Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

    Time frame: By Week 49

  6. Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

    Best overall response (CR or PR) was assessed using tumor volume score (TVS) in the ITT population. Tumor Volume Score is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.

    Time frame: By Week 49

06

Results

Posted Jan 10, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment was stopped on 30 Sep 2016; no new participants received the study drug. After Part 1, those who wished to continue were un-blinded; those on placebo were discontinued.

Participant flow

Part 1 was a double-blind, randomized, Pexidartinib or placebo in participants with symptomatic TGCT for whom surgical resection would be associated with potentially worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity. Part 2 is a long-term treatment phase in which all eligible participants received open-label Pexidartinib.

Part 1
Participant flow — Part 1
MilestonePexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2
Started6159
Completed5248
Not completed911
Withdrew: Physician decision03
Withdrew: Adverse event80
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject16
Withdrew: Disease progression01
Withdrew: Protocol violation01
Part 2
Participant flow — Part 2
MilestonePexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2
Started4830
Completed00
Not completed4830
Withdrew: Adverse event65
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject166
Withdrew: Investigator decision12
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Disease progression10
Withdrew: Subject noncompliance10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Subject transitioned to commercial supply64
Withdrew: Subject transitioned to another ds pexidartinib protocol159
Withdrew: Surgical resection of tumor11
Withdrew: Other01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25

Complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

Time frame:
Week 25
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 at Week 25
Percentage of participantsPexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1
Complete Response (CR)14.80
Partial Response (PR)24.60
Response (CR or PR)39.30
Statistical analysis
  • Pexidartinib Part 1 vs Placebo Part 1 · Fisher's Exact Test · p = <0.0001
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 13, and Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · degrees
Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25
degreesPexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1
Baseline62.5 ± 3.262.9 ± 2.9
Week 1313.0 ± 2.34.8 ± 2.6
Week 2515.1 ± 2.16.2 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Pexidartinib Part 1 vs Placebo Part 1 · Fisher's Exact Test · p = 0.0043
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25

Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were assessed using tumor volume score (TVS). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference. TVS is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.

Time frame:
Week 25
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25
Percentage of participantsPexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1
Complete Response (CR)4.90
Partial Response (PR)50.80
Response (CR or PR)55.70
Statistical analysis
  • Pexidartinib Part 1 vs Placebo Part 1 · Fisher's Exact Test · p = <0.0001
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
at Week 9 , Week 17, and Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25
units on a scalePexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1
Week 92.8 ± 1.0-0.4 ± 0.8
Week 173.2 ± 1.10.2 ± 1.0
Week 254.1 ± 1.1-0.9 ± 1.0
Statistical analysis
  • Pexidartinib Part 1 vs Placebo Part 1 · Mixed effects model for repeated measure · p = 0.0019
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25

The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 9, Week 17, and Week 25
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo Up to Week 25
units on a scalePexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1
Baseline5.6 ± 0.25.9 ± 0.3
Week 9-1.5 ± 0.3-0.5 ± 0.3
Week 17-2.4 ± 0.3-0.4 ± 0.3
Week 25-2.5 ± 0.3-0.3 ± 0.3
Statistical analysis
  • Pexidartinib Part 1 vs Placebo Part 1 · Mixed effects model for repeated measure · p = <0.0001
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame:
Week 25
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 25
percentage of participantsPexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1
Percentage of Participants Who Responded With a Decrease of at Least 30% in the Mean Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score Among Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo at Week 2531.115.3
SecondaryNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression

Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined as the date of the first recorded response to the first date of documented disease progression. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.

Time frame:
By Week 96
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression
participantsPexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Number of responses231235
Week 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression231235
Week 12 (Day 84); With disease progression000
Week 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression231235
Week 24 (Day 168); With disease progression000
Week 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression15924
Week 48 (Day 336); With disease progression101
Week 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression9312
Week 72 (Day 504); With disease progression101
Week 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression213
Week 96 (Day 672); With disease progression101
SecondaryNumber of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume Score

Tumor Volume Score (TVS) is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. The overall number of responses and the number of participants with and without disease progression was assessed.

Time frame:
By Week 120
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Responders to Pexidartinib With and Without Disease Progression Based on Tumor Volume Score
participantsPexidartinib in Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Number of responders341852
Week 12 (Day 84); Without disease progression331851
Week 12 (Day 84); With disease progression000
Week 24 (Day 168); Without disease progression321850
Week 24 (Day 168); With disease progression000
Week 48 (Day 336); Without disease progression221335
Week 48 (Day 336); With disease progression314
Week 72 (Day 504); Without disease progression13316
Week 72 (Day 504); With disease progression314
Week 96 (Day 672); Without disease progression314
Week 96 (Day 672); With disease progression314
Week 120 (Day 840); Without disease progression101
Week 120 (Day 840); With disease progression314
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1

Duration of response (DOR) based on RECIST 1.1 is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.

Time frame:
Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1
monthsPexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on RECIST 1.1NA (31.01 to NA)NA (39.0 to NA)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)

Duration of response (DOR) based on TVS is defined from the date of the first recorded evidence of response to the first date of documented disease progression.

Time frame:
Date of first documentation of objective response up to date of first documentation of progressive disease, assessed up to end of study (approximately 71 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)
monthsPexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS)52.70 (38.60 to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred Term

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events that started or worsened after the first dose of treatment and within 28 days after the last dose. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade adverse events. Any Grade and Grade ≥3 (severe) TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were coded using MedDRA version 17.1.

Time frame:
After the first dose of treatment up to 28 days after the last dose
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Reporting Frequent (≥10%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Preferred Term
Percentage of participantsPexidartinib Part 1Placebo Part 1Pexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Any Hair color changes67.23.473.883.376.9
Grade ≥3 Hair color changes00000
Any Pruritis9.83.416.420.017.6
Grade ≥3 Pruritis001.601.1
Any Rash maculopapular9.81.714.810.013.2
Grade ≥3 Rash maculopapular001.601.1
Any Pruritis generalized8.208.210.08.8
Grade ≥3 Pruritis generalized00000
Any Erythema1.603.320.08.8
Grade ≥3 Erythema00000
Any Dry skin3.33.46.610.07.7
Grade ≥3 Dry skin0003.31.1
Any Photosensitivity reaction001.610.04.4
Grade ≥3 Photosensitivity reaction00000
Any Nausea37.740.744.320.036.3
Grade ≥3 Nausea00000
Any Diarrhea19.725.426.230.027.5
Grade ≥3 Diarrhea00000
Any Vomiting19.75.123.06.717.6
Grade ≥3 Vomiting1.601.601.1
Any Abdominal Pain16.410.221.36.716.5
Grade ≥3 Abdominal Pain00000
Any Dry mouth9.83.413.113.313.2
Grade ≥3 Dry mouth00000
Any Constipation11.55.114.810.013.2
Grade ≥3 Constipation00000
Any Stomatitis6.61.78.210.08.8
Grade ≥3 Stomatitis00000
Any Fatigue54.135.655.726.746.2
Grade ≥3 Fatigue00000
Any Edema peripheral13.13.416.420.017.6
Grade ≥3 Edema peripheral00000
Any Face edema13.11.714.820.016.5
Grade ≥3 Face edema001.63.32.2
Any Asthenia9.85.111.520.014.3
Grade ≥3 Asthenia00000
Any Pyrexia6.61.78.213.39.9
Grade ≥ Pyrexia00000
Any AST increased39.3044.316.735.2
Grade ≥3 AST increased9.809.86.78.8
Any ALT increased27.91.731.123.328.6
Grade ≥3 ALT increased9.809.810.09.9
Any ALP increased14.8014.83.311.0
Grade ≥3 ALP increased6.606.63.35.5
Any LDH increased11.5011.510.011.0
Grade ≥3 LDH increased1.601.601.1
Any Weight increased3.304.910.06.6
Grade ≥3 Weight increased00000
Any Dysgeusia24.61.727.923.326.4
Grade ≥3 Dysgeusia00000
Any Headache19.718.623.020.022.0
Grade ≥3 Headache001.601.1
Any Dizziness9.815.313.113.313.2
Grade ≥3 Dizziness1.601.601.1
Any Paresthesia1.61.78.210.08.8
Grade ≥3 Paresthesia00000
Any Memory impairment01.71.610.04.4
Grade ≥3 Memory impairment00000
Any Arthralgia23.025.427.930.028.6
Grade ≥3 Arthralgia3.31.73.302.2
Any Pain in extremity6.66.89.813.311.0
Grade ≥3 Pain in extremity01.7000
Any Periorbital edema18.01.724.613.320.0
Grade ≥3 Periorbital edema1.601.601.1
Any Eyelid edema3.304.910.06.6
Grade ≥3 Eyelid edema00000
Any Decreased appetite16.410.218.010.015.4
Grade ≥3 Decreased appetite00000
Any Hypertension14.810.219.730.013.1
Grade ≥3 Hypertension4.904.96.75.5
Any Upper respiratory tract infection1.6011.53.38.8
Grade ≥3 Upper respiratory tract infection00000
Any Cough4.95.16.610.07.7
Grade ≥3 Cough00000
Any Dyspnea1.604.910.07.7
Grade ≥3 Dyspnea00000
Any Insomnia4.93.44.910.06.6
Grade ≥3 Insomnia00000
Any Rash14.85.127.923.326.4
Grade ≥3 Rash1.601.601.1
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49

Complete (CR) and partial responses (PR) were assessed based on centrally-read magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A CR was defined as disappearance of all tumors and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target tumors using the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

Time frame:
By Week 49
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response to Pexidartinib Compared With That of Placebo Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 by Week 49
Percentage of participantsPexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Complete Response (CR)24.623.324.2
Partial Response (PR)29.530.029.7
Response (CR or PR)54.153.353.8
Other pre-specifiedMean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

Range of motion (ROM) of the joint was assessed by a qualified, independent, and blinded or third-party assessors at the clinical site. Measurements were recorded in degrees. At baseline, the plane of movement with the smallest relative value (worst) was identified and this plane was used for evaluating the relative change of motion subsequently. Only the plane with the worst impaired ROM at baseline was selected for subsequent analyses.

Time frame:
By Week 49
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Mean Change From Baseline For Range of Motion (ROM) Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49
degreesPexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Baseline62.5 ± 24.866.5 ± 22.963.8 ± 24.2
Week 2515.6 ± 14.913.1 ± 12.914.8 ± 14.2
Week 4914.4 ± 19.512.0 ± 13.413.4 ± 17.3
Other pre-specifiedMean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

The Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function scale was used to assess physical function of the upper and lower limbs. The scale ranged from 1 defined as 'unable to do' or 'cannot do' to 5 defined as 'without any difficulty' or 'not at all', where higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
By Week 49
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Score in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49
units on a scalePexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Week 253.6 ± 4.94.9 ± 6.34.0 ± 5.4
Week 494.7 ± 4.47.6 ± 6.35.8 ± 5.2
Other pre-specifiedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

The Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (stiffness as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 25, and Week 49
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49
units on a scalePexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Baseline5.6 ± 1.75.7 ± 2.35.6 ± 1.9
Week 25-2.7 ± 2.2-3.0 ± 3.1-2.8 ± 2.5
Week 49-3.5 ± 1.9-2.2 ± 2.8-3.1 ± 2.3
Other pre-specifiedMean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS was a 1-item, self-administered questionnaire assessing the "worst" pain in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Time frame:
By Week 49
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Numeric Rating Scale Score (NRS) in Participants Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49
units on a scalePexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Baseline5.6 ± 1.65.2 ± 2.55.5 ± 1.9
Week 25-2.7 ± 2.2-2.6 ± 3.1-2.7 ± 2.5
Week 49-3.3 ± 1.7-2.8 ± 3.4-3.2 ± 2.3
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49

Best overall response (CR or PR) was assessed using tumor volume score (TVS) in the ITT population. Tumor Volume Score is a semi-quantitative MRI scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor.

Time frame:
By Week 49
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 49
Percentage of participantsPexidartinib Part 1 and Part 2Placebo Part 1, Pexidartinib Part 2All Pexidartinib Treated
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic, Locally Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) Achieving Complete or Partial Response Based on Tumor Volume Score (TVS) After Receiving Pexidartinib Compared With Those on Placebo by Week 4963.966.764.8

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored throughout the study from the time the participant signed the informed consent form to 28 days after the final treatment dose, up to 71 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pexidartinib (Part 1)0/61 (0%)8/61 (13.1%)60/61 (98.4%)
Placebo (Part 1)0/59 (0%)1/59 (1.7%)55/59 (93.2%)
Pexidartinib (Parts 1 and 2)0/61 (0%)12/61 (19.7%)61/61 (100%)
Placebo (Part 1), Crossover Pexidartinib (Part 2)1/30 (3.3%)9/30 (30%)30/30 (100%)
All Pexidartinib Treated1/91 (1.1%)21/91 (23.1%)91/91 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent serious events
EventPexidartinib (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Pexidartinib (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1), Crossover Pexidartinib (Part 2)All Pexidartinib Treated
Adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervixNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/610/590/611/301/91
Rectal adenocarcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/610/590/611/301/91
Squamous cell carcinoma of skinNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/610/590/611/301/91
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders0/610/590/611/301/91
Local swellingGeneral disorders0/610/590/611/301/91
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/610/590/611/301/91
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/610/590/611/301/91
LymphangitisInfections and infestations0/610/590/611/301/91
Rectal cancer stage IINeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/610/590/611/301/91
Joint injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/610/590/611/301/91
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 89
Most frequent other events
EventPexidartinib (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)Pexidartinib (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1), Crossover Pexidartinib (Part 2)All Pexidartinib Treated
Hair color changesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders41/612/5944/6125/3069/91
FatigueGeneral disorders33/6121/5935/618/3043/91
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders14/6115/5919/6115/3034/91
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations24/610/5928/616/3034/91
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders23/6124/5928/617/3035/91
HypertensionVascular disorders9/616/5914/6112/3026/91
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders13/6115/5919/6110/3029/91
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations17/611/5919/617/3026/91
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders8/612/5915/619/3024/91
PruritisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/612/5910/619/3019/91

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Pexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years5756113
>=65 years437
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Total
Mean44.6 ± 13.244.3 ± 13.644.5 ± 13.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Total
Female353671
Male262349
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Total
American Indian or Alaska Native202
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander224
Black or African American314
White5254106
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Pexidartinib Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then Pexidartinib Part 2Total
Canada235
Netherlands7411
Hungary213
United States232245
Denmark123
Poland202
Italy8917
United Kingdom011
Australia5712
France257
Germany426
Spain538
07

Study locations

39 sites
  • Mayo Clinic
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259-5499, United States
  • University of Southern California
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Stanford Cancer Center
    Palo Alto, California 94305, United States
  • UCLA Medical Center
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • : Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper
    Camden, New Jersey 08103, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Duke Cancer Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse
    Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
    East Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G2M9, Canada
  • McGill University Health Centre
    Montreal, Quebec H4A3J1, Canada
  • Herlev Hospital
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
  • Centre Leon Bérard
    Lyon, 69373, France
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
    Villejuif, 94800, France
  • HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch
    Berlin, 13125, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Military Hospital-State Health Center
    Budapest, H1134, Hungary
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
    Bologna, BO 40136, Italy
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Fondazione IRCCS
    Milano, MI 20133, Italy
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
  • Radboud Univ. Medical Center
    Nijmegen, 6525 GA, Netherlands
  • Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie
    Warszawa, 02-781, Poland
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • University College Hospital
    London, NW12BU, United Kingdom
  • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SW36JJ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Healey JH, Tap WD, Gelhorn HL, Ye X, Speck RM, Palmerini E, Stacchiotti S, Desai J, Wagner AJ, Alcindor T, Ganjoo K, Martin-Broto J, Wang Q, Shuster D, Gelderblom H, van de Sande M. Pexidartinib Provides Modest Pain Relief in Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Results From ENLIVEN. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):107-116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002335. Epub 2022 Aug 24. PubMed 36001000 ↗
  • Lewis JH, Gelderblom H, van de Sande M, Stacchiotti S, Healey JH, Tap WD, Wagner AJ, Pousa AL, Druta M, Lin CC, Baba HA, Choi Y, Wang Q, Shuster DE, Bauer S. Pexidartinib Long-Term Hepatic Safety Profile in Patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors. Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e863-e873. doi: 10.1002/onco.13629. Epub 2020 Dec 24. PubMed 33289960 ↗
  • Tap W. ENLIVEN study: Pexidartinib for tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT). Future Oncol. 2020 Sep;16(25):1875-1878. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0307. Epub 2020 Aug 5. PubMed 32755241 ↗
  • Tap WD, Gelderblom H, Palmerini E, Desai J, Bauer S, Blay JY, Alcindor T, Ganjoo K, Martin-Broto J, Ryan CW, Thomas DM, Peterfy C, Healey JH, van de Sande M, Gelhorn HL, Shuster DE, Wang Q, Yver A, Hsu HH, Lin PS, Tong-Starksen S, Stacchiotti S, Wagner AJ; ENLIVEN investigators. Pexidartinib versus placebo for advanced tenosynovial giant cell tumour (ENLIVEN): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394(10197):478-487. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30764-0. Epub 2019 Jun 19. PubMed 31229240 ↗
  • Gelhorn HL, Tong S, McQuarrie K, Vernon C, Hanlon J, Maclaine G, Lenderking W, Ye X, Speck RM, Lackman RD, Bukata SV, Healey JH, Keedy VL, Anthony SP, Wagner AJ, Von Hoff DD, Singh AS, Becerra CR, Hsu HH, Lin PS, Tap WD. Patient-reported Symptoms of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors. Clin Ther. 2016 Apr;38(4):778-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 1. PubMed 27041409 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 22, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and applicable supporting clinical trial documents may be available upon request at https://vivli.org/. In cases where clinical trial data and supporting documents are provided pursuant to our company policies and procedures, Daiichi Sankyo will continue to protect the privacy of our clinical trial participants. Details on data sharing criteria and the procedure for requesting access can be found at this web address: https://vivli.org/ourmember/daiichi-sankyo/

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02371369
Lead sponsor
Daiichi Sankyo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2015
Start date
May 11, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 27, 2017
Completion
Apr 30, 2021
Results posted
Jan 10, 2020
Last update
May 11, 2022

Study contacts

Global Team Leader
study director · Daiichi Sankyo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion