Research Online Tele-Rehabilitation Program in People After a Stroke Living at Home

Browse trials for

• Stroke 8,255

Keywords

• telerehabilitation stroke virtual reatlity

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Lead sponsor

Clalit Health Services is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Study arms

• Experimental
  Single arm study

  The clients will receive tele-rehabilitation treatment via the Gertner Tele-Motion Rehabilitation system with remote online monitoring by the therapist. Treatment feedback is given in the form of Knowledge of results (game scores) and Knowledge of performance (feedback of compensatory movements made while using the upper extremity) to enhance motor learning. The software generates a report which includes the duration and type of exercises performed by the subject.

  Device: Tele Rehabilitation

Interventions

• DeviceTele Rehabilitation

  Also known as: Gertner Institute Tele Motion Rehabilitation system

Primary outcomes

1. System usability scale

   This questionnaire includes 10 items which provide a global view of subjective assessment of a system's usability. Each item was rated on a five-point scale from one (disagree totally) to five (agree totally). Five items are positive statements, such as "I think that I would like to use this system frequently" and "I thought the system was easy to use" and the other five items are negative, for example, "I found the system unnecessarily complex" and "I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system." The item scores were calculated to give an overall score ranging from 10 to 100 points. The SUS has been shown by the authors to be a robust and reliable evaluation tool but its psychometric properties have not been fully investigated. (Brooke et al., 1995)

   Time frame: Second assessment (after 6 weeks)

2. Short Feedback Questionnaire

   This is an 8-item questionnaire which queries the user's sense of presence, perceived difficulty of the task and any discomfort that users may have felt during the experience. The first six items assess the participant's (1) feeling of enjoyment, (2) sense of being in the environment, (3) success, (4) control, (5) perception of the environment as being realistic and (6) whether the feedback from the computer was understandable. The seventh item queries whether participants felt any discomfort during the experience. An eighth item queries their perceived difficulty while performing the task. Responses to the first seven items are rated on a scale of 1-5 where 1=not at all and 5 = very much. Responses to the eighth item is also rated on a 1-5 scale where 1= very easy and 5= very difficult. A total mean score for each participant will be calculated for the first six items.(Kizony et al., 2006)

   Time frame: Second assessment ( after 6 week)

3. Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity part (FMA)

   The FMA assesses the motor impairment of the upper extremity after stroke. Each movement is graded on a 3-point scale, and the total score for the upper extremity ranges from 0-60 points where a higher score represents more active movements. An additional part assesses the coordination of the affected upper extremity and the score ranges between 0-6 where a higher score represents poorer coordination ability. This test is one of the most commonly used instruments in rehabilitation and its validity and reliability have been well established (Fugl-Meyer et al., 1975; Wood-Dauphinee, Williams, \& Shapiro, 1990; Chae, Johnston, Kim, \&Zorowitz, 1995).

   Time frame: First assessment (beginning)

4. Motor Activity Log

   The Mal consist of a semi structured interview for the patient to assess the use of the paretic arm and hand during activities of daily living. Two scores are given for each activity, 1 for the amount of use (AOU) and 1 for the quality of movement (QOM). The questions concern activities performed during the past week or, occasionally, the past year. Possible scores range from 0 (never use the affected arm for this activity) to 5 (always use the affected arm for this activity). (Van der Lee, Beckerman, Knol, de Vet, Bouter, 2004)

   Time frame: First assessment (beginning)

5. Change in System Usability Scale between 6th week and 12th week

   Time frame: Third assessment (after 12 weeks)

6. Change in Short Feedback Questionnaire between 6th week and 12th week

   Time frame: Third assessment (after 12 weeks)

7. Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity part (FMA)between baseline and 6th week

   Time frame: Second assessment (after 6 weeks)

8. Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity part (FMA)between 6th week and 12th week

   Time frame: Third Assessment (after 12 weeks)

9. Change in Motor Activity Log between baseline and 6th week

   Time frame: Second assessment (after 6 weeks)

10. Change in Motor Activity Log between 6th week and 12th week

    Time frame: Third assessment (after 12 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

1. Range of Motion (ROM) of shoulder and elbow

   Standard clinical goniometer will be used to measure changes in shoulder (abduction and flexion) and elbow flexion Range of Motion angles in degrees.

   Time frame: First, second and third assessments (beginning, 6 & 12 weeks respectively)

2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

   for Pain evaluation will be used to document pain intensity, and rated from 0 to 10. The VAS is a 10 cm line representing pain intensity from "no pain" (0) to "worst pain" (10). Subjects will be requested to bisect the line at the point that best represented their level of neck pain. The VAS has been recognized as a generic pain intensity instrument for over two decades (Langley \& Sheppard, 1985) and has been found valid and sensitive to changes in acute (Breivik et al., 2000) and chronic (Ogon et al., 1996) pain.

   Time frame: Second and third assessments (6 & 12 weeks respectively)

3. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

   A questionnaire which evaluates the subject's capacity to perform eight different IADL tasks such as cooking, the use of transportation, shopping and taking medication (Lawton \& Brody, 1969; Lawton et al., 1982).

   Time frame: First and third assessments (beginning & 12 weeks respectively)

4. Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

   FIM rates the degree of disability and outcome after rehabilitation. It assesses 18 components of basic activities of daily living (e.g. dressing) and used here to characterize functional status. Thirteen activities (in areas of eating, dressing, grooming, bathing, toileting, transfers and mobility) constitute the motor part of the FIM and five (in areas of comprehension, expression, social relations, problem solving and memory) constitute the cognitive part of the FIM. Each activity is graded on a seven point scale with a total score range between 13-91 for the motor part and 5-35 for the cognitive part. The reliability and validity is well established (Granger, 1998). It was found suitable to use with patients who had a stroke (Ring et al., 1997; Granger Cotter, Hamilton \& Fiedler, 1993) and also has been used for people with SCI (Sipski, Jackson, Gomez-Marin, Estores\&Stein, 2004). (Hamilton Granger, Sherwin, Zielezny\&Tashman, 1987).

   Time frame: First and third assessments (beginning & 12 weeks respectively)

5. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

   SIS is a self-report that each participant will complete regarding his or her overall quality of life, including perceived difficulties with activities of daily living (ADL). (University of Kansas, 2008, http://www2.kumc.edu/coa/ SIS/SIS_pg2.htm )

   Time frame: First and third assessments (beginning & 12 weeks respectively)

Other outcomes

1. NIHSS

   The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a systematic assessment tool that provides a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurologic deficit. the scale is widely used as a clinical assessment tool to evaluate acuity of stroke patients, determine appropriate treatment, and predict patient outcome. The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The single patient assessment requires less than 10 minutes to complete. (http://www.nihstrokescale.org/)

   Time frame: Beginning

2. Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS)

   This is a valid and reliable test battery aimed at predicting everyday problems arising from the dysexecutive syndrome (Norris \& Tate, 2000). The Battery consists of 6 subtests which measures different aspects of executive functions; temporal judgment, rule shift cards, action program, key search, zoo map and modified six elements test (see appendix 5). For each subtest a profile score between 0 and 4 is calculated and all the scores are combined to a total profile score which is converted to an age-matched score. In addition the battery consists of a questionnaire; the Dysexecutive Functional Questionnaire (DEX) that assess how the deficits in executive functions manifest in everyday activities. This questionnaire is administered to the person who had a stroke as well as to his or her caregiver. (Wilson et al., 1996)

   Time frame: Beginning