ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02224703Updated Sep 28, 2022Results posted

GWPCARE2 A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P) in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of GWP42003-P and Placebo Control in Epilepsy and Dravet Syndrome, sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 38 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-28.

Sponsored by Jazz Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
199
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the potential antiepileptic effects of cannabidiol (GWP42003-P) in children and young adults with Dravet syndrome.

Read the detailed description

This study was a 2:2:1:1 randomized, double-blind, 14-week comparison of two dose levels of GWP42003-P (10 milligram/kilogram [mg/kg]/day and 20 mg/kg/day) versus placebo (10 mg/kg/day dose-volume equivalent and 20 mg/kg/day dose-volume equivalent; presented as pooled placebo in the study). A 28-day screening period prior to randomization (to establish baseline parameters) preceded the treatment period, which consisted of a 2-week titration period followed by a 12-week maintenance period. The study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of GWP42003-P compared with placebo. 20 mg/kg/day was recommended by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) after assessment of safety and pharmacokinetic data from Part A of study GWEP1332 (NCT02091206). The first participant did not enroll into this study until the DSMC reviewed the safety data from Part A of study GWEP1332 (NCT02091206).

Following study completion, all participants were invited to continue to receive GWP42003-P in a separate open-label extension study (GWEP1415; NCT02224573).

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy
  • Dravet Syndrome

Keywords

  • Cannabidiol
  • CBD
  • GWP42003-P
  • Epidiolex
03

In context

Epilepsy

1,842 studies on the registry are indexed under Epilepsy; 423 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 199 is above the median of 50 across 1,228 interventional studies indexed under Epilepsy.

Browse Epilepsy studies →

Lead sponsor

Jazz Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 173 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must have been male or female, aged between 2 and 18 years (inclusive).
  • Participant must have had a documented history of Dravet syndrome that was not completely controlled by current antiepileptic drugs.
  • Participant must have been taking 1 or more antiepileptic drugs at a dose that had been stable for at least 4 weeks.
  • All medications or interventions for epilepsy (including ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation) must have been stable for 4 weeks prior to screening and participant was willing to maintain a stable regimen throughout the study.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant had clinically significant unstable medical conditions other than epilepsy.
  • Participant had clinically relevant symptoms or a clinically significant illness in the 4 weeks prior to screening or randomization, other than epilepsy.
  • Participant was currently using or had in the past used recreational cannabis, medicinal cannabis, or synthetic cannabinoid-based medications (including Sativex®) within the 3 months prior to study entry and was unwilling to abstain for the duration for the study.
  • Participant had any known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the investigational medicinal products.
  • There were plans for the participant to travel outside their country of residence during the study.
  • Any history of suicidal behavior or any suicidal ideation of type four or five on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (Children's) at screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
199 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 mg/kg/day GWP42003-P

    GWP42003-P oral solution (100 mg/milliliter \[mL\] cannabidiol in sesame oil with anhydrous ethanol with added sweetener \[sucralose\] and strawberry flavoring). The 10 mg/kg/day dose was defined as 50% of the 20 mg/kg/day dose.

    Drug: GWP42003-P

  • Experimental
    20 mg/kg/day GWP42003-P

    GWP42003-P oral solution (100 mg/mL cannabidiol in sesame oil with anhydrous ethanol with added sweetener \[sucralose\] and strawberry flavoring). The 20 mg/kg/day dose was recommended by the DSMC after assessment of safety and pharmacokinetic data from Part A of study GWEP1332 (NCT02091206).

    Drug: GWP42003-P

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Control

    Excipients only. Participants were pooled from 2 placebo cohorts, half receiving 10 mg/kg/day dose-volume equivalent and half receiving 20 mg/kg/day dose-volume equivalent.

    Drug: Placebo Control

Interventions

  • Also known as: Cannabidiol, CBD, Epidiolex

  • DrugPlacebo Control

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change In Convulsive Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline

    Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary. The primary endpoint was analyzed using negative binomial regression on the sum of the convulsive seizure counts during the treatment period, based on the ITT analysis set. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1. Data reported as the ratio of geometric least squares mean in convulsive seizures and expressed as a percentage reduction.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 99 or Early Termination (ET)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change In Total Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline

    Total seizures were defined as the combination of convulsive and non-convulsive seizures. Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures. Non-convulsive seizures were defined as myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, or absence seizures. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures and non-convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an IVRS diary. Change compared to baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure. Data reported as the ratio of geometric least squares mean in total seizures and expressed as a percentage reduction.

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 99 or ET

  2. Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period

    Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an IVRS diary. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average). Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: (\[frequency during the treatment period - frequency during baseline\]/frequency during baseline) x 100. The frequency during each period was based on 28-day averages and calculated as: (number of seizures in the period/number of reported days in the IVRS period) x 28. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average).

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 99 or ET

  3. Caregiver Global Impression Of Change (CGIC) At The Last Visit

    On Day 1 (prior to receiving study drug), the caregiver was asked to write a brief description of the participant's overall condition as a memory aid for the CGIC questionnaire at subsequent visits. The CGIC questionnaire comprised the following question, to be rated on a 7-point scale: Since your child started treatment, please assess the status of your child's overall condition (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment) using the scale below. The markers were: "Very Much Improved"; "Much Improved"; "Slightly Improved"; "No Change"; "Slightly Worse"; "Much Worse"; "Very Much Worse". The CGIC response/score, recorded at each visit, was summarized, on both a categorical and continuous scale, by treatment group. The scores at the last scheduled visit (not including the end of taper or safety follow-up visits) at which participant's last evaluation was performed were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression.

    Time frame: Baseline to Last Visit

07

Results

Posted Aug 1, 2019

Participant flow

A total of 43 sites screened participants and 38 sites (23 in the United States, 7 in Spain, 3 in Poland, 2 in Australia, 1 in Israel, and 2 in the Netherlands) randomized participants into the trial. Two sites selected (1 in Israel and 1 in the United States) did not screen any participants.

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Started676765
Received at least 1 dose of study drug666765
Safety analysis set646965
Intent to treat (itt) analysis set666765
Completed646165
Not completed360
Withdrew: Adverse event050
Withdrew: Withdrawn by investigator100
Withdrew: Advised by medical monitor100
Withdrew: Withdrawn by parent/guardian010
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy100

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange In Convulsive Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline

Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary. The primary endpoint was analyzed using negative binomial regression on the sum of the convulsive seizure counts during the treatment period, based on the ITT analysis set. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1. Data reported as the ratio of geometric least squares mean in convulsive seizures and expressed as a percentage reduction.

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 99 or Early Termination (ET)
Reported as:
Geometric least squares mean · percentage reduction
Change In Convulsive Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline
percentage reduction10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Change In Convulsive Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline48.7 (37.9 to 57.6)45.7 (34.2 to 55.2)26.9 (11.9 to 39.4)
Statistical analysis
  • 20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.0299 · Treatment ratio: 0.743 · 95% CI 0.568 to 0.971
  • 10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.0095 · Treatment ratio: 0.702 · 95% CI 0.538 to 0.916
SecondaryChange In Total Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline

Total seizures were defined as the combination of convulsive and non-convulsive seizures. Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures. Non-convulsive seizures were defined as myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, or absence seizures. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures and non-convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an IVRS diary. Change compared to baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure. Data reported as the ratio of geometric least squares mean in total seizures and expressed as a percentage reduction.

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 99 or ET
Reported as:
Geometric least squares mean · percentage reduction
Change In Total Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline
percentage reduction10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Change In Total Seizures During The Treatment Period Compared To Baseline56.4 (47.8 to 63.6)47.3 (36.9 to 56.0)29.7 (16.0 to 41.1)
Statistical analysis
  • 20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.0255 · Treatment ratio: 0.749 · 95% CI 0.581 to 0.965
  • 10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.0003 · Treatment ratio: 0.620 · 95% CI 0.481 to 0.799
SecondaryParticipants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period

Convulsive seizures were defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic. Participants or their caregivers recorded the number and type of convulsive seizures each day from screening until completion of dosing using an IVRS diary. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average). Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: (\[frequency during the treatment period - frequency during baseline\]/frequency during baseline) x 100. The frequency during each period was based on 28-day averages and calculated as: (number of seizures in the period/number of reported days in the IVRS period) x 28. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average).

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 99 or ET
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period
Participants10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Participants With A ≥50% Reduction From Baseline In Convulsive Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period293317
Statistical analysis
  • 20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0069 · Odds ratio (or): 2.74 · 95% CI 1.32 to 5.70P-value calculated from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by age group (2-5, 6-12, and 13-18 years).
  • 10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0332 · Odds ratio (or): 2.21 · 95% CI 1.06 to 4.62P-value calculated from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by age group (2-5, 6-12, and 13-18 years).
SecondaryCaregiver Global Impression Of Change (CGIC) At The Last Visit

On Day 1 (prior to receiving study drug), the caregiver was asked to write a brief description of the participant's overall condition as a memory aid for the CGIC questionnaire at subsequent visits. The CGIC questionnaire comprised the following question, to be rated on a 7-point scale: Since your child started treatment, please assess the status of your child's overall condition (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment) using the scale below. The markers were: "Very Much Improved"; "Much Improved"; "Slightly Improved"; "No Change"; "Slightly Worse"; "Much Worse"; "Very Much Worse". The CGIC response/score, recorded at each visit, was summarized, on both a categorical and continuous scale, by treatment group. The scores at the last scheduled visit (not including the end of taper or safety follow-up visits) at which participant's last evaluation was performed were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression.

Time frame:
Baseline to Last Visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Caregiver Global Impression Of Change (CGIC) At The Last Visit
Participants10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Very Much Improved13111
Much Improved11108
Slightly Improved211918
No Change181732
Slightly Worse254
Much Worse132
Very Much Worse010
Statistical analysis
  • 20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0279 · Odds ratio (or): 2.02 · 95% CI 1.08 to 3.78Proportional odds modelling was carried out by including treatment group as a fixed factor. The estimated OR tested the null hypothesis that OR was equal to 1.
  • 10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P vs Placebo Control · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0009 · Odds ratio (or): 2.93 · 95% CI 1.56 to 5.53Proportional odds modelling was carried out by including treatment group as a fixed factor. The estimated OR tested the null hypothesis that OR was equal to 1.

Adverse events

Collected over From Day 1 to Day 137.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P0/64 (0%)13/64 (20.3%)56/64 (87.5%)
20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P0/69 (0%)17/69 (24.6%)60/69 (87%)
Placebo Control0/65 (0%)10/65 (15.4%)58/65 (89.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent serious events
Event10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Status epilepticusNervous system disorders5/647/698/65
ConvulsionNervous system disorders3/640/691/65
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/642/690/65
SomnolenceNervous system disorders2/640/690/65
Seizure clusterNervous system disorders1/640/692/65
Pneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/642/690/65
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/641/690/65
Toxicity to various agentsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/641/690/65
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/641/690/65
Unresponsive to stimuliNervous system disorders1/640/690/65
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
Event10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo Control
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders10/6419/6911/65
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders11/6418/698/65
PyrexiaGeneral disorders15/6414/6911/65
SomnolenceNervous system disorders14/6416/699/65
FatigueGeneral disorders5/6414/697/65
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders4/6411/694/65
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/648/695/65
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations3/648/690/65
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations3/648/690/65
AggressionPsychiatric disorders1/646/692/65

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo ControlTotal
Mean9.169 ± 4.17449.245 ± 4.37929.617 ± 4.57579.343 ± 4.3626
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo ControlTotal
Female383234104
Male26373194
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0011
Asian0145
Black or African American1045
White556655176
Other82111
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)10 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-P20 mg/kg/Day GWP42003-PPlacebo ControlTotal
Australia64313
Israel0123
Netherlands97925
Poland811625
Spain12141339
United States29323293
08

Study locations

38 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
  • Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Savannah, Georgia 31404, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0284, United States
  • Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, United States
  • St Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Omaha, Nebraska 68106, United States
  • Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Buffalo, New York 14203, United States
  • Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4399, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Austin, Texas 78723, United States
  • Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Richmond, Virginia 23298-0211, United States
  • Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • Heidelberg, 3084, Australia
  • Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
  • Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel
  • Heeze, 5591 VE, Netherlands
  • Zwolle, 8025 BV, Netherlands
  • Krakow, 30-363, Poland
  • Lodz, 93-271, Poland
  • Warsaw, 04-730, Poland
  • Barcelona, 08022, Spain
  • Madrid, 28009, Spain
  • Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Madrid, 28222, Spain
  • Pamplona, 31008, Spain
  • Seville, 41013, Spain
  • Valencia, 46026, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Madan Cohen J, Checketts D, Dunayevich E, Gunning B, Hyslop A, Madhavan D, Villanueva V, Zolnowska M, Zuberi SM. Time to onset of cannabidiol treatment effects in Dravet syndrome: Analysis from two randomized controlled trials. Epilepsia. 2021 Sep;62(9):2218-2227. doi: 10.1111/epi.16974. Epub 2021 Jul 15. PubMed 34265088 ↗
  • Miller I, Scheffer IE, Gunning B, Sanchez-Carpintero R, Gil-Nagel A, Perry MS, Saneto RP, Checketts D, Dunayevich E, Knappertz V; GWPCARE2 Study Group. Dose-Ranging Effect of Adjunctive Oral Cannabidiol vs Placebo on Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Dravet Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020 May 1;77(5):613-621. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0073. PubMed 32119035 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 6, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 5, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2015 to primary completion in Apr 2018, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2019, 1 year 3 months after primary completion.

Of 49 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Epilepsy, half reached primary completion within 56 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 37 and three quarters within 88. This study's 35 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 67 studies reached it within 55 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 88.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2014
First posted
Aug 25, 2014
StartActual
Apr 13, 2015
Primary completionActual
Apr 9, 2018
CompletionActual
Apr 9, 2018
Results first posted
Aug 1, 2019
Last update
Sep 28, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02224703
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2014
Start date
Apr 13, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 9, 2018
Completion
Apr 9, 2018
Results posted
Aug 1, 2019
Last update
Sep 28, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cannabidiol

Start the discussion