ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01869491Updated May 8, 2025Results posted

Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablet Symptomatic Relief Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and Matching placebo tablets in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Dyspepsia, sponsored by Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited. Completed at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-08.

Sponsored by Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited (part of Reckitt) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,107
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being conducted to provide evidence that Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets are effective in managing the symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation and dyspepsia in patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • Dyspepsia

Keywords

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • GERD
  • Dyspepsia
  • Indigestion
  • Heartburn
  • Acid reflux
  • Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets
  • Gaviscon Double Action Tablets
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,211 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 202 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,107 is above the median of 68 across 796 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Current evidence of symptomatic GERD in accord with the Montreal definition.
  • Patients must have had troublesome heartburn and/or regurgitation (with or without dyspepsia symptoms) of at least mild or moderate intensity on at least 5 days during the week before the start of screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of drug, solvent or alcohol abuse.
  • Patients who have suffered cardiac chest pain within the last year.
  • Patients who have suffered a recent, significant unexplained weight loss of more than 6 kg in the last 6 months.
  • Female patients of who, for the duration of the study, are either unwilling or unable to take adequate precautions or are unwilling to be sexually abstinent.
  • Pregnancy or lactating mother.
  • Patients with a history and/or symptom profile suggestive of the following: any other gastrointestinal (GI) disease, erosive GERD (Los Angeles classification grades C-D), Barrett's oesophagus, acute peptic ulcer and/or ulcer complications, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, gastric carcinoma, pyloric stenosis, oesophageal or gastric surgery, intestinal obstruction, current pernicious anaemia, indication for H. pylori eradication therapy, known gastrointestinal bleeding (hematochezia or hematemesis) within 3 months prior to the study, and severe diseases of other major body systems.
  • Patients who were observed at screening to have a hiatus hernia with a diameter which exceeds 3 cm.
  • Patients who have taken anti-cholinesterase drugs, traditional Chinese medicines for treating gastrointestinal disease, ulcermin or misoprostol preparations within 7 days prior to screening or throughout the study.
  • Patients who have taken proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) during the 10 days prior to screening, prokinetics or H2 antagonists during the 5 days prior to screening or systemic glucocorticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (except for low dose aspirin which can be given for cardioprotection) on more than 3 consecutive days or PPI-based triple or quadruple therapy for eradication of H-pylori during the last 28 days.
  • Patients taking or requiring to take macrolide antibiotics, such as erythromycin, azithromycin, from the day before screening.
  • Patients with known hypophosphataemia, phenylketonuria or hypercalcaemia.
  • Patients with severe constipation, or history of intestinal obstruction.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator, patients with damaged heart or kidney function and patients who require a low sodium diet.
  • Any previous history of allergy or known intolerance to any of the medicinal products.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets

    Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets, 2 tablets four times daily

    Drug: Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching placebo tablets

    Matching placebo tablets, 2 tablets four times daily

    Drug: Matching placebo tablets

Interventions

  • DrugCompound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets

    2 tablets four times daily

    Also known as: Gaviscon Double Action Tablets

  • DrugMatching placebo tablets

    2 tablets four times daily

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) Scores for the GERD Dimension

    The primary study endpoint is the change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the GERD dimension (heartburn and regurgitation) after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The RDQ is a 12-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess the frequency and severity of heartburn, acid regurgitation and dyspepsia symptoms, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 60, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome. The heartburn and acid regurgitation subscales can be combined into a GERD dimension, which has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 40, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Dyspepsia Dimension

    The change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the dyspepsia dimension after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The dyspepsia subscale of the RDQ has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Heartburn Dimension

    The change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the heartburn dimension after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The heartburn subscale of the RDQ has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Regurgitation Dimension

    The change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the regurgitation dimension after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The regurgitation subscale of the RDQ has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Overall Treatment Evaluation (OTE) as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 1 - Patient's Evaluation of the Change in Symptoms Over the Last 7 Days

    Comparison between the 2 cohorts (Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and matching placebo) in OTE as a measure for patient's responsiveness/satisfaction, determined at Visit 3, the end-of-study visit. Question 1 of the OTE assessed how the patients rated their responsiveness/satisfaction on a 15-point scale (from -7 = a very great deal worse to +7 = a very great deal better).

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. OTE as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 2 - Patient's Evaluation of the Importance of the Change in Symptoms

    Comparison between the 2 cohorts (Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and matching placebo) in OTE as a measure for patient's responsiveness/satisfaction, determined at Visit 3, the end-of-study visit. Question 2 of the OTE addressed how patients perceived the importance of the change of the clinical status on a 7-point scale (from 1 = not important to 7 = extremely important).

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. For Patients With Improvement Only: OTE as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 2 - Patient's Evaluation of the Importance of the Change in Symptoms

    For patients with improvement only, comparison between the 2 cohorts (Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and matching placebo) in OTE as a measure for patient's responsiveness/satisfaction, determined at Visit 3, the end-of-study visit. Question 2 of the OTE addressed how patients perceived the importance of the change of the clinical status on a 7-point scale (from 1 = not important to 7 = extremely important).

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Results

Posted Mar 13, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
Started552555
Completed531531
Not completed2124
Withdrew: Adverse event35
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy03
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject67
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up119
Withdrew: No further need of investigational product10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) Scores for the GERD Dimension

The primary study endpoint is the change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the GERD dimension (heartburn and regurgitation) after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The RDQ is a 12-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess the frequency and severity of heartburn, acid regurgitation and dyspepsia symptoms, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 60, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome. The heartburn and acid regurgitation subscales can be combined into a GERD dimension, which has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 40, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) Scores for the GERD Dimension
score on a scaleSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) Scores for the GERD Dimension-1.27 (-1.37 to -1.16)-1.06 (-1.17 to -0.95)
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.21 · 95% CI -0.31 to -0.11
SecondaryChange From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Dyspepsia Dimension

The change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the dyspepsia dimension after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The dyspepsia subscale of the RDQ has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Dyspepsia Dimension
score on a scaleSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Dyspepsia Dimension-0.98 (-1.10 to -0.86)-0.80 (-0.91 to -0.68)
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0004 · Mean difference (final values): -0.18 · 95% CI -0.29 to -0.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Heartburn Dimension

The change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the heartburn dimension after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The heartburn subscale of the RDQ has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Heartburn Dimension
score on a scaleSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Heartburn Dimension-1.16 (-1.28 to -1.04)-0.95 (-1.07 to -0.83)
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.21 · 95% CI -0.32 to -0.10
SecondaryChange From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Regurgitation Dimension

The change from baseline in RDQ symptom scores for the regurgitation dimension after a 7-day treatment period of Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets compared with a matched placebo. The regurgitation subscale of the RDQ has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20, with lower RDQ scores showing an improved outcome.

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Regurgitation Dimension
score on a scaleSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
Change From Baseline in RDQ Scores for the Regurgitation Dimension-1.37 (-1.48 to -1.26)-1.16 (-1.27 to -1.05)
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0004 · Mean difference (final values): -0.21 · 95% CI -0.32 to -0.09
SecondaryOverall Treatment Evaluation (OTE) as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 1 - Patient's Evaluation of the Change in Symptoms Over the Last 7 Days

Comparison between the 2 cohorts (Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and matching placebo) in OTE as a measure for patient's responsiveness/satisfaction, determined at Visit 3, the end-of-study visit. Question 1 of the OTE assessed how the patients rated their responsiveness/satisfaction on a 15-point scale (from -7 = a very great deal worse to +7 = a very great deal better).

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Treatment Evaluation (OTE) as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 1 - Patient's Evaluation of the Change in Symptoms Over the Last 7 Days
ParticipantsSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
-7 = A very great deal worse00
-6 = A great deal worse01
-5 = A good deal worse00
-4 = Moderately worse03
-3 = Somewhat worse62
-2 = A little worse310
-1 = Almost the same, hardly any worse at all24
0 = No change4164
1 = Almost the same, hardly any better at all3247
2 = A little better85106
3 = Somewhat better8789
4 = Moderately better8872
5 = A good deal better11692
6 = A great deal better5333
7 = A very great deal better2313
Missing01
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.0001
SecondaryOTE as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 2 - Patient's Evaluation of the Importance of the Change in Symptoms

Comparison between the 2 cohorts (Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and matching placebo) in OTE as a measure for patient's responsiveness/satisfaction, determined at Visit 3, the end-of-study visit. Question 2 of the OTE addressed how patients perceived the importance of the change of the clinical status on a 7-point scale (from 1 = not important to 7 = extremely important).

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
OTE as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 2 - Patient's Evaluation of the Importance of the Change in Symptoms
ParticipantsSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
1 = Not important1925
2 = Slightly important3151
3 = Somewhat important4844
4 = Moderately important5549
5 = Important174153
6 = Very important138118
7 = Extremely important3132
Missing4065
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0433
SecondaryFor Patients With Improvement Only: OTE as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 2 - Patient's Evaluation of the Importance of the Change in Symptoms

For patients with improvement only, comparison between the 2 cohorts (Compound Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets and matching placebo) in OTE as a measure for patient's responsiveness/satisfaction, determined at Visit 3, the end-of-study visit. Question 2 of the OTE addressed how patients perceived the importance of the change of the clinical status on a 7-point scale (from 1 = not important to 7 = extremely important).

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
For Patients With Improvement Only: OTE as a Measure of Patient Responsiveness/Satisfaction: Question 2 - Patient's Evaluation of the Importance of the Change in Symptoms
ParticipantsSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
1 = Not important1822
2 = Slightly important2948
3 = Somewhat important4740
4 = Moderately important5549
5 = Important169151
6 = Very important136112
7 = Extremely important3030
Statistical analysis
  • Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets vs Matching Placebo Tablets · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0503

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 8 days, from after the first dose of IMP until no later than the day of the last dose of IMP +1. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets0/549 (0%)1/549 (0.2%)0/549 (0%)
Matching Placebo Tablets0/550 (0%)0/550 (0%)0/550 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo Tablets
Gastro-oesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders1/5490/550

Baseline characteristics

Eight subjects (3 in the Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable Tablets group and 5 in the matching placebo tablets group) were randomized in the study, but not treated, and therefore not included in the safety population, from which baseline data were drawn.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo TabletsTotal
Mean45.0 ± 11.8144.8 ± 11.8444.9 ± 11.82
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo TabletsTotal
Female280262542
Male269288557
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo TabletsTotal
Caucasian101
Asian5485501098
Afro-Caribbean000
Other000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sodium Alginate Double Action Chewable TabletsMatching Placebo TabletsTotal
China5495501099
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • RB Investigational Sites
    Beijing, China
  • RB Investigational Sites
    Shanghai, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sun J, Yang C, Zhao H, Zheng P, Wilkinson J, Ng B, Yuan Y. Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Oct;42(7):845-54. doi: 10.1111/apt.13334. Epub 2015 Jul 31. PubMed 26228097 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2013 to primary completion in May 2014, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2025, 10 years 10 months after primary completion.

Of 20 phase 3 interventional studies under Gastroesophageal Reflux, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 49. This study's 11 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 31, 2013
First posted
Jun 5, 2013
StartActual
Jun 5, 2013
Primary completionActual
May 2014
CompletionActual
May 2014
Results first posted
Mar 13, 2025
Last update
May 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01869491
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2013
Start date
Jun 5, 2013
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
May 2014
Results posted
Mar 13, 2025
Last update
May 8, 2025

Study contacts

Yuan Yaozong, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion