ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01994733TARGETUpdated Jun 23, 2015

Two phosphAte taRGets in End-stage Renal Disease Trial (TARGET)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Calcium carbonate ( Intensive phosphate control) and Calcium carbonate (Liberalized phosphate control) in End-stage Renal Disease, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Completed at 5 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-23.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have elevated serum phosphate (P) levels have significantly higher mortality rates compared to those with normal P. In patients receiving conventional dialysis regimens, serum P may be lowered through dietary intervention and use of P binders, though these have potentially important side effects and may adversely impact quality of life. Whether lowering P, and / or targeting specific P levels improve survival and clinical outcomes is unknown. Despite this uncertainty, over 90% of patients with ESRD receive P lowering therapy and guidelines for the care of patients with ESRD are increasingly calling for more aggressive phosphate lowering. This intensive P lowering results in extra medications (and their associated side-effects), and higher health care costs. We are uncertain whether the intensification of P control results in measurable benefits to patients with ESRD. The overall goal of this pilot trial is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of intensive vs liberalized phosphate control among hemodialysis recipients.

02

Conditions studied

  • End-stage Renal Disease

Keywords

  • end-stage renal disease
  • hemodialysis
  • mineral metabolism
  • serum phosphate
  • phosphate binders
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic

2,121 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 264 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 55 across 1,582 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 444 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 yrs
  2. Receiving chronic hemodialysis for > 90 days,
  3. Dialysis prescription is currently no more than 4 sessions per week and prescribed as 3-5 hrs per session
  4. Most recent P value 1.30-2.50 mmol/L
  5. Receipt of a calcium-based P binder

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is booked (with a known surgical date) for a live donor kidney transplant in the next 26 weeks
  2. Planned switch to a dialysis schedule that involves > 16 hours per week of therapy within the next 26 weeks.
  3. Planned switch to peritoneal dialysis within the next 26 weeks
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Albumin-corrected serum calcium > 2.60 mmol/L in the past year requiring reduction of the calcium carbonate dose
  6. History of calciphylaxis
  7. Attending nephrologist believes that an otherwise eligible patient is mandated- on clinical grounds- to have a P value that is targeted to \< 1.50 mmol/L or > 2.00 mmol/L
  8. Attending nephrologist believes an otherwise eligible patient is not a candidate for escalation of the current calcium dose
  9. Co-enrollment in a clinical trial where the intervention is deemed to interfere with the adherence, safety or efficacy of the intervention provided herein
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intensive phosphate control

    Individuals randomized to this arm will be exposed to a treatment strategy that targets a P of \< 1.50 mmol/L, reflecting the recommendations of current guidelines. Titration of the calcium carbonate dose will be the core of this approach and this will be complemented by usual recommendations regarding dietary P restriction. Dietitians will be available to provide counseling with regards to any aspect of the end-stage renal disease diet, as per usual dialysis unit practice.

    Drug: Calcium carbonate ( Intensive phosphate control)

  • Active comparator
    Liberalized phosphate control

    Individuals in this arm will be exposed to a treatment strategy that allows P to rise above 2.00 mmol/L. This will be accomplished through structured reduction of P binders already in use (as per the algorithm detailed below). "Rescue" P binding will be instituted if P rises above 2.50 mmol/L. Dietitians will be available to provide counseling regarding any aspect of the end-stage renal disease diet, as per usual dialysis unit practice, but will not provide counseling on dietary P restriction unless the P rises above 2.50 mmol/L.

    Drug: Calcium carbonate (Liberalized phosphate control)

Interventions

  • Individuals randomized to this arm will be exposed to a treatment strategy that targets a P of \< 1.50 mmol/L, reflecting the recommendations of current guidelines. Titration of the calcium carbonate dose will be the core of this approach and this will be complemented by usual recommendations regarding dietary P restriction. Dietitians will be available to provide counseling with regards to any aspect of the end-stage renal disease diet, as per usual dialysis unit practice

    Also known as: Calcium carbonate

  • DrugCalcium carbonate (Liberalized phosphate control)

    Individuals in this arm will be exposed to a treatment strategy that allows P to rise above 2.00 mmol/L. This will be accomplished through structured reduction of P binders already in use (as per the algorithm detailed below). "Rescue" P binding will be instituted if P rises above 2.50 mmol/L. Dietitians will be available to provide counseling regarding any aspect of the end-stage renal disease diet, as per usual dialysis unit practice, but will not provide counseling on dietary P restriction unless the P rises above 2.50 mmol/L.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Serum phosphate concentration

    Time frame: 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients who successfully achieved target serum P at week 26 based on the arm to which they were randomized

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  2. Treatment compliance as defined by taking the study medication at least 80% of the time

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  3. Number of serious adverse events

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  4. Number of hospitalizations for vascular reasons that are unrelated to dialysis access

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  5. Proportion of patients with a vascular death or non-fatal vascular event

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  6. Proportion of patients developing serum calcium > 2.60 mmol/L

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  7. Number of fractures

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  8. Number of patients developing calcific uremic arteriolopathy (ie, calciphylaxis)

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  9. Change in quality-of-life

    Time frame: 26 weeks

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
  • Capital District Health Authority
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1V7, Canada
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario N6G 2V4, Canada
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2014, a primary completion of Apr 2015 and a completion of Apr 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2013
First posted
Nov 26, 2013
Start
Jan 2014
Primary completionActual
Apr 2015
CompletionActual
Apr 2015
Last update
Jun 23, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01994733
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Ron Wald (Staff Physician, Division of Nephrology; Scientist, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2013
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
Jun 23, 2015

Study contacts

Ron Wald, MDCM
principal investigator · Unity Health Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Calcium Carbonate

Start the discussion