ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01896895Updated Mar 1, 2018Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A Against Placebo to Treat Abnormal Contraction or Twitch of the Eyelid

A Phase 3 interventional study of IncobulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 25 Units and IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 12.5 Units in Bilateral Blepharospasm (BEB), sponsored by Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH. Completed at 11 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-01.

Sponsored by Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH (part of Merz Pharma) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase 3 study will serve to collect efficacy and safety data of two different doses of NT 201 in subjects suffering from Bilateral Blepharospasm (BEB) who are BTX treatment-naïve.

In this study, BTX treatment-naïve subjects are defined as those who have not received BTX treatment within the last 12 months for the treatment of BEB. This definition aims to avoid bias by comparison of treatment effects in the subject's assessments. Furthermore, this study will substantiate the existing efficacy and safety database for the indication BEB.

Read the detailed description

Subjects to receive one injection with NT 201 or placebo at baseline of the placebo-controlled first cycle. Thereafter, all subjects entering the Open-Label Extension Period (OLEX) to receive a second injection of NT 201 (second injection cycle).

02

Conditions studied

  • Bilateral Blepharospasm (BEB)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Blepharospasm

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Blepharospasm; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is above the median of 40 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Blepharospasm.

Browse Blepharospasm studies →

Lead sponsor

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH is the lead sponsor of 61 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female out-patients age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years.
  • A clinical diagnosis of bilateral BEB characterized by spontaneous, spasmodic, intermittent or persistent involuntary contractions of orbicular oculi muscles.
  • A need for injection of BTX defined as a Jankovic Rating Scale [JRS] severity subscore ≥ 2.
  • Treatment-naïve subject defined as at least 12 months without BTX of any serotype for the treatment of BEB before administration of IP.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with any previous unsuccessful treatment with BTX of any serotype for the treatment of BEB.
  • Atypical variant of BEB (e.g., apraxia of the eyelid opening) caused by inhibition of levator palpebrae muscle.
  • Neuroleptic-induced blepharospasm.
  • Myotomy or denervation surgery in the affected muscles (e.g., peripheral denervation, spinal cord stimulation) and surgery in the upper face.
  • Generalized disorders of muscles activity (e.g., myasthenia gravis in particular ocularis, Lambert-Eaton-Syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or any other significant neuromuscular dysfunction which might interfere with the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) 25U per eye

    Main Period: one injection session, 25 Units per eye. Open-Label Extension: one injection session, up to 35 Units per eye. Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.

    Drug: IncobulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 25 Units · Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 35 Units

  • Experimental
    IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) 12.5U per eye

    Main Period: one injection session, 12.5 Units per eye. Open-Label Extension Period: one injection session, up to 35 Units per eye. Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.

    Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 12.5 Units · Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 35 Units

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Main Period: Placebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)(12.5 or 25U/eye), one injection session. Open-Label Extension: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), one injection session, up to 35 Units per eye. Mode of administration: intramuscular injection.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), 35 Units

Interventions

  • IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Main Period: 25 Units per eye.

    Also known as: NT 201, Xeomin, Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins

  • IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Main Period: 12.5 Units per eye.

    Also known as: NT 201, Xeomin, Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins

  • DrugPlacebo

    Main Period: Placebo to IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl).

  • IncobotulinumtoxinA (active ingredient: Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection, prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% Sodium Chloride (NaCl). Open-Label Extension: up to 35 Units per eye.

    Also known as: NT 201, Xeomin, Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in JRS Severity Subscore at Day 43 (Visit 4)

    JRS severity subscore was used to classify individual symptoms of blepharospasm and to determine therapeutic efficacy. JRS severity subscore ranges from 0 to 4, where 0: None; 1: increased blinking present with external stimuli; 2: Mild but spontaneous eyelid fluttering, definitely noticeable, possibly embarrassing, but not functionally disabling, 3: Moderate, very noticeable spasm of eyelids only, mildly incapacitating, 4: Severe, incapacitating spasm of eyelids and possibly other facial muscles. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and visit 4 resulting from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group, pooled site, and gender as fixed factors and baseline JRS severity subscore and age as covariates and missings replaced using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Negative values denote improvement, while positive values denote deterioration vs. baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) at Day 43 (Visit 4)

    BSDI is a scale for assessment of impairment of specific activities of daily living caused by blepharospasm. BSDI consists of six items (driving a vehicle; reading; watching TV; shopping; getting about on foot (walking); doing everyday activities), each ranging from 0 (=no impairment) to 4 (=no longer possible due to illness). The BSDI total score is a mean score for non-missing items ranging from 0 to 4. It is calculated by adding scores of all applicable and answered items, and dividing the resulting sum by the number of items answered. Outcome values represent LS mean differences between baseline and visit 4 (visit 4 value minus baseline value) resulting from ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site, gender as fixed factors and baseline BSDI total score, age as covariates. Missings were replaced by the LOCF method. Negative values denote an improvement, while positive values denote deterioration vs. baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)

  2. Double-blind MP: Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) at Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)

    PEGR scale is a descriptive subjective 9-point response self-rating scale ranging from "complete abolishment of signs and symptoms" (value=+4) down to "very marked worsening" (value=-4). Outcome values represent least square means at visit 4 resulting from an ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site, gender as fixed factors and age as covariates. Missing were set to a zero effect (value=0). Positive values denote an improvement, while negative values denote deterioration.

    Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)

07

Results

Posted Mar 1, 2018

Participant flow

Double-blind MP
Participant flow — Double-blind MP
MilestoneDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsOLEX: IncobotulinumtoxinA 70 Units
Started2022190
Completed1920160
Not completed1230
Withdrew: Physician decision0010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0210
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1010
OLEX Period
Participant flow — OLEX Period
MilestoneDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsOLEX: IncobotulinumtoxinA 70 Units
Started00039
Completed00039
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDouble-blind MP: Change From Baseline in JRS Severity Subscore at Day 43 (Visit 4)

JRS severity subscore was used to classify individual symptoms of blepharospasm and to determine therapeutic efficacy. JRS severity subscore ranges from 0 to 4, where 0: None; 1: increased blinking present with external stimuli; 2: Mild but spontaneous eyelid fluttering, definitely noticeable, possibly embarrassing, but not functionally disabling, 3: Moderate, very noticeable spasm of eyelids only, mildly incapacitating, 4: Severe, incapacitating spasm of eyelids and possibly other facial muscles. Values represent least square (LS) mean differences between baseline and visit 4 resulting from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group, pooled site, and gender as fixed factors and baseline JRS severity subscore and age as covariates and missings replaced using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Negative values denote improvement, while positive values denote deterioration vs. baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in JRS Severity Subscore at Day 43 (Visit 4)
score on a scaleDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 Units
Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in JRS Severity Subscore at Day 43 (Visit 4)-0.6 (-1.0 to -0.1)-1.0 (-1.5 to -0.6)-1.8 (-2.3 to -1.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Double-blind MP: Placebo vs Double-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 Units · ANCOVA · p = =0.0004 · Ls mean difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -1.9 to -0.6
  • Double-blind MP: Placebo vs Double-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 Units · ANCOVA · p = =0.1452 · Ls mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.2
SecondaryDouble-blind MP: Change From Baseline in Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) at Day 43 (Visit 4)

BSDI is a scale for assessment of impairment of specific activities of daily living caused by blepharospasm. BSDI consists of six items (driving a vehicle; reading; watching TV; shopping; getting about on foot (walking); doing everyday activities), each ranging from 0 (=no impairment) to 4 (=no longer possible due to illness). The BSDI total score is a mean score for non-missing items ranging from 0 to 4. It is calculated by adding scores of all applicable and answered items, and dividing the resulting sum by the number of items answered. Outcome values represent LS mean differences between baseline and visit 4 (visit 4 value minus baseline value) resulting from ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site, gender as fixed factors and baseline BSDI total score, age as covariates. Missings were replaced by the LOCF method. Negative values denote an improvement, while positive values denote deterioration vs. baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 43 (Visit 4)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) at Day 43 (Visit 4)
score on a scaleDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 Units
Double-blind MP: Change From Baseline in Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) at Day 43 (Visit 4)-0.4 (-0.8 to 0.0)-0.5 (-0.9 to -0.2)-0.7 (-1.1 to -0.3)
SecondaryDouble-blind MP: Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) at Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)

PEGR scale is a descriptive subjective 9-point response self-rating scale ranging from "complete abolishment of signs and symptoms" (value=+4) down to "very marked worsening" (value=-4). Outcome values represent least square means at visit 4 resulting from an ANCOVA with treatment group, pooled site, gender as fixed factors and age as covariates. Missing were set to a zero effect (value=0). Positive values denote an improvement, while negative values denote deterioration.

Time frame:
Baseline, Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Double-blind MP: Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) at Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)
score on a scaleDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 Units
Double-blind MP: Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) at Final Visit (Day 43-Day 141)1.3 (0.7 to 1.9)1.8 (1.2 to 2.4)2.2 (1.5 to 2.8)

Adverse events

Collected over Double-blind MP: From the time point of first injection up to final visit (Day 43 to 141); OLEX Period: From the time point of first injection up to end of study visit (Day 43 to 141). Non-serious events are listed at a 4.5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Double-blind MP: Placebo0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)6/20 (30%)
Double-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 Units0/22 (0%)2/22 (9.1%)7/22 (31.8%)
Double-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 Units0/19 (0%)1/19 (5.3%)7/19 (36.8%)
OLEX: IncobotulinumtoxinA 70 Units0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)4/39 (10.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsOLEX: IncobotulinumtoxinA 70 Units
Atrioventricular block completeCardiac disorders0/200/221/190/39
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/201/220/190/39
GoitreEndocrine disorders0/201/220/190/39
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent other events
EventDouble-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsOLEX: IncobotulinumtoxinA 70 Units
Eyelid ptosisEye disorders0/202/223/192/39
Dry eyeEye disorders2/200/220/192/39
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/200/221/190/39
HypoaesthesiaNervous system disorders0/200/221/190/39
Eyelid disorderEye disorders0/200/221/190/39
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/200/221/190/39
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/200/221/190/39
Hepatic steatosisHepatobiliary disorders0/200/221/190/39
EczemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/200/221/190/39
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/200/221/190/39

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS) was subset of participants in the safety evaluation set (SES) of the double-blind MP for whom at least a baseline value of the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) severity subscore was available.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Double-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years17131444
>=65 years39517
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Double-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsTotal
Mean55.4 ± 12.0155.8 ± 15.7053.5 ± 13.8255.0 ± 13.79
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Double-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsTotal
Female12111336
Male811625
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Double-blind MP: PlaceboDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 25 UnitsDouble-blind MP: IncobotulinumtoxinA 50 UnitsTotal
Greece46414
Sri Lanka10101030
Malaysia66517
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • Merz Investigational Site #030002
    Athens, 11521, Greece
  • Merz Investigational Site #030001
    Athens, 11526, Greece
  • Merz Investigational Site #060007
    Georgetown, Penang 10990, Malaysia
  • Merz Investigational Site #060004
    Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88586, Malaysia
  • Merz Investigational Site #060006
    Kuala Lumpur, 50586, Malaysia
  • Merz Investigational Site #060002
    Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
  • Merz Investigational Site #060003
    Selangor, 43000, Malaysia
  • Merz Investigational Site #094001
    Colombo, 07, Sri Lanka
  • Merz Investigational Site #094005
    Colombo, 10350, Sri Lanka
  • Merz Investigational Site #094006
    Kurunegala, 60000, Sri Lanka
  • Merz Investigational Site #094002
    Nugegoda, 10250, Sri Lanka
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitsikostas DD, Dekundy A, Hanschmann A, Althaus M, Scheschonka A, Pagan F, Jankovic J. Duration and onset of effect of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of blepharospasm in botulinum toxin-naive subjects. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Oct;37(10):1761-1768. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1965975. Epub 2021 Aug 24. PubMed 34384301 ↗
  • Duarte GS, Rodrigues FB, Marques RE, Castelao M, Ferreira J, Sampaio C, Moore AP, Costa J. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 19;11(11):CD004900. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004900.pub3. PubMed 33211907 ↗
  • Mitsikostas DD, Dekundy A, Sternberg K, Althaus M, Pagan F. IncobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Blepharospasm in Toxin-Naive Subjects: A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4249-4265. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01427-6. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32779096 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2013, a primary completion of Apr 2016 and a completion of Nov 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2018, 1 year 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Mar 2017.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 8, 2013
First posted
Jul 11, 2013
Start
Nov 2013
Primary completionActual
Apr 2016
CompletionActual
Nov 2016
Results delay requested
Mar 30, 2017
Results first posted
Mar 1, 2018
Last update
Mar 1, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 1, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01896895
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2013
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Nov 2016
Results posted
Mar 1, 2018
Last update
Mar 1, 2018

Study contacts

Merz Medical Expert
study director · Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Botulinum toxin type A

Start the discussion