ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02045498Updated Jan 27, 2014

Effect of Capnography Feedback During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR ) on Patient's Outcome

An interventional study of capnography feedback in Cardiopulmonary Arrest, sponsored by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Iran. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-27.

Sponsored by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Compare the quality performance of rescuers and resuscitation outcomes of cardiac arrest patients in both groups with and without capnography feedback

Read the detailed description

This study has done at Mashhad Ghaem Educational center. Two nurses and an anesthesia resident selected and trained according to the latest guidelines of CPR . In the control sample, with the declare of code 99 and attend the team on the patient's bedside, CPR begins and then every two minutes, return of the patient checks in the usual way. quality performance of rescuers ,Recovery or death of the patient and the result is recording. In the second phase , group members were educated how to use capnography (Comdek's MD-660P Oxi-Capnography) in CPR and guiding restoration efforts by it. with the code 99 and attend the team on the patient's bedside capnography uses and its waveforms will appear on the monitor device which is visible to all rescuers and the quality of performance is renewed based on the its guidance. The two groups patients for age, sex, initial rhythm of arrest, time of arrest until the first action, the time of arrest until the first shocks are comparing to control these factors influence on the outcome. quality performance of rescuers , resuscitation outcomes and CPR duration and relative factors in each of the groups were recorded and compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cpr
  • feedback
  • capnography
  • outcome
  • quality
  • resuscitation
03

In context

Heart Arrest

984 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 130 is above the median of 100 across 563 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 92 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • cardiac arrest patient age more than 18

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age more than 80 cardiac arrest due to pulmonary embolism
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    capnography, feedback, quality of cpr

    capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.

    Device: capnography feedback

  • No intervention
    conventional cpr

    conventional cpr

Interventions

  • Devicecapnography feedback

    capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. chest compressions and artificial ventilation rate in a minute

    The number Of chest compressions and artificial ventilation rate in a minute by rescuers in both study groups (with and without capnography feedback) were assessed.

    Time frame: By the end of twenty minutes of CPR

Secondary outcomes

  1. Return of spontaneous circulation or death of patient at the end of resuscitation

    Return of spontaneous circulation or death of patient at the end of resuscitation in both study groups (with and without capnography feedback) were assessed.

    Time frame: about twenty minutes After start of CPR

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ghaem Educational, Research and Treatment Center
    Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan Province (+98 511) 8023024-6, Iran
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Qvigstad E, Kramer-Johansen J, Tomte O, Skalhegg T, Sorensen O, Sunde K, Olasveengen TM. Clinical pilot study of different hand positions during manual chest compressions monitored with capnography. Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 15. PubMed 23499897 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2013, a primary completion of Oct 2013 and a completion of Nov 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2014
First posted
Jan 27, 2014
Start
Feb 2013
Primary completionActual
Oct 2013
CompletionActual
Nov 2013
Last update
Jan 27, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02045498
Lead sponsor
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Seyedreza Mazloum (dr seyed reza mazlom, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2014
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Last update
Jan 27, 2014

Study contacts

Tayebe PourGhaznein, MSc
study director · MUMS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion