CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01888159Updated Jun 27, 2013

Salpingectomy vs Tubal Sterilisation in Low Risk for Ovarian Cancer Women and Its Effect on Ovarian Reserve

An interventional study of Bilateral Salpingectomy and Tubal sterilization with bipolar energy in Ovarian Cancer, sponsored by Karlstad Central Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-27.

Sponsored by Karlstad Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2013), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Randomised study to investigate if salpingectomies done to women wishing tubal sterilisation has an effect on ovarian reserve.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Ovarian Neoplasms

2,695 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 727 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 2,030 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Karlstad Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women seeking for tubal sterilisation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women older than 45
  • family history of ovarian cancer
  • presence of menopausal symptoms
  • irregular cycles
  • Hormone Replacement Therapy or hormone contraceptions the last 3 months
  • history of previous ovarian or uterine surgeries
  • imaging suggesting an ovarian cyst or other adnexal pathology during investigation
  • previous salpingectomy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tubal Sterilization with bipolar

    Salpingectomy vs Tubal Sterilisation

    Procedure: Tubal sterilization with bipolar energy

  • Active comparator
    Bilateral Salpingectomy

    Salpingectomy vs Tubal Sterilisation

    Procedure: Bilateral Salpingectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureBilateral Salpingectomy
  • ProcedureTubal sterilization with bipolar energy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)and Follicle Stimulation Hormone (FSH)

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH)

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Operative time

    Time frame: Postoperatively

  3. Complications

    Time frame: 3 months

Other outcomes

  1. Follicle Stimulation Hormone (FSH)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Follicle Stimulation Hormone (FSH)

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Karlstad, Värmaland 65185, Sweden
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01888159
Lead sponsor
Karlstad Central Hospital
Responsible party
Leonidas Magarakis (MD, Karlstad Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2013

Study contacts

Leonidas Magarakis, MD
Contact
lemagarakis@gmail.com
046737529929

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion