ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02293460PRISMUpdated Jan 27, 2021Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Study of I10E in Treatment of Patients With CIDP

A Phase 3 interventional study of I10E in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, sponsored by Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies. Completed at 33 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-27.

Sponsored by Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 38 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in France — 8 open to participants now, 10 under way, 7 of them phase 3. Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating · France.

Enrollment
18th of 29
44 · median 82
Started
2015
with 3 others
Phase 3
15 of 38
5 open now
Registered
6th of 38
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 38
Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies

Among the 38 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in France, this one is the 18th largest by enrollment of the 29 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2015, is one of 15 in phase 3, and was the 6th registered.

Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating

137 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; 51 are open to participants now.

Browse Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating studies →

Open to participants now

8 of the 38 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

3 more — sign in →

All 8 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 36 Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating studies recruiting now, 24 (67%) set no upper age limit and 9 (25%) stop at 75 or younger; 4 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 38 studies in Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Primary objective:

To assess the efficacy of I10E in improving the disability of patients with CIDP.

Secondary objective:

To assess the safety of I10E in patients with CIDP.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Keywords

  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Disimmune disease
  • Neurology Chronic disease
  • Rare disease
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patient aged 18 years or more
  2. Definite or probable CIDP according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) guidelines 2010 clinical and neurophysiological criteria Pure motor CIDP, provided that a diagnosis of multifocal motor neuropathy has been ruled out CIDP associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), provided that anti-MAG antibodies titer is lower than the used technique's negativity threshold (1000 BTU for Bühlmann ELISA technique) Lewis-Sumner syndrome
  3. Score of at least 2 on the adjusted INCAT disability scale
  4. Patient who either :

    1. has never been previously treated with Ig (Ig-naive patient) Or
    2. was previously treated with Ig but is in clinical relapse following treatment withdrawal. In the latter case, the last Ig course shall have been administered no less than 3 months prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of IgA deficiency, unless the absence of anti-IgA antibodies has been documented
  2. History of cardiac insufficiency ( [NYHA] III/IV), uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, unstable ischemic heart disease, or uncontrolled hypertension
  3. History of venous thrombo-embolic disease, myocardial infarction or, cerebrovascular accident
  4. Risk factor for blood hyperviscosity such as cryoglobulinemia or haematologic with monoclonal gammopathy
  5. (BMI) ≥40 kg/m²
  6. \<80 mL/min/1.73m² measured according to the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) calculation
  7. Any other ongoing disease that may cause chronic peripheral neuropathy, such as toxin exposure, dietary deficiency, uncontrolled diabetes, hyperthyroidism, cancer, systemic lupus erythematosus or other connective tissue diseases, infection with , virus (HBV) or virus (HCV), Lyme disease, multiple myeloma, Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia, amyloid, and hereditary neuropathy
  8. Woman with positive results on a urine pregnancy test or breastfeeding woman or woman of without an effective .
  9. Any other serious medical condition that would interfere with the clinical assessment of CIDP or use of I10E or prevent the patient from complying with the protocol requirements
  10. Increasing dosage or introduction of a corticotherapy within the last 3 months prior to screening, with oral or systemic at a dose higher than 10 mg daily prednisolone or equivalent. Topical corticosteroids are permitted
  11. Treatment within 12 months prior to screening with immunomodulatory or agents (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, interferon-alfa, interferon-beta1a, anti-CD20, alemtuzumab, aziathioprine, etanercept, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate and haemopoetic stem cell transplantation)
  12. Plasma exchange, blood products or derivatives administered within the last 3 months prior to screening
  13. Administration of another product within the last month prior to screening
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    I10E Arm

    Drug: I10E

Interventions

  • DrugI10E

    Patients who meet all eligibility criteria will receive one dose of IMP at 2g/kg over 2-5 days followed by 7 doses of IMP at 1g/kg over 1-2 day(s), every 3 weeks. Duration of treatment period: 21 weeks +/- 7 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study

    Responders were defined as patients with a decrease ≥1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score compared to baseline. Adjusted INCAT disability score can vary from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximal disability). If a patient was treated with a not-allowed treatment during the study period, then all adjusted INCAT disability score measured after the intake of these not-allowed treatments were censored. If the score at EoS visit was missing, then the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied to replace this missing value.

    Time frame: 24 weeks after first treament injection

07

Results

Posted Mar 9, 2020

Participant flow

Between 24 February 2015 and 22 March 2017, 59 subjects from 23 sites signed an informed consent.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSingle Arm
Started43
Completed37
Not completed6
Withdrew: Protocol violation1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy2
Withdrew: Adverse event2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryEfficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study

Responders were defined as patients with a decrease ≥1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score compared to baseline. Adjusted INCAT disability score can vary from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximal disability). If a patient was treated with a not-allowed treatment during the study period, then all adjusted INCAT disability score measured after the intake of these not-allowed treatments were censored. If the score at EoS visit was missing, then the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) approach was applied to replace this missing value.

Time frame:
24 weeks after first treament injection
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Efficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study
ParticipantsFull Analysis Set
Efficacy Endpoint: Responder Rate at End of Study32
Statistical analysis
  • Full Analysis Set · exact binomial Clopper-Pearson · p = <0.0001 (One-sided test at nominal level of significance alpha = 2.5 %) · Responder rate: 76.2 · 95% CI 60.5 to 87.9

Adverse events

Collected over The safety was assessed by recording all AEs occurring during the study, i.e. after signature of the informed consent and until the end of the study recorded (week 24 after inclusion).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Total Treated Set0/43 (0%)7/43 (16.3%)39/43 (90.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTotal Treated Set
Femur fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/43
Synovial ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/43
Fibrin D dimer increasedInvestigations1/43
Colorectal adenocarcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/43
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/43
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders1/43
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/43
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders1/43
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/43
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventTotal Treated Set
HeadacheNervous system disorders20/43
PyrexiaGeneral disorders8/43
InfluenzaInfections and infestations8/43
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/43
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/43
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations5/43
AstheniaGeneral disorders4/43
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/43
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/43
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/43

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Total Treated Set
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years32
>=65 years11
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Total Treated Set
Median50.0 (21 to 79)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Total Treated Set
Female19
Male24
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Treated Set
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White24
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported19
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Total Treated Set
Turkey2
Italy16
United Kingdom1
France2
Tunisia8
Spain6
Poland8
08

Study locations

33 sites
  • CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin
    Bordeaux, France
  • Hôpital général du CHU de Dijon
    Dijon, France
  • CHU de Nice - Hôpital l'Archet
    Nice, France
  • CHU Paris - Hôpital Pitié salpétrière
    Paris, France
  • Hôpital Pontchaillou
    Rennes, France
  • CHU de saint Etienne - Hôpital nord
    Saint Etienne, France
  • Hôpital de Hautepierre
    Strasbourg, France
  • IRRCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria
    Genova, Italy
  • IRCCS - Istituto Clinico Humanitas
    Milano, Italy
  • IRRCS Istituto Nazionale Neurologico Besta
    Milano, Italy
  • Ospedale San Raffaele IRCCS
    Milano, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliere Universitaria di Padova
    Padova, Italy
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
    Roma, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliere Universitaria san Giovanni
    Torino, Italy
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Quiron Madrid
    Madrid, 28223, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital clinico Universitario de Santiago
    Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    Seville, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario i Politècnico La Fe
    Valencia, Spain
  • Hôpital Razi, La Manouba
    Manouba, Tunisia
  • Hôpital Fattouma Bourguiba
    Monastir, Tunisia
  • Hôpital habib Bourguiba
    Sfax, Tunisia
  • Hôpital Sahloul
    Sousse, Tunisia
  • Hôpital militaire de Tunis
    Tunis, Tunisia
  • Ankara University medical School Neurology
    Ankara, Turkey
  • Hacettepe University Medical School Neurology
    Ankara, Turkey
  • Uludag University Medical School Neurology
    Bursa, Turkey
  • Istanbul UniversityCerrahpasa Medical School Neurology
    Istanbul, Turkey
  • Marmara Universitesi Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi
    Istanbul, Turkey
  • St Georges
    London, SW17OQT, United Kingdom
  • Southampton General Hospital
    Southampton, United Kingdom
  • University Hospital of North Straffordshire
    Stratford-upon-Avon, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2015, a primary completion of Sep 2017 and a completion of Sep 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2020, 2 years 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 13, 2014
First posted
Nov 18, 2014
Start
May 2015
Primary completionActual
Sep 29, 2017
CompletionActual
Sep 29, 2017
Results first posted
Mar 9, 2020
Last update
Jan 27, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02293460
Lead sponsor
Laboratoire français de Fractionnement et de Biotechnologies
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2014
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Sep 29, 2017
Completion
Sep 29, 2017
Results posted
Mar 9, 2020
Last update
Jan 27, 2021

Study contacts

Eduardo NOBILE-ORAZIO, MD
principal investigator · IRCCS Instituto Clinico Humanitas, Milano, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion