CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02078323Updated Jul 23, 2018

Investigation of Linaclotide's Effect on the Bi-directional Brain and Gut Axis in IBS-C Patients

An interventional study of Linaclotide and Placebo in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C), sponsored by Augusta University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-23.

Sponsored by Augusta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to understand how a drug called Linaclotide improves bowel function and abdominal pain in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C) as well as to examine whether Linaclotide alters communication between the brain and pelvic-floor region.

Linaclotide has been shown to improve abdominal pain and bowel symptoms in IBS-C, and is approved by the FDA for the treatment of this condition. However, how exactly this drug works to relieve abdominal pain and discomfort in humans is not clearly known. Studies in animal models suggest that patients with IBS-C have hypersensitivity in the gut.

Consequently, in IBS-C patients, there is rapid and excessive conduction of signals both from the brain and central nervous system region towards the pelvic-floor (anorectal axis) and the reverse direction. The investigators hypothesize that treatment with Linaclotide may improve/normalize these signals and thereby improve bowel symptoms.

Investigators will test this theory using a new, noninvasive (and established) method of studying this communication pathway between the brain and gut.

Read the detailed description

modulate these mechanisms and thereby improve visceral pain.

Investigators propose three specific aims:

  1. Examine the hyperexcitability of the afferent-pelvic floor brain axis in 60 patients with IBS by measuring the cortical evoked potentials (CEP) and sensory thresholds after electrical stimulation of the rectum and anus before and after administration of linaclotide or placebo for a period of 10 weeks.
  2. Study the efferent brain pelvic floor axis by stimulating the cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation and record the anal and rectal motor evoked potentials (MEP) in 60 IBS-C patients.
  3. Determine the locus for neuronal modulation i.e are the neuroenteric changes due to central or peripheral neuronal sensitization or both, by evoking anal and rectal MEPs after selectively stimulating the lumbar and sacral nerves bilaterally, and by comparing segmental with transcranial-induced MEPs.
02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

Keywords

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C)
  • Linaclotide
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,062 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 71 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Augusta University is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • During the previous year, all patients must have recurrent abdominal discomfort or pain for at least 3 days per month in the last 3 months associated with two or more of the following symptoms (36): i) improvement with defecation; ii) onset associated with a change in frequency of stool; and/or iii) onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stool.
  • No evidence for structural diseases- (excluded by colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or barium enema). Patients over 50 will not be eligible to enroll unless they have had a colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or barium enema within ten years prior to screening. Individuals under the age of 50 would only be required to undergo one of such diagnostic procedures if they present with alarm symptoms such as rectal bleeding, unexplained weight loss or anemia). There is no plan undergo such procedures as part of this research protocol. Therefore, individuals requiring such a procedure will be referred back to their treating physician (due to reaching age 50 and requiring a general screening of colon check or any age, due to alarm symptoms) and will not be enrolled in the study.
  • No evidence of metabolic problems (to be excluded by laboratory testing; a comprehensive blood count and metabolic panel are required to be within six months of screening visit. If none are available on the patient's electronic records or records provided by an external provider, we will have them complete blood testing to exclude clinically significant metabolic abnormalities). The P.I. will decide if any values that fall out of range represent clinical significance or not.
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to a urine pregnancy test at screening and to avoid pregnancy throughout the study.
  • On a prospective symptom/stool diary patients reported i) presence of abdominal pain/discomfort for at least 2 days per week; ii) hard or lumpy stools >25% and loose or watery stools in \< 25% of bowel movements (IBS-C); (iii) loose or watery stools in >25% of bowel movements and hard stools \<25% of Bowel Movements(IBS-D); >25% of hard or loose stools within one week (IBS-M)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with laxative abuse, anorexia nervosa, and bulimia;
  • Patients taking opioids (e.g. codeine or morphine), antispasmodics (dicyclomine or hyoscyamine), or muscle relaxants (e.g. cyclobenzaprine). If a patient is taking any of these drugs or supplements, and the P.I. determines that they may be able to safely come off of their medication, the patient may be eligible to re-screen, pending a two week minimum washout before enrollment;
  • Patients with active episodic major depression will not be enrolled and will be referred for treatment, if necessary. Patients with a history of depression and have achieved stable remission are eligible.
  • Patients with comorbid illnesses, severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure or previous gastrointestinal surgery except cholecystectomy and appendectomy;
  • Patients with neurologic diseases (e.g. head injuries, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, spinal cord injuries) or brain disorders prone to causing seizures;
  • Patients experiencing impaired cognizance (mini mental score of \< 15) and/or legally blind;
  • Women who are pregnant or likely to conceive (women with potential for pregnancy must use contraceptive measures to be included);
  • Patients with ulcerative and Crohns colitis;
  • Patients with rectal prolapse, anal fissure, anal surgery or inflamed hemorrhoids. Patients found to have any of these conditions are not eligible for enrollment due to the potential discomfort of probe placement. If a patient who is excluded due to anal fissure or inflamed hemorrhoids achieves full remission after the initial screening, they may be eligible for rescreening.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Linaclotide

    Linaclotide 290micrograms q day 30 min before meal for a 10 week period

    Drug: Linaclotide

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    Placebo q day 30 min before meal for a 10 week period

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLinaclotide
  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1: Change from baseline in Prolongation and normalization of anal CEP and rectal CEP responses at 10 weeks.

    A rectal catheter will be inserted into the rectum, up to 10 cm from the anal verge. The threshold for first sensation and pain will be determined by increasing the electrical stimulation in steps of 1 mA. subsequent stimuli will be applied at an intensity of 75% of the difference between the first sensation and pain thresholds. The CEPs will be recorded in a quiet room in a semi-recumbent position. Four runs of 50 stimuli will be averaged for both the rectal and anal stimulation studies, with a 5-min rest period between each run and a 30 minute rest period between rectal and anal studies.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment and at 10 weeks following baseline

  2. Change from Baseline in Prolongation and normalization of rectal MEP and anal MEP at 10 weeks.

    A 70 mm figure of eight coil, positioned over the cranium's vertex. TThe coil will be placed with the anterior edge of the cross point over the region of interest, with the handle pointing backward (for midline grid points) or at an angle of 45º tangential to the scalp surface (for lateral grid points). We will perform TMS of the anorectal motor cortex and assess the anal and rectal MEPs (EMG), by using the anorectal probe.

    Time frame: at baseline assessment at at 10 weeks following this baseline assessment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Augusta University
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rao SSC, Xiang X, Yan Y, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T, Parr R, Ayyala D, Sharma A. Randomised clinical trial: linaclotide vs placebo-a study of bi-directional gut and brain axis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun;51(12):1332-1341. doi: 10.1111/apt.15772. Epub 2020 May 13. PubMed 32406112 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02078323
Lead sponsor
Augusta University
Collaborators
Forest Laboratories
Responsible party
Satish Rao (Principal Investigator, Augusta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2014
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2017
Completion
Jul 20, 2018
Last update
Jul 23, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion