ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02007733DHAKAUpdated Feb 23, 2023

DeHydration: Assessing Kids Accurately

An observational study in Severe Dehydration, sponsored by Rhode Island Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 1 Month to 60 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-23.

Sponsored by Rhode Island Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,396
Ages
1 Month to 60 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diarrhea is the second leading cause of death in children worldwide, and accurately assessing dehydration status remains a crucial step in preventing morbidity and mortality from this disease. While children with severe dehydration require immediate treatment with intravenous fluids, children with mild to moderate dehydration have a significant reduction in hospital length of stay and fewer adverse events when treated with relatively inexpensive oral rehydration solution (ORS). While several clinical scales have been developed for assessing dehydration in children, these scales have never been prospectively validated in a low-income country setting, where the vast majority of diarrhea morbidity and mortality occurs in children.

The investigators hypothesize that new clinical and ultrasound-based tools will improve the diagnosis of severe dehydration in children with diarrhea in low-income countries, reducing the morbidity and mortality that occurs as a result of under-diagnosis of severe dehydration as well as the adverse events and inappropriate utilization of scarce resources that occurs as a result of over-diagnosis of severe dehydration.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Children under five experience 1.7 billion episodes of diarrhea each year, resulting in 36 million cases of severe disease and 700,000 deaths, or 10% of all child deaths worldwide. As the severity of diarrheal disease can vary quite widely in children, accurately assessing dehydration status remains a crucial step in preventing morbidity and mortality. While children with severe dehydration require immediate treatment with intravenous fluids to prevent hemodynamic compromise, organ ischemia, and death, children with mild to moderate dehydration have a significant reduction in hospital length of stay and fewer adverse events when treated with relatively inexpensive oral rehydration solution (ORS). The World Health Organization (WHO), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) recommend separating children with acute diarrhea into three groups to determine management based on the presence or absence of various clinical signs: no dehydration (\<3%), some dehydration (3-9%), and severe dehydration (>9%). These authorities recommend treating children with some dehydration with ORS and limiting IV hydration to children with severe dehydration, in order to prevent the inappropriate utilization of scarce hospital resources and the adverse events associated with a more liberal use of IV hydration in children. However, no clinical prediction model for severe dehydration has ever been empirically derived and validated in a developing world setting, where the vast majority of diarrheal deaths occur in children each year.

Study Objectives:

As part of this study, the investigators will derive a new clinical prediction rule for severe dehydration in children with diarrhea in the developing world. In addition, the investigators will validate and assess the reliability of ultrasound of the inferior vena cava (IVC) for predicting severe dehydration in children with diarrhea. Finally, the investigators will compare the accuracy of each of these new diagnostic tools to that of the WHO scale, the current standard for assessing dehydration in most low-income countries.

Study Design:

The investigators will enroll a prospective cohort of children under five admitted with diarrhea and dehydration to the Dhaka Hospital of the International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B). Research staff will identify eligible children on arrival and obtain informed consent from their guardian. Children will be weighed on arrival and assessed clinically for the presence or absence of signs of dehydration. A brief ultrasound of the IVC will also be performed. Children will then be rehydrated according to standard hospital protocols, with their weight checked regularly until they achieve a stable, post-hydration weight. Greater than 9% difference between admission weight and stable weight (or post-illness weight) will be considered the gold standard for severe dehydration, against which the investigators will determine the accuracy of our new clinical and ultrasound-based assessment tools.

Ethical Protection of Human Subjects:

Children enrolled are very unlikely to be exposed to any additional risks or discomforts, either mental or physical, as a result of participating in this study. Study procedures will include physical exam and ultrasound, neither of which will expose children to increased harm, and study procedures will not delay any immediately necessary care, such as IV fluids. All data collected will be kept strictly confidential in a password-protected database. In addition to obtaining ethical approval from the Lifespan Institutional Review Board (IRB), the investigators have also already obtained approval from the ICDDR,B Ethical Review Committee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Dehydration

Keywords

  • Diarrhea
  • Dehydration
  • Children
  • Resuscitation
  • Clinical Prediction Rule
  • Low Income Country
  • Bangladesh
03

In context

Dehydration

208 studies on the registry are indexed under Dehydration; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,396 is above the median of 102 across 49 observational studies indexed under Dehydration.

Browse Dehydration studies →

Lead sponsor

Rhode Island Hospital is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month to 60 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Children under five with acute diarrhea observed in the rehydration ward of the Dhaka Hospital of ICDDR,B.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 5 years (60 months) or younger
  2. History of diarrhoea (defined as 3 or more loose stools per day)
  3. Children observed in the rehydration ward

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic diarrhoea (greater than 2 week duration)
  2. Clear alternative diagnosis to gastroenteritis on presentation
  3. Previously enroled in this research study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,396 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Derivation Cohort

    The derivation cohort includes patients enrolled in the first phase of the study, from February 2014 to June 2014. All children enrolled in this study will receive the same interventions, which include collection of regular weights to establish percent weight change with rehydration, clinical assessment of dehydration status, and ultrasound of the IVC and aorta.

    Other: Serial Weights · Other: IVC/Aorta Ultrasound · Other: Clinical Assessment

  • Validation Cohort

    The validation cohort includes patients enrolled in the second phase of the study, from March 2015 to May 2015. All children enrolled in this study will receive the same interventions, which include collection of regular weights to establish percent weight change with rehydration, clinical assessment of dehydration status, and ultrasound of the IVC and aorta.

    Other: Serial Weights · Other: Clinical Assessment

Interventions

  • OtherSerial Weights

    We will collect serial weights on all children enrolled in this study.

  • OtherIVC/Aorta Ultrasound

    We will perform an ultrasound assessment of the IVC and Aorta size in each child enrolled.

  • OtherClinical Assessment

    We will perform a clinical assessment of dehydration status in each child enrolled in the study, as well as collect data on mid-upper arm circumference, length, symptoms and demographic information.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area under the Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve for predictors of severe diarrheal disease

    We will follow all enrolled children for up to a maximum of 2 weeks to assess the percent change between initial dehydrated weight and stable rehydration weight or post-illness weight. Greater than 9% weight change or death prior to achieving stable weight will be our criterion standard for severe disease. We will then determine the area under the Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves for our newly derived clinical scale (DHAKA scale); for ultrasound of the IVC to Aorta ratio; and for the WHO scale as predictors of severe diarrheal disease in children enrolled in our study.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area under the receiver operating curve for predictors of some dehydration

    We will follow all enrolled children for up to a maximum of 2 weeks to assess the percent change between initial dehydrated weight and stable rehydration weight or post-illness weight. 3-9% weight change between arrival and stable weight or post-illness weight will be our criterion standard for some dehydration. We will then determine the area under the Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves for our newly derived clinical scale (DHAKA scale); for ultrasound of the IVC to Aorta ratio; and for the WHO scale as predictors of some dehydration in children enrolled in our study.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Sub-group analyses

    We will perform subgroup analyses for all of our predictors of dehydration in children by age, nutrition status, and type of diarrhea (watery versus bloody).

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dhaka Hospital of ICDDR,B
    Dhaka, Bangladesh
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Levine AC, Glavis-Bloom J, Modi P, Nasrin S, Rege S, Chu C, Schmid CH, Alam NH. Empirically Derived Dehydration Scoring and Decision Tree Models for Children With Diarrhea: Assessment and Internal Validation in a Prospective Cohort Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Aug 18;3(3):405-18. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00097. PubMed 26374802 ↗
  • Levine AC, Glavis-Bloom J, Modi P, Nasrin S, Atika B, Rege S, Robertson S, Schmid CH, Alam NH. External validation of the DHAKA score and comparison with the current IMCI algorithm for the assessment of dehydration in children with diarrhoea: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Oct;4(10):e744-51. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30150-4. Epub 2016 Aug 23. PubMed 27567350 ↗
  • Modi P, Nasrin S, Hawes M, Glavis-Bloom J, Alam NH, Hossain MI, Levine AC. Midupper Arm Circumference Outperforms Weight-Based Measures of Nutritional Status in Children with Diarrhea. J Nutr. 2015 Jul;145(7):1582-7. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.209718. Epub 2015 May 13. PubMed 25972523 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2014, a primary completion of May 2015 and a completion of Jun 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 25, 2013
First posted
Dec 11, 2013
Start
Feb 2014
Primary completionActual
May 2015
CompletionActual
Jun 2015
Last update
Feb 23, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02007733
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2013
Start date
Feb 2014
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Feb 23, 2023

Study contacts

Adam C. Levine, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Brown University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion