ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06439953Updated Aug 14, 2026

Irrisept Solution for Instrumented Spine Surgery

An interventional study of Chlorhexidine gluconate solution and Vancomycin in Post-Op Complication, Spine Surgery and Site Infection, sponsored by Rhode Island Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-14.

Primary conditionSurgical Wound InfectionRegistry: Postoperative ComplicationsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Postoperative Complications — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Surgical Wound Infection
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Surgical Wound Infection, a narrower term within Postoperative Complications.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Rhode Island Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Various spine surgeons perform wound irrigation using saline mixed with vancomycin, relying on mechanical debridement of non-viable tissue, physical disruption of biofilm, and bacteriostatic effect against gram positive flora. When used as a powder, topical application of vancomycin has demonstrated increased risk of symptomatic seroma formation, which is an adverse outcome that often requires bedside or intra-operative aspiration. Broad-spectrum antiseptic agents, such as Irrisept, offer bacteriocidal properties to eliminate hardware inoculation, thereby minimizing the risk of deep space infection, while obviating the risk of seroma development.

Read the detailed description

Spinal instrumentation remains the standard of care in the treatment of various traumatic, oncologic, and degenerative spinal pathologies, often requiring the implantation of hardware to stabilize the bony column. In the setting of an aging patient population and expanding indications for instrumentation in younger patients, the number of spinal operations performed has risen substantially within the past decade. Although these procedures have proven to enhance patient quality of life, spinal instrumentation is not without post-operative complication, most notable of which are surgical site infection, seroma formation, and wound breakdown. Such complications can result in notable negative sequelae. Recurrent seroma may compress underlying neurologic structures or increase pressure along the incision, thereby precipitating wound dehiscence and inoculation of the surgical site with pathogenic organisms. Deep space infections often result in prolonged hospitalization, long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, hardware removal, and permanent disability, which increases cost burden at the patient and hospital level. As such, preventative strategies to reduce the rate of complications following spinal instrumentation remain paramount. Within recent years, attention has turned to various irrigation methods to terminally sterilize prosthetic devices and wound beds, thereby minimizing bacterial colonization and biofilm formation that would otherwise predispose infection.

Irrisept (Irrimax Corporation, Gainesville, Florida) is a solution comprised of 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate in 99.95% sterile water administered through a proprietary, low-pressure lavage mechanism that has demonstrated efficacy as a bacteriocidal agent in orthopedic hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Whereas other antiseptic irrigation solutions, such as vancomycin-saline lavage, are routinely used to prevent surgical site infection, relative inertness against gram negative organisms and potential predisposition toward seroma formation render them non-ideal for use in spine surgery. Despite the utility of dilute chlorhexidine gluconate as a prophylactic irrigant, there exist gaps in knowledge with regard to the efficacy of Irrisept to prevent post-operative complications following spinal instrumentation. The central hypothesis of this proposal is that prophylactic use of Irrisept irrigation will result in fewer surgical site infections, clinically significant seromas, and gram negative or atypical infections when compared to standard of care irrigation (vancomycin-saline solution with or without topical vancomycin powder).

Proposed is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing rates of post-operative complications following use of Irrisept irrigation alone versus vancomycin-saline lavage with or without topical vancomycin powder (standard of care) in patients aged 18 years or older who undergo posterior cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spinal instrumentation for various indications (deformity, malignancy, degenerative pathology, and trauma) at Rhode Island Hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-Op Complication
  • Spine Surgery
  • Site Infection
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Spinal Instrumentation
  • Index Spinal Instrumentation
  • Layer-by-Layer Closure
  • Locoregional Flap-Based Closure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection Reclassified

745 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 200 across 581 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Rhode Island Hospital is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.

Compared within Surgical Wound Infection, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Postoperative Complications. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 18+ years old
  • Indications: deformity, oncologic, degenerative, trauma
  • Standard layer-by-layer closure
  • Locoregional flap-based closure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute/chronic open wounds (spine or non-spine)
  • On-going non-spinal infection within 30 days of index operation
  • Concurrent antibiotic use (for spine or non-spine infections)
  • History of prior spinal infection
  • Allergy to vancomycin or chlorhexidine
  • Suspicion for osteomyelitis
  • Other surgery within 90 days post-operatively fromm index
  • Concurrent enrollment in other trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Irrisept Irrigation

    Patients scheduled to undergo spinal instrumentation will receive intra-operative Irrisept irrigation.

    Device: Chlorhexidine gluconate solution

  • Active comparator
    Vancomycin-saline Irrigation

    Patients scheduled to undergo spinal instrumentation will receive intra-operative irrigation using vancomycin-saline irrigation.

    Drug: Vancomycin

Interventions

  • DeviceChlorhexidine gluconate solution

    Evaluating the prophylactic use of Irrisept irrigation alone

    Also known as: Irrisept irrigation

  • Evaluating the use of versus vancomycin-saline irrigation with or without topical vancomycin

    Also known as: Vancomycin-saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of surgical site infection

    Development of infection after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 90 days post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Capture mortality rates after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

  2. Duration of index hospitalization

    Capture duration of index hospitalization after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

  3. Occurrence of 30-day readmission

    Capture 30-day readmission rates after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 30 days post-operatively

  4. Occurrence of wound dehiscence

    Capture all incidences of wound dehiscence after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

  5. Time to closed suction drain removal

    Capture the time interval to closed suction drain removal after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

  6. Presence of atypical micro-organisms on wound fluid laboratory culture

    Capture the presence of atypical micro-organisms after index spinal instrumentation

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

  7. Cost of spine surgery care from surgery to 12-month post-operative follow up

    Consider associated total costs of spinal instrumentation after index spinal instrumentation by comparing total surgical costs and post-surgical outcome expenses of those with and without Irrisept irrigation use

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Rhode Island Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
    Recruiting
    • Alexander Chernysh · ContactAChernysh@Lifespan.org · 401-444-9868
    • Jared S. Fridley, MD · Principal investigator
    • Albert S. Woo, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1259-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.338. PubMed 20371784 ↗
  • Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS. Trends in Lumbar Fusion Procedure Rates and Associated Hospital Costs for Degenerative Spinal Diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):369-376. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822. PubMed 30074971 ↗
  • Jain NK, Dao K, Ortiz AO. Radiologic evaluation and management of postoperative spine paraspinal fluid collections. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014 May;24(2):375-89. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2014.01.001. PubMed 24792615 ↗
  • Blumberg TJ, Woelber E, Bellabarba C, Bransford R, Spina N. Predictors of increased cost and length of stay in the treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infection. Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.173. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28739477 ↗
  • de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun;37(5):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Apr 23. PubMed 19398246 ↗
  • Torres KA, Konrade E, White J, Tavares Junior MCM, Bunch JT, Burton D, Jackson RS, Birlingmair J, Carlson BB. Irrigation techniques used in spine surgery for surgical site infection prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 26;23(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05763-2. PubMed 36008858 ↗
  • Yao R, Tan T, Tee JW, Street J. Prophylaxis of surgical site infection in adult spine surgery: A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jun;52:5-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 30. PubMed 29609860 ↗
  • Kapadia BH, Zhou PL, Jauregui JJ, Mont MA. Does Preadmission Cutaneous Chlorhexidine Preparation Reduce Surgical Site Infections After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1592-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4767-6. PubMed 26956247 ↗
  • Johnson AJ, Kapadia BH, Daley JA, Molina CB, Mont MA. Chlorhexidine reduces infections in knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun;26(3):213-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329232. Epub 2012 Nov 12. PubMed 23288739 ↗
  • Lung BE, Le R, Callan K, McLellan M, Issagholian L, Yi J, McMaster WC, Yang S, So DH. Chlorhexidine gluconate lavage during total joint arthroplasty may improve wound healing compared to dilute betadine. J Exp Orthop. 2022 Jul 10;9(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00503-w. PubMed 35819733 ↗
  • Ghobrial GM, Cadotte DW, Williams K Jr, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS. Complications from the use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spinal surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E11. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15258. PubMed 26424335 ↗
  • Youssef JA, Orndorff DG, Scott MA, Ebner RE, Knewitz AP. Sterile Seroma Resulting from Multilevel XLIF Procedure as Possible Adverse Effect of Prophylactic Vancomycin Powder: A Case Report. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2014 Oct;5(2):127-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1386754. PubMed 25364326 ↗
  • Mallet C, Meissburger V, Caseris M, Happiette A, Chinnappa J, Bonacorsi S, Simon AL, Ilharreborde B. Does the use of intrawound povidone-iodine irrigation and local vancomycin powder impact surgical site infection rate in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery? Eur Spine J. 2022 Nov;31(11):3020-3028. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07340-6. Epub 2022 Aug 1. PubMed 35913622 ↗
  • Schroeder JE, Girardi FP, Sandhu H, Weinstein J, Cammisa FP, Sama A. The use of local vancomycin powder in degenerative spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1029-33. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4119-3. Epub 2015 Aug 7. PubMed 26249032 ↗
  • Lemans JVC, Oner FC, Wijdicks SPJ, Ekkelenkamp MB, Vogely HC, Kruyt MC. The efficacy of intrawound vancomycin powder and povidone-iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infections in complex instrumented spine surgery. Spine J. 2019 Oct;19(10):1648-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.592. Epub 2019 May 31. PubMed 31158503 ↗
  • Cohen LE, Fullerton N, Mundy LR, Weinstein AL, Fu KM, Ketner JJ, Hartl R, Spector JA. Optimizing Successful Outcomes in Complex Spine Reconstruction Using Local Muscle Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan;137(1):295-301. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001875. PubMed 26710033 ↗
  • Rinkinen JR, Weitzman RE, Clain JB, Lans J, Shin JH, Eberlin KR. Locoregional Flap Closure for High-risk Multilevel Spine Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 21;8(4):e2751. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002751. eCollection 2020 Apr. PubMed 32440420 ↗
  • Hochberg J, Ardenghy M, Yuen J, Gonzalez-Cruz R, Miura Y, Conrado RM, Pait TG. Muscle and musculocutaneous flap coverage of exposed spinal fusion devices. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Aug;102(2):385-9; discussion 390-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199808000-00013. PubMed 9703074 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06439953
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 14, 2026

Study contacts

Alexander Chernysh
Contact
AChernysh@lifespan.org
401-444-9868
Owen Leary
Contact
owen.leary@lifespan.org
401-6068388
Jared S. Fridley, MD
principal investigator · Rhode Island Hospital
Albert S. Woo, MD
principal investigator · Rhode Island Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion