CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02052947CLEMUpdated Aug 23, 2017

Co-LEsions in Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders

An interventional study of SPECT-DaTscan in Alzheimer's Disease, Cerebrovascular Disease and Lewy Body Disease, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-23.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
214
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

One of the crucial challenges for the future of Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapeutic approaches in elderly is to target the main pathological process responsible for disability and dependency. However, a progressive cognitive impairment occurring after the age of 70 is often related to mixed lesions of neurodegenerative and vascular origins. Whereas young patients are mostly affected by pure lesions, aging favors the occurrence of co-lesions of AD, vascular and Lewy body types. Pure DLB (Dementia with Lewy Body) and AD are distinct disorders but they often coexist in old age patients, the Abeta pathology of DLB/AD cases being different to that observed in patients with AD alone. Vascular dementia (VD) and AD with cerebrovascular disease (AD+CVD) are the leading causes of dementia next to AD alone. Lack of consensus persists about the diagnosis criteria for VD and AD+CVD, due in part to their clinical, pathological heterogeneity and the multiple pathological subtypes.

We do not know the precise role and weight of each brain lesion type in the disability progression in elderly. To target the actual pathological process, we need to disclose the functional weight of AD, Lewy body and vascular lesion types in elderly. Most of the studies report on functional and clinical abnormalities in patients with pure pathologies. Thus, co-morbid processes involved in the transition from an independent functional status to disability in the elderly with co-lesions still remain to be elucidated. Neuropathological examination often performed at late stages cannot answer this question at mild or moderate stages.

Brain MRI, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) with DaTscan® and CSF biomarkers help routinely in performing the diagnosis of pure or mixed lesions responsible for dementia. The topography of the atrophy in MRI helps to provide information about the etiological diagnosis. Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI has good discriminatory power for AD compared to DLB and VD in pathologically confirmed cases. DaTscan® SPECT presents with good sensitivity and specificity at early stages of DLB. The good diagnosis value of CSF biological markers has led recently to their inclusion in the research diagnosis criteria of AD. Low Aβ1-42 and high levels of total tau and hyperphosphorylated tau isoforms appear to be the most sensitive and specific CSF biomarkers. Aβ1-42 is lowered in AD, as well as in other neurodegenerative diseases like DLB, VD. The combination of MRI, particularly medial temporal atrophy measures and vascular lesions on FLAIR MRI sequences, SPECT and CSF biomarkers seem to be of incremental value for the diagnosis AD, VD, DLB and mixed profiles.

The aim of this study is to identify the biomarkers (MRI, SPECT-DaTscan® and CSF), and their combination, that are the most predictive of functional disability in elderly presenting with a progressive cognitive decline related to AD, DLB, VD and all mixed patterns.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Cerebrovascular Disease
  • Lewy Body Disease

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • cerebrovascular disease
  • Lewy body disease
  • MRI
  • SPECT
  • CSF
  • biomarkers
  • disability
  • Multicenter and prospective cohort study
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,681 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 875 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 214 is above the median of 70 across 2,809 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,826 studies on the registry; 439 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subject aged over 70 years
  • Out-patient consulting at one of the Memory Centres participating to the study
  • Patients meeting diagnosis criteria for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (McKhann, Knopman et al. 2011), vascular dementia (NINCDS-AIREN criteria, Roma´n, G. C., Tatemichi, T. K., Erkinjuntti, T., et al. (1993), Lewy body disease (McKeith, Dickson et al. 2005), and patients presenting with mixed signs and symptoms suggesting a combination of these diagnosis
  • Mild or moderate dementia stage (MMSE criteria > 15)
  • Being affiliated to health insurance
  • Patient with sufficient visual, auditory and oral and written French language skills to complete the clinical and neuropsychological evaluations
  • Accompanied by a close relation in sufficient contact with the subject to assess their dependency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with psychiatric disorders (Axe 1 DSMIV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) disease) excepted patients with depressive or anxious disorders stabilized for more than 3 months
  • Patients taking any neuroleptic psychotropic medication
  • Patients taking other psychotropic medication, with the exception of any antidepressant, hypnotic, anxiolytic, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or memantine which has been prescribed and stabilised for more than 3 months
  • Patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of dementia related to other diseases than AD, vascular and Lewy diseases, or mixed forms
  • Patients with other neurological diseases
  • Patients with progressive and unstable pathologies which could interfere with the variables under consideration
  • Deafness or blindness which could compromise evaluation of the patient
  • Patients being not able to undergo DaTscan®: with moderate or severe hepatic or renal impairment, a known hypersensitivity to ioflupane or any of the excipients
  • Patient living in an institution
  • Patient meeting brain MRI exclusion criteria (pacemakers, aneurysm clips, artificial heart valves, ear implants, metal fragments or foreign objects in the eyes, skin, or body) or refusing MRI
  • Patient being under guardianship
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
214 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    SPEC-DaTscan

    SPEC-DaTscan

    Radiation: SPECT-DaTscan

Interventions

  • RadiationSPECT-DaTscan

    * Measurement of fixation of DaTscan® in the caudate and lenticular nucleus * LP (Lumbar Puncture): the LP will follow the last guidelines published in 2011 (Armand Perret-Liaudet is co-author of these guidelines; Perret-Liaudet A. et al, Cerebrospinal Fluid Collection Tubes: a critical issue for Alzheimer Disease diagnosis. Clin Chem, 2012, accepted).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disability progression

    defined by the Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) scale (Gauthier, Gelinas et al. 1997; Gelinas, Gauthier et al. 1999)

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neuropsychological inventory

    For the diagnosis and initial correlation with imaging and CSF markers, o For longitudinal assessments : MMSE (Folstein, Folstein et al. 1975), Batterie Rapide d'Efficience Frontale (BREF) (Dubois, Slachevsky et al. 2000) Adas-Cog (Rosen, Mohs et al. 1984)

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. NeuroPsychiatric inventory

    Inventory described in Cummings, Mega et al. 1994

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Clinical/serum markers

    Disability progression and cognitive decline

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hopital Charpennes
    Villeurbanne, 69100, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boublay N, Federico D, Pesce A, Verny M, Blanc F, Paccalin M, Desmidt T, Grosmaitre P, Moreaud O, Relland S, Bravant E, Bouet R, Krolak-Salmon P. Study protocol on Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: focus on clinical and imaging predictive markers in co-existing lesions. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0949-2. PubMed 30428832 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02052947
Lead sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 3, 2014
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Jul 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 23, 2017

Study contacts

Nawele Boublay
Contact
nawele.boublay@chu-lyon.fr
0472856302 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion