CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01987895Updated Feb 4, 2025Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Cadazolid Versus Vancomycin in Subjects With Clostridium Difficile - Associated Diarrhea

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cadazolid and Vancomycin in Clostridium Difficile Infection, sponsored by Actelion. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-04.

Sponsored by Actelion · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
632
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study is conducted to assess the efficacy of cadazolid compared to vancomycin in subjects with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD).

Read the detailed description

Subjects selected to participate in the study are treated either with cadazolid or vancomycin for 10 days. At the end of treatment, clinical cure is assessed; subjects are then followed-up to assess any disease recurrence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Clostridium Difficile Infection

Keywords

  • Post-antibiotic diarrhea
  • Clostridium difficile infection
03

In context

Clostridium Infections

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Clostridium Infections; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 632 is above the median of 65 across 233 interventional studies indexed under Clostridium Infections.

Browse Clostridium Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Actelion is the lead sponsor of 140 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed Informed Consent.
  • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age. Females of childbearing potential must agree to use an adequate and reliable method of contraception.
  • Subject with a diagnosis of mild-moderate or severe CDAD (first occurrence or first recurrence within 3 months) with: Diarrhea: a change in bowel habits with > 3 liquid or unformed bowel movements (UBM) within 24 hours prior to randomization, AND Positive C. difficile toxin test on a stool sample produced within 72 hours prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than one previous episode of CDAD in the 3-month period prior to randomization.
  • Evidence of life-threatening or fulminant CDAD.
  • Likelihood of death within 72 hours from any cause.
  • History of inflammatory colitides, chronic abdominal pain, or chronic diarrhea.
  • Antimicrobial treatment active against CDAD administered for > 24 hours except for metronidazole treatment failures (MTF)
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to study drugs, oxazolidinones, or quinolones.
  • Unable or unwilling to comply with all protocol requirements.
  • Any circumstances or conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect full participation in the study or compliance with the protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
632 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cadazolid

    Subjects receive oral cadazolid 250 mg twice daily (bid) and oral vancomycin-matching placebo 4 times per day (qid) for 10 days

    Drug: Cadazolid · Drug: Vancomycin-matching placebo

  • Active comparator
    Vancomycin

    Subjects receive oral vancomycin 125 mg qid and oral cadazolid-matching placebo bid for 10 days

    Drug: Vancomycin · Drug: Cadazolid-matching placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCadazolid

    Cadazolid 250 mg as oral suspension twice daily.

    Also known as: ACT-179811

  • DrugVancomycin

    Vancomycin 125 mg as oral capsules 4 times daily.

    Also known as: Vancocin

  • DrugCadazolid-matching placebo

    Placebo matching cadazolid and administered orally twice daily

  • DrugVancomycin-matching placebo

    Placebo capsules matching vancomycin and administered orally 4 times per day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population

    Clinical Cure (CC) is defined as: • Resolution of Diarrhea (≤ 3 unformed bowel movement per day for at least 2 consecutive days) on study treatment and maintained for 2 days after end-of-treatment (EOT), AND • No additional antimicrobial treatment active against Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) or fecal microbiota transplant between first dose of study drug and 2 days after EOT. CCR is the percentage of subjects with Clinical Cure. Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT) are reported below.

    Time frame: Up to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)

  2. Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol Population

    Clinical Cure (CC) is defined as: • Resolution of Diarrhea (≤ 3 unformed bowel movement per day for at least 2 consecutive days) on study treatment and maintained for 2 days after end-of-treatment (EOT), AND • No additional antimicrobial treatment active against Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) or fecal microbiota transplant between first dose of study drug and 2 days after EOT. CCR is the percentage of subjects with Clinical Cure. Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the per-protocol set (PPS) are reported below.

    Time frame: Up to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population

    Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. SCR is the percentage of subjects with Sustained Cure. The main analysis is performed on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT).

    Time frame: Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)

  2. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea

    Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD) is defined as no more than 3 unformed bowel movements per day for at least two consecutive days for subjects on study treatment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates (KM estimates) for having an event (ROD) are reported for each time point.

    Time frame: Up to Day 10

  3. Change From Baseline to Day 3 in Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Daily Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome (CDI-DaySyms PRO) Domain Scores

    CDI-DaySyms PRO is a questionnaire assessing 10 symptoms relevant to subjects with CDAD and grouped into 3 domains: Diarrhea symptoms, Abdominal symptoms and Systemic/Other. The subjects rate the severity of each item as None, Mild, Moderate, Severe or Very severe, converted to numeric scores from 0 to 4, respectively. The daily domain score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing responses for that domain on that day. A negative value for change from baseline corresponds to an improvement in domain score. The three domains are evaluated in a hierarchical manner, starting with Diarrhea Symptoms, then Abdominal Symptoms, and finally Systemic/Other Symptoms. The least squares means (LSM) are computed on the scores.

    Time frame: Day 1 (baseline) and Day 3

Other outcomes

  1. Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population

    ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with clinical response assessed as cured according to the investigator's own judgement. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as not cured for the analysis. ICR rate is used as a supportive measure of the primary efficacy endpoint (CCR). Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT) are reported below.

    Time frame: Up to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)

  2. Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Per-protocol Population

    ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with clinical response assessed as cured according to the investigator's own judgement. ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with ICR assessed as cured. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as not cured for the analysis. ICR rate is used as a supportive measure of the primary efficacy endpoint (CCR). Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the per-protocol set (PPS) are reported below.

    Time frame: Up to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)

  3. Investigator's Assessment of Sustained Response Rate (ISR Rate) at Visit 5

    ISR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects assessed as Sustained Cure at Visit 5, according to the investigator's own judgement. Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as having 'Not Sustained Cure' for the analysis. ISR rate is used as a supportive measure of the secondary efficacy endpoint (SCR). Analyses are performed on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT).

    Time frame: Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28 to 32 days)

  4. Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Per-protocol Population

    Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. SCR is the percentage of subjects with Sustained Cure. The analyses performed on the modified intent-to- treat set (mITT) are repeated on the per-protocol set (PPS) for sensitivity.

    Time frame: Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)

  5. Recurrence Rate

    Recurrence is defined as the occurrence of a new episode of diarrhea (\> 3 unformed bowel movements on any day between end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days ) Recurrence rates is the percentage of subjects assessed as having a recurrence out of subjects with Clinical Cure.

    Time frame: Between Day 13 and Day 40 on average (from end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days)

07

Results

Posted May 4, 2018

Participant flow

904 patients at 70 sites in 12 countries were screened, among whom 632 were enrolled in the IMPACT 1 trial at 64 sites located in North \& South America, Europe and Australia.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCadazolidVancomycin
Started306326
Completed276296
Not completed3030
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject127
Withdrew: Physician decision810
Withdrew: Death77
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up35
Withdrew: Randomized before giving ic01

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population

Clinical Cure (CC) is defined as: • Resolution of Diarrhea (≤ 3 unformed bowel movement per day for at least 2 consecutive days) on study treatment and maintained for 2 days after end-of-treatment (EOT), AND • No additional antimicrobial treatment active against Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) or fecal microbiota transplant between first dose of study drug and 2 days after EOT. CCR is the percentage of subjects with Clinical Cure. Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT) are reported below.

Time frame:
Up to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population83.8 (79.2 to 87.5)85.2 (80.9 to 88.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: -1.4 · 95% CI -7.2 to 4.3CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: -2.4 · 95% CI -8.1 to 3.2CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
PrimaryClinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol Population

Clinical Cure (CC) is defined as: • Resolution of Diarrhea (≤ 3 unformed bowel movement per day for at least 2 consecutive days) on study treatment and maintained for 2 days after end-of-treatment (EOT), AND • No additional antimicrobial treatment active against Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) or fecal microbiota transplant between first dose of study drug and 2 days after EOT. CCR is the percentage of subjects with Clinical Cure. Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the per-protocol set (PPS) are reported below.

Time frame:
Up to Day 12 on average (end-of-treatment + 2 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol Population
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Clinical Cure Rate (CCR) in the Per-protocol Population87.6 (83.2 to 90.9)91.7 (87.9 to 94.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: -4.1 · 95% CI -9.2 to 1.0CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson' score method
SecondarySustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population

Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. SCR is the percentage of subjects with Sustained Cure. The main analysis is performed on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT).

Time frame:
Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population65.6 (60.0 to 70.7)62.3 (56.8 to 67.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: 3.3 · 95% CI -4.3 to 10.8CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea

Resolution of Diarrhea (ROD) is defined as no more than 3 unformed bowel movements per day for at least two consecutive days for subjects on study treatment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates (KM estimates) for having an event (ROD) are reported for each time point.

Time frame:
Up to Day 10
Reported as:
Number · KM estimate (%)
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Resolution of Diarrhea
KM estimate (%)CadazolidVancomycin
Day 146.7 (41.2 to 52.5)45.9 (40.6 to 51.6)
Day 262.6 (57.2 to 68.0)60.7 (55.4 to 66.1)
Day 369.9 (64.6 to 74.9)71.1 (66.0 to 76.0)
Day 472.8 (67.7 to 77.7)77.7 (73.0 to 82.1)
Day 577.8 (73.0 to 82.3)80.2 (75.6 to 84.4)
Day 681.1 (76.5 to 85.3)81.8 (77.3 to 85.8)
Day 782.5 (78.0 to 86.5)84.6 (80.4 to 88.3)
Day 883.4 (79.0 to 87.4)85.2 (81.1 to 88.9)
Day 983.8 (79.4 to 87.7)85.2 (81.1 to 88.9)
Day 1083.8 (79.4 to 87.7)85.2 (81.1 to 88.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Log Rank · p = 0.6016 (two-sided p-value (alpha 5%) based on log-rank test stratified by first occurrence / first recurrence and geographical region.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.96 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Day 3 in Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Daily Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome (CDI-DaySyms PRO) Domain Scores

CDI-DaySyms PRO is a questionnaire assessing 10 symptoms relevant to subjects with CDAD and grouped into 3 domains: Diarrhea symptoms, Abdominal symptoms and Systemic/Other. The subjects rate the severity of each item as None, Mild, Moderate, Severe or Very severe, converted to numeric scores from 0 to 4, respectively. The daily domain score is calculated as the mean of the non-missing responses for that domain on that day. A negative value for change from baseline corresponds to an improvement in domain score. The three domains are evaluated in a hierarchical manner, starting with Diarrhea Symptoms, then Abdominal Symptoms, and finally Systemic/Other Symptoms. The least squares means (LSM) are computed on the scores.

Time frame:
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 3
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Day 3 in Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Daily Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome (CDI-DaySyms PRO) Domain Scores
Score on a scaleCadazolidVancomycin
Diarrhea symptoms-1.233 (-1.37 to -1.09)-1.235 (-1.37 to -1.10)
Abdominal symptoms-0.623 (-0.74 to -0.51)-0.710 (-0.82 to -0.60)
Other symptoms-0.639 (-0.74 to -0.54)-0.689 (-0.79 to -0.59)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · ANOVA · p = 0.9814 (Two-sided 5% alpha level was used) · Least square mean difference: 0.002 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.20The Least Square Means of the treatments differences for the changes from baseline at Day 3 were obtained using estimate statements
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · ANOVA · p = 0.2879 (Two-sided 5% alpha level was used) · Least square mean difference: 0.087 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.25The Least Square Means of the treatments differences for the changes from baseline at Day 3 were obtained using estimate statements
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · ANOVA · p = 0.4880 (Two-sided 5% alpha level was used) · Least square mean difference: 0.050 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.19The Least Square Means of the treatments differences for the changes from baseline at Day 3 were obtained using estimate statements
Other pre-specifiedInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population

ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with clinical response assessed as cured according to the investigator's own judgement. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as not cured for the analysis. ICR rate is used as a supportive measure of the primary efficacy endpoint (CCR). Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT) are reported below.

Time frame:
Up to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Modified Intent-to-treat Population89.7 (85.8 to 92.7)91.5 (87.9 to 94.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: -1.8 · 95% CI -6.5 to 2.9CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
Other pre-specifiedInvestigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Per-protocol Population

ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with clinical response assessed as cured according to the investigator's own judgement. ICR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects with ICR assessed as cured. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as not cured for the analysis. ICR rate is used as a supportive measure of the primary efficacy endpoint (CCR). Analyses are performed on two analysis sets. Results on the per-protocol set (PPS) are reported below.

Time frame:
Up to Day 12 on average (up to end-of-treatment + 2 to 4 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Per-protocol Population
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response (ICR) Rate at Visit 4 in the Per-protocol Population92.2 (88.5 to 94.8)94.1 (90.8 to 96.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: -1.9 · 95% CI -6.2 to 2.3CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
Other pre-specifiedInvestigator's Assessment of Sustained Response Rate (ISR Rate) at Visit 5

ISR rate (%) is the percentage of subjects assessed as Sustained Cure at Visit 5, according to the investigator's own judgement. Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. Subjects with missing assessment are considered as having 'Not Sustained Cure' for the analysis. ISR rate is used as a supportive measure of the secondary efficacy endpoint (SCR). Analyses are performed on the modified intent-to-treat set (mITT).

Time frame:
Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28 to 32 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Investigator's Assessment of Sustained Response Rate (ISR Rate) at Visit 5
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Investigator's Assessment of Sustained Response Rate (ISR Rate) at Visit 573.8 (68.6 to 78.5)70.1 (64.9 to 74.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: 3.7 · 95% CI -3.4 to 10.7CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
Other pre-specifiedSustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Per-protocol Population

Sustained Cure is defined for each subject having Clinical Cure and no recurrence. SCR is the percentage of subjects with Sustained Cure. The analyses performed on the modified intent-to- treat set (mITT) are repeated on the per-protocol set (PPS) for sensitivity.

Time frame:
Between Day 38 and Day 42 on average (end-of-treatment + 28-32 days)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Per-protocol Population
Percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Sustained Cure Rate (SCR) in the Per-protocol Population68.8 (63.2 to 73.9)67.7 (62.1 to 72.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Cadazolid vs Vancomycin · Difference between 2 proportions: 1.1 · 95% CI -6.5 to 8.7CI for the difference between two proportions are estimated using the Wilson's score method
Other pre-specifiedRecurrence Rate

Recurrence is defined as the occurrence of a new episode of diarrhea (\> 3 unformed bowel movements on any day between end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days ) Recurrence rates is the percentage of subjects assessed as having a recurrence out of subjects with Clinical Cure.

Time frame:
Between Day 13 and Day 40 on average (from end-of-treatment + 3 days and end-of-treatment + 30 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Recurrence Rate
percentage of participantsCadazolidVancomycin
Recurrence Rate15 (11.1 to 19.9)21.4 (16.9 to 26.7)

Adverse events

Collected over Serious and frequent adverse events are reported from study treatment initiation up to Day 17 on average (i.e., 7 days after end-of-treatment or study withdrawal) and all-cause mortality up to Day 40 on average (i.e. 28 to 32 days after end-of-treatment or study withdrawal). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cadazolid7/304 (2.3%)19/304 (6.3%)33/304 (10.9%)
Vancomycin7/322 (2.2%)26/322 (8.1%)49/322 (15.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 55
Most frequent serious events
EventCadazolidVancomycin
Clostridium difficile infectionInfections and infestations2/3048/322
Deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders2/3040/322
SepsisInfections and infestations2/3042/322
Abdominal abscessInfections and infestations1/3040/322
Acute chest syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/3040/322
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/3040/322
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/3040/322
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders1/3040/322
Biliary anastomosis complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/3040/322
Cardiac failure chronicCardiac disorders1/3040/322
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCadazolidVancomycin
HeadacheNervous system disorders14/30425/322
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders12/30424/322
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders14/30422/322

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics were defined using the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (mITT) including all randomized subjects who have received at least one dose of the study drug and had a confirmed diagnosis of CDAD

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
18-64 years180203383
65-74 years7370143
75 years and older494594
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
Female183195378
Male119123242
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
Black or African American3912
Asian235
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
White288299587
Other246
Missing639
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
United States101108209
Canada8388171
Europe111117228
Other7512
CDAD episode type strata
CDAD episode type strata(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
First occurrence238253491
First recurrence6465129
Initial strain of Clostridium difficile
Initial strain of Clostridium difficile(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
Hypervirulent strains5882140
Non-hypervirulent strains226215441
Unable to determine182139
CDAD severity at baseline
CDAD severity at baseline(Participants)CadazolidVancomycinTotal
Mild-Moderate227243470
Severe5951110
Unable to determine162440
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gerding DN, Cornely OA, Grill S, Kracker H, Marrast AC, Nord CE, Talbot GH, Buitrago M, Gheorghe Diaconescu I, Murta de Oliveira C, Preotescu L, Pullman J, Louie TJ, Wilcox MH. Cadazolid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: results of two double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;19(3):265-274. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30614-5. Epub 2019 Jan 29. PubMed 30709665 ↗
  • Kleinman L, Talbot GH, Hunsche E, Schuler R, Nord CE. The CDI-DaySyms: Content Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Symptoms of Clostridium difficile Infection. Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3017. Epub 2017 Nov 7. PubMed 29680101 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 22, 2015
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 19, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01987895
Lead sponsor
Actelion
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2013
Start date
Mar 27, 2014
Primary completion
Feb 26, 2017
Completion
Mar 24, 2017
Results posted
May 4, 2018
Last update
Feb 4, 2025

Study contacts

Anne Claire Marrast, MD
study director · Actelion

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion