CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01983865Updated Feb 19, 2014

Monocenter 6-period Study in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis to Birch Pollen to Establish a Challenge Model With Natural Birch Pollen in an Environmental Challenge Chamber (ECC)

An interventional study of Exposure to birch pollen in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Fraunhofer-Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-19.

Sponsored by Fraunhofer-Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical validation study is aimed at establishing a birch pollen challenge in the Fraunhofer ECC in patients allergic to birch pollen. The symptoms will be recorded on a validated symptom score as Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), allowing to determine whether the challenge is dose dependent and reproducible.

Read the detailed description

This is a mono-center, single-blind, placebo controlled study assessing nasal symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis upon exposure to birch pollen in an environmental challenge chamber during a 4 hour challenge period with different concentrations of birch pollen versus placebo.

Subjects with allergic rhinitis to birch pollen will be recruited from the Fraunhofer ITEM database or the surrounding communities. After the screening evaluation eligible subjects will undergo six challenge sessions in the environmental challenge chamber at intervals of at least one week. In order to determine dose response, the concentration of birch pollen in the atmosphere of the challenge chamber will be varied from 1000 birch pollen/m³ in the first period, 2000 birch pollen/m³ in the second period, 4000 birch pollen/m³ in the third period, 8000 birch pollen/m³in the fourth period to 0 birch pollen/m³ (only air) in the fifth period. In order to investigate reproducibility in addition to dose response, a challenge with one concentration previously used will be repeated in period six. The dose will be chosen by the Investigator according to the observed nasal symptoms. According to previous experience with grass pollen (Dactylis glomerata) the target symptom level for TNSS is around 6. Therefore, the dose to study reproducibility will be chosen where the average mean TNSS of the last two hours will be closest to six. If two doses are equally close, the higher dose will be chosen because this will allow to optimize the particle monitoring technique. In this regard, it is better to have a high particle concentration in order to separate specific particles from unspecific particles (originating from the subjects themselves).

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 89 across 906 interventional studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fraunhofer-Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Male and female subjects aged 18-65 years.

  • Non smokers or ex-smokers with a history of less than 10 pack years, having been non-smokers for at least the last 12 months.
  • History of allergic rhinitis to birch pollen. Subjects with mild intermittent asthma controlled with occasional use of as-needed short-acting beta-agonists can be included.
  • Normal lung function (FEV1 ≥ 80 % predicted)
  • Positive skin prick test for birch
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent to take part in the study.
  • Available to complete all study measurements
  • Women will be considered for inclusion if they are:

O Not pregnant, as confirmed by pregnancy test (see flow chart) and not nursing.

O Of non-child bearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who were pre-menarchial or post-menopausal, with documented proof of hysterectomy or tubal ligation, or met clinical criteria for menopause and had been amenorrhoeic for more than 1 year prior to the screening visit).

O Of childbearing potential and using a highly effective method of contraception during the entire study (vasectomised partner, sexual abstinence - the lifestyle of the female should be such that there was complete abstinence from intercourse from two weeks prior to the first dose of study medication until at least 72 hours after treatment -, implants, injectables, combined oral contracep-tives, hormonal IUDs or double-barrier methods, i.e. any double combination of IUD, condom with spermicidal gel, diaphragm, sponge, and cervical cap).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of a respiratory tract infection and/or exacerbation of asthma within 4 weeks before the screening.
  • Any history of life-threatening asthma, defined as an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnea, respiratory arrest or hypoxic seizures.
  • Administration of oral, injectable or dermal corticosteroids within 8 weeks or intranasal and/or inhaled corticosteroids 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Past or present disease, which as judged by the investigator, might have affected the outcome of this study. These diseases included, but were not limited to, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, hepatic disease, renal disease, hematological disease, neurological disease, endocrine disease or pulmonary disease (including but not confined to chronic bronchitis, emphysema, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis or cystic fibrosis).
  • Any structural nasal abnormalities or nasal polyps on examination, history of frequent nose bleeding or recent nasal surgery.
  • Conditions or factors, which made the subject unlikely to be able to stay in the Fraunhofer ECC for four hours.
  • Specific Immunotherapy (SIT) within the last two years prior to screening
  • Risk of non-compliance with study procedures
  • Participation in another clinical trial 30 days prior to enrolment
  • Any contraindication for adrenalin use (e.g. use of local and systemic beta-blockers)
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Exposure to birch pollen

    Other: Exposure to birch pollen

Interventions

  • OtherExposure to birch pollen
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS)

    TNSS measured every 20 minutes over 4 hours of birch pollen challenge in the ECC

    Time frame: every 20 minutes

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01983865
Lead sponsor
Fraunhofer-Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Jens Hohlfeld (Division Director Airway Research, Fraunhofer-Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Feb 2014
Last update
Feb 19, 2014
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion