CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01958294LOTUSUpdated Jan 18, 2020Results posted

The MICHI NEUROPROTECTION SYSTEM: Evaluation of Performance in Carotid Artery Stent Procedures (The LOTUS Study)

An interventional study of MICHI Neuroprotection System in Carotid Stenosis and Carotid Artery Disease, sponsored by Silk Road Medical. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-18.

Sponsored by Silk Road Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The LOTUS Study is intended to demonstrate the usability of the MICHI Neuroprotection System (MICHI NPS) or MICHI Neuroprotection System with filter (MICHI NPS+f) for use in subjects who are candidates for Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS). It is a prospective, single arm study in which a maximum of 30 study subjects, and a run-in enrollment of up to 10 subjects will be followed immediately post-op and at 30 days.

Read the detailed description

Cerebral embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS) can often precipitate severe adverse neurological effects. Most major clinical studies of CAS have used distal filters for cerebral protection and have compared the neurologic complication rates with those of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Many currently available embolic protection devices, however, have limited efficacy in capturing microembolic debris liberated during stenting, pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. Furthermore, distal protection systems are limited by the need to cross the lesion prior to deployment. Some studies have shown a relatively high incidence of cerebral infarction even when distal protection devices are employed.

Cerebral protection with carotid flow reversal is a method that was developed by Parodi, et al. (2005), as an alternative to the use of distal protection devices. While novel in its approach, this method too has its limitations. Criado, et al. (2004), developed a derivative technique that employs carotid flow reversal prior to traversing the stenosis that can be accomplished by directly accessing carotid anatomy without the use of the transfemoral approach. Major benefits to this method include the ability to perform the procedure on patients with severe carotid tortuosity and difficult aortic arch anatomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carotid Stenosis
  • Carotid Artery Disease
03

In context

Carotid Stenosis

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 106 across 182 interventional studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.

Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Silk Road Medical is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must be > 21 years of age.
  • Subject has the ability to understand and cooperate with study procedures and agrees to return for all required follow-up visits, tests, and exams.
  • International Normalized Ratio (INR) must be ≤ 1.5 at the time of the procedure (subjects taking warfarin may be included if their dose is tapered prior to the procedure to meet the inclusion criterion. Dose may be returned to a therapeutic level after the procedure).
  • The subject must sign a written informed consent prior to the procedure, using a form that is approved by the local medical Ethics Committee (EC).
  • The life expectancy of the subject is at least one year.
  • The subject has a lesion located in the internal carotid artery (ICA); the carotid bifurcation may be involved.
  • The subject must have a minimum distance of 5 cm between the clavicle and bifurcation, as assessed by duplex Doppler ultrasound, computed axial tomographic (CT) angiography or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is participating in another investigational study that would interfere with the conduct or result of this study.
  • The subject has dementia or a neurological illness that may confound the neurological evaluation.
  • Presence of any one of the following anatomic risk factors:

    • Previous radiation treatment to the neck or radical neck dissection
    • Tracheostomy or tracheal stoma
    • Laryngectomy
    • Contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy
    • Severe tandem lesions
    • Inability to extend the head due to cervical arthritis or other cervical disorders
  • Total occlusion of the target vessel.
  • There is an existing, previously placed stent in the target artery.
  • The subject has a known life-threatening allergy to the contrast media that cannot be treated.
  • Subject has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications including aspirin, clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®) or ticlopidine (Ticlid®), prasugrel heparin or bivalirudin (Angiomax™). Subjects must be able to tolerate a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel/ticlopidine or prasugrel.
  • The subject has a gastrointestinal bleed that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy.
  • The subject has known cardiac sources of emboli.
  • Subject has Hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 8 gm/dL (unless on dialysis), platelet count \< 50,000/mm3, or known heparin associated thrombocytopenia.
  • Subject has documented atrial fibrillation in the prior 90 days.
  • The subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy including thrombocytopenia or an inability to receive heparin in amounts sufficient to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) at > 250, or if the subject will refuse blood transfusions.
  • The subject has atherosclerotic disease involving the ipsilateral common carotid artery (CCA) that precludes safe placement of the sheath.
  • The subject has abnormal angiographic findings other than that of the target lesion that indicate the subject is at risk for a stroke, such as: ipsilateral arterial stenosis greater in severity than the target lesion, cerebral aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation of the cerebral vasculature.
  • There is evidence of a carotid artery dissection prior to the initiation of the procedure.
  • There is an angiographically visible thrombus.
  • There is any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe, e.g. morbid obesity, sustained systolic blood pressure > 180 mm Hg, tortuosity, occlusive disease, vessel anatomy or aortic arch anatomy.
  • Occlusion (TIMI 0 flow), or string sign of the ipsilateral common or internal carotid artery.
  • There is evidence of bilateral carotid stenosis that would require intervention within 30 days of procedure.
  • There is evidence of a major stroke (NIHSS ≥10) within the previous 30 days of the procedure or the patient is considered, by the investigator, to be at high risk for hemorrhagic stroke.
  • There is a planned treatment of a non-target lesion within 30 days post procedure.
  • There is a history of intracranial hemorrhage within the previous 3 months, including hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke.
  • There is history of an ipsilateral stroke with fluctuating neurologic symptoms within one year prior to the procedure.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant (negative pregnancy test is required in women of childbearing potential).
  • Subjects, who the Investigator determines, to be at risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    MICHI Neuroprotection System

    Subjects enrolled into this study will be male or female subjects who are candidates for carotid angioplasty and stenting, who, after meeting all of the eligibility criteria, undergo transcervical Carotid Artery Stenting with carotid flow reversal using the MICHI Neuroprotection System.

    Device: MICHI Neuroprotection System

Interventions

  • DeviceMICHI Neuroprotection System

    Also known as: MICHI NPS, MICHI NPS + f

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction and Death

    Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate of any stroke, myocardial infarction and death during the 30-day post procedural period.

    Time frame: 30-days post-procedurally

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute Device Success

    Acute device success - Defined as MICHI™ NPS was delivered (vascular access achieved), reverse flow was attempted and established and the device retrieved / removed from vasculature.

    Time frame: Intra procedural (1 day)

  2. Procedural Success

    Procedure Success - Procedural success is the ability to deliver therapeutic devices (balloons, stents, etc.) through the Transcervical Arterial Sheath and the ability to provide embolic protection throughout the procedure with the freedom of device related Major Adverse Events at 30 days.

    Time frame: Through 30-day Follow-up period

07

Results

Posted Jan 18, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMICHI Neuroprotection System
Started12
Completed10
Not completed2
Withdrew: Clinical circumstances2

Outcome measures

PrimaryComposite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction and Death

Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate of any stroke, myocardial infarction and death during the 30-day post procedural period.

Time frame:
30-days post-procedurally
Reported as:
Number · participants
Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction and Death
participantsMICHI Neuroprotection System
Myocardial Infarction1
Stroke0
Death0
SecondaryAcute Device Success

Acute device success - Defined as MICHI™ NPS was delivered (vascular access achieved), reverse flow was attempted and established and the device retrieved / removed from vasculature.

Time frame:
Intra procedural (1 day)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Acute Device Success
participantsMICHI Neuroprotection System
Acute Device Success10
SecondaryProcedural Success

Procedure Success - Procedural success is the ability to deliver therapeutic devices (balloons, stents, etc.) through the Transcervical Arterial Sheath and the ability to provide embolic protection throughout the procedure with the freedom of device related Major Adverse Events at 30 days.

Time frame:
Through 30-day Follow-up period
Reported as:
Number · participants
Procedural Success
participantsMICHI Neuroprotection System
Procedural Success9

Adverse events

Collected over 0 to 30 days following study index procedure. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MICHI Neuroprotection System—2/12 (16.7%)12/12 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMICHI Neuroprotection System
HematomaVascular disorders2/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventMICHI Neuroprotection System
HematomaVascular disorders6/12
Hemorrhage/OozingVascular disorders6/12
HypertensionVascular disorders4/12
Blood Troponin, CK or CK-MB IncreasedInvestigations2/12
Full Blood Count AbnormalInvestigations2/12
Hemoglobin DecreasedInvestigations2/12
BradycardiaCardiac disorders1/12
DyspneaCardiac disorders1/12
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders1/12
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/12

Baseline characteristics

Enrolled patients with extracranial carotid stenosis who were candidates for angioplasty and Carotid Artery Stenting.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)MICHI Neuroprotection System
70-74 years of age8
75-79 years of age2
80 years of age and older1
Unknown or not reported1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MICHI Neuroprotection System
Female5
Male7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MICHI Neuroprotection System
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino12
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MICHI Neuroprotection System
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White12
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)MICHI Neuroprotection System
United Kingdom12
Average Height
Average Height(cm)MICHI Neuroprotection System
Mean163.8 ± 7.4
Average Weight
Average Weight(kg)MICHI Neuroprotection System
Mean71.7 ± 12.7
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Newcastle upon Tyne, England NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01958294
Lead sponsor
Silk Road Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 9, 2013
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
Aug 2014
Results posted
Jan 18, 2020
Last update
Jan 18, 2020

Study contacts

Sumaira Macdonald, FRCP FRCR PhD EBIR
principal investigator · Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion