CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02343159Updated May 16, 2017Results posted

Study to Evaluate Whether a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) Can Improve Adherence to Tecfidera Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

A Phase 4 interventional study of dimethyl fumarate and Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Biogen. Terminated at 29 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-16.

Sponsored by Biogen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor Decision
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS®) cap with a liquid crystal display (LCD) reader (a "smart" cap) along with additional patient counseling intervention (Arm 3) can improve adherence to dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients as compared to a MEMS cap without an LCD reader (a "standard" cap) and no patient counseling intervention (standard of care, Arm 1) at Month 12.

The secondary objectives of this study in this study population are: to determine if data display on a smart MEMS cap with an LCD reader (Arm 2) can improve adherence as compared to a standard MEMS cap without an LCD reader (Arm 1) at Month 12; to determine whether the addition of patient counseling intervention based on MEMS data (Arm 3), or data display from a MEMS cap with an LCD reader (Arm 2) can improve adherence compared to standard MEMS cap without an LCD reader (Arm 1) at Month 6; to assess persistence and compliance at Months 6 and 12 for all arms; to assess the association between adherence and patient- reported outcomes (PROs) for all arms including Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI): MS v2.0.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 84 is above the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Biogen is the lead sponsor of 494 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Of its 98 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • The candidate is a DMF-naïve patient
  • Have a diagnosis of relapsing forms of MS and satisfy the approved therapeutic indication for DMF
  • Have a recent (i.e., within the previous 6 months) complete blood count with results that do not preclude the patient's participation in the study, in the judgment of the Investigator

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have comorbid conditions that preclude participation in the study, as determined by the Investigator
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or known drug hypersensitivity
  • Are participating, planning to participate, or have participated in the Tecfidera QuickStart Program

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: Standard MEMS Cap

    A standard MEMS cap that records the time and date when the bottle is opened without a visual LCD reader. Standard-of-care commercial supply of DMF (BID oral capsule) will be used in this study.

    Drug: dimethyl fumarate · Device: Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS)

  • Experimental
    Arm 2: Smart MEMS Cap

    A smart MEMS cap with feedback (an LCD reader that allows the participant to monitor DMF bottle openings). Standard-of-care commercial supply of DMF (BID oral capsule) will be used in this study.

    Drug: dimethyl fumarate · Device: Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS)

  • Experimental
    Arm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + Counseling

    A smart MEMS cap with feedback (an LCD reader that allows the participant to monitor DMF bottle openings) and an adherence counseling intervention. Standard-of-care commercial supply of DMF (BID oral capsule) will be used in this study.

    Drug: dimethyl fumarate · Device: Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) · Behavioral: Adherence counseling

Interventions

  • Drugdimethyl fumarate

    120 mg and 240 mg delayed release capsules

    Also known as: Tecfidera, DMF, BG000012

  • DeviceMedication Event Monitoring System (MEMS)

    The MEMS automatically compiles drug dosing history data by electronically recording the date and time of each opening of the medication container

  • BehavioralAdherence counseling

    A telephone call to discuss adherence and individualized strategies based on data collected via smart device (i.e., LCD reader)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Adherence Rates at Month 12: Arm 3 vs. Arm 1

    Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

    Time frame: Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Adherence Rates at Month 12: Arm 2 vs. Arm 1

    Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

    Time frame: Month 12

  2. Overall Adherence Rates at Month 6: Arm 3 vs. Arm 1

    Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

    Time frame: Month 6

  3. Overall Adherence Rates at Month 6: Arm 2 vs. Arm 1

    Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

    Time frame: Month 6

  4. Persistence Rates at Months 6 and 12

    Persistence rates defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period.

    Time frame: Month 6, Month 12

  5. Compliance Rates at Month 6 and 12

    Compliance rates defined as the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over total expected DMF doses per label during treatment period.

    Time frame: Month 6, Month 12

  6. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)

    The 29-item MSIS-29 is a participant-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of MS on day-to-day life during the past 2 weeks from a participants perspective; it measures 20 physical items and 9 psychological items. The physical score is generated by summing individual items and then transforming to a scale with a range of 0 to 100, where high scores indicate worse health.

    Time frame: Month 6, Month 12

  7. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI: MS Version 2.0)

    The WPAI questionnaire is a validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed) 2. Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) 4. Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

    Time frame: Month 6, Month 12

07

Results

Posted May 16, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm 1: Standard MEMS CapArm 2: Smart MEMS CapArm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + Counseling
Started272730
Completed110
Not completed262630
Withdrew: Early study termination161923
Withdrew: Physician decision201
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject302
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up022
Withdrew: Adverse event442
Withdrew: Sponsor decision010
Withdrew: Enrollment error100

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Adherence Rates at Month 12: Arm 3 vs. Arm 1

Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

Time frame:
Month 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryOverall Adherence Rates at Month 12: Arm 2 vs. Arm 1

Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

Time frame:
Month 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryOverall Adherence Rates at Month 6: Arm 3 vs. Arm 1

Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

Time frame:
Month 6

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryOverall Adherence Rates at Month 6: Arm 2 vs. Arm 1

Adherence is defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period, times the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over the total expected DMF doses per label during a treatment period.

Time frame:
Month 6

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPersistence Rates at Months 6 and 12

Persistence rates defined as the proportion of time on treatment over the study observation time period.

Time frame:
Month 6, Month 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryCompliance Rates at Month 6 and 12

Compliance rates defined as the proportion of actual DMF doses taken per label according to feedback from MEMS data over total expected DMF doses per label during treatment period.

Time frame:
Month 6, Month 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMultiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)

The 29-item MSIS-29 is a participant-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of MS on day-to-day life during the past 2 weeks from a participants perspective; it measures 20 physical items and 9 psychological items. The physical score is generated by summing individual items and then transforming to a scale with a range of 0 to 100, where high scores indicate worse health.

Time frame:
Month 6, Month 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI: MS Version 2.0)

The WPAI questionnaire is a validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed) 2. Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) 4. Activity Impairment. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Time frame:
Month 6, Month 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Collected between the time of informed consent and month 12 or early discontinuation visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1: Standard MEMS Cap—1/26 (3.8%)17/26 (65.4%)
Arm 2: Smart MEMS Cap—1/26 (3.8%)22/26 (84.6%)
Arm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + Counseling—0/27 (0%)17/27 (63%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventArm 1: Standard MEMS CapArm 2: Smart MEMS CapArm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + Counseling
Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders0/261/260/27
EncephalopathyNervous system disorders0/261/260/27
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/260/260/27
Intentional overdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/261/260/27
Toxicity to various agentsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/261/260/27
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 75
Most frequent other events
EventArm 1: Standard MEMS CapArm 2: Smart MEMS CapArm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + Counseling
FlushingVascular disorders9/2610/268/27
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/264/264/27
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/265/262/27
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders4/261/264/27
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/262/263/27
Seasonal allergyImmune system disorders0/262/260/27
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders1/262/261/27
Multiple sclerosis relapseNervous system disorders2/262/261/27
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders0/262/260/27
HaemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders0/262/260/27

Baseline characteristics

The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population will be used for analysis. ITT is defined as all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Arm 1: Standard MEMS CapArm 2: Smart MEMS CapArm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + CounselingTotal
18 - 50 Years21191757
> 50 Years571022
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1: Standard MEMS CapArm 2: Smart MEMS CapArm 3: Smart MEMS Cap + CounselingTotal
Female22232368
Male43411
08

Study locations

29 sites
  • Research Site
    Homewood, Alabama 35209, United States
  • Research Site
    Pheonix, Arizona 85018, United States
  • Research Site
    Carlsbad, California 92011, United States
  • Research Site
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Research Site
    Panorama City, California 91402, United States
  • Research Site
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • Research Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Research Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Research Site
    Fairfield, Connecticut 06824, United States
  • Research Site
    Gainesville, Florida 32607, United States
  • Research Site
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Research Site
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Research Site
    Vero Beach, Florida 32960, United States
  • Research Site
    Merrillville, Indiana 46410, United States
  • Research Site
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Research Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40513, United States
  • Research Site
    Auburn, Maine 04210, United States
  • Research Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02135, United States
  • Research Site
    St. Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Research Site
    Akron, Ohio 44320, United States
  • Research Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
  • Research Site
    Sandusky, Ohio 44870, United States
  • Research Site
    Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • Research Site
    Bend, Oregon 97701, United States
  • Research Site
    Portland, Oregon 97225, United States
  • Research Site
    Hodges, South Carolina 29653-9181, United States
  • Research Site
    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Research Site
    Round Rock, Texas 78681, United States
  • Research Site
    Winchester, Virginia 22601, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02343159
Lead sponsor
Biogen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2015
Start date
Feb 28, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2016
Completion
Apr 15, 2016
Results posted
May 16, 2017
Last update
May 16, 2017

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Biogen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion