ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02083653Updated Apr 16, 2019Results posted

Sym004 vs Standard of Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sym004 (12 mg/kg) and Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Symphogen A/S. Completed at 54 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-16.

Sponsored by Symphogen A/S · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
254
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2, open-label, randomized, 3-arm trial investigating the efficacy of two Sym004 doses (Arm A and Arm B) compared with a control group (Arm C) in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

Read the detailed description

This trial assesses the efficacy of two different weekly dosing regimens of Sym004 (Arm A: 12 mg/kg/week versus Arm B: 9 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg/week) compared with investigator's choice in terms of overall survival time in subjects with mCRC. Subjects assigned to Arm C will receive best supportive care (BSC), Fluorouracil (5-FU), or Capecitabine, per local standard of care.

Subjects will receive treatment until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or until the subject meets any of the criteria for treatment discontinuation or trial discontinuation. Therefore, the duration of treatment will differ among individuals and cannot be fixed in advance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • Best Supportive Care
  • Capecitabine
  • Fluorouracil (5-FU)
  • Sym004
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,734 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,481 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 254 is above the median of 77 across 4,222 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Symphogen A/S is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written informed consent obtained before undergoing any study-related activities
  • Male or female, at least 18 years of age
  • Subjects with histologically or cytologically confirmed mCRC, Kirsten rat sarcoma wild-type (KRAS WT) at initial diagnosis
  • Failure of or intolerance to 5-FU, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan
  • Acquired resistance to marketed anti-EGFR mAbs as defined in the protocol
  • Measurable disease defined as one or more target lesions according to RECIST
  • Life expectancy of at least 3 months
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pretreatment with regorafenib.
  • Subjects who in the opinion of the subject and investigator would benefit more from regorafenib treatment (except where regorafenib is not reimbursed in the country)
  • Skin rash Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) Grade greater than 1 from previous anti-EGFR therapy at time of randomization
  • Magnesium less than 0.9 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the treatment ingredients. Known previous Grade 3-4 infusion related reactions with anti-EGFR mABs
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
254 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)

    Sym004 will be administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 12 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) weekly until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or consent withdrawal.

    Drug: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)

  • Experimental
    Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)

    Sym004 will be administered as an intravenous infusion at a loading dose of 9 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg weekly until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or consent withdrawal.

    Drug: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)

  • Active comparator
    Arm C: Investigator's Choice

    Best supportive care (BSC) or Fluorouracil (5-FU) or Capecitabine will be given as per Investigator's discretion.

    Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Drug: Fluorouracil (5-FU) · Drug: Capecitabine

Interventions

  • DrugSym004 (12 mg/kg)

    Drug page: Futuximab

    Sym004 is a 1:1 mixture of two mAbs (futuximab and modotuximab) which bind to two non-overlapping epitopes of the EGFR.

  • DrugSym004 (9/6 mg/kg)

    Drug page: Futuximab

    Sym004 is a 1:1 mixture of two mAbs (futuximab and modotuximab) which bind to two non-overlapping epitopes of the EGFR.

  • OtherBest Supportive Care (BSC)

    BSC is the best palliative care as per Investigator's discretion, excluding antineoplastic agents. BSC may include, but is not limited to, antibiotics, analgesics, antiemetics, blood transfusions, and nutritional support.

  • 5-FU will be administered at doses and schedules as per Investigator's discretion and in line with the local package insert.

    Also known as: Adrucil

  • Capecitabine will be administered at doses and schedules as per Investigator's discretion and in line with the local package insert.

    Also known as: Xeloda

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS) Time

    OS based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. If a subject had not died, survival time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive.

    Time frame: From randomization until the date of death (assessed up to 32 months).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best Overall Response (OR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Tumor assessments were done via computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and evaluated per RECIST v1.1. The assessment for measurable disease during screening (within 14 days prior to Day 1) acts as the baseline assessment. Best OR was summarized for each treatment group by means of counts and percentages for the following categories: Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions), Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions), Progressive Disease (PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions), Stable Disease (SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD) or Not Evaluable (NE).

    Time frame: From randomization until first radiological confirmed or clinical progression event, or death due to any cause, within 12 weeks after last tumor assessment (assessed up to 32 months).

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time

    PFS based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. Death will only be considered as an event if it occurs within 12 weeks after last tumor response assessment without progression.

    Time frame: From randomization until first event, where an event can be a progression (radiological confirmed or clinical progression) or death due to any cause (assessed up to 32 months).

  3. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley.

    Time frame: From randomization until treatment discontinuation for any reason, including disease progression or death (assessed up to 32 months).

  4. Occurrence and Nature of Adverse Events (AEs), as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (Version 4.03) (CTCAE v4.03).

    AEs were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. The incidence and type of AEs (i.e., serious AE \[SAE\], treatment-emergent AE \[TEAE\]) were summarized by dose cohort according to MedDRA system organ classes and preferred terms. An AE was considered as treatment-emergent if it occurred during or after the first IMP administration. An AE that occurred before the first IMP administration and worsened thereafter was also considered an AE. Worsening was reported as a new AE.

    Time frame: From Baseline up to 28 days after the last IMP administration.

  5. Relative Dose Intensity of Sym004

    Treatment duration (weeks) is calculated as \[(last dose date of Sym004 - first dose date of Sym004)+7\] / 7 days. Sym004 dose received (mg/kg) is calculated as (total dose administered (mg)/weight (kg)). Dose Intensity is calculated as (cumulative Sym004 dose (mg/kg) / treatment duration (weeks)). Relative Dose Intensity is calculated as (dose intensity / planned dose intensity at randomization)\*100. Percentages are based on the number of subjects in the safety analysis set.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug until disease progression (assessed up to 32 months).

  6. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Sym004 Concentrations

    The Sym004 serum concentration used for the PK evaluation was calculated as the sum of the serum concentrations of the 2 component monoclonal antibodies of Sym004 (futuximab and modotuximab). Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is equivalent to the concentration collected at the pre-dose timepoint. Maximum Concentration (Cmax) is equivalent to the concentration collected at the end of infusion (EOI) timepoint.

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 5, and 7 and at the End of Treatment visit, including a Week 1 and Week 2 subset.

  7. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

    Tmax was defined as the time the PK sample was taken at end of infusion (EOI) relative to the start time of infusion (i.e., time between the start of infusion and the time of the EOI sample). For presentation of individual PK parameters and calculation of mean parameters, half of the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) value was used for concentration values below the LLOQ. The Sym004 serum concentration used for the PK evaluation was calculated as the sum of the serum concentrations of the 2 component monoclonal antibodies of Sym004, futuximab and modotuximab.

    Time frame: Day 1 on Weeks 1-3 followed by Week 5 Day 1 and Week 7 Day 1.

  8. Host Immune Response: Number of Subjects With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Sym004 Over Time

    A validated double antigen bridging ELISA was used for screening, confirmation, and titration of patient samples for anti-Sym004 ADA. Using rabbit anti-Sym004 as an ADA control antibody, the lower limit of detection was 54 ng/mL in the absence of Sym004 and 500 ng/mL in the presence of Sym004 at 5 µg/mL The timepoints for ADA sampling were chosen by the original sponsor for this trial. After the trial was transferred to Symphogen A/S, it was determined that not all samples were necessary for analysis. This is why the collection time points specified in the Outcome Measure Time Frame do not match with the Outcome Measure Data Table.

    Time frame: Every two weeks (Days 15, 29, and 43) followed by every six weeks thereafter (Days 78, 120, 162, etc.) until the End of Treatment Visit

  9. Quality of Life Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3)

    Scale: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (Version 3) \[QLQ-C30, Version 3\]. The QLQ-C30 is a 30-question scale used to assess cancer patients' quality of life based on 15 factors (e.g., global health status, physical functioning, role functioning, etc.). The scale is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100: * A high score for a functional scale represents a healthy level of functioning. * A high score for the global health status represents a high quality of life. * A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology (problems).

    Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks (week 1 and week 7 reported)

  10. Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29

    Scale: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Colorectal Cancer Module (QLQ-CR29). The QLQ-CR29 is a 29-question scale used to assess colorectal cancer patients' quality of life based on 22 factors (e.g., body image, anxiety, weight, etc.). The scale is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100: * A high score for a functional scale/item represents an unhealthy level of functioning, with the exception of one (1) scale pertaining to sexual interest (separated by sex). * A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology (problems).

    Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks (week 1 and week 7 reported)

  11. Quality of Life Assessed by FACT-EGFRI-18 for Skin Rash

    Scale: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor 18 (FACT-EGFRI-18). The FACT-EGFRI-18 is an 18-question scale used to assess EGFR-inhibitor-treated cancer patients' quality of life relative to their experience of skin rash based on three (3) multi-item subscales. The subscales combined (i.e., Symptom Index) range in score from 0 to 72. A higher score represents a high level of symptomatology (problems). High scores for all subscales represent a worse outcome: * The Physical subscale ranges in score from 0 to 28. * The Social/Emotional subscale ranges in score from 0 to 24. * The Functional subscale ranges in score from 0 to 20.

    Time frame: Assessed every 3 weeks (week 1 and week 4 reported)

07

Results

Posted Dec 24, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Considering the hypothesis-generating nature of a phase 2 clinical trial, the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis should be viewed as the starting point of a scientific investigation process, not the final conclusion.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Started838685
Completed111
Not completed828584
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated027
Withdrew: Adverse event1254
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100
Withdrew: Death222
Withdrew: Progressive disease657363
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject212
Withdrew: Other events022
Withdrew: Reason missing004

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) Time

OS based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. If a subject had not died, survival time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive.

Time frame:
From randomization until the date of death (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS) Time
monthsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Overall Survival (OS) Time7.9 (6.5 to 9.9)10.3 (9.0 to 12.9)9.6 (8.3 to 12.2)
SecondaryBest Overall Response (OR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

Tumor assessments were done via computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and evaluated per RECIST v1.1. The assessment for measurable disease during screening (within 14 days prior to Day 1) acts as the baseline assessment. Best OR was summarized for each treatment group by means of counts and percentages for the following categories: Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions), Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions), Progressive Disease (PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions), Stable Disease (SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD) or Not Evaluable (NE).

Time frame:
From randomization until first radiological confirmed or clinical progression event, or death due to any cause, within 12 weeks after last tumor assessment (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Best Overall Response (OR) According to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
ParticipantsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Complete Response (CR)001
Partial Response (PR)1181
Stable Disease (SD)404737
Progressive Disease (PD)272831
Not Evaluable (NE)5315
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) Time

PFS based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. Death will only be considered as an event if it occurs within 12 weeks after last tumor response assessment without progression.

Time frame:
From randomization until first event, where an event can be a progression (radiological confirmed or clinical progression) or death due to any cause (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time
monthsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time2.8 (1.8 to 3.2)2.7 (2.6 to 3.3)2.6 (1.4 to 3.1)
SecondaryTime to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Time frame:
From randomization until treatment discontinuation for any reason, including disease progression or death (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
monthsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)2.1 (1.4 to 2.7)2.6 (2.2 to 2.6)1.6 (1.2 to 2.7)
SecondaryOccurrence and Nature of Adverse Events (AEs), as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (Version 4.03) (CTCAE v4.03).

AEs were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. The incidence and type of AEs (i.e., serious AE \[SAE\], treatment-emergent AE \[TEAE\]) were summarized by dose cohort according to MedDRA system organ classes and preferred terms. An AE was considered as treatment-emergent if it occurred during or after the first IMP administration. An AE that occurred before the first IMP administration and worsened thereafter was also considered an AE. Worsening was reported as a new AE.

Time frame:
From Baseline up to 28 days after the last IMP administration.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurrence and Nature of Adverse Events (AEs), as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (Version 4.03) (CTCAE v4.03).
ParticipantsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
At least one TEAE838467
At least one Serious TEAE272312
TEAE leading to dose reduction29178
TEAE leading to interruption of trial treatment584710
TEAE leading to trial treatment withdrawal1256
TEAE related to trial treatment818046
TEAE, Grade >=3675325
Dermatologic toxicity78788
Infusion-related reaction27260
TEAE resulting in death443
Related Serious TEAE962
Related TEAE leading to dose reduction29176
Related TEAE leading to interruption of treatment53427
Related TEAE leading to treatment withdrawal923
Related TEAE, Grade >=358419
Related TEAE resulting in death000
SecondaryRelative Dose Intensity of Sym004

Treatment duration (weeks) is calculated as \[(last dose date of Sym004 - first dose date of Sym004)+7\] / 7 days. Sym004 dose received (mg/kg) is calculated as (total dose administered (mg)/weight (kg)). Dose Intensity is calculated as (cumulative Sym004 dose (mg/kg) / treatment duration (weeks)). Relative Dose Intensity is calculated as (dose intensity / planned dose intensity at randomization)\*100. Percentages are based on the number of subjects in the safety analysis set.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug until disease progression (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of relative dose intensity
Relative Dose Intensity of Sym004
percentage of relative dose intensityArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)
Relative Dose Intensity of Sym00480.49 ± 20.02088.91 ± 13.843
SecondaryPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Sym004 Concentrations

The Sym004 serum concentration used for the PK evaluation was calculated as the sum of the serum concentrations of the 2 component monoclonal antibodies of Sym004 (futuximab and modotuximab). Trough Concentration (Ctrough) is equivalent to the concentration collected at the pre-dose timepoint. Maximum Concentration (Cmax) is equivalent to the concentration collected at the end of infusion (EOI) timepoint.

Time frame:
Weeks 3, 5, and 7 and at the End of Treatment visit, including a Week 1 and Week 2 subset.
Reported as:
Mean · ug/mL
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Sym004 Concentrations
ug/mLArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)
Screening (Pre-dose)0.50 ± 0.0000.50 ± 0.000
Week 1 Day 1 (Pre-dose)0.50 ± 0.0000.75 ± 0.700
Week 1 Day 1 (EOI)182.95 ± 97.686174.44 ± 47.023
Week 1 Day 1 (0.5 hours after EOI)214.98 ± 46.242184.84 ± 33.103
Week 1 Day 1 (1 hour after EOI)209.80 ± 60.707189.24 ± 38.923
Week 1 Day 1 (2 hours after EOI)197.31 ± 65.801181.68 ± 37.577
Week 1 Day 1 (4 hours after EOI)188.75 ± 68.421171.63 ± 35.862
Week 2 Day 1 (Pre-dose)45.37 ± 28.60438.76 ± 10.311
Week 2 Day 1 (EOI)275.42 ± 80.975145.91 ± 47.950
Week 3 Day 1 (Pre-dose)92.66 ± 38.44344.26 ± 20.995
Week 3 Day 1 (EOI)323.35 ± 83.412170.18 ± 50.323
Week 5 Day 1 (Pre-dose)125.73 ± 61.64449.26 ± 30.252
Week 5 Day 1 (EOI)354.91 ± 108.263168.94 ± 67.901
Week 7 Day 1 (Pre-dose)128.30 ± 77.43758.38 ± 47.505
Week 7 Day 1 (EOI)346.83 ± 136.083163.11 ± 74.967
End of Treatment64.55 ± 79.25017.61 ± 24.474
SecondaryPharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

Tmax was defined as the time the PK sample was taken at end of infusion (EOI) relative to the start time of infusion (i.e., time between the start of infusion and the time of the EOI sample). For presentation of individual PK parameters and calculation of mean parameters, half of the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) value was used for concentration values below the LLOQ. The Sym004 serum concentration used for the PK evaluation was calculated as the sum of the serum concentrations of the 2 component monoclonal antibodies of Sym004, futuximab and modotuximab.

Time frame:
Day 1 on Weeks 1-3 followed by Week 5 Day 1 and Week 7 Day 1.
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
hoursArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)
Week 1 Day 13.14 ± 0.8222.79 ± 0.210
Week 2 Day 12.82 ± 0.3062.33 ± 0.459
Week 3 Day 13.01 ± 0.5552.34 ± 0.477
Week 5 Day 12.74 ± 0.5322.06 ± 0.448
Week 7 Day 12.83 ± 0.8672.06 ± 0.473
SecondaryHost Immune Response: Number of Subjects With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Sym004 Over Time

A validated double antigen bridging ELISA was used for screening, confirmation, and titration of patient samples for anti-Sym004 ADA. Using rabbit anti-Sym004 as an ADA control antibody, the lower limit of detection was 54 ng/mL in the absence of Sym004 and 500 ng/mL in the presence of Sym004 at 5 µg/mL The timepoints for ADA sampling were chosen by the original sponsor for this trial. After the trial was transferred to Symphogen A/S, it was determined that not all samples were necessary for analysis. This is why the collection time points specified in the Outcome Measure Time Frame do not match with the Outcome Measure Data Table.

Time frame:
Every two weeks (Days 15, 29, and 43) followed by every six weeks thereafter (Days 78, 120, 162, etc.) until the End of Treatment Visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Host Immune Response: Number of Subjects With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Sym004 Over Time
ParticipantsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)
Screening — Negative7881
Screening — Positive20
Screening — Not Reportable10
Screening — Missing23
Week 5 Day 1 — Negative5962
Week 5 Day 1 — Positive00
Week 5 Day 1 — Not Reportable00
Week 5 Day 1 — Missing2422
Week 12 — Negative2435
Week 12 — Positive00
Week 12 — Not Reportable00
Week 12 — Missing5949
Week 13 — Negative11
Week 13 — Positive00
Week 13 — Not Reportable00
Week 13 — Missing8283
Week 24 — Negative01
Week 24 — Positive00
Week 24 — Not Reportable00
Week 24 — Missing8383
End of Treatment Visit — Negative6055
End of Treatment Visit — Positive00
End of Treatment Visit — Not Reportable00
End of Treatment Visit — Missing2329
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3)

Scale: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (Version 3) \[QLQ-C30, Version 3\]. The QLQ-C30 is a 30-question scale used to assess cancer patients' quality of life based on 15 factors (e.g., global health status, physical functioning, role functioning, etc.). The scale is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100: * A high score for a functional scale represents a healthy level of functioning. * A high score for the global health status represents a high quality of life. * A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology (problems).

Time frame:
Assessed every 6 weeks (week 1 and week 7 reported)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Version 3)
score on a scaleArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Global Health Status (Week 1 Day 1)55.5 (0 to 92)59.7 (8 to 100)55.8 (8 to 100)
Global Health Status (Week 7 Day 1)57.4 (25 to 100)59.4 (17 to 100)59.7 (17 to 100)
Physical Functioning (Week 1 Day 1)76.4 (7 to 100)78.7 (27 to 100)77.7 (27 to 100)
Physical Functioning (Week 7 Day 1)82.1 (13 to 100)83.0 (47 to 100)76.7 (40 to 100)
Role Functioning (Week 1 Day 1)75.0 (0 to 100)76.4 (0 to 100)72.5 (0 to 100)
Role Functioning (Week 7 Day 1)81.1 (33 to 100)82.4 (50 to 100)72.8 (17 to 100)
Emotional Functioning (Week 1 Day 1)76.6 (17 to 100)77.8 (17 to 100)73.2 (0 to 100)
Emotional Functioning (Week 7 Day 1)74.8 (0 to 100)82.7 (33 to 100)75.3 (17 to 100)
Cognitive Functioning (Week 1 Day 1)87.4 (33 to 100)86.2 (17 to 100)87.5 (50 to 100)
Cognitive Functioning (Week 7 Day 1)88.1 (33 to 100)88.5 (33 to 100)87.0 (33 to 100)
Social Functioning (Week 1 Day 1)78.2 (17 to 100)80.2 (17 to 100)75.4 (17 to 100)
Social Functioning (Week 7 Day 1)77.9 (0 to 100)83.4 (50 to 100)72.7 (0 to 100)
Fatigue Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)35.3 (0 to 89)32.2 (0 to 100)34.7 (0 to 100)
Fatigue Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)26.3 (0 to 78)25.3 (0 to 78)33.2 (0 to 78)
Nausea & Vomiting Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)7.9 (0 to 67)6.4 (0 to 100)7.8 (0 to 83)
Nausea & Vomiting Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)5.6 (0 to 33)5.1 (0 to 50)8.4 (0 to 50)
Pain Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)27.2 (0 to 100)23.6 (0 to 100)27.8 (0 to 100)
Pain Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)12.7 (0 to 50)14.6 (0 to 67)24.1 (0 to 83)
Dyspnoea Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)15.9 (0 to 100)17.2 (0 to 100)16.4 (0 to 100)
Dyspnoea Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)10.4 (0 to 67)8.8 (0 to 100)15.7 (0 to 100)
Insomnia Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)29.3 (0 to 100)19.1 (0 to 100)21.7 (0 to 100)
Insomnia Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)27.4 (0 to 100)16.9 (0 to 100)16.6 (0 to 67)
Appetite Loss Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)22.3 (0 to 100)17.6 (0 to 100)22.2 (0 to 100)
Appetite Loss Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)16.9 (0 to 100)17.5 (0 to 67)23.0 (0 to 100)
Constipation Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)15.0 (0 to 67)16.0 (0 to 100)11.4 (0 to 100)
Constipation Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)11.5 (0 to 67)8.3 (0 to 67)11.1 (0 to 67)
Diarrhoea Symptoms (Week 1 Day 1)12.5 (0 to 100)8.5 (0 to 100)15.9 (0 to 100)
Diarrhoea Symptoms (Week 7 Day 1)8.8 (0 to 100)11.1 (0 to 67)11.0 (0 to 67)
Financial Difficulties (Week 1 Day 1)19.7 (0 to 67)16.6 (0 to 100)23.3 (0 to 100)
Financial Difficulties (Week 7 Day 1)19.4 (0 to 100)15.2 (0 to 67)19.3 (0 to 100)
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29

Scale: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Colorectal Cancer Module (QLQ-CR29). The QLQ-CR29 is a 29-question scale used to assess colorectal cancer patients' quality of life based on 22 factors (e.g., body image, anxiety, weight, etc.). The scale is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100: * A high score for a functional scale/item represents an unhealthy level of functioning, with the exception of one (1) scale pertaining to sexual interest (separated by sex). * A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology (problems).

Time frame:
Assessed every 6 weeks (week 1 and week 7 reported)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-CR29
score on a scaleArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Body Image (Week 1 Day 1)76.2 (0 to 100)80.1 (0 to 100)75.8 (0 to 100)
Body Image (Week 7 Day 1)76.4 (11 to 100)77.6 (33 to 100)78.2 (0 to 100)
Anxiety (Week 1 Day 1)50.0 (0 to 100)48.2 (0 to 100)43.0 (0 to 100)
Anxiety (Week 7 Day 1)57.1 (0 to 100)61.1 (0 to 100)50.9 (0 to 100)
Weight (Week 1 Day 1)79.5 (0 to 100)85.6 (0 to 100)78.3 (0 to 100)
Weight (Week 7 Day 1)86.6 (33 to 100)89.6 (33 to 100)88.0 (0 to 100)
Sexual Function (Men) (Week 1 Day 1)31.7 (0 to 100)21.2 (0 to 100)23.5 (0 to 100)
Sexual Function (Men) (Week 7 Day 1)33.2 (0 to 100)26.6 (0 to 67)34.9 (0 to 100)
Sexual Function (Women) (Week 1 Day 1)16.5 (0 to 33)12.3 (0 to 67)10.1 (0 to 67)
Sexual Function (Women) (Week 7 Day 1)16.6 (0 to 67)13.6 (0 to 67)11.0 (0 to 33)
Urinary Frequency (Week 1 Day 1)34.4 (0 to 100)30.3 (0 to 83)32.6 (0 to 100)
Urinary Frequency (Week 7 Day 1)28.2 (0 to 100)28.8 (0 to 67)18.5 (0 to 67)
Blood and Mucus (Week 1 Day 1)4.1 (0 to 50)1.5 (0 to 33)2.0 (0 to 33)
Blood and Mucus (Week 7 Day 1)2.6 (0 to 33)3.1 (0 to 67)2.3 (0 to 33)
Stool Frequency (Week 1 Day 1)15.5 (0 to 100)11.3 (0 to 100)14.1 (0 to 83)
Stool Frequency (Week 7 Day 1)13.4 (0 to 50)11.8 (0 to 83)13.1 (0 to 67)
Urinary Incontinence (Week 1 Day 1)8.2 (0 to 100)7.5 (0 to 100)7.4 (0 to 100)
Urinary Incontinence (Week 7 Day 1)7.0 (0 to 67)4.8 (0 to 67)1.9 (0 to 33)
Dysuria (Week 1 Day 1)4.0 (0 to 33)2.9 (0 to 67)3.0 (0 to 67)
Dysuria (Week 7 Day 1)3.2 (0 to 33)2.1 (0 to 33)0.9 (0 to 33)
Abdominal Pain (Week 1 Day 1)18.8 (0 to 100)12.8 (0 to 100)23.0 (0 to 100)
Abdominal Pain (Week 7 Day 1)10.4 (0 to 67)10.8 (0 to 67)16.6 (0 to 67)
Buttock Pain (Week 1 Day 1)11.6 (0 to 100)10.8 (0 to 100)9.9 (0 to 100)
Buttock Pain (Week 7 Day 1)4.4 (0 to 33)8.8 (0 to 67)7.4 (0 to 67)
Bloated Feeling (Week 1 Day 1)20.4 (0 to 100)14.8 (0 to 67)21.7 (0 to 100)
Bloated Feeling (Week 7 Day 1)13.3 (0 to 67)12.1 (0 to 33)12.9 (0 to 67)
Dry Mouth (Weel 1 Day 1)25.1 (0 to 100)17.0 (0 to 67)22.1 (0 to 100)
Dry Mouth (Weel 7 Day 1)26.8 (0 to 100)29.2 (0 to 100)13.8 (0 to 67)
Hair Loss (Week 1 Day 1)17.1 (0 to 100)11.1 (0 to 100)14.6 (0 to 100)
Hair Loss (Week 7 Day 1)7.0 (0 to 100)7.6 (0 to 67)4.6 (0 to 100)
Trouble with Taste (Week 1 Day 1)20.0 (0 to 100)13.9 (0 to 100)15.1 (0 to 100)
Trouble with Taste (Week 7 Day 1)18.5 (0 to 100)15.2 (0 to 67)12.9 (0 to 100)
Flatulence (Week 1 Day 1)18.3 (0 to 100)19.5 (0 to 100)23.1 (0 to 100)
Flatulence (Week 7 Day 1)12.4 (0 to 67)16.1 (0 to 67)12.4 (0 to 33)
Faecal Incontinence (Week 1 Day 1)8.9 (0 to 100)8.8 (0 to 100)7.1 (0 to 67)
Faecal Incontinence (Week 7 Day 1)2.5 (0 to 33)7.3 (0 to 67)3.1 (0 to 33)
Sore Skin (Week 1 Day 1)9.6 (0 to 67)8.8 (0 to 67)6.0 (0 to 33)
Sore Skin (Week 7 Day 1)11.6 (0 to 33)9.7 (0 to 67)4.2 (0 to 67)
Embarrassed by Bowel Movement (Week 1 Day 1)8.5 (0 to 100)7.8 (0 to 100)13.9 (0 to 100)
Embarrassed by Bowel Movement (Week 7 Day 1)7.5 (0 to 67)8.1 (0 to 67)10.4 (0 to 67)
Stoma Care Problem (Week 1 Day 1)16.6 (0 to 100)3.3 (0 to 33)6.6 (0 to 67)
Stoma Care Problem (Week 7 Day 1)9.9 (0 to 33)2.4 (0 to 33)8.3 (0 to 33)
Impotence (Week 1 Day 1)46.9 (0 to 100)38.7 (0 to 100)49.5 (0 to 100)
Impotence (Week 7 Day 1)40.4 (0 to 100)42.7 (0 to 100)50.7 (0 to 100)
Dyspareunia (Week 1 Day 1)12.1 (0 to 100)7.2 (0 to 33)11.0 (0 to 100)
Dyspareunia (Week 7 Day 1)14.3 (0 to 67)10.3 (0 to 33)13.3 (0 to 67)
SecondaryQuality of Life Assessed by FACT-EGFRI-18 for Skin Rash

Scale: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor 18 (FACT-EGFRI-18). The FACT-EGFRI-18 is an 18-question scale used to assess EGFR-inhibitor-treated cancer patients' quality of life relative to their experience of skin rash based on three (3) multi-item subscales. The subscales combined (i.e., Symptom Index) range in score from 0 to 72. A higher score represents a high level of symptomatology (problems). High scores for all subscales represent a worse outcome: * The Physical subscale ranges in score from 0 to 28. * The Social/Emotional subscale ranges in score from 0 to 24. * The Functional subscale ranges in score from 0 to 20.

Time frame:
Assessed every 3 weeks (week 1 and week 4 reported)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life Assessed by FACT-EGFRI-18 for Skin Rash
score on a scaleArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Physical (Week 1 Day 1)22.9 (2 to 28)23.1 (4 to 28)24.3 (6 to 28)
Physical (Week 4 Day 1)18.0 (4 to 28)19.7 (5 to 28)25.1 (16 to 28)
Social/Emotional (Week 1 Day 1)21.5 (9 to 24)21.5 (6 to 24)22.6 (9 to 24)
Social/Emotional (Week 4 Day 1)19.9 (7 to 24)20.3 (5 to 24)23.2 (15 to 24)
Functional (Week 1 Day 1)17.9 (5 to 20)18.3 (7 to 20)18.7 (4 to 20)
Functional (Week 4 Day 1)16.3 (3 to 20)17.0 (6 to 20)19.3 (13 to 20)
Symptom Index (Week 1 Day 1)62.3 (18 to 72)62.9 (20 to 72)65.6 (19 to 72)
Symptom Index (Week 4 Day 1)54.2 (16 to 72)57.0 (22 to 72)67.6 (46 to 72)
Post-hocOverall Survival (OS) Time for Patients in Europe + United States With Double-Negative mCRC (EU+US DNmCRC)

OS based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. This outcome measure is considered exploratory. Because of the unanticipated long OS in the control group, initial exploratory subgroup analyses identified that findings in patients enrolled in Russia differed when compared with patients enrolled in the ITT subpopulation and the EU+US subpopulation. For this reason, subjects in Russia were excluded from further exploratory subset analyses that evaluated the effects of genomic parameters known to impact patient responses to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Removal of the outlier Russian subpopulation of patients provided a patient population that was more homogeneous with respect to their prior treatment regimens, thereby facilitating further exploratory analyses. If a subject had not died, survival time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive.

Time frame:
From randomization until the date of death (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS) Time for Patients in Europe + United States With Double-Negative mCRC (EU+US DNmCRC)
monthsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Overall Survival (OS) Time for Patients in Europe + United States With Double-Negative mCRC (EU+US DNmCRC)8.9 (6.2 to 12.4)11.9 (9.7 to 13.8)8.4 (6.4 to 10.0)
Post-hocOverall Survival (OS) Time for Patients in Europe + United States With Triple-Negative mCRC (EU+US TNmCRC)

OS based on product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) estimates. Confidence intervals for the median are calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. This outcome measure is considered exploratory. Because of the unanticipated long OS in the control group, initial exploratory subgroup analyses identified that findings in patients enrolled in Russia differed when compared with patients enrolled in the ITT subpopulation and the EU+US subpopulation. For this reason, subjects in Russia were excluded from further exploratory subset analyses that evaluated the effects of genomic parameters known to impact patient responses to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Removal of the outlier Russian subpopulation of patients provided a patient population that was more homogeneous with respect to their prior treatment regimens, thereby facilitating further exploratory analyses. If a subject had not died, survival time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive.

Time frame:
From randomization until the date of death (assessed up to 32 months).
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS) Time for Patients in Europe + United States With Triple-Negative mCRC (EU+US TNmCRC)
monthsArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Overall Survival (OS) Time for Patients in Europe + United States With Triple-Negative mCRC (EU+US TNmCRC)10.6 (6.8 to 13.1)12.8 (9.7 to 14.7)7.3 (6.3 to 8.8)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event (AE) data were collected beginning with the signing of informed consent and continued through the End of Trial Intervention Visit (i.e., no earlier than 28 days after stop of treatment). The AE data collection period was 38 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)68/83 (81.9%)27/83 (32.5%)83/83 (100%)
Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)62/86 (72.1%)23/84 (27.4%)84/84 (100%)
Arm C: Investigator's Choice57/85 (67.1%)12/78 (15.4%)67/78 (85.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 58
Most frequent serious events
EventArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
HypomagnesaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/835/840/78
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/830/843/78
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/831/842/78
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders2/832/841/78
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/832/840/78
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders2/830/840/78
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/831/840/78
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/831/840/78
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders0/832/840/78
Device related infectionInfections and infestations1/832/841/78
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 51
Most frequent other events
EventArm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's Choice
Dermatitis acneiformSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders68/8365/841/78
HypomagnesaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders57/8347/846/78
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders33/8330/842/78
AstheniaGeneral disorders26/8321/8414/78
XerosisGeneral disorders26/8312/840/78
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders10/8319/8420/78
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders20/839/847/78
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications18/8315/840/78
ParonychiaInfections and infestations15/8318/843/78
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders16/8311/840/78

Baseline characteristics

The baseline analysis population was the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Mean62.2 ± 9.9164.2 ± 10.4161.4 ± 10.7062.6 ± 10.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Female31323194
Male525454160
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Hispanic or Latino55515
Not Hispanic or Latino697270211
Unknown or Not Reported991028
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian1001
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1203
White727573220
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported991230
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Austria0112
Belgium36514
Hungary0156
United States86822
Poland108725
Italy17122049
France991028
Germany4015
Russia8121030
Spain24311873
Height
Height(centimeters (cm))Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Mean168.9 ± 10.82169.1 ± 9.71167.9 ± 9.56168.7 ± 10.01
Weight
Weight(kilograms (kg))Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Mean75.3 ± 13.5174.0 ± 14.1476.0 ± 16.1375.1 ± 14.61
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Arm A: Sym004 (12 mg/kg)Arm B: Sym004 (9/6 mg/kg)Arm C: Investigator's ChoiceTotal
Mean26.5 ± 4.4325.8 ± 4.2626.8 ± 4.5926.4 ± 4.43
08

Study locations

54 sites
  • USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Sharp Memorial Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists-Broadway
    Fort Myers, Florida 33916, United States
  • Hematology - Oncology Associates of Treasure Coast
    Port Saint Lucie, Florida 34952, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33705, United States
  • Mercy Research
    Springfield, Missouri 65807, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Henderson, Nevada 89074, United States
  • Texas Oncology, P.A.
    Tyler, Texas 75702, United States
  • SMZ Süd - Kaiser Franz Josef Spital Wien
    Vienna, 1100, Austria
  • ULB Hôpital Erasme
    Brussels, 1070, Belgium
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • CHU Ambroise Paré
    Mons, 7000, Belgium
  • Clinique et Maternité Sainte-Elisabeth
    Namur, 5000, Belgium
  • CHU Mont-Godinne
    Yvoir, 5530, Belgium
  • ICO - Site Paul Papin
    Angers, 49933, France
  • Institut Sainte Catherine
    Avignon, 84000, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier Saint André - Hôpital Saint André
    Bordeaux, 33075, France
  • Centre Georges François Leclerc
    Dijon, 21079, France
  • Centre Léon Bérard
    Lyon, 69008, France
  • CRLCC Eugene Marquis
    Rennes, 35042, France
  • ICO - Site René Gauducheau
    Saint-Herblain, 44805, France
  • CHU de Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Uzsoki Utcai Korhaz
    Budapest, 1145, Hungary
  • Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen Megyei Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz
    Miskolc, 3526, Hungary
  • SzSzB Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz
    Nyíregyháza, 4400, Hungary
  • Jasz-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Korhaz-Rendelointezet
    Szolnok, 5000, Hungary
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti
    Ancona, 60126, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino
    Genova, 16132, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda
    Milan, 20162, Italy
  • Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli
    Naples, 80138, Italy
  • IOV - Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS
    Padova, 35128, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
    Roma, 00168, Italy
  • Presidio Ospedaliero SS. Trinità Sora
    Sora, 03039, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria Di Terni
    Terni, 05100, Italy
  • SPZOZ MSW zWarmińsko-MazurskimCen.Onko.wOlsztynie
    Olsztyn, 10-228, Poland
  • Wielkopolskie Centrum Onkologii
    Poznan, 61-866, Poland
  • Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera w Toruniu
    Torun, 87-100, Poland
  • Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. M. Sklodowskiej Curie
    Warsaw, 02-781, Poland
  • BHI of Omsk region "Clinical Oncology Dispensary"
    Omsk, 644013, Russia
  • St. Petersburg SHI "City Clinical Oncology Dispensary"
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
  • Hospital del Mar
    Barcelona, 08003, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • ICO l´Hospitalet - Hospital Duran i Reynals
    Barcelona, 08908, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Centro Integral Oncologico Clara Campal
    Madrid, 28050, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
    Oviedo, 33006, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    Seville, 41013, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. PubMed 8433390 ↗
  • Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition). Published by: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels 2001.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02083653
Lead sponsor
Symphogen A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2014
Start date
Mar 6, 2014
Primary completion
Oct 24, 2016
Completion
Apr 26, 2017
Results posted
Dec 24, 2018
Last update
Apr 16, 2019

Study contacts

Josep Tabernero, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Vall d'Hebron University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Futuximab

Start the discussion