ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT02365090Updated Aug 25, 2026

Binocular iPad Sub-Study

An interventional study of patching and binocular games in Amblyopia, sponsored by Retina Foundation of the Southwest. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Retina Foundation of the Southwest · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. To determine whether a binocular iPad game app is effective in improving visual acuity and reducing interocular suppression in amblyopic children
  2. To compare the amount of visual acuity improvement achieved with the binocular game app to the amount achieved with patching (standard treatment for amblyopia)
Read the detailed description

Although patching treatment results in improved visual acuity for most amblyopic children, some fail to achieve normal visual acuity after months or years of treatment. Even among children who do achieve normal visual acuity with amblyopia treatment, the risk for recurrence of amblyopia is high. Patching treatment is based on the premise that amblyopia is a monocular disorder that can be treated by forcing use of the amblyopic eye. However, recent studies have elucidated a clear link between binocular dysfunction and the complex constellation of deficits that characterizes amblyopia, including visual acuity, vernier acuity, fixation instability, fusional suppression, and risk for residual and recurrent amblyopia. The association of binocular dysfunction and the myriad of monocular and binocular deficits in amblyopia has led us to hypothesize that amblyopia is a monocular consequence of a primary binocular obstacle to normal visual development.

Although binocular interaction does not normally occur in amblyopia, weak, noisy signals from the amblyopic eye can contribute to binocular vision if suppression by the fellow eye is reduced by signal attenuation, such as reduced stimulus contrast. In small cohorts of amblyopic adults and schoolchildren, repeated practice with a binocular Falling Blocks iPod game with reduced fellow eye contrast yielded modest visual acuity improvement after just 1-5 weeks (Hess et al 2010, 2012, 2014; Knox et al 2011; Li et al 2012). Recently, we showed that the same binocular game app approach(reduced fellow eye contrast) could be adapted for home use by amblyopic children on a larger iPad display (Li et al 2014; Birch et al 2014). These games also were effective in improving visual acuity, and the visual acuity gains were maintained for at least 6 months (Li et al 2014a, 2014b). The major limitation of both sets of studies was that the games were not very interesting and quickly became tedious to play day after day. To overcome this limitation, we propose to evaluate a new, more engaging binocular iPad adventure game to determine whether practice with a binocular iPad games app, with reduced fellow eye contrast, can improve visual acuity and reduce interocular suppression in children with amblyopia.One group of participants will include 56 children with anisometropic, strabismic, or combined mechanism amblyopia, age 4-10 years. The participants will be randomly assigned to patch 2 hours daily patching (standard-of-care treatment) or to play the iPad game app 1 hour per day 5 days per week for 2 weeks. Half of the children will have had no prior treatment for amblyopia and the other half will have had prior amblyopia treatment; these two subgroups will be randomized separately. A blocked randomization order will be provided in sealed envelopes by our consultant statistician. A second group of participants will include 40 children with deprivation amblyopia due to cataract. The participants will be randomly assigned to continue their patching regimen (if any) or to continue their current patching regimen and also play the iPad game app 1 hour per day 5 days per week for 4 weeks. iPads with the game app are loaned to the family for the duration of the study, Vision will be tested at baseline and at 2 weeks for the primary outcome of change in visual acuity (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia) or at baseline and 4 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia). At the primary outcome visit, the patching group will be crossed over to play the iPad game app 1 hour per day 5 days per week and return for a secondary outcome at 4 weeks (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia) or 8 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia). Families will have the option to discontinue or to continue with the game app for up to 8 weeks, with testing every 4 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amblyopia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Amblyopia

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 60 across 137 interventional studies indexed under Amblyopia.

Browse Amblyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Retina Foundation of the Southwest is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 4-14 years Female and male Amblyopia with amblyopic eye visual acuity 20/40-20/125, fellow eye visual acuity 20/16-20/25, and interocular difference in visual acuity of 3 lines or more.

Anisometropic (with or without microtropia) or fully accommodative esotropia (no tropia present with glasses), or deprivation amblyopia Wearing glasses (if needed) for 8 weeks or no change in visual acuity with glasses wear for 4-6 weeks.

Must be able to demonstrate understanding and ability to play the Dig Rush game app during the enrollment visit.

Signed obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Prematurity ≥8 weeks Coexisting ocular or systemic disease Developmental delay Poor ocular alignment (strabismus >5 prism diopters)

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    patching (occlusion therapy)

    2 hours per day patching of the sound eye (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia) or current patching regimen (deprivation amblyopia)

    Other: patching

  • Experimental
    binocular games

    1 hour per day (5 days per week) binocular game play

    Other: binocular games

Interventions

  • Otherpatching

    covering the sound eye with a patch to force use of the amblyopic eye

    Also known as: occlusion therapy

  • Otherbinocular games

    playing iPad games 1 hour per day 5 days per week to allow the child to use the amblyopic eye and the sound eye together

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Acuity of the Amblyopic Eye HOTV (for children <7 y) or ETDRS for children 7+y

    HOTV (for children \<7 y) or ETDRS for children 7+y

    Time frame: 2 weeks (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia); 4 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Acuity of the Amblyopic Eye HOTV (for children <7 y) or ETDRS for children 7+y

    HOTV (for children \<7 y) or ETDRS for children 7+y

    Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia); 8 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia)

  2. Stereoacuity Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test

    Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test

    Time frame: 2, 4, and 8 weeks (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia); 4 and 8 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia)

  3. Interocular Suppression Dichoptic Motion Coherence Threshold (<7y) & Dichoptic Letter Contrast Threshold (7+ y)

    Dichoptic Motion Coherence Threshold (\<7y) \& Dichoptic Letter Contrast Threshold (7+ y)

    Time frame: 2, 4, and 8 weeks (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia); 4and 8 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia)

  4. Fixation Stability BCEA during 30 sec fixation assessed using the EyeLink system

    BCEA during 30 sec fixation assessed using the EyeLink system

    Time frame: 2, 4, and 8 weeks (for strabismic, anisometropic, and combined mechanism amblyopia); 4 and 8 weeks (for deprivation amblyopia)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jost RM, Kelly KR, Birch EE. Risk of recurrence after cessation of dichoptic, binocular treatment of amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2023 Oct;27(5):298-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Aug 23. PubMed 37619861 ↗
  • Birch EE, Jost RM, Wang SX, Kelly KR. A pilot randomized trial of contrast-rebalanced binocular treatment for deprivation amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2020 Dec;24(6):344.e1-344.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Oct 16. PubMed 33069871 ↗
  • Kelly KR, Jost RM, Dao L, Beauchamp CL, Leffler JN, Birch EE. Binocular iPad Game vs Patching for Treatment of Amblyopia in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 1;134(12):1402-1408. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4224. PubMed 27832248 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02365090
Lead sponsor
Retina Foundation of the Southwest
Responsible party
Eileen Birch (Sr. Research Scientist, Retina Foundation of the Southwest) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 18, 2015
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2021
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion