An interventional study of Simulated Dawn Light Box and Sleep Hygiene instructions in Depression, Anxiety and Fatigue, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-24.
Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Medical students score higher than the general population on measures of depression, anxiety, fatigue, poor sleep and sleepiness. Data suggest that disparages in circadian phase might contribute to these problems. From an internal validity standpoint, first year medical students are an ideal group to study. The majority of the students will be matched on variables such as education, age, and intelligence. However, more importantly, they have a nearly identical life style when it comes to factors such as schedule, living conditions, level of stress, and timing of stressors. The specific aim and hypothesis is:Medical students randomized to sleep hygiene counseling plus simulated dawn will report less depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleepiness, and sleep disruption (as measured by standardized questionnaires) than students randomized to just sleep hygiene counseling.
There is a substantial and growing body of literature that has identified medical students as a group that suffers from increased levels of depression, anxiety, and other markers of "psychological distress". Other studies have demonstrated that in conjunction with the "psychological distress", medical students suffer from sleep deprivation, sleep disruption, and daytime sleepiness. Finally there is some preliminary evidence that residents and interns show increased symptoms of fatigue. It might reasonably be assumed that all of these symptoms are inter-related and more importantly detrimental to both the student and those patients under their care. There have been interventional studies aimed at educating participants on stress management, however these attempts have had only limited success.
Circadian rhythms are biological rhythms that contribute to most of our bodies' physiological processes. It has been determined that light is the major environmental cue that influences the setting of our circadian rhythm. Under ideal circumstances exposure to natural sunlight is sufficient to maintain a consistent and synchronized circadian rhythm. Often times this is not the case. Reduced exposure to natural light and increased exposure to artificial light are just two influencing factors.
Artificial light therapy has been successfully applied to the treatment of disorders of circadian rhythms as well as the treatment of some affective disorders. Most notably, light therapy has been shown to be effective in treating symptoms of depression and sleep disruption, specifically in patients with seasonal affective disorder, non-seasonal major depression, delayed sleep phase syndrome, advanced sleep phase syndrome, and sub-syndromal levels of each of these.
The theoretical mechanism of action is reviewed by Terman et al and asserts that morning bright light therapy advances and stabilizes the circadian rhythm of individuals who have delayed or drifting rhythms. There is subsequent synchronization and entrainment of the individual's endogenous rhythm with the environmental rhythm of daily life as reviewed in.
The timing, duration, and type of light delivered are of paramount concern, as improper delivery of therapy has been shown to have no advantage over placebo. One method of light delivery is simulated dawn light therapy. Simulated dawn light therapy works by gradually increasing light exposure over a specified period of time at the end of the sleep period. This gradually increasing light exposure during the sleep period is in contrast to traditional light therapy, which is delivered at full intensity after wake time. Simulated dawn has shown great promise as being just as effective as traditional light therapy but with the additional advantages of being more time efficient, easier to use, and more easily tolerated. All of these factors are important considerations in the application of this intervention to medical students, as being short on time and under significant stress are both hallmarks of medical education. The following proposal is a novel approach, using light therapy, to improve the mental well-being of first year medical students.
8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.
Browse Depression studies →Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 874 studies on the registry; 166 are open to participants now.
Of its 131 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Simulated Dawn Light box
Device: Simulated Dawn Light Box · Behavioral: Sleep Hygiene instructions
Standard sleep hygiene instructions were read aloud.
Behavioral: Sleep Hygiene instructions
per3 model of Naturebright It was set at the participants habitual wake time, and automatically began ramping between 30 and 90 minutes prior to that time (based upon participant preference). The ramp increased in a curvilinear fashion, mimicking sunrise during the summer at 45 degrees North latitude and reached a maximum light intensity of 300lux. They were allowed to switch the lamp off during the ramp period, and sleep in on off days, but were asked to allow the light to begin its ramp.
Also known as: per3 model of Naturebright
Sleep Hygiene instructions read aloud
Sleep quality
Time frame: 3 months
This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medical University of South Carolina →