CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02021812Updated Sep 9, 2022Results posted

Feasibility Study for GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis to Treat Proximal Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

An interventional study of GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis in Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-09.

Sponsored by W.L.Gore & Associates · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of the use of the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis to treat aneurysms involving the proximal Descending Thoracic Aorta (DTA)

Read the detailed description

The GORE® TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis (TAG® Device) received premarket approval (PMA) for use in endovascular aneurysm repair of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) on 23-Mar-2005 under P040043, and design changes that resulted in the conformable GORE® TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis (CTAG Device) received premarket approval for the treatment of aneurysms of the DTA on 23-Aug-2011 (P040043/S039). The TAG® Device and CTAG Device are intended to exclude an aneurysm from the blood circulation in patients diagnosed with DTA aneurysms. However, endovascular-only treatment options for patients with aneurysms approaching the aortic arch are limited as current stent graft technology would require coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) which may result in the need for a surgical revascularization procedure. This prompted the creation of the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (previously known as Branched TAG® Device), which was evaluated in this study under IDE G130120 for Zone 2 aneurysms of the DTA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
03

In context

Aneurysm

960 studies on the registry are indexed under Aneurysm; 175 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 72 across 462 interventional studies indexed under Aneurysm.

Browse Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

W.L.Gore & Associates is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Presence of DTA aneurysm deemed to warrant surgical repair which requires proximal graft placement in Zone 2:

    1. Fusiform (≥ 55 mm), or
    2. Fusiform (>2 times native aortic diameter), or
    3. Saccular (no diameter criteria)
  2. Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
  3. Subject is capable of complying with protocol requirements, including follow-up
  4. Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed by Subject or legal representative
  5. Must have appropriate proximal aortic landing zone, defined as:

    1. Must require coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) origin for exclusion of the lesion
    2. Aortic inner diameters between 16-48 mm
    3. Landing zone, which must include the LSA ostium, cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed,
    4. Acceptable proximal landing zone outer curvature length for the required device
    5. Landing zone must be native aorta
  6. Must have appropriate distal aortic landing zone, defined as:

    1. Outer curvature length must be ≥2cm proximal to the celiac artery
    2. Aortic inner diameters between 16-48mm (diameter should be between 16-42mm if using distal TAG® Device extension)
    3. Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
    4. Native aorta or previously implanted GORE® TAG® Device
  7. Must have appropriate LSA landing zone, defined as:

    1. LSA length of ≥3 cm proximal to first major branch vessel if using Aortic Component with 8 mm portal diameter, or LSA length of ≥2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel if using Aortic Component with 12 mm portal diameter
    2. LSA inner diameters of 6-15 mm if using Aortic Component with 8 mm portal diameter, or inner diameters of 11-18 mm if using Aortic Component with 12 mm portal diameter
    3. Target branch vessel landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concomitant aneurysm/disease of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or abdominal aorta requiring repair
  2. Previous endovascular repair of the ascending aorta
  3. Previous endovascular repair of the DTA with a non-Gore device
  4. Surgery within 30 days of treatment
  5. Infected aorta
  6. Dissection of the DTA
  7. Intramural hematoma of the DTA without DTA aneurysm
  8. Life expectancy \<2 years
  9. Myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 weeks prior to treatment
  10. Patient has a systemic infection and may be at increased risk of endovascular graft infection
  11. Pregnant female at time of informed consent signature
  12. Degenerative connective tissue disease, e.g. Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome
  13. Participation in another drug or medical device study within one year of study enrollment
  14. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
  15. Significant thrombus or atheroma in the aortic arch
  16. Tortuous or stenotic iliac and/or femoral arteries preventing introducer sheath insertion and the inability to use a conduit for vascular access
  17. Planned coverage of left carotid or celiac arteries
  18. Patient has known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
  19. Patient has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment
  20. Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin
  21. Diameter taper outside of the device sizing range between proximal and distal landing zones of aorta and the inability to use additional devices of different diameters to compensate for the taper
  22. Mycotic aneurysm
  23. Persistent refractory shock (systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg)
  24. Patient has body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate visualization of the aorta

    Additionally, the following exclusion criteria apply for Subjects enrolled in Stage 1:

  25. Aberrant right subclavian or left vertebral arteries
  26. Occluded/stenosed/hypoplastic right vertebral artery
  27. Presence of a patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft
  28. Bilateral carotid artery disease
  29. Known incomplete Circle of Willis
  30. Known left vertebral artery ending in posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Branched TAG® Device

    Treatment with the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis

    Device: GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis

Interventions

  • DeviceGORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Successful Study Device Access

    Access to the aneurysm and target landing zone location is obtained via conventional vascular access and endovascular techniques.

    Time frame: During treatment procedure (day 0)

  2. Number of Participants With Successful Study Device Deployment

    Absence of deployment failure will be considered a successful deployment. Deployment failure will be considered the failure of any Branched TAG® Device component (Aortic Component, Aortic Extender, or SB Component) to be released from the delivery catheter resulting in a serious adverse event (SAE) due to mechanical failure or use error.

    Time frame: During treatment procedure (day 0)

  3. Number of Participants With Primary Procedural Side Branch Patency as Assessed by Angiography

    The presence of forward flow through the implanted Side Branch Component into the target branch vessel.

    Time frame: At conclusion of the treatment procedure (day 0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With 1 Month Side Branch Primary Patency Assessed by an Independent Core Lab

    Time frame: 1 Month

  2. Number of Participants Without 1 Month Device Related Endoleaks Assessed by an Independent Core Lab

    Device-related endoelaks are defined as the presence of contrast within the aneurysm sac originating from the junction between any Branched TAG® Device component and the adjacent tissue (endoleak type IA or IB) OR the junction between the Aortic Component and either the SB Component or the Aortic Extender (type III endoleak).

    Time frame: 1 Month

07

Results

Posted Aug 2, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBranched TAG® Device
Started31
Completed16
Not completed15
Withdrew: Death8
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Refuse to return, covd 192

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Successful Study Device Access

Access to the aneurysm and target landing zone location is obtained via conventional vascular access and endovascular techniques.

Time frame:
During treatment procedure (day 0)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Successful Study Device Access
ParticipantsBranched TAG® Device
Number of Participants With Successful Study Device Access31
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Successful Study Device Deployment

Absence of deployment failure will be considered a successful deployment. Deployment failure will be considered the failure of any Branched TAG® Device component (Aortic Component, Aortic Extender, or SB Component) to be released from the delivery catheter resulting in a serious adverse event (SAE) due to mechanical failure or use error.

Time frame:
During treatment procedure (day 0)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Successful Study Device Deployment
ParticipantsBranched TAG® Device
Number of Participants With Successful Study Device Deployment31
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Primary Procedural Side Branch Patency as Assessed by Angiography

The presence of forward flow through the implanted Side Branch Component into the target branch vessel.

Time frame:
At conclusion of the treatment procedure (day 0)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Primary Procedural Side Branch Patency as Assessed by Angiography
ParticipantsBranched TAG® Device
Number of Participants With Primary Procedural Side Branch Patency as Assessed by Angiography31
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 1 Month Side Branch Primary Patency Assessed by an Independent Core Lab
Time frame:
1 Month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With 1 Month Side Branch Primary Patency Assessed by an Independent Core Lab
ParticipantsBranched TAG® Device
Number of Participants With 1 Month Side Branch Primary Patency Assessed by an Independent Core Lab31
SecondaryNumber of Participants Without 1 Month Device Related Endoleaks Assessed by an Independent Core Lab

Device-related endoelaks are defined as the presence of contrast within the aneurysm sac originating from the junction between any Branched TAG® Device component and the adjacent tissue (endoleak type IA or IB) OR the junction between the Aortic Component and either the SB Component or the Aortic Extender (type III endoleak).

Time frame:
1 Month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Without 1 Month Device Related Endoleaks Assessed by an Independent Core Lab
ParticipantsBranched TAG® Device
Number of Participants Without 1 Month Device Related Endoleaks Assessed by an Independent Core Lab29

Adverse events

Collected over Through 60 Months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Branched TAG® Device8/31 (25.8%)20/31 (64.5%)30/31 (96.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 65
Most frequent serious events
EventBranched TAG® Device
Aspiration pneumoniaInfections and infestations3/31
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/31
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/31
Congestive heart failureCardiac disorders2/31
Unknown cause of deathGeneral disorders2/31
Clostridium difficile infectionInfections and infestations2/31
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/31
Acute post hemorrhagic anemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/31
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/31
Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular responseCardiac disorders1/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 41
Most frequent other events
EventBranched TAG® Device
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations7/31
AtelectasisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/31
HypotensionVascular disorders6/31
LeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/31
Stent-graft endoleak type IAGeneral disorders5/31
Stent-graft endoleak type IIGeneral disorders5/31
DizzinessNervous system disorders5/31
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/31
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/31
Electrolyte imbalanceMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Branched TAG® Device
Mean74.1 ± 10.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Branched TAG® Device
Female15
Male16
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Branched TAG® Device
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino29
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Branched TAG® Device
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian3
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White26
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
BMI
BMI(kg/(m^2))Branched TAG® Device
Mean28.7 ± 6.8
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Leland Stanford Junior University
    Stanford, California 94305-5407, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Mayo Clinic - Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • The Hitchcock Foundation (Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center)
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02021812
Lead sponsor
W.L.Gore & Associates
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 27, 2013
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Mar 2022
Results posted
Aug 2, 2017
Last update
Sep 9, 2022

Study contacts

Michael D Dake, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion