ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02037204IMPACTUpdated Jan 2, 2019Results posted

IMPACT: Safety and Feasibility of a Single-stage Procedure for Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee.

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Cartilage repair surgery in Foreign-Body Reaction, Inflammation and Effusion (L) Knee, sponsored by UMC Utrecht. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-02.

Primary conditionInflammation(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Inflammation is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by UMC Utrecht · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Articular cartilage defects in the knee have a poor intrinsic healing capacity and may lead to functional disability and osteoarthritis. Cartilage cell therapy using autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been established as the first advanced treatment therapy medicinal product. Although this technique has achieved good mid-term results, it is a costly and extensive two-stage procedure which is limited by the number of chondrocytes obtained by biopsy and the dedifferentiation resulting from the expansion phase. Therefore, there is a need for improvement. A new cartilage repair technique should aim at decreasing surgical trauma, lowering complexity, improving logistics and cost-effectiveness while retaining or improving clinical outcome. Direct contact between mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and dedifferentiated articular chondrocytes in vitro showed improvement of the chondrogenic phenotype of dedifferentiated articular chondrocytes. In addition, preserving the pericellular matrix of chondrocytes improves cartilage formation. These chondrons (chondrocytes with their pericellular matrix) have shown improved cartilage formation when combined with allogeneic MSCs in extensive preclinical studies. The cells are mixed with fibrin cell carrier and applied to the cartilage lesion within one surgical procedure. This will reduce patient morbidity and improve patient care through immediate transplantation of a potent cell-based cartilage product. This is a phase I/II prospective monocenter study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the IMPACT for treatment of focal articular cartilage lesions of the knee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Foreign-Body Reaction
  • Inflammation
  • Effusion (L) Knee
  • Knee Pain Swelling

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • IMPACT
  • Chondrons
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Allogeneic MSCs
  • single-stage
  • Cartilage repair
  • Safety
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Inflammation Unverified

3,536 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 642 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 50 across 2,577 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Compared within Inflammation, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 and \<45 years old
  • Symptomatic isolated full-thickness articular cartilage lesion on the femoral condyle or trochlea.
  • Size 2 - 8 cm2
  • Intact anterior cruciate ligament

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (History of) osteoarthritis, defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade >3 as determined from appropriate X-ray.
  • Concomitant inflammatory disease that affects the joint (rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease, psoriasis, gout, symptomatic chondrocalcinosis)
  • (History of) Septic arthritis.
  • Malalignment requiring an osteotomy.
  • (History of) total menisectomy in the target knee joint.
  • Any surgery in the knee joint 6 months prior to study inclusion.
  • Risk groups for MRI scanning due to the magnetic field like patients with pacemakers, nerve stimulators, metal particles, stents, clips or implants, (possible) pregnancy or breast feeding.
  • Patients with severe anxiety for MRI scans and/or needles
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cartilage repair surgery

    Single-stage cartilage repair surgery using autologous chondrons (10-20%) and allogeneic MSCs (80-90%) in a fibrin glue carrier with a dosage of two million cells/ cm2 applied once during a surgical procedure.

    Other: Cartilage repair surgery

Interventions

  • OtherCartilage repair surgery

    Single-stage surgery, After debridement, the cartilage defect is filled with the fibrin glue carrier containing autologous chondrons and allogeneic MSCs

    Also known as: Single-stage, Cartilage repair, IMPACT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety: Adverse Events

    Adverse events rate

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Improvement, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

    Clinical improvement as measured by patient reported outcome scores. The questionnaire has been developed to evaluate the symptoms and limitations for patients with osteoarthritis. The outcome of the KOOS-scale varies from 0-100, where 0 indicates the greatest possible problems and is the worst outcome and 100 indicates no problems.

    Time frame: 3 and 18 months

Other outcomes

  1. Structural Repair

    To examine parameters of structural repair at one year after treatment using MRI and a second-look arthroscopy.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Health Care Use and Costs

    To assess the healthcare use and costs related to the procedure as well as the health-related work leave during the study period.

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 2, 2019

Participant flow

Patient recruitment started on February 1st 2013 and was completed in September 2014

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCartilage Repair Surgery
Started35
Completed35
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety: Adverse Events

Adverse events rate

Time frame:
18 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Safety: Adverse Events
participantsCartilage Repair Surgery
Safety: Adverse Events0
SecondaryClinical Improvement, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

Clinical improvement as measured by patient reported outcome scores. The questionnaire has been developed to evaluate the symptoms and limitations for patients with osteoarthritis. The outcome of the KOOS-scale varies from 0-100, where 0 indicates the greatest possible problems and is the worst outcome and 100 indicates no problems.

Time frame:
3 and 18 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinical Improvement, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
units on a scaleCartilage Repair Surgery
KOOS outcome baseline57.9 ± 16.1
KOOS outcome 3 months76.6 ± 11.1
KOOS outcome 18 months85.4 ± 13.3
Statistical analysis
  • Cartilage Repair Surgery · ANOVA · p = <0.05
Other pre-specifiedStructural Repair

To examine parameters of structural repair at one year after treatment using MRI and a second-look arthroscopy.

Time frame:
12 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedHealth Care Use and Costs

To assess the healthcare use and costs related to the procedure as well as the health-related work leave during the study period.

Time frame:
18 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over All patients were monitored for the duration of 18 months after surgery, at fixed time points (at 7 days, 6 weeks and 3,6,12 and 18 months after surgery), for inflammation and signs of a foreign body response by an independent physician (rheumatologist) using standardized clinical measures, pain assessment by numeric rating scale for pain and blood analysis including serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and leukocyte count.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cartilage Repair Surgery—0/35 (0%)18/35 (51.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCartilage Repair Surgery
Post surgery (joint swelling, pain)Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders18/35

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cartilage Repair Surgery
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years35
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cartilage Repair Surgery
Mean33 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cartilage Repair Surgery
Female11
Male24
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cartilage Repair Surgery
Netherlands35
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
    Utrecht, 3508GA, Netherlands
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bekkers JE, Creemers LB, Tsuchida AI, van Rijen MH, Custers RJ, Dhert WJ, Saris DB. One-stage focal cartilage defect treatment with bone marrow mononuclear cells and chondrocytes leads to better macroscopic cartilage regeneration compared to microfracture in goats. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Jul;21(7):950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 9. PubMed 23583464 ↗
  • Bekkers JE, Tsuchida AI, van Rijen MH, Vonk LA, Dhert WJ, Creemers LB, Saris DB. Single-stage cell-based cartilage regeneration using a combination of chondrons and mesenchymal stromal cells: comparison with microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2158-66. doi: 10.1177/0363546513494181. Epub 2013 Jul 5. PubMed 23831891 ↗
  • Vonk LA, Doulabi BZ, Huang C, Helder MN, Everts V, Bank RA. Preservation of the chondrocyte's pericellular matrix improves cell-induced cartilage formation. J Cell Biochem. 2010 May;110(1):260-71. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22533. PubMed 20213765 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2013, a primary completion of Apr 2016 and a completion of Apr 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2019, 2 years 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2014
First posted
Jan 15, 2014
Start
Mar 2013
Primary completionActual
Apr 2016
CompletionActual
Apr 2016
Results first posted
Jan 2, 2019
Last update
Jan 2, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02037204
Lead sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Responsible party
D.B.F. Saris (MD, PhD, Orthopaedic surgeon, UMC Utrecht) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2014
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Apr 2016
Results posted
Jan 2, 2019
Last update
Jan 2, 2019

Study contacts

Tommy S. de Windt, MD
study director · UMC Utrecht
Daniel B.F. Saris, MD, PhD
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion