ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02028247TAASDUpdated Nov 15, 2021Results posted

Psychotherapy for Anxiety in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

An interventional study of Personalized Cognitive-behavioral therapy and Standard Practice Cognitive-behavioral therapy in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Autism and Asperger's Syndrome, sponsored by University of South Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 13 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-15.

Sponsored by University of South Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
214
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Anxiety disorders affect 40 to 50% of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), contributing to substantial distress and impairment. The goal of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a personalized type of psychotherapy against standard-care psychotherapy for addressing anxiety in youth with ASD.

Read the detailed description

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are common neurodevelopmental syndromes affecting 1% of U.S. children. Comorbid anxiety disorders affect 40 to 50% of children with ASD, causing substantial distress and impairment over and above that caused by ASD alone. Although standard practice cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been established as an efficacious and safe treatment for anxiety disorders among typically developing youth, its utility in comorbid cases with ASD remains unknown. To date, no studies have experimentally compared standard practice CBT to a cognitive-behavioral intervention that has been personalized for children with a comorbid presentation of anxiety and ASD. Accordingly, we are proposing a randomized controlled trial to be conducted at three treatment sites to evaluate the efficacy of personalized CBT for anxiety in ASD (Behavioral Intervention for Anxiety in Children with Autism: BIACA) relative to standard practice CBT for anxiety (Coping Cat program). Furthermore, this study will employ a waitlist control group to assess the efficacy of each CBT arm relative to the absence of treatment (i.e., a Waitlist control arm). The proposed research will: (1) examine the efficacy of BIACA relative to Coping Cat, which represents standard practice treatment, and the efficacy of both these treatments relative to a waitlist control group, (2) evaluate the maintenance of treatment gains, (3) examine the impact of personalized intervention on functional outcomes. A total of 201youth across 3 study locations (ages 8-13 years) with ASD and co-occurring anxiety will be randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. The three recruitment sites for this study are University of California, Los Angeles, the University of South Florida (USF), and Temple University. Considering the rising number of children diagnosed with ASD together with the frequency and severity of comorbid anxiety, the proposed work is tailored to the unique needs of youth with ASD and will provide a timely contribution to public health efforts.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorders
  • Autism
  • Asperger's Syndrome
  • Pervasive Developmental Disability - Not Otherwise Specified
  • Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
  • Social Phobia
  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder
  • Specific Phobia
  • Separation Anxiety Disorder

Keywords

  • Autism spectrum disorders
  • Autism
  • Asperger's syndrome
  • Pervasive developmental disability - not otherwise specified
  • obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • Social phobia
  • Generalized anxiety disorder
  • Specific phobia
  • Separation anxiety disorder
  • Counseling
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy
  • Psychotherapy
03

In context

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,724 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 214 is above the median of 52 across 1,368 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Florida is the lead sponsor of 340 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (24%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatient boys and girls with ASD between the ages 7-13 years at consent/assent.
  • The child meets criteria for ASD.
  • The child meets criteria for anxiety symptoms.
  • The child has a Full Scale and Verbal Comprehension Intelligence Quotient >70 as assessed on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV or another acceptable Intelligence Quotient test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving concurrent therapy targeting anxiety, social skills training with homework, or behavioral interventions (e.g., applied behavior analysis). This excludes academic tutoring, occupational therapy, speech therapy, school counseling that is no more than 60 minutes per week in duration, school aides, and social skills training groups that do not include homework and are no more than 60 minutes/week in duration.
  • (a) Current suicidality or (b) individuals who have engaged in suicidal behaviors within 6 months will be excluded and referred for appropriate clinical intervention.
  • Child has been nonresponsive to an adequate trial of CBT for anxiety within the previous 2 years.
  • Lifetime bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
  • Initiation of an antidepressant medication within 12 weeks before study enrollment or an antipsychotic medication 6 weeks before study enrollment or the child has changed the dose of an established medication within 8 weeks before study enrollment (4 weeks for antipsychotic) or during psychotherapy (unless the dose is lowered because of side effects).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
214 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Personalized Cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Personalized Cognitive-behavioral therapy involves 16 weekly individual therapy sessions, up to 90 minutes each, based on a treatment protocol that has been designed specifically for youth with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

    Behavioral: Personalized Cognitive-behavioral therapy

  • Active comparator
    Standard Practice Cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Standard Practice Cognitive-behavioral therapy involves 16 weekly individual therapy sessions, up to 60 minutes each, based on a treatment protocol that represent the standard practice psychotherapy for anxiety that has been found to be effective in multiple trials in youngsters without autism spectrum disorders.

    Behavioral: Standard Practice Cognitive-behavioral therapy

  • Other
    Treatment as Usual

    Participants randomized to the TAU condition will be instructed to continue receiving their prior interventions as recommended by their providers (e.g., psychotherapy, social skills training, behavioral interventions, family participation in family therapy or a parenting class, or pharmacological interventions) for a 16-week period. Treatment changes (e.g., medication increase, starting psychotherapy in community) are not prohibited and will be monitored. Thus, treatment will continue as it would in standard practice; and will be monitored through periodic study assessment.

    Behavioral: Treatment as Usual

Interventions

  • BehavioralPersonalized Cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Also known as: Behavioral Interventions for Anxiety in Children with Autism

  • BehavioralStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral therapy

    Also known as: Coping Cat

  • BehavioralTreatment as Usual
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Anxiety Severity on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale After 16 Weeks of Treatment.

    This measure is administered by a clinician and assesses anxiety symptom severity on a scale from 0-25 with higher scores corresponding to worse anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline and After 16 Weeks of Treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Positive Treatment Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale

    The Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) was completed by a clinician after 16 weeks of treatment. The CGI-I assesses the severity of anxiety on a 7 point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). A rating of 1 or 2 on the CGI-I designated a positive treatment response.

    Time frame: After 16 weeks of treatment

  2. Change From Baseline in Anxiety/Depression Severity on the Child Behavior Checklist After 16 Weeks of Treatment.

    The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is completed by parents and the anxiety/depression subscale of the CBCL was used to assess anxiety/depression symptomatology. The CBCL anxiety/depression subscale is rated on a 3-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not true) to 2 (Very True), with higher scores indicating more symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and After 16 weeks of treatment

  3. Change From Baseline in Anxiety Related Impairment as Measured by the Childhood Anxiety Impact Scale After 16 Weeks of Treatment.

    The Childhood Anxiety Impact Scale (CAIS) is a questionnaire completed by parents about the impact of the child's anxiety on functioning in three situational categories (i.e., school, social, and family functioning). The CAIS is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CAIS items are summed and sorted into 3 subscales, corresponding to each situational category: school, social, and family. For all 3 subscales, higher scores correspond to more associated impact in that area.

    Time frame: Baseline and After 16 weeks of treatment

07

Results

Posted Nov 11, 2021

Participant flow

Two-hundred and fourteen children between 7-13 years (M=9.96, SD=1.76) were recruited through referrals, advertisements, and the patient flow of three university-based mental health clinics. Recruitment began April 2014 and final data were collected around January 2017.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePersonalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as Usual
Started777119
Completed675915
Not completed10124

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Anxiety Severity on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale After 16 Weeks of Treatment.

This measure is administered by a clinician and assesses anxiety symptom severity on a scale from 0-25 with higher scores corresponding to worse anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline and After 16 Weeks of Treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Severity on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale After 16 Weeks of Treatment.
units on a scalePersonalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as Usual
Baseline3.43 ± 0.483.47 ± 0.473.28 ± 0.39
Post-treatment2.13 ± 0.912.43 ± 0.702.93 ± 0.59
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Positive Treatment Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale

The Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) was completed by a clinician after 16 weeks of treatment. The CGI-I assesses the severity of anxiety on a 7 point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). A rating of 1 or 2 on the CGI-I designated a positive treatment response.

Time frame:
After 16 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Positive Treatment Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale
percentage of participantsPersonalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as Usual
Percentage of Participants With Positive Treatment Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale92.4281.0311.11
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Anxiety/Depression Severity on the Child Behavior Checklist After 16 Weeks of Treatment.

The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is completed by parents and the anxiety/depression subscale of the CBCL was used to assess anxiety/depression symptomatology. The CBCL anxiety/depression subscale is rated on a 3-point scale, ranging from 0 (Not true) to 2 (Very True), with higher scores indicating more symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and After 16 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Anxiety/Depression Severity on the Child Behavior Checklist After 16 Weeks of Treatment.
units on a scalePersonalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as Usual
Baseline0.83 ± 0.390.88 ± 0.390.73 ± 0.28
Post-treatment0.51 ± 0.290.69 ± 0.340.77 ± 0.27
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Anxiety Related Impairment as Measured by the Childhood Anxiety Impact Scale After 16 Weeks of Treatment.

The Childhood Anxiety Impact Scale (CAIS) is a questionnaire completed by parents about the impact of the child's anxiety on functioning in three situational categories (i.e., school, social, and family functioning). The CAIS is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The CAIS items are summed and sorted into 3 subscales, corresponding to each situational category: school, social, and family. For all 3 subscales, higher scores correspond to more associated impact in that area.

Time frame:
Baseline and After 16 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Anxiety Related Impairment as Measured by the Childhood Anxiety Impact Scale After 16 Weeks of Treatment.
units on a scalePersonalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as Usual
Baseline - CAIS School1.38 ± 0.611.48 ± 0.601.19 ± 0.70
Post - CAIS School0.77 ± 0.570.88 ± 0.541.24 ± 0.51
Baseline - CAIS Social0.97 ± 0.560.96 ± 0.620.70 ± 0.54
Post - CAIS Social0.49 ± 0.420.65 ± 0.540.80 ± 0.50
Baseline - CAIS Family1.16 ± 0.631.12 ± 0.620.98 ± 0.44
Post - CAIS Family0.65 ± 0.490.73 ± 0.510.88 ± 0.60

Adverse events

Collected over 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Personalized Cognitive-behavioral Therapy0/77 (0%)0/77 (0%)0/77 (0%)
Standard Practice Cognitive-behavioral Therapy0/71 (0%)0/71 (0%)0/71 (0%)
Treatment as Usual0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Personalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as UsualTotal
<=18 years777119167
Between 18 and 65 years0000
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Personalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as UsualTotal
Mean9.71 ± 1.8610.03 ± 1.6610.05 ± 1.759.90 ± 1.78
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Personalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as UsualTotal
Female2112033
Male565919134
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Personalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as UsualTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native2103
Asian63110
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American62311
White585713128
More than one race0415
Unknown or Not Reported54110
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Personalized Cognitive-behavioral TherapyStandard Practice Cognitive-behavioral TherapyTreatment as UsualTotal
United States777119167
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Rothman Center for Neuropsychiatry, University of South Florida
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Storch EA, Wood JJ, Guzick AG, Small BJ, Kerns CM, Ordaz DL, Schneider SC, Kendall PC. Moderators of Response to Personalized and Standard Care Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Comorbid Anxiety. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Feb;52(2):950-958. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05000-0. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PubMed 33826038 ↗
  • Wood JJ, Kendall PC, Wood KS, Kerns CM, Seltzer M, Small BJ, Lewin AB, Storch EA. Cognitive Behavioral Treatments for Anxiety in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 May 1;77(5):474-483. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4160. PubMed 31755906 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02028247
Responsible party
Eric Storch (McIngvale Presidential Endowed Chair & Professor, Baylor College of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2014
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Jan 2018
Completion
Oct 2018
Results posted
Nov 11, 2021
Last update
Nov 15, 2021

Study contacts

Eric A Storch, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of South Florida
Jeff Wood, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles
Philip C Kendall, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Temple University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion