ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02099786COMP-VAUpdated Oct 9, 2019Results posted

Randomized Trial Comparison of Ototoxicity Monitoring Programs

An interventional study of COMP-VA and Standard of care in Cisplatin Ototoxicity and Hearing Loss, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-09.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 16 studies in Hearing Loss by VA Office of Research and Development — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Hearing Loss · VA Office of Research and Development.

Enrollment
11th of 13
47 · median 84
Started
2015
with 1 other
No phase
13 of 16
3 open now
Registered
8th of 16
by date

Among the 16 studies in Hearing Loss by VA Office of Research and Development, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment of the 13 interventional ones, is one of 2 that started in 2015, is one of 13 with no phase, and was the 8th registered.

By phase

16 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study13 · 3 open
Observational2 · 0 open
Other kind1 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2007; this study’s year is marked. 2 started in 2015.

Size and results

Median enrollment 84 across the 13 interventional studies, 63 across the 3 observational. Of the 12 that completed or were terminated, 10 (83%) have results posted.

Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies in Hearing Loss by VA Office of Research and Development, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study involves research. Some chemotherapeutic drugs that can permanently reduce hearing are termed "ototoxic". One such drug is the chemotherapy called cisplatin. Currently, if a patient is receiving cisplatin, hearing is tested in the Audiology Clinic using lengthy protocols and may be retested only when it is requested by their oncologist and when the Veteran can arrange an appointment. Researchers think that hearing testing prior to every treatment of cisplatin may reduce the number of Veterans who get disabling hearing loss from treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare the current method of monitoring hearing (audiology clinic protocols termed "usual care") with a new portable hearing monitoring program (a comprehensive program of ototoxicity monitoring termed "COMP-VA") that tests hearing using a portable hearing testing audiometer and a variety of efficient tools and techniques so that testing can occur prior to each cisplatin treatment at any quiet location in the hospital.

Read the detailed description

Research objectives are to compare the effectiveness of ototoxicity monitoring implemented using Comp-VA or usual care with regard to (1) improving Veterans' hearing and quality of life outcomes, (2) assisting oncologists in pre-treatment counseling and therapeutic planning and (3) increasing use of post-treatment rehabilitative services.

The investigators plan to recruit a total of 320 Veterans undergoing cisplatin chemotherapeutic treatment over 4 years and 120 control subjects.

Program Evaluation: Hearing testing prior to treatment will be done in order to establish eligibility, enroll and randomize each subject into one of two study arms. At 5 weeks and at one year post-randomization hearing will be re-tested in order to obtain an estimate of longitudinal trends in hearing and quality of life assessment. Use of audiological services following treatment from the randomized subjects will be tracked. Finally, data will also be collected at each treatment interval to track use of counseling tools and oncology personnel treatment decisions.

Serial measurements from subjects receiving cisplatin prior to treatment who are randomized to:

Comp-VA group will get a screening hearing test prior to treatment, at each treatment interval and at one-month post-treatment. Auditory testing will be done on or near the Chemo Unit and will include otoscopy, immittance testing, and a hearing testing done by the Veteran using a self-testing procedure, and may be tested using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), if they cannot take a reliable hearing test.

Usual care group will receive a full audiometric evaluation (otoscopy, immittance testing, air conduction and bone conduction hearing testing, speech audiometry, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions, DPOAEs) scheduled in the audiology clinic sound booth according to Audiology Service ototoxicity monitoring protocols. Testing will be arranged according to availability of appointments and patient convenience.

Additionally data will also be collected from control subjects who are similar in age and are tested at intervals similar to the chemotherapy subjects.

03

Conditions studied

  • Cisplatin Ototoxicity
  • Hearing Loss

Keywords

  • hearing
  • cisplatin
  • Ototoxicity
  • Veterans
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All Veterans entering cisplatin chemotherapy will be informed of the project and invited to participate unless the Veteran was excluded by CPRS review or medical advice.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Experimental subjects must be prescribed cisplatin for treatment of cancer to be enrolled in the treatment arms of this study.

Criteria for excluding subjects (chemotherapy and controls subjects) from this study will be:

  • cognitively or physically unable to participate (patient or nurse report patient is incapable of participating), CPRS indication that subject exhibits aggressive behavior, subject has documented dementia, Alzheimer's disease, or severe psychosocial disorder, CPRS notes indicate individual is not legally capable of providing (subject has a legal guardian)
  • unable to provide reliable behavioral hearing test responses (for either program evaluation hearing test or baseline, pre -treatment hearing test) as indicated by intra-session behavioral threshold reliability criterion of > +5 dB)
  • exhibits Meniere's disease or retrocochlear disorder based on hearing test results, patient report or notes in CPRS
  • exhibits active or recent history of middle ear disorder based on otoscopy, tympanometry, patient report, or notes in CPRS
  • unwilling to participate
  • hearing thresholds > 70 dB SPL at 4 kHz and below (based on DPOAE 'no response' data from a similar protocol described in Bibliography Reference 32, Table 3). The last exclusion was adopted in an effort to increase the potential that DPOAEs will be measurable in a large number of subjects.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    COMP-VA

    Hearing testing at each treatment and at 1 month following treatment.

    Other: COMP-VA

  • Experimental
    Usual Care

    Hearing testing done according to Audiology Clinic protocol

    Other: Standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherCOMP-VA

    Hearing testing at each treatment interval by the comp-va audiologist

  • OtherStandard of care

    Hearing testing done in the audiology clinic after oncology referral or patient self referral

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Ototoxic Hearing Shift

    Veterans randomized to the COMP-VA arm will have improved hearing outcomes (a) fewer ASHA-significant threshold shifts, (b) fewer CTCAE grade 1 or greater hearing shifts at Program Evaluation 3 as compared with Veterans randomized to the Usual Care arm. 1. ASHA Shift is defined as: 20 dB shift at a single frequency 10 dB shift at two adjacent frequencies loss of response at three adjacent frequencies 2. CTCAE Grade 1 or greater ototoxicity = hearing shift of 15-25 dB averaged at 2 contiguous test frequencies

    Time frame: 35 days post randomization

  2. Number of Participants Who Accessed the Audiology Clinic for Aural Rehabilitation

    Veterans randomized to Comp-VA will access and use audiology rehabilitation at higher rates than usual care up to 1 year post-treatment. This includes: New hearing aid issued; Hearing aid adjustments made; Technology updated.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year post randomization

  3. Number of Participants With Mortality

    Mortality among participants defined as differences in rates of death within one year of randomization.

    Time frame: 1 year post randomization

  4. Hearing-related Quality of Life Measure

    Differences in the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA) questionnaire score \[or Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) score as appropriate\] depending on the age of the subject. Minimum possible value = 0 Maximum possible value = 100 A higher score indicates poorer performance

    Time frame: 1 year post randomization

07

Results

Posted Oct 9, 2019

Participant flow

Forty-seven Veterans receiving cisplatin for the treatment of cancer were randomized to one of the two treatment arms of the clinical trial. Thirty-six healthy participants were studied to assess normal variability in auditory function measures over time; they were not part of the clinical trial portion of this research project.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCOMP-VAUsual Care
Started2423
Program eval 12423
Program eval 22319
Program eval 32115
Completed2115
Not completed38

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With an Ototoxic Hearing Shift

Veterans randomized to the COMP-VA arm will have improved hearing outcomes (a) fewer ASHA-significant threshold shifts, (b) fewer CTCAE grade 1 or greater hearing shifts at Program Evaluation 3 as compared with Veterans randomized to the Usual Care arm. 1. ASHA Shift is defined as: 20 dB shift at a single frequency 10 dB shift at two adjacent frequencies loss of response at three adjacent frequencies 2. CTCAE Grade 1 or greater ototoxicity = hearing shift of 15-25 dB averaged at 2 contiguous test frequencies

Time frame:
35 days post randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Ototoxic Hearing Shift
ParticipantsCOMP-VAUsual Care
Number of Participants With an Ototoxic Hearing Shift158
Statistical analysis
  • COMP-VA vs Usual Care · Regression, Logistic · p = .27 · Odds ratio (or): 2.2 · 95% CI .55 to 8.8
  • COMP-VA vs Usual Care · Regression, Logistic · p = .67 · Odds ratio (or): 1.4 · 95% CI .3 to 5.9
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Accessed the Audiology Clinic for Aural Rehabilitation

Veterans randomized to Comp-VA will access and use audiology rehabilitation at higher rates than usual care up to 1 year post-treatment. This includes: New hearing aid issued; Hearing aid adjustments made; Technology updated.

Time frame:
through study completion, an average of 1 year post randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Accessed the Audiology Clinic for Aural Rehabilitation
ParticipantsCOMP-VAUsual Care
Number of Participants Who Accessed the Audiology Clinic for Aural Rehabilitation1212
Statistical analysis
  • COMP-VA vs Usual Care · Regression, Logistic · p = .88 · Odds ratio (or): .92 · 95% CI .29 to 2.9
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Mortality

Mortality among participants defined as differences in rates of death within one year of randomization.

Time frame:
1 year post randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Mortality
ParticipantsCOMP-VAUsual Care
Number of Participants With Mortality24
Statistical analysis
  • COMP-VA vs Usual Care · Odds ratio (or): 1.9
PrimaryHearing-related Quality of Life Measure

Differences in the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA) questionnaire score \[or Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) score as appropriate\] depending on the age of the subject. Minimum possible value = 0 Maximum possible value = 100 A higher score indicates poorer performance

Time frame:
1 year post randomization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Hearing-related Quality of Life Measure
score on a scaleCOMP-VAUsual Care
Hearing-related Quality of Life Measure20.8 ± 18.623.2 ± 22.5
Statistical analysis
  • COMP-VA vs Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = .72 (The a priori threshold for statistical significance is .05)

Adverse events

Collected over 4 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
COMP-VA2/24 (8.3%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
Usual Care4/23 (17.4%)0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)COMP-VAUsual CareTotal
Mean64.6 ± 6.464.7 ± 9.164.6 ± 7.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)COMP-VAUsual CareTotal
Female000
Male242347
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)COMP-VAUsual CareTotal
Count of participants——0
3, 4, and 6 kHz pure tone average (PTA)
3, 4, and 6 kHz pure tone average (PTA)(dB HL)COMP-VAUsual CareTotal
Mean47.8 ± 21.555.4 ± 19.851.6 ± 20.8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Brungart D, Schurman J, Konrad-Martin D, Watts K, Buckey J, Clavier O, Jacobs PG, Gordon S, Dille MF. Using tablet-based technology to deliver time-efficient ototoxicity monitoring. Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S25-S33. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1370138. Epub 2017 Sep 12. PubMed 28893111 ↗
  • Dille MF, McMillan GP, Helt WJ, Konrad-Martin D, Jacobs P. A Store-and-Forward Tele-Audiology Solution to Promote Efficient Screenings for Ototoxicity during Cisplatin Cancer Treatment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Oct;26(9):750-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15028. PubMed 26415968 ↗
  • Reavis KM, McMillan GP, Dille MF, Konrad-Martin D. Meta-Analysis of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Retest Variability for Serial Monitoring of Cochlear Function in Adults. Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):e251-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000176. PubMed 25985018 ↗
  • Konrad-Martin D, Knight K, McMillan GP, Dreisbach LE, Nelson E, Dille M. Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):239-253. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000536. PubMed 29280917 ↗
  • Konrad-Martin D, Poling GL, Garinis AC, Ortiz CE, Hopper J, O'Connell Bennett K, Dille MF. Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions. Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S3-S18. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1398421. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Erratum In: Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S108. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1470739. PubMed 29157038 ↗
  • Garinis AC, Cornell A, Allada G, Fennelly KP, Maggiore RJ, Konrad-Martin D. Ototoxicity monitoring through the eyes of the treating physician: Perspectives from pulmonology and medical oncology. Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S19-S24. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1381769. Epub 2017 Oct 5. PubMed 28978238 ↗
  • Konrad-Martin D, Poling GL, Dreisbach LE, Reavis KM, McMillan GP, Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L. Serial Monitoring of Otoacoustic Emissions in Clinical Trials. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Sep;37(8):e286-94. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001134. PubMed 27518137 ↗
  • Konrad-Martin D, Reavis KM, McMillan G, Helt WJ, Dille M. Proposed comprehensive ototoxicity monitoring program for VA healthcare (COMP-VA). J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(1):81-100. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.04.0092. PubMed 24805896 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02099786
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 31, 2014
Start date
Apr 1, 2015
Primary completion
May 5, 2018
Completion
May 5, 2018
Results posted
Oct 9, 2019
Last update
Oct 9, 2019

Study contacts

Dawn L Konrad-Martin, PhD
principal investigator · VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion