ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01925898Updated Jan 22, 2014

A Randomized, Clinical Trial of Oral Midazolam Versus Oral Ketamine for Sedation During Laceration Repair.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Midazolam - active comparator and Experimental Arm: Ketamine in Lacerations, sponsored by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-01-22.

Sponsored by Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2013), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sedation is often needed for young children undergoing minor procedures in the emergency department (ED). Oral midazolam is one of the most commonly used regimens for children undergoing laceration repair but its sedative efficacy was shown to be suboptimal. In only one randomized controlled study oral ketamine has been used successfully for procedural sedation for laceration repair. A recent study showed that the combination of oral midazolam and oral ketamine provided deeper sedation compared with oral midazolam alone. However children treated wuth the combination of midazolam and ketamine required longer recovery

Hypothesis:

Oral ketamine can provide superior sedation to oral midazolam in children requiring sedation for laceration repair.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lacerations

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Laceration
  • Sedation
  • Pediatrics
03

In context

Lacerations

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Lacerations; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 79 across 111 interventional studies indexed under Lacerations.

Browse Lacerations studies →

Lead sponsor

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 267 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any child with laceration requiring sedation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major trauma
  • Closed head injury associated with loss of consciousness
  • Abnormal neurologic examination in a previously normal child
  • Significant developmental delay or baseline neurological deficit
  • A patient with seizures
  • Elevated intra-cranial pressure
  • Hypersensitivity to midazolam or ketamine
  • Hypertension
  • Hyperthyroidism or a patient receiving thyroid replacement
  • alcohol intoxication or a history of alcohol abuse
  • Acute or chronic respiratory, cardiac, renal or hepatic abnormalities
  • Glaucoma
  • Known psychiatric disease
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of more than 2
  • Informed consent cannot be obtained from legal guardian
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine

    Oral ketamine

    Drug: Experimental Arm: Ketamine

  • Active comparator
    Midazolam

    Oral Midazolam

    Drug: Midazolam - active comparator

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score: Visual analog score (VAS)- by a parent

    A parent will assess the child's pain on a Visual analog scale

    Time frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

  2. Number of patients requiring IV sedation

    patients who fail to achieve University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) of two or higher will be switched to IV sedation

    Time frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. UMSS - by ED physician

    Time frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

  2. • VAS by nurse

    Time frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

  3. Time to reach UMSS > 2

    Time frame: up to 1 hour

  4. • Procedure time

    Time frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour

  5. • Time from procedure to full recovery

    Time frame: While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours

  6. The occurrence of adverse effects during the ED stay

    Significant adverse effects are defined as 1. Oxygen desaturation \<92% or hypoventilation requiering ventilatory support 2. Need for hemodynamic support 3. Anaphylaxis 4. Seizures 5. Any adverse effects requiring patient admission

    Time frame: While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours

  7. • Patients and parents satisfaction assessed on VAS

    Time frame: While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Assaf Harofeh MC
    Be’er Ya‘aqov, Israel
    • Orit Rubinstein, MD · Contact · oritar78@gmail.com · 972-8-9779916
    • Orit Rubinstein, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2013, a primary completion of Feb 2014 and a completion of Jul 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 17, 2013
First posted
Aug 20, 2013
Start
Aug 2013
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2014
CompletionEst.
Jul 2014
Last update
Jan 22, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01925898
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2013
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2014 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2014

Study contacts

Eran Kozer, MD
Contact
erank@assaf.health.gov.il
972-8-9779916

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ketamine

Start the discussion