CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02123992Harmony 522Updated Sep 7, 2016

Study of the Elevate Apical and Posterior Prolapse Repair System Compared to Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

A Phase 4 interventional study of Elevate Apical and Posterior and Native Tissue Repair for pelvic organ prolapse in Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by ASTORA Women's Health. Terminated at 23 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-07.

Sponsored by ASTORA Women's Health · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Astora business is closing
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Elevate® Apical and Posterior Prolapse Repair System for repair of apical/posterior pelvic organ prolapse in a controlled, post-market cohort study.

Read the detailed description

The Harmony 522 study has been terminated due to the closing of the Astora Women's Health business. No other entity will be taking responsibility for this study. The study was terminated with partial subject enrollment complete and therefore no primary or secondary data analysis can be performed. The data from this study resides in a national data base which Astora no longer has access and therefore is another reason why no data analysis can be performed. The national database is owned and managed by the American Urogynecology Society (AUGS). AUGS has access to Astora's data and will at some time in the near future publish results to physicians who are active participants in the registry. Full public disclosure of this data may not occur for a number of years and will be aggregated with data from other study sponsors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
03

In context

Prolapse

676 studies on the registry are indexed under Prolapse; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is above the median of 74 across 435 interventional studies indexed under Prolapse.

Browse Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

ASTORA Women's Health is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subject is female

Subject is at least 18 years of age

Subject must have documented diagnosis of posterior or posterior and apical vaginal prolapse with leading edge of pelvic organ prolapse at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Bp ≥ 0; or Bp ≥ 0 and C ≥ -1/2 TVL (for a multi-compartment posterior prolapse that includes the apical compartment)

Subject reports a bothersome bulge they can see or feel per PFDI-20, question 3, response of 2 or higher (i.e., responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit")

Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing to provide written informed consent

Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study

Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) or tissue necrosis

Subject has history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical)

Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area

Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months)

Subject has systemic connective tissue disease (e.g. scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Marfan's syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica)

Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that involves the pelvis

Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM)

Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or stroke with residual neurologic deficit)

Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (colpocleisis)

Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position

Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study

Subject has a known sensitivity to polypropylene

Subject has had previous prolapse repair with mesh in the target compartment

Subject is planning to undergo a concomitant repair with use of mesh in the non-target compartment

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Elevate Apical and Posterior

    The experimental arm of the study will include the implantation of the Elevate Posterior surgical mesh for the treatment of posterior vaginal prolapse

    Device: Elevate Apical and Posterior

  • Active comparator
    Native Tissue Repair

    The control arm of the study will include the treatment of posterior vaginal prolapse using standard surgical sutures

    Procedure: Native Tissue Repair for pelvic organ prolapse

Interventions

  • DeviceElevate Apical and Posterior
  • ProcedureNative Tissue Repair for pelvic organ prolapse
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical success or failure through composite endpoint including anatomic, subjective and re-treatment measures

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Rate of device or procedure related serious adverse events

    Time frame: 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical success or failure through composite endpoint including anatomic, subjective and re-treatment measures

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Rate of repeat surgery/revision for prolapse arising from the same site/target compartment

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Changes in Quality of Life measured through the following questionaires: PFDI- 20,PFIQ-7, PISQ-12

    Time frame: 36 months

Other outcomes

  1. Subjects experiencing adverse events related to device or procedure

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. Subjects experiencing vaginal bulge

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. Subjects experiencing prolapse at or beyond the hymenal ring [Time Frame: 36 months

    Time frame: 36 months

07

Study locations

23 sites
  • Urological Associates of Southern Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85941, United States
  • The Clark Center for Urogynecology
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Yale School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
  • National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Women's Health Advantage
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46825, United States
  • Metro Urology
    Woodbury, Minnesota 55125, United States
  • Adult & Pediatric Urology and Urogynecology
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Women's Cancer Center of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89169, United States
  • Delaware Valley Urology
    Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, United States
  • Princeton Medical Center
    Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
  • The Center for Specialized Women's Health
    Whippany, New Jersey 07981, United States
  • North Shore Women's Health Clinic
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • Premier Medical Group
    Poughkeepsie, New York 12601, United States
  • The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine - St. Luke's Hospital
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18103, United States
  • Center for Women's Health of Lansdale
    Lansdale, Pennsylvania 19446, United States
  • The Female Pelvic Health Center
    Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940, United States
  • Swan Urogynecology
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • The Womens Centre
    Denton, Texas 76210, United States
  • University of Texas at Galveston
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
  • Lone Star Urogynecology and Continence Center
    Round Rock, Texas 78665, United States
  • Female Pelvic Medicine Institute of Virginia
    North Chesterfield, Virginia 23235, United States
  • Athena Women's Health
    Issaquah, Washington 98027, United States
  • University of Washington Pelvic Health Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be shared at a later data by the American Urogynecology Society aggregated with other data extracted from a national registry database.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02123992
Lead sponsor
ASTORA Women's Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 28, 2014
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 7, 2016

Study contacts

Eric R Sokol, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion