CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01862679Updated Jun 7, 2016

Randomised Study of High-flux Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration

An interventional study of High-flux haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration in End Stage Renal Disease, sponsored by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-07.

Sponsored by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The most common forms of renal replacement therapy currently in use are high flux haemodialysis (HF-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF). Although these techniques appear similar to the patient, there are important differences in what happens to the blood as it travels through the dialysis machine.

During HDF, the machine controls hydrostatic pressure across the dialyser to remove additional water together with toxins from the blood and this fluid volume is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. HDF has a theoretical advantage removing more waste substances, especially larger molecules, from the blood than HF-HD which may be of benefit to the patient in the medium to long term.Despite the theoretical advantages, trials have so far been unable to find any significant difference in death rates or the development of health problems among patients on HDF or HF-HD.

It is therefore important to examine other factors which may help doctors and patients to decide which treatment to use. The investigators have designed a study which aims to answer three main questions:

  1. Does HDF make patients feel better?
  2. Is blood pressure more stable on HDF in comparison with HF-HD?
  3. Are Phosphate levels and other blood parameters better controlled with HDF than HF-HD?

The investigators will do this by randomly assigning patients on HF-HD to receive 2 months of either HF-HD or HDF with as equivalent treatment prescriptions as possible and without the patient knowing which treatment they are receiving. After two months the patients will switch to the alternative form of dialysis for a further two months. During the study the investigators will ask the patients how long it took them to recover from the preceding session of dialysis, assess the frequency of symptomatic low blood pressure and also perform blood tests at set intervals to measure specific blood parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Renal Disease
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic

2,085 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 260 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 55 across 1,557 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving HF-HD for at least 3 months
  • Reliable vascular access (i.e. use of the same fistula, graft or tunnelled central venous catheter for at least 1 month)
  • Aged 18 or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving HDF
  • Emergency hospital admissions within the preceding 4 weeks
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Neoplasia
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Unable to perform QoL questionnaire or self report recovery post-dialysis time
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    8 weeks HF haemodialysis / 8 weeks HD-filtration

    8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis followed by 8 weeks haemodiafiltration

    Other: High-flux haemodialysis · Procedure: Haemodiafiltration

  • Experimental
    8 weeks HD-filtration /8 weeks HF haemodialysis

    8 weeks haemodiafiltration followed by 8 weeks high-flux haemodialysis

    Other: High-flux haemodialysis · Procedure: Haemodiafiltration

Interventions

  • OtherHigh-flux haemodialysis

    High-flux haemodialysis is the standard dialysis modality currently in use in the UK

  • ProcedureHaemodiafiltration

    During Haemodiafiltration, the dialysis machine removes more water from the blood than during "normal" hemodialysis. The additional liquid is continually replaced with an ultra-pure solution. Thus, the machine exchanges a high volume of fluid during treatment and removes the liquid together with toxins from the blood.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the average time taken to fully recover post dialysis

    Self-assessment by patient of hours/mins to full recovery after dialysis

    Time frame: Baseline compared 8 week treatment point

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of symptomatic hypotension events

    Time frame: Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks

  2. Number of dialysis circuit clotting events

    Time frame: Number of events noted by nurse at each dialysis session in each of the two arms of the study. Each arm= 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks

  3. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of potassium

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  4. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of phosphate

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  5. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of vitamin B12.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  6. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of PTH.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  7. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of beta-2-microglobulin

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  8. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of betaine

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  9. Pre-dialysis serum concentrations of interleukin-6

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

  10. Kt/V urea.

    Time frame: : Measured at baseline, and after 4 and 8 weeks of each treatment period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NHS Greater Glasgow andClyde
    Glasgow, G12 0XH, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01862679
Lead sponsor
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 24, 2013
Start date
Jul 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Mar 2014
Last update
Jun 7, 2016

Study contacts

Robert MacTier, Md, FRCP
study director · NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion