ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02295553Updated Jun 10, 2019Results posted

Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Endoscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ketamine and Propofol in Anesthesia, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-10.

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2013, registered Dec 2013).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the dose-response relationship of ketamine in combination with propofol.

Read the detailed description

Direct visualization of the esophagus, stomach and small intestine is performed using a scope that is inserted while the patient is under under deep sedation or general anesthesia. The most common method of providing general anesthesia for upper endoscopy is intravenous administration of medications such as propofol, often in combination with other medications such as fentanyl, midazolam, remifentanil or ketamine. One study found that the combination of propofol and ketamine provides better conditions (less patient movement, more stable heart and breathing) but more side effects afterwards compared to propofol and fentanyl.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Ketamine
  • Propofol
  • Children
  • Pediatrics
  • Upper endoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children is the lead sponsor of 577 studies on the registry; 83 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 3-13 years
  • Receiving general anesthesia for upper endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or possible difficult airway
  • BMI > 35
  • Weight \< 10 kg
  • Sedative premedication required
  • Known contraindication to ketamine or propofol
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine 0 mg/kg

    Ketamine dose will be 0 mg/kg. Propofol dose for the first patient will be 4 mg/kg. Doses for the subsequent patients will increase or decrease by 1.6 mg/kg using the Dixon Up and Down method.

    Drug: Propofol

  • Experimental
    Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg

    Ketamine dose will be 0.25 mg/kg. Propofol dose for the first patient will be 3 mg/kg. Doses for the subsequent patients will increase or decrease by 1.2 mg/kg using the Dixon Up and Down method.

    Drug: Ketamine · Drug: Propofol

  • Experimental
    Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg

    Ketamine dose will be 0.5 mg/kg. Propofol dose for the first patient will be 2.5 mg/kg. Doses for the subsequent patients will increase or decrease by 0.8 mg/kg using the Dixon Up and Down method.

    Drug: Ketamine · Drug: Propofol

  • Experimental
    Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg

    Ketamine dose will be 1.0 mg/kg. Propofol dose for the first patient will be 2 mg/kg. Doses for the subsequent patients will increase or decrease by 0.4 mg/kg using the Dixon Up and Down method.

    Drug: Ketamine · Drug: Propofol

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus

    The objective is to determine the effective bolus dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of propofol in combination with ketamine 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg that produces an adequate depth of anesthesia to prevent minimal or no movement on endoscope insertion in children

    Time frame: This outcome is measured at the time of insertion of the endoscope into the esophagus.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Apnea After Propofol Administration

    The patient will be observed for apnea after propofol is administered until the endoscopy procedure is complete. Duration of apnea will be recorded.

    Time frame: This outcome will be measured after propofol is administered until the end of the procedure.

  2. Incidence of Adverse Respiratory Events During the Procedure

    Any respiratory adverse event including desaturation \<95 requiring oxygen administration or need for airway management maneuvers (jaw thrust, bag/mask ventilation) to relieve upper airway obstruction

    Time frame: From induction of anesthesia until endoscopy procedure is complete

  3. Incidence of Side Effects and Complications During the Recovery Period

    Side effects including: hallucinations and/or emergence delirium measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale dizziness nausea and/or vomiting administration of antiemetic pain \> 3/10 at any site (measured using age appropriate scale) time to discharge readiness using established criteria reasons for delayed discharge (if any)

    Time frame: From the time procedure is complete until discharge from hospital with an average time of 1 hour.

07

Results

Posted Jun 10, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneKetamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kg
Started14141414
Completed14141313
Not completed0011

Outcome measures

PrimaryDose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus

The objective is to determine the effective bolus dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of propofol in combination with ketamine 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg that produces an adequate depth of anesthesia to prevent minimal or no movement on endoscope insertion in children

Time frame:
This outcome is measured at the time of insertion of the endoscope into the esophagus.
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg
Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus
mg/kgKetamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kg
Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of Endoscope Into the Patient's Esophagus6.1 (4.1 to 8.1)4.5 (2.9 to 6)4.7 (3.1 to 6.2)1.1 (0.5 to 1.8)
SecondaryDuration of Apnea After Propofol Administration

The patient will be observed for apnea after propofol is administered until the endoscopy procedure is complete. Duration of apnea will be recorded.

Time frame:
This outcome will be measured after propofol is administered until the end of the procedure.
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Duration of Apnea After Propofol Administration
secondsKetamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kg
Duration of Apnea After Propofol Administration59 ± 2645 ± 2057 ± 1939 ± 12
SecondaryIncidence of Adverse Respiratory Events During the Procedure

Any respiratory adverse event including desaturation \<95 requiring oxygen administration or need for airway management maneuvers (jaw thrust, bag/mask ventilation) to relieve upper airway obstruction

Time frame:
From induction of anesthesia until endoscopy procedure is complete
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Adverse Respiratory Events During the Procedure
ParticipantsKetamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kg
Desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen1110119
Need for airway management1121
SecondaryIncidence of Side Effects and Complications During the Recovery Period

Side effects including: hallucinations and/or emergence delirium measured by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale dizziness nausea and/or vomiting administration of antiemetic pain \> 3/10 at any site (measured using age appropriate scale) time to discharge readiness using established criteria reasons for delayed discharge (if any)

Time frame:
From the time procedure is complete until discharge from hospital with an average time of 1 hour.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Side Effects and Complications During the Recovery Period
ParticipantsKetamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kg
Hallucinations0010
Nausea/vomiting0024
Dizziness6789
Nystagmus/visual disturbance3539
Emergence delirium0000

Adverse events

Collected over From the time patient enters recovery room to discharge from hospital. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ketamine 0 mg/kg0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)7/14 (50%)
Ketamine 0.25 mg/kg0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)8/14 (57.1%)
Ketamine 0.5 mg/kg0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)10/13 (76.9%)
Ketamine 1.0 mg/kg0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)11/14 (78.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventKetamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kg
DizzinessNervous system disorders6/147/148/139/14
Nystagmus/visual disturbanceNervous system disorders3/145/143/139/14
Nausea/vomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/140/142/134/14
HallucinationsNervous system disorders0/140/141/130/14
Emergence deliriumNervous system disorders0/140/140/130/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ketamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kgTotal
Mean8.4 ± 2.88.9 ± 2.78.9 ± 2.18.9 ± 2.58.8 ± 2.5
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Ketamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kgTotal
Count of participantsNANANANANA
Weight
Weight(kg)Ketamine 0 mg/kgKetamine 0.25 mg/kgKetamine 0.5 mg/kgKetamine 1.0 mg/kgTotal
Mean30.1 ± 12.428.5 ± 8.929.5 ± 0.930.0 ± 10.729.5 ± 10.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hayes J, Matava C, Pehora C, El-Beheiry H, Jarvis S, Finkelstein Y. Determination of the median effective dose of propofol in combination with different doses of ketamine during gastro-duodenoscopy in children: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):453-461. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.037. Epub 2018 Jun 5. PubMed 30032885 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02295553
Responsible party
Jason Hayes (Staff Anaesthesiologist, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 20, 2014
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Jun 10, 2019
Last update
Jun 10, 2019

Study contacts

Jason Hayes
principal investigator · The Hospital for Sick Children

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ketamine

Start the discussion