ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04294927TUBA-WISP-IIUpdated Apr 6, 2026

TUBectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy in High Risk Women to Assess the Safety of Prevention

An interventional study of Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 Gene Mutation, BRCA2 Gene Mutation and RAD51C Gene Mutation, sponsored by University Medical Center Nijmegen. Recruiting at 66 sites in 16 countries. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-06.

Sponsored by University Medical Center Nijmegen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2020; still recruiting 6 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,000
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
25 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of the project is to evaluate the risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high risk women with respect to ovarian cancer incidence.

Read the detailed description

In BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers, a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended around the age of 40. This recommendation is based on a 10-40% life-time risk of ovarian cancer in this population and disappointing results of ovarian cancer surveillance for early detection. Moreover, the mortality rate of ovarian cancer is high. Effects of RRSO are a decrease in ovarian cancer risk (80-96%) on one hand and immediate onset of menopause and non-cancer related morbidity on the other hand. The fifty percent breast cancer risk reduction after RRSO has become disputable in the last years. Based on multiple studies showing that most high-grade serous ovarian cancers develop at the distal end of the Fallopian tube, an innovative strategy for RRSO has been developed for this study proposal: risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) with delayed risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRO). However, the safety of this strategy has not been proven yet. Before implementing this innovative strategy as standard care we need to investigate the long term effects on ovarian cancer incidence.

02

Conditions studied

  • BRCA1 Gene Mutation
  • BRCA2 Gene Mutation
  • RAD51C Gene Mutation
  • RAD51D Gene Mutation
  • BRIP1 Gene Mutation
  • Ovarian Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Ovarian Neoplasms

3,381 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms; 790 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,000 is above the median of 54 across 2,548 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Neoplasms.

Browse Ovarian Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Nijmegen is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with a class 5 (definitely pathogenic) BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D or BRIP1 germline mutation in one of the participating centers.
  • Age at inclusion;

    • BRCA1: 25-40 years
    • BRCA2: 25-45 years
    • RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1: 25-50 years
  • Childbearing completed
  • Presence of at least one fallopian tube
  • Participants may have a personal history of non-ovarian
  • must be obtained and documented according to national and local regulatory requirements and the local rules followed in the institution.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • status (natural menopause or due to treatment)
  • Wish for second stage RRO within two years after RRS
  • Legally incapable
  • Prior bilateral salpingectomy
  • A personal history of ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer
  • Current diagnosis or treatment for malignant disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy

    Risk-reducing salpingectomy after the completion of childbearing with delayed oophorectomy.

    Procedure: Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy

  • Active comparator
    Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

    Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

    Procedure: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureRisk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy

    * BRCA1: RRS at age 25-40 and RRO at a maximum age of 45 (advised between 35 and 45). * BRCA2: RRS at age 25-45 and RRO at a maximum age of 50 (advised between age 40 and 50). * BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D: RRS at age 25-50 and RRO at a maximum age of 55 (advised between 45 and 55)

  • ProcedureRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

    * BRCA1 at a maximum age of 40 (advised between age 35 and 40) * BRCA2 at a maximum age of 45 (advised between age 40 and 45) * BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D: at a maximum age of 50 (advised between 45 and 50)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. High grade serous (ovarian) cancer incidence

    High grade serous (ovarian) cancer incidence

    Time frame: Until the age of 45 for BRCA1 and 50 for BRCA2 germline mutation carriers

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of (pre)malignant findings in tubes/ovaries

    Incidence of (pre)malignant findings in tubes/ovaries at risk-reducing salpingectomy, oophorectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after each surgery

  2. Peri-operative morbidity and mortality

    Peri-operative morbidity and mortality

    Time frame: 6 weeks after each surgery

  3. Incidence of pelvic cancer (other than ovarian cancer)

    Incidence of pelvic cancer (other than ovarian cancer)

    Time frame: Up to the age of 70

  4. Incidence of breast cancer

    Incidence of breast cancer

    Time frame: Up to the age of 70

  5. Uptake of risk reducing oophorectomy

    Uptake of risk reducing oophorectomy after risk reducing salpingectomy

    Time frame: Up to the age of 70

Other outcomes

  1. High grade serous (ovarian) cancer incidence at the age of 70

    Exploratory outcome measure

    Time frame: Up to the age of 70

07

Study locations

63 of 66 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pennington KP, Pugh SL, Huh W, Walker JL, Jewell E, Havrilesky LJ, Carter J, Muller CY, Drapkin R, Lankes HA, Castellano T, Zamorano AS, Blank SV, Kachnic LA. Optimization of Timing for Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy and Oophorectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jan 1;145(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005781. Epub 2024 Nov 7. PubMed 39509704 ↗
  • Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MHD, intHout J, Peterson CB, Simons M, Roes KCB, Kets M, Norquist BM, Swisher EM, Hermens RPMG; TUBA-WISP II consortium; Lu KH, de Hullu JA. TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Jun 5;33(6):982-987. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004377. PubMed 37045546 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04294927
Lead sponsor
University Medical Center Nijmegen
Responsible party
Joanne A. de Hullu, MD, PhD (Dr. J.A. de Hullu, MD, PhD, University Medical Center Nijmegen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 17, 2040 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 17, 2040 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 6, 2026

Study contacts

Joanne A. de Hullu, MD, PhD
Contact
Joanne.deHullu@radboudumc.nl
+31 (0) 24 36 16683
Karen H. Lu, MD, PhD
Contact
khlu@mdanderson.org
(713) 745-8902
Joanne A. de Hullu, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Medical Center
Karen H. Lu, MD, PhD
principal investigator · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Rosella P.M.G. Hermens, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Medical Center
Elizabeth M. Swisher, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion