CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01895660CHAMPUpdated Mar 25, 2022

Children With Hemiparesis Arm and Hand Movement Project (CHAMP Study)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Variations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation in Hemiparesis, Cerebral Palsy and Brain Injury, sponsored by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-25.

Sponsored by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

What is the CHAMP Study?

The CHAMP Study is a multisite clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health that is comparing the efficacy of alternative therapies for young children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (or hemiparetic cerebral palsy). Children who meet study eligibility criteria at one of the three clinical sites (Roanoke, VA; Charlottesville, VA, and Columbus, OH) will be invited to enroll, and their parents will be provided all necessary paperwork along with informed consent documentation. Assignment to one of the alternative therapy conditions will be random. Participation in the study includes assessment of each child prior to treatment, close monitoring of the child's progress during treatment, and post-treatment evaluation at the end of therapy, as well as, 6 and 12 months later. Parents will have an active role in the project, both observing their child during therapy sessions and then engaging in home-based activities that allow the child to practice and extend new motor skills. There will be no charge for the therapy provided.

What are the therapies being tested? In the past decade or so, a new form of therapy for children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy was developed and has shown to produce positive changes in individual children and in small clinical trials (e.g., DeLuca, Echols, Ramey, \& Taub, 2003; DeLuca, Echols, Law, \& Ramey, 2006; Case-Smith, DeLuca, Stevenson, \& Ramey, 2012). The therapy is named Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and refers to a multi-component form of therapy in which the child has the unimpaired or less impaired upper extremity constrained (by a cast or a splint) while also receiving active therapy from a specially trained therapist who shapes new skills and functional activities with the child's more impaired upper extremity. Traditionally, CIMT therapy dosages have been high - often lasting many hours per day, 5 days a week, for 4 consecutive weeks. There are important clinical and scientific questions that need to be answered about the effects of different dosage levels and about different types of constraint on the child's more functional (less impaired) arm and hand. This study will be the first that will directly compare different amounts of therapy and different types of constraint to evaluate what "works best" for young children. The therapy is very play-like and engaging for children, and no negative effects of casting or the high dosages have been detected in previous clinical trials.

Who is eligible: Children between 2 and 8 years of age with a diagnosis of unilateral spastic cerebral palsy or hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Children must be relatively healthy, not currently receiving Botox (or other similar medications), and able to understand simple communication and instructions. In advance, the treatment will be explained in detail to parents and a written protocol available to share with the child's physician and other current therapist for review. During the one month of treatment, children will not receive other forms of physical or occupational therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemiparesis
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Brain Injury

Keywords

  • P-CIMT
  • Pediatric Constraint Induced Movement Therapy
  • Hemiparesis
  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Children
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 384 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is above the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University is the lead sponsor of 124 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. are 2 years - 8 years old
  2. do not have any serious complicating conditions or acute medical concerns
  3. are diagnosed with cerebral palsy with hemiparesis (prior to age 2)
  4. have not had botox injections in the last 6 months and
  5. have not received Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in the last 6 months
  6. have a clinical MRI that can be provided in digital format for research project

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group with continuous constraint and daily therapy

    Behavioral: Variations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation

  • Experimental
    Group with continuous constrainit and 3 days a week therapy

    Behavioral: Variations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation

  • Experimental
    Group with part-time constraint and daily therapy

    Behavioral: Variations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation

  • Experimental
    Group with part-time constraint and 3 days a week therapy

    Behavioral: Variations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Usual and customary treatment group

    Behavioral: Variations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation

Interventions

  • BehavioralVariations in Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (P-CIMT) versus usual and customary rehabilitation

    Types of constraint and dosage amounts will be varied.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional measurements of change across time in the child's abilities with their arms and hands will be measured using the Assisting Hand Assessment, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales, and the Pediatric Evaluation and Disability Inventory.

    Functional measurements of arm use

    Time frame: Pretreatment; Post-Treatment, 6 and 12 months Follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified version of Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST)

    Functional range of motion measure

    Time frame: Pre treatment; Post-Treatment (end of 4 weeks of treatment), 6 and 12 months Follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech
    Roanoke, Virginia 24016, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramey SL, DeLuca SC, Stevenson RD, Conaway M, Darragh AR, Lo W; CHAMP. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2021 Nov;148(5):e2020033878. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-033878. Epub 2021 Oct 14. PubMed 34649982 ↗
  • Ramey SL, DeLuca S, Stevenson RD, Case-Smith J, Darragh A, Conaway M. Children with Hemiparesis Arm and Movement Project (CHAMP): protocol for a multisite comparative efficacy trial of paediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) testing effects of dosage and type of constraint for children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):e023285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023285. PubMed 30782701 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01895660
Lead sponsor
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Collaborators
Ohio State University, University of Virginia
Responsible party
Stephanie DeLuca (Assistant Professor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2013
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2018
Completion
Dec 2019
Last update
Mar 25, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion