CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01969500Updated May 13, 2019Results posted

Development of a Mobile System for Self-management of Schizophrenia (SOS)

An interventional study of Mobile Application and Treatment as Usual (TAU) in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-13.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This 2-arm clinical trial piloted a mobile Self-Management of Schizophrenia (SOS) system that administers interventions targeting persistent symptoms of psychosis, social dysfunction, and medication adherence. Researchers compared an intervention arm using the SOS system and an arm receiving treatment as usual on the outcomes of change in severity of psychotic symptoms and change in social functioning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizoaffective Disorder

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Self Management of Schizophrenia
  • SOS
  • Serious Mental Illness
  • Psychosis
  • Social Dysfunction
  • Medication Adherence
  • Mobile Application
  • EHealth
  • E-Health
  • Health Technology
  • mobile health
  • m-Health
  • electronic health
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 472 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV) criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder based on a chart diagnosis;
  • 18 years or older;
  • Prescribed oral antipsychotic medication; and
  • A rating of "3" or lower on one of the three items which comprise the Domination by Symptoms factor from the Recovery Assessment Scale, indicating patient-rated need for illness self-management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing, vision, or motor impairment that make it impossible to operate a smartphone or respond to prompts (determined using demonstration smartphone for screening); and
  • English reading level below 4th grade (determined using the Wide Range Achievement Test - 4th Edition)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment as Usual

    Treatment as usual includes outpatient case management, linkage to services and medication monitoring.

    Behavioral: Treatment as Usual (TAU)

  • Experimental
    Mobile Application

    Mobile Application system designed to improve coping with psychotic symptoms, social functioning, and medication adherence.

    Behavioral: Mobile Application

Interventions

  • BehavioralMobile Application

    Also known as: Self-Management of Schizophrenia (SOS), FOCUS

  • BehavioralTreatment as Usual (TAU)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Severity of Psychotic Symptoms

    Severity of Psychotic Symptoms was assessed with the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS). The PSYRATS is comprised of 17 items inquiring about the specific dimensions of hallucinations and delusions, with each item being rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). The PSYRATS has 2 subscales: the auditory hallucinations subscale (AHS) consisting of 11 items, and the delusions subscale (DS) consisting of 6 items. These subscale scores are added to create a total score ranging from 0-68. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12

  2. Change in Social Functioning

    Social Functioning was measured using two subscales from the Social Functioning Scale (SFS): Social Engagement (5-items) and Withdrawal \& Communication (10-items). The item values range from 0 (almost never) to 3 (often). The two subscales were summed to give a score between 0-45. A higher score indicates greater social functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in System Use

    System use was measured by the SOS application regarding the percent of SOS prompts and self-report interactions with the system.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Usability and Satisfaction

    Usability and Satisfaction was measured using the USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) Questionnaire, which was designed to measure satisfaction, usefulness, ease of use and ease of learning.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 13, 2019

Participant flow

Individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were receiving services were recruited through flyers in waiting rooms and bulletin boards at treatment centers, and through referrals from clinical staff. Enrollment was open from November 2015 to July 2016.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment as UsualMobile Application
Started2526
Completed2424
Not completed12
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Extended hospitalization11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Severity of Psychotic Symptoms

Severity of Psychotic Symptoms was assessed with the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS). The PSYRATS is comprised of 17 items inquiring about the specific dimensions of hallucinations and delusions, with each item being rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe). The PSYRATS has 2 subscales: the auditory hallucinations subscale (AHS) consisting of 11 items, and the delusions subscale (DS) consisting of 6 items. These subscale scores are added to create a total score ranging from 0-68. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Severity of Psychotic Symptoms
units on a scaleTreatment as UsualMobile Application
baseline20.20 ± 3.2019.88 ± 3.20
12 weeks21.98 ± 3.2420.96 ± 3.24
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment as Usual vs Mobile Application · Linear mixed effects model · p = .85 · Mean difference (final values): -0.71 · 95% CI -8.37 to 6.96Mean difference (Intervention Arm - TAU) in change from baseline to 12 weeks
PrimaryChange in Social Functioning

Social Functioning was measured using two subscales from the Social Functioning Scale (SFS): Social Engagement (5-items) and Withdrawal \& Communication (10-items). The item values range from 0 (almost never) to 3 (often). The two subscales were summed to give a score between 0-45. A higher score indicates greater social functioning.

Time frame:
Baseline, week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Social Functioning
units on a scaleTreatment as UsualMobile Application
baseline27.60 ± 1.1525.96 ± 1.15
12 weeks29.28 ± 1.1726.34 ± 1.17
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment as Usual vs Mobile Application · Linear mixed effects model · p = .44 · Mean difference (final values): -1.30 · 95% CI -4.66 to 2.06Mean difference (Intervention Arm - TAU) in change from baseline to 12 weeks
SecondaryChange in System Use

System use was measured by the SOS application regarding the percent of SOS prompts and self-report interactions with the system.

Time frame:
4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryUsability and Satisfaction

Usability and Satisfaction was measured using the USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) Questionnaire, which was designed to measure satisfaction, usefulness, ease of use and ease of learning.

Time frame:
4 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Assessed at the baseline and 12 week assessments for each participant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment as Usual0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Mobile Application1/26 (3.8%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years252550
>=65 years011
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
Mean43.0 ± 12.542.5 ± 13.442.7 ± 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
Female51116
Male201535
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
Hispanic or Latino213
Not Hispanic or Latino232447
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American213
White222446
More than one race112
Unknown or Not Reported000
Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire - General (BMQ - General)
Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire - General (BMQ - General)(units on a scale)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
Mean19.96 ± 4.5720.32 ± 4.3620.14 ± 4.46
Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire - Specific (BMQ - Specific)
Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire - Specific (BMQ - Specific)(units on a scale)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
Mean32.56 ± 5.2432.20 ± 4.4932.38 ± 4.86
Schizophrenia Patient Activation Measure (SPAM)
Schizophrenia Patient Activation Measure (SPAM)(units on a scale)Treatment as UsualMobile ApplicationTotal
Mean56.28 ± 5.7357.48 ± 5.2556.88 ± 5.49

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester
    Manchester, New Hampshire 03103, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 25, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01969500
Lead sponsor
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2013
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Feb 2017
Completion
Feb 2017
Results posted
May 13, 2019
Last update
May 13, 2019

Study contacts

Dror Ben-Zeev, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion