ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02262377IMGVUpdated Aug 28, 2019Results posted

Integrative Medicine Group Visits: A Patient-Centered Approach to Reducing Chronic Pain and Depression

An interventional study of Integrative Medicine Group Visits in Chronic Pain and Depression, sponsored by Boston Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-28.

Sponsored by Boston Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
159
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Integrative Medicine Group Visits (IMGV) are effective for treating patients with chronic pain and depression.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial for patients from predominantly low-income minority backgrounds with chronic pain and depressive symptoms comparing two treatment groups: (1) A standardized, 9-session Integrative Medicine Group Visits (IMGV) protocol; (2) primary care visits including medications and provider's advice. The trial will take place at three sites: Boston Medical Center's Family Medicine Center and two affiliated federally qualified community health centers.

Patients at the three sites can self-refer or with their permission, their clinician can forward their information via email, an electronic flag or phone call to research staff. Following verbal consent, patients will be screened for eligibility by a Research Assistant either over the phone or in person. Eligible participants will then have the study explained to them by the Research Assistant and will be offered an opportunity to ask questions about the study and then invited to provide informed consent. Those participants who consent to participate will provide contact information for themselves and two additional contacts to assist with follow-up. They will then complete the baseline data survey which will consist of questionnaires on topics such as stress, pain, sleep, self-efficacy, social support, diet, exercise, relaxation, and use of pain medications. These will be administered on a tablet by a Research Assistant and should take no more than one hour to complete. Once the baseline measures have been completed, participants will be randomized to either the intervention or control condition. Once randomized, participants' clinicians will be notified via phone call, letter or email that their patient is enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTION GROUP Integrative Medicine Group Visits (IMGV)

The intervention is adapted from Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR). For this study, those randomized to the intervention group will be asked to attend nine consecutive group visits (once a week) and a follow-up group visit at 12 weeks after the last session. During the session, a physician and co-leader facilitate each groups. Participants are taught and practice relaxation techniques at each class. The physician facilitates a discussion on health topics important to the group participants on chronic disease management, such as prevention and management of pain and associated conditions (stress re-activity, insomnia, obesity, hypertension etc.). Patients are also introduced to evidenced based complementary activities such as self-massage techniques, acupressure, and cooking classes. Finally, an optional healthy meal is served each week, creating an opportunity to model healthy nutrition and build community. Individuals randomized to IMGV will continue to receive routine medical care, including pain medications, from their primary care providers (PCPs).

Individual time spent with the group visit physician - Depending on the individual patient and his/her needs. The IMGV physician facilitator will communicate with the participants' PCPs (via electronic medical record or phone) throughout the intervention to give updates on the activities and progress of the patients.

To establish the internal validity of IMGV a research assistant will monitor the groups. An evaluation checklist of key components of the group visit will be used to assure internal validity and standardization of group IMGV curriculum across all three sites.

COMPANION WEB-BASED HOMEWORK/ HOME PRACTICE

The website serves several functions: 1) by putting all the patient materials online, it gives all patients regardless of study site the opportunity to track their health progress, participate in a monitored discussion group, and have access to audio and visual materials from class. At home, participants will complete their homework online which includes: accessing video or audio exercises or watching provider talks, which reinforce key content from the groups. 2) Our research team will use the website to track the length of time and frequency that patients practice self-care exercises at home, as well as which portions of the site the participant visits. Another component of the website is access to a Virtual Patient Advocate (VPA). The VPA will deliver a menu of mind-body activities and nutrition advice that mirrors the content of the IMGV groups.

Intervention participants will receive reminder calls each week prior to their IMGV from study staff, just as they would for other medical visits. If a participant does not attend an IMGV session, a research assistant will call to find out why they have missed the session and to remind them of the importance of attending as many sessions as possible. They will also receive letters/emails to remind them to log in to the website on a weekly basis and a letter/email to remind them about the final, follow-up session.

Control Group

Patients randomized to the control group will be given access to IMGV if desired in a non-study context at the completion of their data collection at 21 weeks (i.e., wait list control). Access to primary care providers is our control group (an approximately 15-minute usual care visit with MD, nurse practitioner (NP), physician assistant (PA) - prescribing medications, advice, standard of care recommendations).

Nine weeks after study enrollment control participants will receive a request to complete a follow-up survey which will measure the same items as the baseline survey with the exception of the demographic information and health literacy information. Finally, 21 weeks after study enrollment for the controls, participants will be asked to complete a second follow-up survey. Both follow-up surveys will be administered on a tablet by a research assistant, preferably in person, but by phone if a participant prefers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Depression

Keywords

  • Group Medical Visits
  • Integrative Medicine
  • Chronic Pain
  • Depression
  • MBSR
  • Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction
  • Web based
  • Virtual Patient Advocate
  • Internet Based
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,998 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 159 is above the median of 60 across 2,209 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 323 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 34 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 28 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • self-reported chronic pain for at least 12 weeks
  • average pain intensity for the previous week >4 on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale; PHQ-9 score >5, indicating minor depression or greater
  • English fluency sufficient to follow treatment instructions and answer survey questions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous participation in IMGV
  • new pain treatments in past month or anticipated to begin in next 3 months
  • active or planned worker's compensation, disability, or personal injury claims
  • known or planned pregnancy
  • manic symptoms
  • active suicidality
  • psychotic symptoms
  • no PCP
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
159 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Integrative Medicine Group Visits

    9-week integrative medicine group visit that meets 1 time per week for 2.5 hours followed by a 3 month Web based curriculum and final group meeting

    Behavioral: Integrative Medicine Group Visits

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    primary care visits, which include medications and advice

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntegrative Medicine Group Visits

    Patients with chronic pain and depression attend group medical visits and use website and virtual patient advocate as part of the curriculum.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Chronic Pain

    Chronic pain reflects the average scores for the severity, interference and average pain subscales from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form (BPI-sf). BPI-sf is a 9 item self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a patient's pain and the impact of this pain on their daily functioning on a 10 point scale from 0 to 10 where higher scores indicate higher levels of pain. Average pain was obtained by asking the participant's what their average pain was in the past 7 days. Pain interference was calculated by adding the scores for questions 8a, b, c, d, e, f, and g and then dividing by seven. Pain severity was calculated by adding the scores for questions 2, 3, 4, and 5 and then by dividing by four. The average score for each subscale was obtained by adding all respective scores and then dividing each subscale total by the total number of participants.

    Time frame: This was conducted at 21 weeks.

  2. Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) measures severity of depressive symptoms. It is a sum of 9 items each with a 0-3 units on a scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. A score of 0-4 is considered minimal or none in depression severity. A score of 5-9 is considered mild in depression severity. A score of 10-14 is considered moderate in depression severity. A score of 15-19 is considered moderately severe in depression severity. A score of 20-27 is considered severe in depression severity. (Kroenke 2009) This was conducted at 21 weeks.

    Time frame: This was conducted at 21 weeks.

  3. Pain Self Efficacy Scale

    Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) - used to assess the confidence in performing activities while in pain. It is the sum of 10 items each with a 0-6 scale. Scores range from 0-60 and is done by simple addition. Higher scores indicate higher levels of confidence. (Nicholas 2007) This was conducted at 21 weeks.

    Time frame: This was conducted at 21 weeks.

  4. Pain Medication Use

    Number of participants reported pain medication in the past seven day. This was obtained at 21 weeks.

    Time frame: This was conducted at 21 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Emergency Department Use

    Number of emergency room visits based on chart review data collection.

    Time frame: This was collected at 21 weeks.

07

Results

Posted Aug 28, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Our limitations for this study includes: study participation (intervention group did not all attend IMGV and not everyone in control group attended PCP visit), no data on baseline antidepressants medication, only English speaking patients included.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntegrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of Care
Started8079
Completed6873
Not completed126
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up56
Withdrew: Found ineligible after enrollment30
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject40

Outcome measures

PrimaryChronic Pain

Chronic pain reflects the average scores for the severity, interference and average pain subscales from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form (BPI-sf). BPI-sf is a 9 item self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate the severity of a patient's pain and the impact of this pain on their daily functioning on a 10 point scale from 0 to 10 where higher scores indicate higher levels of pain. Average pain was obtained by asking the participant's what their average pain was in the past 7 days. Pain interference was calculated by adding the scores for questions 8a, b, c, d, e, f, and g and then dividing by seven. Pain severity was calculated by adding the scores for questions 2, 3, 4, and 5 and then by dividing by four. The average score for each subscale was obtained by adding all respective scores and then dividing each subscale total by the total number of participants.

Time frame:
This was conducted at 21 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Chronic Pain
units on a scaleIntegrative Medicine Group VisitsStandard of Care-Control
21 week Average pain6.0 ± 2.06.0 ± 2.0
21 week BPI Interference6.0 ± 2.75.0 ± 2.7
21 week BPI Severity6.0 ± 2.36.0 ± 2.0
Statistical analysis
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Regression, Poisson · p = 0.68 (Statistical significance was set at p\< 0.05.) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.15
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Regression, Poisson · p = 0.36 (Statistical significance was set at p\< 0.05.) · Risk ratio (rr): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Regression, Poisson · p = 0.996 (Statistical significance was set at p\< 0.05.) · Risk ratio (rr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.16
PrimaryDepression

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) measures severity of depressive symptoms. It is a sum of 9 items each with a 0-3 units on a scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. A score of 0-4 is considered minimal or none in depression severity. A score of 5-9 is considered mild in depression severity. A score of 10-14 is considered moderate in depression severity. A score of 15-19 is considered moderately severe in depression severity. A score of 20-27 is considered severe in depression severity. (Kroenke 2009) This was conducted at 21 weeks.

Time frame:
This was conducted at 21 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Depression
units on a scaleIntegrative Medicine Group VisitsStandard of Care-Control
Depression9.32 ± 5.4210.15 ± 5.88
Statistical analysis
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Regression, Poisson · p = 0.054 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.17 · 95% CI 0.99 to 1.37
PrimaryPain Self Efficacy Scale

Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) - used to assess the confidence in performing activities while in pain. It is the sum of 10 items each with a 0-6 scale. Scores range from 0-60 and is done by simple addition. Higher scores indicate higher levels of confidence. (Nicholas 2007) This was conducted at 21 weeks.

Time frame:
This was conducted at 21 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Self Efficacy Scale
units on a scaleIntegrative Medicine Group VisitsStandard of Care-Control
Pain Self Efficacy Scale34 ± 14.738 ± 13.5
Statistical analysis
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Regression, Poisson · p = 0.98 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.89 to 1.13
PrimaryPain Medication Use

Number of participants reported pain medication in the past seven day. This was obtained at 21 weeks.

Time frame:
This was conducted at 21 weeks.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pain Medication Use
ParticipantsIntegrative Medicine Group VisitsStandard of Care-Control
Pain Medication Use4960
Statistical analysis
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Odds Ratio · Odds ratio (or): 0.42 · 95% CI 0.18 to 0.98
SecondaryEmergency Department Use

Number of emergency room visits based on chart review data collection.

Time frame:
This was collected at 21 weeks.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Emergency Department Use
participantsIntegrative Medicine Group VisitsStandard of Care-Control
Emergency Department Use99
Statistical analysis
  • Integrative Medicine Group Visits vs Standard of Care-Control · Odds Ratio · Odds ratio (or): 1.01 · 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Integrative Medical Group Visits0/76 (0%)1/76 (1.3%)19/76 (25%)
Standard of Care0/79 (0%)1/79 (1.3%)13/79 (16.5%)
All Participants0/155 (0%)2/155 (1.3%)32/155 (20.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventIntegrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareAll Participants
Hospitalization unrelated to studyGeneral disorders1/761/792/155
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIntegrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareAll Participants
Non Serious Adverse EventsGeneral disorders19/7613/7932/155

Baseline characteristics

\*We did not include intervention data on the four participants who withdrew consent.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
Mean50 ± 12.251 ± 12.450.5 ± 12.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
Female6470134
Male12921
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino101222
Not Hispanic or Latino6667133
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American444387
White121729
More than one race549
Unknown or Not Reported151530
Study Sites
Study Sites(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
Boston Medical Center333568
Dotwell Health Center192140
Codman Square Health Center242347
Income
Income(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
Less than $5K91120
$5K-$29.99K364177
$30K and over6713
Refused/ DK/ No income252045
Work Status
Work Status(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
Full/ Part time151732
Unemployed101222
Retired/ Homemaker9918
Sick Leave/ Disability323466
Other10717
Education Level
Education Level(Participants)Integrative Medical Group VisitsStandard of CareTotal
< High school/ some HS151227
High school degree223153
Some college/ AA degree302353
College degree or higher91322

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Upshur CC, Luckmann RS, Savageau JA. Primary care provider concerns about management of chronic pain in community clinic populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):652-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00412.x. PubMed 16808752 ↗
  • Niazi AK, Niazi SK. Mindfulness-based stress reduction: a non-pharmacological approach for chronic illnesses. N Am J Med Sci. 2011 Jan;3(1):20-3. doi: 10.4297/najms.2011.320. PubMed 22540058 ↗
  • Cramer H, Lauche R, Paul A, Dobos G. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(5):e343-52. doi: 10.3747/co.19.1016. PubMed 23144582 ↗
  • Cramer H, Haller H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for low back pain. A systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Sep 25;12:162. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-162. PubMed 23009599 ↗
  • Fjorback LO, Arendt M, Ornbol E, Fink P, Walach H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011 Aug;124(2):102-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01704.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28. PubMed 21534932 ↗
  • Carnes D, Homer KE, Miles CL, Pincus T, Underwood M, Rahman A, Taylor SJ. Effective delivery styles and content for self-management interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic literature review. Clin J Pain. 2012 May;28(4):344-54. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31822ed2f3. PubMed 22001667 ↗
  • Eisenstat SA, Ulman K, Siegel AL, Carlson K. Diabetes group visits: integrated medical care and behavioral support to improve diabetes care and outcomes from a primary care perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Apr;13(2):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0349-5. PubMed 23207990 ↗
  • Gardiner P, Dresner D, Barnett KG, Sadikova E, Saper R. Medical group visits: a feasibility study to manage patients with chronic pain in an underserved urban clinic. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014 Jul;3(4):20-6. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.011. PubMed 25105072 ↗
  • Nephew BC, Incollingo Rodriguez AC, Melican V, Polcari JJ, Nippert KE, Rashkovskii M, Linnell LB, Hu R, Ruiz C, King JA, Gardiner P. Depression Predicts Chronic Pain Interference in Racially Diverse, Income-Disadvantaged Patients. Pain Med. 2022 Jul 1;23(7):1239-1248. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab342. PubMed 34908146 ↗
  • Gardiner P, Luo M, D'Amico S, Gergen-Barnett K, White LF, Saper R, Mitchell S, Liebschutz JM. Effectiveness of integrative medicine group visits in chronic pain and depressive symptoms: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):e0225540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225540. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31851666 ↗
  • Gardiner P, Lestoquoy AS, Gergen-Barnett K, Penti B, White LF, Saper R, Fredman L, Stillman S, Lily Negash N, Adelstein P, Brackup I, Farrell-Riley C, Kabbara K, Laird L, Mitchell S, Bickmore T, Shamekhi A, Liebschutz JM. Design of the integrative medical group visits randomized control trial for underserved patients with chronic pain and depression. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Mar;54:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 13. PubMed 27979754 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02262377
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2014
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Nov 2016
Results posted
Aug 28, 2019
Last update
Aug 28, 2019

Study contacts

Paula Gardiner, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Boston Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion