CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT01888198Updated Jul 2, 2026

Ablation of Renal Masses Outcomes Registry (ARMOR): Ablation Procedure and Quality of Life Assessment

An observational study in Renal Cancer, sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Active, not recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-02.

Sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
294
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand how effective ablation is for destroying tumor cells in the kidney and whether quality of life is improved for patients. Participation in ARMOR may involve retrospective data collection only, combined retrospective and prospective data collection, or prospective data collection

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ablation
  • quality of Life (QOL)
  • kidney
  • registry
  • Ablation of Renal Masses Outcomes Registry (ARMOR)
  • 13-116
03

In context

Kidney Neoplasms

956 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Neoplasms; 210 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 294 is above the median of 218 across 216 observational studies indexed under Kidney Neoplasms.

Browse Kidney Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 1,930 studies on the registry; 328 are open to participants now.

Of its 129 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (51%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The patients at MSKCC will be identified and recruited from the existing patient population in the Interventional Radiology Service in the Department of Radiology. At all other participating sites, patients meeting eligibility criteria will be identified by the site investigators that have received the referral for consideration of renal mass ablation. Participation in ARMOR may involve retrospective data collection only, combined retrospective and prospective data collection, or prospective data collection

Inclusion criteria

Retrospective enrollment:

- Patients having undergone percutaneous, open or laparoscopic energy ablation of a renal mass.

Prospective enrollment:

- Patients scheduled to undergo, rather than having undergone, percutaneous, open or laparoscopic energy ablation of a renal mass.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not having undergone, or considered candidates for percutaneous, open or laparoscopic energy ablation of a renal mass
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Patients under the age of 18.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
294 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
24 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • renal mass ablation candidates

    Standard of care interventions for the treatment of renal masses using energy ablation will be studied. Data collection can be divided into five basic categories: 1) Patient demographics and relevant history, 2) Renal mass characteristics, 3) Ablation procedure details, 4) Imaging studies, and 5) Patient-reported quality of life.

    Behavioral: (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire · Behavioral: EuroQol EQ-5D 7-item questionnaire

Interventions

  • Behavioral(EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire

    Also known as: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item

  • BehavioralEuroQol EQ-5D 7-item questionnaire
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. assess renal ablation outcomes

    To assess renal ablation outcomes using standard quality of life measures. Specifically, quality of life outcomes measures will be analyzed with respect to ablation procedure characteristics including ablation technique and anesthesia type as well as renal mass characteristics such as size, location and pathologic tumor type.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. differences in imaging characteristics

    between CT and MR related to renal ablation. We hypothesize that, after ablation, the observed relative change in contrast enhancement at the site of ablation for each follow-up time point will be similar for tumors imaged by CT compared with those imaged by MR. This objective will be met by observational and descriptive methods.

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Assess the progression of imaging findings

    in terms of size and contrast enhancement at the site of renal ablation, correlated with ablation technology and tumor histopathology. The objective is to determine whether the choice of imaging method, ablation technique, or histopathologic tumor subtype will be associated with similar relative change in contrast enhancement and size after ablation.

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Radiation exposure

    associated with CT imaging performed during an ablation procedure and subsequent imaging follow-up to 2 years. Radiation dose will be analyzed using multivariable linear regression, with ablation technique as the primary predictor.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Rhode Island Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
  • Md Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01888198
Lead sponsor
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Collaborators
Rhode Island Hospital, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, Thomas Jefferson University, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, San Diego Imaging Medical Group, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, University Hospital, Bordeaux, University of California, Los Angeles
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2013
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2026

Study contacts

Fourat Ridouani, MD
principal investigator · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion