ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02098265Updated Sep 17, 2026

A Closed Loop Neural Activity Triggered Stroke Rehabilitation Device

An interventional study of Functional Electric Stimulation (FES) and Behavioral Assessments in Stroke, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2010, registered Mar 2014).
  • Started Jun 2010; still recruiting 16 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
288
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to determine if two non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, muscle stimulation of the arm and neuro-stimulation through the tongue, can increase the extent of stroke recovery.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to determine if functional muscle stimulation, in addition to non-invasive neurostimulation through the tongue (TDU), directed by electroencephalogram (EEG) output, can increase the extent of stroke recovery on behavioral measures and induce brain plasticity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Adult stroke patients with upper extremity motor impairments (henceforth "experimental group"), healthy controls, and participants with risk factors for stroke, without upper extremity impairment (allowing them to serve as controls for patients with upper extremity impairments (henceforth "control group")), will be recruited in this study. Half of the participants in the experimental group will be randomly assigned to the EEG-BCI (brain-computer interface) training ("closed-loop") group and will receive training on the BCI task along with muscle and tongue stimulation. The other half of the participants in the experimental group receiving traditional rehab will not receive any kind of FES or tongue stimulation for the first 8-10 weeks of study period and then will start receiving BCI-FES-tongue stimulation rehab therapy.

All participants without UE impairment in Control group 1 will receive 4-6 (minimum 4, up to a maximum of 6) sessions of training on the BCI system and pre- and post MRI and 2 behavioral testing sessions.

Addition of a Control group 2 is consistent with the AHA grants - Twenty four ischemic stroke patients with moderate upper extremity (dominant right hand affected) impairment (score of 1 or 2 on the motor sub-component of the NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) and ARAT score 20-45); no upper extremity injury or conditions that limited use prior to the stroke; and pre-stroke independence with a Modified Rankin Score of 0 or 1), will be recruited in this arm. All participants in this group will receive MR sessions and behavioral testing similar to the Experimental group.

Addition of an Experimental group receiving EEG-BCI-bilateral FES intervention using the recoveriX system: recoveriX is a brain driven rehabilitation system for stroke patients that pairs mental activities with motor functions. Through the EEG-based recoveriX BCI system, the brain receives visual and tactile feedback in real-time, making rehabilitation more effective. A stroke patient imagines a hand movement while receiving visual feedback through a virtual avatar, and tactile feedback through electrical muscle stimulation paired to the patient's imagined movement, with the aim that these patients might regain the volitional ability to grasp following therapy. Unlike the current EEG-BCI-FES intervention that involves stimulation of only the impaired arm, with recoveriX, both arms are simultaneously stimulated during the course of the intervention.

Specific Aims

To determine if functional muscle stimulation of the arms, in addition to non-invasive neurostimulation through the tongue (TDU), directed by electroencephalogram (EEG) output, can increase the extent of stroke recovery as measured by behavioral measures and induce brain plasticity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Primary objective

  • To examine the effect of EEG guided functional muscle stimulation on improvement in upper extremity function

Secondary objective

  • To examine plasticity changes as measured by EEG/fMRI measures before and after EEG guided functional muscle stimulation.
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Keywords

  • aneurysm
  • transient ischemic attack
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 288 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,188 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 157 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Experimental Group):

  • Stroke patients with persistent upper extremity (UE) deficits

Inclusion Criteria (Control Group 1)

  • Stroke patients without UE impairments
  • Participants with risk factors for stroke
  • healthy controls

    • No known neurologic, psychiatric or developmental disability

Inclusion Criteria (Control Group 2)

  • Stroke patients with persistent upper extremity (UE) deficits
  • Moderate upper extremity (dominant right hand affected) impairment (score of 1 or 2 on the motor sub-component of the NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) and ARAT score 20-45)
  • No upper extremity injury or conditions that limited use prior to the stroke
  • Pre-stroke independence with a Modified Rankin Score of 0 or 1, for the standard FES only intervention.

Exclusion Criteria (for all participants):

  • Allergic to electrode gel, surgical tape and metals
  • Participants under treatment for infectious diseases or having apparent oral lesions or inflammation will be excluded from the study
  • Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant during the course of the study will be excluded
  • Participants with for MRI will be offered the opportunity to participate in the interventions study only (e.g. EEG-BCI-FES and behavioral testing)

Exclusion Criteria (for healthy controls)

  • Contraindications for MRI
  • Allergic to electrode gel, surgical tape, and metals.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
288 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group - Immediate BCI Therapy

    EEG - BCI training (closed loop)

    Behavioral: Behavioral Assessments · Other: Magnetic Resonance Imaging · Other: EEG · Device: BCI-FES

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group - Delayed BCI Therapy

    Scanned and tested 4 times over a 10-week period before EEG-BCI training

    Behavioral: Behavioral Assessments · Other: Magnetic Resonance Imaging · Other: EEG · Other: Delay · Device: BCI-FES

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group - RecoveriX

    Recruited from participants who have completed the study intervention

    Other: RecoveriX

  • Active comparator
    Control Group 1

    48 stroke patients, 48 participants with risk factors for stroke, 48 healthy controls receiving 4-6 training sessions on the EEG-BCI, pre- and post- behavioral testing, and MRI

    Behavioral: Behavioral Assessments · Other: Magnetic Resonance Imaging · Other: EEG · Device: BCI-FES

  • Active comparator
    Control Group 2

    24 Stroke Patients with UE impairment receiving standard FES only therapy

    Device: Functional Electric Stimulation (FES)

Interventions

  • DeviceFunctional Electric Stimulation (FES)

    FES uses low energy electrical pulses to artificially generate body movements in individuals with muscle paralysis. FES can be used to generate muscle contraction in otherwise paralyzed limbs to restore function.

  • BehavioralBehavioral Assessments

    These assessments will include measures of upper extremity motor assessments, standard stroke scales, and measures of activities of daily living.

  • OtherMagnetic Resonance Imaging

    A functional magnetic resonance image will be collected.

  • OtherEEG

    EEG electrodes will be attached to the participant's scalp using a standard, commercially available electrode cap. Proper electrode placement is made according to the international 10-20 system, ensuring complete electrode coverage over sensorimotor cortex.

    Also known as: Electroencephalography

  • OtherRecoveriX

    RecoveriX is a brain driven rehabilitation system for stroke patients that pairs mental activities with motor functions.

  • OtherDelay

    10 week delay before intervention

  • DeviceBCI-FES
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Action Research Arm Test Scores

    The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is designed for evaluation of upper extremity function. This test consists of sections for Grasp, Grip, Pinch and Gross Movements and comprise a total of 19 tests. Each test is scored 0-3 where 0 is 'no movement' and 3 is 'the movement is performed normally'. Each section is scored separately and the scores added for a total possible range of scores from 0-57 where the higher the score, the complete and efficient the movement. ARAT will be assessed at baseline and end of study (approximately 4 months)

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Response Strength

    The change in the strength of the EEG response before and after functional stimulation during left arm imagery with respect to right arm imagery.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Signal change in functional MRI

    To compare the percent signal change in the functional MRI activations before and after functional stimulation.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Young BM, Stamm JM, Song J, Remsik AB, Nair VA, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Brain-Computer Interface Training after Stroke Affects Patterns of Brain-Behavior Relationships in Corticospinal Motor Fibers. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 16;10:457. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00457. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27695404 ↗
  • Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Walton LM, Remsik A, Song J, Nair VA, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Dose-response relationships using brain-computer interface technology impact stroke rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 23;9:361. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00361. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26157378 ↗
  • Song J, Nair VA, Young BM, Walton LM, Nigogosyan Z, Remsik A, Tyler ME, Farrar-Edwards D, Caldera KE, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. DTI measures track and predict motor function outcomes in stroke rehabilitation utilizing BCI technology. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 27;9:195. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00195. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25964753 ↗
  • Song J, Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Walton LM, Nair VA, Grogan SW, Tyler ME, Farrar-Edwards D, Caldera KE, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Characterizing relationships of DTI, fMRI, and motor recovery in stroke rehabilitation utilizing brain-computer interface technology. Front Neuroeng. 2014 Jul 29;7:31. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00031. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25120466 ↗
  • Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Nair VA, Walton LM, Song J, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Case report: post-stroke interventional BCI rehabilitation in an individual with preexisting sensorineural disability. Front Neuroeng. 2014 Jun 24;7:18. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00018. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25009491 ↗
  • Remsik AB, Williams L Jr, Gjini K, Dodd K, Thoma J, Jacobson T, Walczak M, McMillan M, Rajan S, Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Advani H, Mohanty R, Tellapragada N, Allen J, Mazrooyisebdani M, Walton LM, van Kan PLE, Kang TJ, Sattin JA, Nair VA, Edwards DF, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Ipsilesional Mu Rhythm Desynchronization and Changes in Motor Behavior Following Post Stroke BCI Intervention for Motor Rehabilitation. Front Neurosci. 2019 Mar 6;13:53. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00053. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30899211 ↗
  • Remsik AB, Dodd K, Williams L Jr, Thoma J, Jacobson T, Allen JD, Advani H, Mohanty R, McMillan M, Rajan S, Walczak M, Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Rivera CA, Mazrooyisebdani M, Tellapragada N, Walton LM, Gjini K, van Kan PLE, Kang TJ, Sattin JA, Nair VA, Edwards DF, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Behavioral Outcomes Following Brain-Computer Interface Intervention for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurosci. 2018 Nov 8;12:752. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00752. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30467461 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2010 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 204 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 204 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 6, 2014
First posted
Mar 27, 2014
StartActual
Jun 2010
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02098265
Collaborators
American Heart Association
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2014
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Radiology Studies
Contact
Radstudy@uwhealth.org
608-282-8349
Vivek Prabhakaran, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion