ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02209233Updated Feb 9, 2015

Effects of Massage on Post-operative Pain in Urologic Patients

An interventional study of Massage Therapy in Postoperative Pain and Anxiety, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-09.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect that receiving massage therapy post-operatively has on reducing perceived anxiety and pain in urology patients. Secondarily, the result of massage on patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and narcotic use will also be studied.

Read the detailed description

Post-operative pain for Urology patients can be an anxiety-provoking and distressing recovery process. Massage therapy for post-operative pain has been shown to reduce pain and anxiety levels in various surgical patients however no study has assessed massage therapy effect on post-operative pain in patients who have gone through urological procedures.

This study will investigate the effects of hand massage interventions during the post-operative period of Urology patients. Perception of pain and anxiety levels will be assessed, as well as vital signs before and after massage therapy will be measured. These findings may lead to both subjective and objective improvements in patients undergoing urological surgeries and procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Anxiety
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,154 are open to participants now.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 305 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Of its 29 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Urology patients over the age of 18 years old who are post-operative day 1 to post-operative day 4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Given pain medication in the past hour
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    If randomized to the control group, patients will not be receiving massage therapy.

  • Experimental
    Massage Therapy

    If randomized to the intervention group, patients will receive massage therapy of the hand, arm, shoulder, and neck by the licensed massage therapist on duty. The massage will be given in a manner that is congruent with standard of care practices by the Heart and Surgical Hospital and the licensed massage therapist.

    Other: Massage Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherMassage Therapy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in pain on the visual analogue scale score and survey

    Time frame: Baseline, 0-1 hour after intervention

  2. Change from baseline in anxiety on the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    Time frame: Baseline, 0-1 hours after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in patient satisfaction on the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire 18 (PSQ18)

    Time frame: Baseline, 0-1 hours after intervention

  2. Length of hospital stay by chart review

    Time frame: From enrollment to time of discharge, an expected average of 7 days

  3. Narcotic use (dosage, frequency, etc.) by chart review

    Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Loma Linda University Heart and Surgical Hospital
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S467-72. doi: 10.1002/acr.20561. No abstract available. PubMed 22588767 ↗
  • Stanley MA, Novy DM, Bourland SL, Beck JG, Averill PM. Assessing older adults with generalized anxiety: a replication and extension. Behav Res Ther. 2001 Feb;39(2):221-35. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00030-9. PubMed 11153975 ↗
  • Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997 Aug;72(1-2):95-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00005-5. PubMed 9272792 ↗
  • Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001 May;18(3):205-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205. PubMed 11354213 ↗
  • Reed MD, Van Nostran W. Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: a plea for uniformity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;54(3):241-4. doi: 10.1002/jcph.250. Epub 2014 Jan 23. No abstract available. PubMed 24374753 ↗
  • Campeau MP, Gaboriault R, Drapeau M, Van Nguyen T, Roy I, Fortin B, Marois M, Nguyen-Tan PF. Impact of massage therapy on anxiety levels in patients undergoing radiation therapy: randomized controlled trial. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2007 Fall;5(4):133-8. doi: 10.2310/7200.2007.018. PubMed 19087756 ↗
  • Bagheri-Nesami M, Shorofi SA, Zargar N, Sohrabi M, Gholipour-Baradari A, Khalilian A. The effects of foot reflexology massage on anxiety in patients following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 25. PubMed 24439644 ↗
  • Kim MS, Cho KS, Woo H, Kim JH. Effects of hand massage on anxiety in cataract surgery using local anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jun;27(6):884-90. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00730-6. PubMed 11408136 ↗
  • Braun LA, Stanguts C, Casanelia L, Spitzer O, Paul E, Vardaxis NJ, Rosenfeldt F. Massage therapy for cardiac surgery patients--a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Dec;144(6):1453-9, 1459.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.027. Epub 2012 Sep 7. PubMed 22964355 ↗
  • Babaee S, Shafiei Z, Sadeghi MM, Nik AY, Valiani M. Effectiveness of massage therapy on the mood of patients after open-heart surgery. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012 Feb;17(2 Suppl 1):S120-4. PubMed 23833593 ↗
  • Cutshall SM, Wentworth LJ, Engen D, Sundt TM, Kelly RF, Bauer BA. Effect of massage therapy on pain, anxiety, and tension in cardiac surgical patients: a pilot study. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2010 May;16(2):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.10.006. Epub 2009 Nov 14. PubMed 20347840 ↗
  • Wang AT, Sundt TM 3rd, Cutshall SM, Bauer BA. Massage therapy after cardiac surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Autumn;22(3):225-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2010.10.005. PubMed 21167456 ↗
  • Buyukyilmaz F, Asti T. The effect of relaxation techniques and back massage on pain and anxiety in Turkish total hip or knee arthroplasty patients. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Sep;14(3):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Jan 28. PubMed 23972865 ↗
  • Ucuzal M, Kanan N. Foot massage: effectiveness on postoperative pain in breast surgery patients. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Jun;15(2):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Jun 20. PubMed 24882025 ↗
  • Wang HL, Keck JF. Foot and hand massage as an intervention for postoperative pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2004 Jun;5(2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2004.01.002. PubMed 15297952 ↗
  • Thayaparan AJ, Mahdi E. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) as an adaptable, reliable, and validated tool for use in various settings. Med Educ Online. 2013 Jul 23;18:21747. doi: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.21747. No abstract available. PubMed 23883565 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02209233
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2014
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Last update
Feb 9, 2015

Study contacts

D. Duane Baldwin, M.D.
principal investigator · Loma Linda University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion