CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02048241Updated Jun 13, 2018Results posted

Intuniv vs Placebo in the Treatment of Childhood Intermittent Explosive Disorder

A Phase 4 interventional study of Parent Management Training and Placebo in Intermittent Explosive Disorder, Childhood Aggression and Oppositional Defiant Disorder, sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-13.

Sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2011, registered Dec 2012).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Children with explosive aggression are often rejected by their peers, placed in special classroom, and contribute to family discord. When psychotherapy and family therapy is unsuccessful, medications are often used. Current medications are stimulants (e.g. methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine), anticonvulsants (e.g. Divalproex) and antipsychotics (olanzapine, risperidone). At this time, the available medications are of limited usefulness, either because they do not always work or because they have side effects such as weight gain or insomnia. There is a clear need for new medications to treat explosive aggression when psychotherapy is unsuccessful.

The hypothesis of this study is the medication Intuniv when combined with psychotherapy will be more helpful to children with explosive aggression than placebo combined with psychotherapy. Intuniv is a long acting form of guanfacine, a medication approved by the FDA for treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Intuniv is not a stimulant, nor is it an anticonvulsant, nor is it an antipsychotic.

The children in this study will be between the ages of 6 and 12 and meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for Intermittent Explosive Disorder.

Read the detailed description

Aggressive children are often alienated from parents, separated from peers, placed in special education and segregated with other aggressive children. While predatory (i.e. planned, goal directed, reward driven) aggression is not responsive to pharmacologic treatment, non predatory (impulsive, paranoid, irritable) aggression (DSM-IV-TR "Intermittent Explosive Disorder") often is. Intermittent Explosive Disorder is characterized by discrete episodes of failure to resist aggressive impulses resulting in serious assaults or destruction of property. In children, due to their limited ability to damage or hurt others, the seriousness of the aggressive impulses are indicated by (a) the frequency and severity of tantrums (b) the fact that the severity is out of proportion to the provocation, and (c) the intent to damage and hurt is present and (d) this pattern of events causes impairment.

The level of aggression being studied is equivalent to that in moderate to severe Oppositional Defiant Disorder with the severity due to the tantrums rather than passive aggression (Modified Overt Aggression Score between 15-50). For 20 years a blood pressure medication, guanfacine (Tenex), has also been used for impulse control (e.g. in Attention Deficit Disorder, in Tourette's Syndrome) and to calm the sympathetic nervous system when it is hyper-aroused (e.g. in opiate and nicotine withdrawal]. Both impulsivity and hyper arousal can also promote intermittent explosive aggression. If guanfacine treats impulsivity and hyper arousal, it is logical to ask if guanfacine can treat intermittent explosive aggression.

Shire Pharmaceuticals modified the guanfacine molecule to create a long acting preparation (Intuniv) that the FDA recently judged safe and effective for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children ages 6-17. Secondary analysis of data from the pivotal studies that led to this indication revealed that in ADHD children, Intuniv also reduced oppositional-defiant symptoms. Better impulse control (these were all ADHD children) and/or decreased sympathetic arousal (common to all intermittent explosive aggression) are plausible explanations.

This Investigator Sponsor Protocol (ISP) seeks to replicate prospectively the anti-aggression finding. Since Intuniv could benefit non-ADHD aggressive children, any child with mild to moderate Intermittent Explosive Disorder is eligible. Anti-psychotic and anti-convulsant medications (current treatments for Intermittent Explosive Disorder) have serious side effects (weight gain, metabolic syndrome) and are not always effective. Intuniv is neither a stimulant, nor an antipsychotic, nor an anticonvulsant. Intuniv is not FDA approved for treatment of Intermittent Explosive Disorder.

In addition to medication or placebo, all children will receive a modified form of Parent Management Training, the standard psychotherapy for oppositional symptoms, administered by a child psychiatrist. It addresses the coercive reciprocal social interactions that characterize microenvironment of oppositional children.

Fifty children, ages 6-12 with Intermittent Explosive Disorder will be randomly assigned to eight weeks of double blind Intuniv plus Parent Management Training or placebo Parent Management Training. Titrated over four weeks to a maximum dose of 4 mgs or .09-.12 mgs/kg/day, they will be maintained on that dose for four weeks. At the end of treatment, the treating physician will break the blind and offer open label treatment for eight weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intermittent Explosive Disorder
  • Childhood Aggression
  • Oppositional Defiant Disorder
  • Attention Deficit Disorder

Keywords

  • childhood
  • temper
  • explosive
  • aggression
  • tantrums
  • oppositional
  • defiant
  • conduct
  • disruptive
  • emotional dysregulation
  • special education
03

In context

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

1,514 studies on the registry are indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 72 across 1,207 interventional studies indexed under Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity.

Browse Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity studies →

Lead sponsor

New York State Psychiatric Institute is the lead sponsor of 425 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Of its 50 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 6-12
  2. Meets DSM-IV TR Criteria for Intermittent Explosive Disorder

    1. several discreet episodes of failure to resist aggressive impulses that result in serious assaultive acts or destruction of property
    2. the degree of aggressiveness is grossly out of proportion to any precipitating psychosocial stressors
    3. the aggressive episode is not better accounted for by another mental disorder
    4. duration of at least six months
    5. impairment in home, peer relations and / or school
  3. Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) score > 15
  4. Parent and child willing to consent to study
  5. Inadequate response to psycho-social interventions (including school interventions)
  6. Medically healthy with

    1. weight > 55 lb (25 kg)
    2. body mass index \< 35
    3. normal blood pressure as defined by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (below 95th percentile for age height and weight)
    4. normal response to orthostatic changes (no persistent fall in systolic/diastolic BP > 20/10 mm Hg within 3 minutes of assuming the upright position)
    5. normal electrocardiogram
    6. normal vital signs
    7. no history of intolerance of guanfacine.
  7. If on another medication, willingness to discontinue if medication is judged ineffective after adequate trial or to remain on a constant optimized dose if it is partially effective

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current Treatment with another alpha 2 blocker e.g. clonidine
  2. Puberty
  3. Meets criteria for Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Childhood schizophrenia
  4. MOAS score > 50
  5. weight \< 55 lb or body mass index > 35
  6. hypertension (Blood Pressure above 95th percentile for age height and weight)
  7. Chronic hypotension (Blood Pressure at or below 5th percentile for age height and weight)
  8. Orthostatic Hypotension fall in systolic/diastolic BP > 20/10 mm Hg within 3 minutes of assuming the upright position
  9. QTc interval of > 440 milliseconds; Bradycardia; heart block diagnosed
  10. history of seizure during the past 2 years (exclusive of febrile seizures)
  11. Patients who had taken an investigational drug within 28 days
  12. Intelligence Quotient \< 70
  13. Physical exam, EKG or laboratory results with any other significant abnormalities until reviewed by medicine.
  14. Active suicidal or homicidal ideation or history of suicide attempts
  15. Unequivocal manic or hypomanic Episode
  16. Patients who meet criteria for Major Depression in pre-puberty will not be eligible for this study.
  17. Axis I disorders that are current, severe and uncontrolled. Children with moderate Axis I pathology will be evaluated on a case by case basis and excluded if the other diagnosis is not ADHD but could still be the cause of the temper dyscontrol and the treatment is judged substandard.
  18. Any other history of cardiovascular dysfunction
  19. Positive Urine Toxicology
  20. Children who have experienced prior adverse effects (physical or psychological) to either Tenex or clonidine
  21. Any child who previously received Tenex and either did not tolerate it, or failed to respond to an adequate trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Placebo plus Parent Management Training

    Pills matching Intuniv Tablets without active medication combined with weekly Parent Management Training

    Behavioral: Parent Management Training · Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Intuniv plus Parent Management Training

    Administration of Intuniv in increasing doses from 1 mg to 2 mgs to 3 mgs to 4 mgs as tolerated over a period of 4-6 weeks, combined with weekly Parent Management Training

    Behavioral: Parent Management Training · Drug: Intuniv

Interventions

  • BehavioralParent Management Training

    This is a psychological treatment that focuses on decreasing tantrums and outbursts by reducing the ability of the tantrum to coerce parents into giving in to the demand that precipitated the tantrum.

    Also known as: PMT

  • OtherPlacebo

    Weekly dispensation of pills matching Intuniv but without the active medication

  • DrugIntuniv

    Weekly administration of medication in doses as per protocol

    Also known as: Extended release Guanfacine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants That Were Responders

    Overall response to treatment is defined as at least a 70% decline in both the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) score and the Symptom Checklist-6 (SCL-6) from randomization to end of study. The MOAS measures the severity of explosive overt aggression. The score can range from 0 (no overt aggressive) and it has no theoretical upper limit (incidents could be too many to count). The higher the score, the more serious the aggression; the lower the score, the less serious the aggression. Response to treatment is defined as a 70% or more reduction in the MOAS at the end of the study. The SCL-6 uses 6 subscale items from the larger SCL that measure hostility or irritability on a scale of 1 (not at all) - 5 (definitely). The raw score ranges from 6 (no irritability) to 30 (severe irritability). The lower the score is, the better the outcome. The % decline vary from 0%-100%. A 70% or more decline in the SCL-6 score at the end of study is a response.

    Time frame: up to 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 6, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management Training
Started56
Completed55
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants That Were Responders

Overall response to treatment is defined as at least a 70% decline in both the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) score and the Symptom Checklist-6 (SCL-6) from randomization to end of study. The MOAS measures the severity of explosive overt aggression. The score can range from 0 (no overt aggressive) and it has no theoretical upper limit (incidents could be too many to count). The higher the score, the more serious the aggression; the lower the score, the less serious the aggression. Response to treatment is defined as a 70% or more reduction in the MOAS at the end of the study. The SCL-6 uses 6 subscale items from the larger SCL that measure hostility or irritability on a scale of 1 (not at all) - 5 (definitely). The raw score ranges from 6 (no irritability) to 30 (severe irritability). The lower the score is, the better the outcome. The % decline vary from 0%-100%. A 70% or more decline in the SCL-6 score at the end of study is a response.

Time frame:
up to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Were Responders
ParticipantsPlacebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management Training
Number of Participants That Were Responders05

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Plus Parent Management Training0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)2/5 (40%)
Intuniv Plus Parent Management Training0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)3/6 (50%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management Training
FatigueGeneral disorders0/53/6
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders1/50/6
IrritabilityPsychiatric disorders1/50/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management TrainingTotal
<=18 years5611
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management TrainingTotal
Female011
Male5510
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Placebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management TrainingTotal
White213
African American123
Hispanic235
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Placebo Plus Parent Management TrainingIntuniv Plus Parent Management TrainingTotal
United States5611
08

Study locations

1 site
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02048241
Lead sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Collaborators
Shire
Responsible party
Stephen Donovan (Clinical Psychiatrist, New York State Psychiatric Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 29, 2014
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Nov 6, 2017
Last update
Jun 13, 2018

Study contacts

Stephen J Donovan, MD
principal investigator · New York State Psychiatric Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion