ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02168439Updated Nov 14, 2024Results posted

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Laceration and Anxiety, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 5 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-14.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 5 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 60 studies in Lacerations with a site in United States — 12 open to participants now, 14 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Lacerations · United States.

Enrollment
32nd of 52
40 · median 52
Started
2014
with 4 others
Phase 4
10 of 60
2 open now
Registered
21st of 60
by date

Among the 60 studies in Lacerations with a site in United States, this one is the 32nd largest by enrollment of the 52 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2014, is one of 10 in phase 4, and was the 21st registered.

By phase

60 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase33 · 5 open
Phase 4this study10 · 2 open
Observational7 · 2 open
Phase 26 · 1 open
Phase 11 · 1 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 2/31 · 0 open
Phase 31 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2014.

Size and results

Median enrollment 52 across the 52 interventional studies, 50 across the 7 observational. Of the 36 that completed or were terminated, 18 (50%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 60 studies in Lacerations with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The objective of this research study is to show superiority of intranasal dexmedetomidine to intranasal midazolam as anxiolysis prior to pediatric laceration repairs.

03

Conditions studied

  • Laceration
  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Midazolam
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 5 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presenting to Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  • Laceration \<5 cm in total length
  • Require simple suture laceration repair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergies/intolerance/ to the study drugs
  • Lacerations requiring complex (multilayer) repair or total laceration length>5cm
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine

    Intranasal Dexmedetomidine 2 micrograms/kilogram once

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine

  • Experimental
    Midazolam

    Intranasal Midazolam 0.4 milligram/kilogram

    Drug: Midazolam

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. mYPAS Score as Completed by Researchers to Assess Anxiety

    Primary outcome was the mYPAS scores at the time of positioning for procedure. mYPAS stands for modified Yale Preoperative anxiety scale. The scale is from minimum 23.3- maximum 100. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety. By prior characterization, scores less than or equal to 30 are classified as not anxious.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. mYPAS Scores at Other Time Points

    mYPAS stands for modified Yale Preoperative anxiety scale. The scale is from minimum 23.3- maximum 100. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety. By prior characterization, scores less than or equal to 30 are classified as not anxious.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. VAS for Anxiety as Completed by Caregiver and Observer

    VAS, Visual Analog Scale for anxiety. Scale from 0-10 written on a 10 cm horizontal line with the extremes labeled as no anxiety to very anxious. Vertical line is drawn on the scale at the level of anxiety. The distance was measured. Higher numbers equal higher anxiety.

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Procedure Completion

    note of whether the procedure was able to be completed

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Need for Procedural Sedation

    Whether the patient required procedural sedation for completion of the procedure

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Anxiolysis Satisfaction

    Likert scale parent, child life and proceduralist survey 5 point likert scale asking how satisfied the parent or proceduralist is with the anxiolysis from the medication. 1 being not satisfied at all, 3 neutral, 5 very satisfied.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Results

Posted Mar 10, 2017
Limitations and caveats
2 patients not included in the midazolam group: one for equipment malfunction leading to no data collected and the second due to weight error resulting in the patient receiving over twice the dose. Both recognized around the time of enrollment.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDexmedetomidineMidazolam
Started2020
Completed2018
Not completed02
Withdrew: Protocol violation02

Outcome measures

PrimarymYPAS Score as Completed by Researchers to Assess Anxiety

Primary outcome was the mYPAS scores at the time of positioning for procedure. mYPAS stands for modified Yale Preoperative anxiety scale. The scale is from minimum 23.3- maximum 100. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety. By prior characterization, scores less than or equal to 30 are classified as not anxious.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
mYPAS Score as Completed by Researchers to Assess Anxiety
units on a scaleDexmedetomidineMidazolam
mYPAS Score as Completed by Researchers to Assess Anxiety23.3 (23.3 to 30.8)36.3 (32.5 to 38.8)
SecondarymYPAS Scores at Other Time Points

mYPAS stands for modified Yale Preoperative anxiety scale. The scale is from minimum 23.3- maximum 100. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety. By prior characterization, scores less than or equal to 30 are classified as not anxious.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
mYPAS Scores at Other Time Points
units on a scaleDexmedetomidineMidazolam
Baseline Anxiety48.8 (36.7 to 82.5)47.1 (40.0 to 51.3)
Anxiety at Wound Washout42.5 (23.3 to 88.3)47.1 (34.2 to 67.5)
Anxiety at First Stitch Placement23.3 (23.3 to 89.2)35.4 (31.3 to 52.9)
SecondaryVAS for Anxiety as Completed by Caregiver and Observer

VAS, Visual Analog Scale for anxiety. Scale from 0-10 written on a 10 cm horizontal line with the extremes labeled as no anxiety to very anxious. Vertical line is drawn on the scale at the level of anxiety. The distance was measured. Higher numbers equal higher anxiety.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
VAS for Anxiety as Completed by Caregiver and Observer
units on a scaleDexmedetomidineMidazolam
VAS Baseline3.8 ± 2.93.5 ± 3.5
VAS Position1.7 ± 2.91.6 ± 2.4
VAS Recovery.7 ± 1.61.2 ± 1.6
Other pre-specifiedProcedure Completion

note of whether the procedure was able to be completed

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Procedure Completion
percentage of participantsDexmedetomidineMidazolam
Procedure Completion100100
Other pre-specifiedNeed for Procedural Sedation

Whether the patient required procedural sedation for completion of the procedure

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Need for Procedural Sedation
percentage of participantsDexmedetomidineMidazolam
Need for Procedural Sedation00
Other pre-specifiedAnxiolysis Satisfaction

Likert scale parent, child life and proceduralist survey 5 point likert scale asking how satisfied the parent or proceduralist is with the anxiolysis from the medication. 1 being not satisfied at all, 3 neutral, 5 very satisfied.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Anxiolysis Satisfaction
units on a scaleDexmedetomidineMidazolam
Parent Satisfaction5 ± 1.35 ± 1.1
Proceduralist Satisfaction4.5 ± 1.35 ± 1.4

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dexmedetomidine—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Midazolam—0/18 (0%)2/18 (11.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDexmedetomidineMidazolam
vomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/201/18
fallNervous system disorders0/201/18

Baseline characteristics

38 patients were analyzed in total.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DexmedetomidineMidazolamTotal
Mean3.44 (1.6 to 5.4)3.15 (1.0 to 5.4)3.21 (1.0 to 5.4)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DexmedetomidineMidazolamTotal
Female7613
Male131225
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)DexmedetomidineMidazolamTotal
United States201838
Laceration length
Laceration length(centimeters)DexmedetomidineMidazolamTotal
Mean1.59 ± .871.44 ± .731.52 ± .79
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2014, a primary completion of Apr 2015 and a completion of Jun 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2017, 1 year 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2014
First posted
Jun 20, 2014
Start
Jun 2014
Primary completionActual
Apr 2015
CompletionActual
Jun 2016
Results first posted
Mar 10, 2017
Last update
Nov 14, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02168439
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Responsible party
Desiree Neville, MD (M.D., Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Physician, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2014
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Jun 2016
Results posted
Mar 10, 2017
Last update
Nov 14, 2024

Study contacts

Desiree Neville, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Dexmedetomidine · Midazolam

Start the discussion