CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02330328Updated Jan 13, 2020

Telemetry for Chest Pain of Low Risk for Acute Coronary Syndrome Pts

An interventional study of No Telemetry Monitoring and Telemetry Monitoring in Chest Pain, Telemetry and Acute Coronary Syndrome, sponsored by Carilion Clinic. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 49 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-13.

Sponsored by Carilion Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Collaborator withdrew closing the study prematurely with no participants enrolled
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 49 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled, multi-center, non-blinded non-inferiority study examining the utility of telemetry monitoring in patients admitted who are low risk for acute coronary syndrome. Each of the six sites will prospectively enroll 250 patients in each arm of the study randomized to either a med-surg bed (no telemetry) or a telemetry bed during their admission. Research study coordinators will enroll patients and then follow them throughout their hospital course and record primary and secondary end point events.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled, multi-center, non-blinded non-inferiority study examining the utility of telemetry monitoring in patients admitted who are low risk for acute coronary syndrome. Each of the six sites will prospectively enroll 250 patients in each arm of the study randomized to either a med-surg bed (no telemetry) or a telemetry bed during their admission. Research study coordinators will enroll patients and then follow them throughout their hospital course and record primary and secondary end point events.

The research coordinators will collect information on the following items for data collection: age, gender, smoking history, history of hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hypercholesterolemia, and history of family member with early heart disease or myocardial infarction, and body mass index. Research coordinators will document if the patient had any of the following events during their hospital course: death, myocardial infarction (MI), upgrade to a higher level of care, dysrhythmia, results of any stress testing or cardiac catheterization. In addition patients will be contacted at 30 days and 365 days to inquire about MI, needing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or revascularization (CABG).

Based on previous studies, we hypothesize that patients aged 18-49 years who are at low risk for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are unlikely to benefit from continuous heart monitoring while admitted to the hospital for chest pain. We suspect that the rate of significant events may approach zero in this group of participants. This study aim is to show that a bed without remote monitoring- telemetry- is adequate when these low risk participants with chest pain are hospitalized.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Pain
  • Telemetry
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Health Care Resource Utilization

Keywords

  • Chest Pain
  • Telemetry
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,461 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 267 are open to participants now.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Carilion Clinic is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (22%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must be admitted for chest pain and evaluation of acute coronary syndrome

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of coronary artery disease, previous myocardial infarction, or any percutaneous intervention either documented in the medical report or verbal report by patient
  • Have an initial troponin serum value above the threshold for that hospital's normal limit
  • Have used cocaine in the previous 14 days (patient report)
  • Have an abnormal ECG as determined by attending emergency physician
  • Unable to consent for the study due to language barrier or mental incapacity
  • Admitting attending physician does not agree with randomization of the patient into either study arm
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    No Telemetry Monitoring

    The participants in this arm will be admitted to a bed without telemetry monitoring

    Other: No Telemetry Monitoring

  • Active comparator
    Telemetry

    The participants in this arm will be admitted to a bed with telemetry monitoring

    Device: Telemetry Monitoring

Interventions

  • OtherNo Telemetry Monitoring
  • DeviceTelemetry Monitoring
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained (> 30 seconds) or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia

    Time frame: up to 60 sec

  2. Ventricular fibrillation

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Death

    Time frame: up to 1 year after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days and 1 year after enrollment

  2. ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days and 1 year from enrollment

  3. Positive Stress Test

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days and 1 year after enrollment

  4. Negative Stress Test

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days and 1 year after enrollment

  5. Cardiac catheterization result

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days and 1 year after enrollment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Estrada CA, Rosman HS, Prasad NK, Battilana G, Alexander M, Held AC, Young MJ. Role of telemetry monitoring in the non-intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;76(12):960-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80270-7. PubMed 7484840 ↗
  • Hollander JE, Sites FD, Pollack CV Jr, Shofer FS. Lack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;43(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00719-4. PubMed 14707944 ↗
  • Durairaj L, Reilly B, Das K, Smith C, Acob C, Husain S, Saquib M, Ganschow P, Evans A, McNutt R. Emergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomes. Am J Med. 2001 Jan;110(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00640-9. PubMed 11152858 ↗
  • O'Neill DR. Low-risk classified chest pain patients: Do they need cardiac monitoring in the emergency department and can they be cared for in non-monitored beds? Australian Emerg Nur J 2007; 10:58-63.
  • Perkins JC, Voore N, Patel J, et al: Assessment of an Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient Cohort at Low Risk for Significant Adverse Events During Admission for Acute Coronary Syndrome. SAEM Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting, 02/2014, Philadephia, PA.
  • Perkins J, McCurdy MT, Vilke GM, Al-Marshad AA. Telemetry bed usage for patients with low-risk chest pain: review of the literature for the clinician. J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.098. Epub 2013 Nov 22. PubMed 24268896 ↗
  • Hermann LK, Weingart SD, Duvall WL, Henzlova MJ. The limited utility of routine cardiac stress testing in emergency department chest pain patients younger than 40 years. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;54(1):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 23. PubMed 19231025 ↗
  • Collin MJ, Weisenthal B, Walsh KM, McCusker CM, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Young patients with chest pain: 1-year outcomes. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;29(3):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.031. Epub 2010 Mar 25. PubMed 20825795 ↗
  • Than M, Cullen L, Aldous S, Parsonage WA, Reid CM, Greenslade J, Flaws D, Hammett CJ, Beam DM, Ardagh MW, Troughton R, Brown AF, George P, Florkowski CM, Kline JA, Peacock WF, Maisel AS, Lim SH, Lamanna A, Richards AM. 2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 5;59(23):2091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 May 9. PubMed 22578923 ↗
  • Henriques-Forsythe MN, Ivonye CC, Jamched U, Kamuguisha LK, Olejeme KA, Onwuanyi AE. Is telemetry overused? Is it as helpful as thought? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Jun;76(6):368-72. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.76a.07260. PubMed 19487558 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02330328
Lead sponsor
Carilion Clinic
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University, University of Maryland, College Park, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medstar Health Research Institute, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 1, 2015
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2017
Completion
Jul 2017
Last update
Jan 13, 2020

Study contacts

John Perkins, MD
principal investigator · Carlion Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion