CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02286596APHERESEUpdated Mar 8, 2016

Comparisons of Two Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Systems in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

An observational study in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia, sponsored by Laval University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-08.

Sponsored by Laval University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
9
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is characterized by a six- to eight-fold raise in plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations and atherosclerotic coronary artery disease usually occur before the age of 20 if untreated. Lipid apheresis (LA) has been proved to be a reliable method to decrease LDL-C concentrations and therefore decrease cardiovascular disease risk in HoFH. The objective of this crossover study was to compare efficacy of LA performed with heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation to dextran sulfate adsorption on the reduction of lipids, inflammatory markers, adhesion molecules and LDL particles size in a cohort of HoFH subjects.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II

245 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II; 52 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 743 across 66 observational studies indexed under Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II.

Browse Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II studies →

Lead sponsor

Laval University is the lead sponsor of 371 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia already treated with LDL apheresis using both systems being compared (HELP vs Dextran)

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 18-65 years
  • Subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia:
  • Carrier of a mutation in the LDL receptor gene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a previous history of cardiovascular disease
  • Subjects with Type 2 diabetes
  • Were pregnant or nursing;
  • Subjects with a history of cancer
  • Subjects with acute liver disease, hepatic dysfunction, or persistent elevations of serum transaminases
  • Subjects with a secondary hyperlipidemia due to any cause
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 2 years
  • hormonal treatment
  • Subjects who are in a situation or have any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with optimal participation in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation

    Lipid apheresis treatment for 3 hours

    Device: heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation

  • dextran sulfate adsorption

    Lipid apheresis treatment for 3 hours

    Device: dextran sulfate adsorption

Interventions

  • Deviceheparin-induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation

    Lipid apheresis for 3 hours

    Also known as: Futura

  • Devicedextran sulfate adsorption

    Lipid apheresis for 3 hours

    Also known as: Kaneka

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in plasma lipid levels between the two lipid apheresis treatment

    Time frame: At the end of the two lipid apheresis (Week 0 and 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in plasma adhesion molecule levels between the two lipid apheresis treatment

    Time frame: At the end of the two lipid apheresis (Week 0 and 2)

  2. Change in plasma inflammatory marker levels between the two lipid apheresis treatment

    Time frame: At the end of the two lipid apheresis (Week 0 and 2)

  3. Change in LDL particle size between the two lipid apheresis treatment

    Time frame: At the end of the two lipid apheresis (Week 0 and 2)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods (INAF)
    Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02286596
Lead sponsor
Laval University
Responsible party
Patrick Couture (MD, PhD, FRCP, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2014
Start date
Apr 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
Mar 8, 2016

Study contacts

Patrick Couture, MD, FRCP, PhD
principal investigator · Laval University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion