CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01879631Updated Jun 18, 2013

Efficacy of Radial Keratotomy in the Optical Rehabilitation of Mild to Moderate Keratoconus Cases

An observational study in Radial Keratotomy in Keratoconus Cases, sponsored by Nisa Hastanesi. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-18.

Sponsored by Nisa Hastanesi · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Keratoconus is a progressive ectatic disorder that steepens the cornea resulting in a conical shape. Radial Keratotomy can provide an optical rehabilitation by its flattening effect. It can also halt the progression of disease owing to fibrotic activation in perpendicular corneal incisions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radial Keratotomy in Keratoconus Cases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • radial keratotomy; keratoconus; optical rehabilitation
03

In context

Keratoconus

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 130 across 94 observational studies indexed under Keratoconus.

Browse Keratoconus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Nisa Hastanesi as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

mild to moderate keratoconus cases

Inclusion criteria

  • keratoconus with a central corneal thickness (CCT) over 400µm,
  • poor corrected visual acuity (≤0.4 at Snellen visual acuity charts),
  • contact lens intolerance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • apical scarring,
  • ocular or systemic problem other than keratoconus
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • mild to moderate keratoconus cases

    keratoconus with a central corneal thickness (CCT) over 400µm, poor corrected visual acuity (≤0.4 at Snellen visual acuity charts), contact lens intolerance, no apical scarring, no ocular or systemic problem other than keratoconus

    Procedure: radial keratotomy

Interventions

  • Procedureradial keratotomy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. outcome measures: uncorrected and best spectacle corrected visual acuity, keratometer readings

    Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle corrected visual acuity, and keratometer readings will be reviewed retrospectively. As reviewed follow up time range is 12 to 52 months, time frame is assessed as " 12 to 52 months"

    Time frame: after surgery - 12 to 52 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ophthalmology Department, Nisa Hospital
    Istanbul, 34196, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Utine CA, Bayraktar S, Kaya V, Kucuksumer Y, Eren H, Perente I, Yilmaz OF. Radial keratotomy for the optical rehabilitation of mild to moderate keratoconus: more than 5 years' experience. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 May-Jun;16(3):376-84. PubMed 16761238 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01879631
Lead sponsor
Nisa Hastanesi
Responsible party
Ibrahim Kocak (M.D., Nisa Hastanesi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2013
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Dec 2012
Last update
Jun 18, 2013

Study contacts

ibrahim kocak, m.d
principal investigator · ophthalmologist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion