CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06339190NAVAIDDUpdated May 30, 2025

Neurofilament Light Chain And Voice Acoustic Analyses In Dementia Diagnosis

An observational study in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Dementia, sponsored by Monash University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Australia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-30.

Sponsored by Monash University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cohort study aims to determine if a blood test can aid with diagnosing dementia in anyone presenting with cognitive complaints to a single healthcare network. The investigators will measure levels of a brain protein, Neurofilament light chain (Nfl), and assess changes in language using speech tests.

Participants will have a single blood test and speech test, and will be followed up at 12-months to complete questionnaires and cognitive scales over the phone. The speech test will also be completed again at 12-months.

Individuals at risk of a Fronto-temporal dementia syndrome will be eligible to complete optional genetic testing involving an 'at home' saliva sample.

Read the detailed description

Problem: There is no "gold-standard test" to detect all forms of dementia. People can present with subtle changes that are missed on standard cognitive screening tests, which are not designed for people whose first language is not English or from diverse cultural and educational backgrounds. State-of-the art brain imaging is only available to Australians living in large urban centres, further entrenching health care inequities. The lack of validated diagnostic tests and pathways causes diagnostic delays, increases patient and caregiver stress. Therapies are on the horizon for many forms of dementia - not only Alzheimer's disease - meaning that the lack of identification of simple dementia diagnostic biomarkers represents a critical knowledge gap.

Mission: New technologies now allow us to test abnormal brain protein levels in a routine peripheral blood test, record a voice sample to analyse its acoustics and reveal brain disease, and perform "mail-out" genetic tests using a simple saliva sample. The levels of a brain derived blood protein, neurofilament light chain (NfL), will be estimated and natural language processing and acoustic analysis will be measured in all patients presenting with cognitive complaints to a single healthcare network servicing 1 million ethnically and culturally diverse Australians. Researchers will investigate the utility of early genetic testing for those at high risk of a genetic cause for their disease. They will use these data to develop diagnostic pathways, leveraging existing collaborations to develop future screening programs. Early to mid-career researchers will be supported to translate new technologies into clinical practice in the shortest practicable time-frame.

Significance: Accessible and cost effective tests will inform new pathways to dementia diagnosis. This will transform the dementia landscape, shortening time to diagnosis, increasing diagnostic certainty, and allowing more Australians access to appropriate care, education, and future therapies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Dementia

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Dementia
  • Neurofilament light chain
  • Speech
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Biomarker
  • Health care disparity
03

In context

Dementia

2,172 studies on the registry are indexed under Dementia; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 250 across 482 observational studies indexed under Dementia.

Browse Dementia studies →

Lead sponsor

Monash University is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study cohort will include any individual of all ages, ethnicities, identities and genders. This is to ensure that the findings are generalisable to other national healthcare networks and to provide maximum information on the utility of using blood-biomarker estimation in real-world clinical settings

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients presenting to Eastern Health services with a cognitive complaint or potential neurodegenerative disorder

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prognosis \<12 months
  • No cognitive complaint
  • Patients not involved within the single healthcare network
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testVenepuncture

    A single blood draw at the time of presentation to clinic or whilst an inpatient.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Baseline NfL level

    Plasma Nfl (pg/ml), estimated using Quanterix SIMOA HD-X

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in speech processing

    Staff and/or self administered using Redenlab software and analysed by speech pathologist for acoustic measures of timing (e.g., pause length (seconds) in reading and monologue tasks), vocal control (e.g., fundamental frequency (hertz) and loudness variation (decibel) from vowel and monologue), and vocal quality (e.g., dysphonia measures derived from sustained vowel).

    Time frame: Day 0 and 12-months

  2. Change in language processing

    Recorded by a member of the research team using Redenlab software and assessed by a speech therapist using Natural Language Processing techniques.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at 12-months

  3. Change in Direct Magnitude Estimation

    Perceptual rating of speech using Redenlab software; measuring intelligibility (i.e ability to be understood) and naturalness (deviation from healthy norm) of speech. Assessed by a speech therapist on a scale from 0 to 100; 0 indicates none of the speech is intelligible/natural, 100 indicates all the speech is intelligible/natural.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at 12-months

Other outcomes

  1. Modified Rankin Scale

    Functional screen; assessed by member of the research team based on clinical notes. Assessed as change from baseline. Scores ranging from 0-5, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

    Time frame: Day 0 and at 12-months

  2. Montreal Cognitive Assessment score

    Cognitive screen; staff administered via telephone. Scores include overall MoCA score (0-22) and Memory Index Score (0-15), greater scores indicate greater cognition.

    Time frame: At 12-months

  3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score

    Mood screen; staff administered via telephone. Scores include a total depression score (0-21) and total anxiety score (0-21); grouped according to normal (0-7), Borderline abnormal (8-10) and Abnormal (11-21).

    Time frame: At 12-months

  4. Clinical Global Impression score

    Global rating of improvement/change; staff administered via telephone. Scored on a 7 point scale, scores closer to 0 indicative of greater improvement and scores closer to 7 representing much worse).

    Time frame: At 12-months

  5. WHO Disability Assessment 12-item telephone interview score

    Functional screen, staff administered via telephone. Scored as an overall percentage (%) disability, higher scores indicating less function.

    Time frame: At 12-months

  6. WHO Disability Assessment 36-item self report score

    Functional screen, self administered. Scored as an overall percentage (%) disability, higher scores indicating less function.

    Time frame: At 12-months

  7. DNA sample for testing known pathogenic dementia mutations

    Self-administered saliva sample; Testing using Invitae Fronto-temporal dementia and AD panel: C9orf72, CHCHD10, CHMP2B, DCTN1, FUS, GRN, HNRNPA2B1, MAPT, SQSTM1, TARDBP, TBK1, TREM2, UBQLN2, VCP

    Time frame: Anytime before 12-months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Box Hill Hospital
    Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
    Recruiting
  • Wantirna Health
    Wantirna, Victoria 3152, Australia
    • Sarah Shue · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Mar 11, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06339190
Lead sponsor
Monash University
Collaborators
Eastern Health, University of Melbourne, Wake Forest University, Deakin University, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Invitae Corporation, Redenlab
Responsible party
Amy Brodtmann (Professor, Monash University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 30, 2025

Study contacts

Prof. Amy Brodtmann, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, FANZAN
Contact
amy.brodtmann@monash.edu
03 9094 9540
Svetlana Ivanic, BSc(Hons)
Contact
svetlana.ivanic@monash.edu
Prof. Amy Brodtmann, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, FANZAN
principal investigator · Monash University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion