CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01833026Updated Dec 24, 2019Results posted

COPD Assessment and Management Bundle Versus Usual Care

An interventional study of Spirometry test and Levalbuterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-24.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory (lung) disease that makes it harder to breathe over time. To date, there is no cure for COPD, but it can be managed when diagnosed and proper medical care is provided.

The purpose of this study is to determine if diagnosis and guided therapy with the use of spirometry is related to better patient outcomes (the condition of a patient's health) compared to usual care which may or may not include the use of spirometry. Spirometry is a standardized test used in medical practice that measures how much air your lungs can hold and how forcefully you can breathe out.

For this study, the investigators will compare two groups: 1) intervention (treatment) group and 2) usual care group (control). The intervention group will have a spirometry test and the results will be provided to the primary care physician. The usual care group will not initially have a spirometry test. Both groups will be followed for outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine if diagnosis and guided therapy with the use of spirometry is related to better patient associated outcomes compared to usual care which may or may not include the use of spirometry. To do this, we propose a comparative effectiveness trial of introducing a COPD assessment and management bundle targeted to primary care providers for patients suspected of having COPD versus usual care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • pulmonary disease
  • chronic obstructive airflow
  • spirometry
  • primary healthcare
  • guideline-based therapy
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 515 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients, male and female, who are at least 40 years of age, receive primary treatment at the University of Illinois , and with any one of the following:

New Diagnosis

Inpatient or emergency department setting

  1. New physician-diagnosis of COPD and/or new physician-diagnosis of asthma with a ≥10 pack year smoking without a spirometry 4 weeks or more after discharge from diagnosis setting.

    Outpatient setting

  2. A new physician diagnosis of COPD within the past 6 months prior to their visit, without a spirometry or with a normal spirometry within the past 5 years prior to the diagnosis to the time of their visit.
  3. A new physician diagnosis of asthma within past 6 months and a ≥10 pack year smoking history prior to their visit, without a diagnosis of COPD, without a spirometry or with a pre-bronchodilator spirometry with evidence of obstruction within the past 5 years prior to the diagnosis to the time of their visit.
  4. Any patient with an existing physician-diagnosis of asthma within the past 2 years but > 6 months prior to the time of their visit and a ≥10 pack year smoking history, without a diagnosis of COPD, using a respiratory medication in the past year, and no spirometry on record or had a pre-bronchodilator spirometry with evidence of obstruction on record for at least the past 5 years.

    Existing Diagnosis

  5. Any patient with an existing physician-diagnosis of COPD within the past 2 years but > 6 months prior to the time of their visit, and using a respiratory medication in the past year but no spirometry on record or had a spirometry without evidence of chronic obstruction in the past 5 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to perform adequate spirometry (e.g. muscle weakness, tracheostomy, cognitive dysfunction, mental retardation or other psychiatric disorders)
  2. Non-English speaking
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Any patient planning to move away from the city within the next year.
  5. Seen by a pulmonary specialist in the past 3 years.
  6. Any terminal illness with a life expectancy of \<6 months (e.g. hospice care, malignancies)
  7. Any patient with a physician diagnosis of COPD and had a pre or post-bronchodilator spirometry with evidence of chronic obstruction on record.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    COPD assessment and management recommendations

    Patients with a physician-diagnosed COPD or asthma suspicious for COPD being managed by the physician randomized to the intervention group will perform a spirometry test and provide information regarding their medical history on their initial visit, which is 90 minutes before their doctor's appointment. A letter containing the interpretation of spirometry test results, and recommendations for guideline based therapy based on GOLD guidelines will be available to the primary care doctor at the time of the patient's clinic visit. The doctor may review the results and use his or her own judgment in moving forward with the subject's diagnosis and management. A copy of the spirometry results and assessment based on the GOLD criteria at the time of the test of your subject will be uploaded to his or her electronic health record for future reference. Outcomes will be assessed every 3 months for up to one year through patient telephone calls and medical chart reviews.

    Device: Spirometry test · Drug: Levalbuterol

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual Care

    Patients with a physician-diagnosed COPD or physician-diagnosed asthma suspicious for COPD being managed by the physician randomized to the usual care group will provide medical history, not initially have a spirometry, and will be observed as usual care. Outcomes will be assessed every 3 months for up to one year through patient telephone calls and medical chart reviews. At the conclusion of the research study which will be 12 months from the patients' initial visit, patients being managed by the physician randomized to the usual care group will have a spirometry test and these results will not be shared with the doctor or the patients during the study but will be uploaded to the electronic health record after the end of the study for future reference.

    Device: Spirometry test · Drug: Levalbuterol

Interventions

  • DeviceSpirometry test

    For the initial visit for the intervention group, an initial demographics form and a health questionnaire will given to the subject to complete. To evaluate the breathing and quality of living, a spirometry test will be performed that will evaluate how well and how fast the subject can breath and blow out air.

    Also known as: KoKo Spirometer (Model 313105), 3 Liter Calibration Syringe

  • DrugLevalbuterol

    The spirometry test will be performed with a breathing medication called Levalbuterol (Xopenex®). Levalbuterol is used in standard practice for COPD and is commonly used during spirometry.

    Also known as: Xopenex®: 4 puffs administered 30 seconds apart

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Accurate Classification of Irreversible Airflow Obstruction

    accuracy of diagnosis was the outcome measure. The results of the spirometry test (done in the beginning for the intervention group and ant the end of 1 year for the usual care groups) were reviewed in conjunction with the initial physician diagnosis of COPD and/or asthma to confirm whether the diagnosis was accurate, not accurate, or indeterminate. Accuracy of diagnosis of COPD was determined by spirometry results if the FEV1/FVC ratio was \<0.7.

    Time frame: spirometry was performed at the first visit for intervention group and at 1 year from recruitment for the usual care group, one time assessment for both groups

07

Results

Posted Dec 24, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUsual CareIntervention
Started2234
Completed2234
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Accurate Classification of Irreversible Airflow Obstruction

accuracy of diagnosis was the outcome measure. The results of the spirometry test (done in the beginning for the intervention group and ant the end of 1 year for the usual care groups) were reviewed in conjunction with the initial physician diagnosis of COPD and/or asthma to confirm whether the diagnosis was accurate, not accurate, or indeterminate. Accuracy of diagnosis of COPD was determined by spirometry results if the FEV1/FVC ratio was \<0.7.

Time frame:
spirometry was performed at the first visit for intervention group and at 1 year from recruitment for the usual care group, one time assessment for both groups
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Accurate Classification of Irreversible Airflow Obstruction
ParticipantsCOPD Assessment and Management RecommendationsUsual Care
Number of Participants With Accurate Classification of Irreversible Airflow Obstruction105

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
COPD Assessment and Management Recommendations—0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)
Usual Care—0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)COPD Assessment and Management RecommendationsUsual CareTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years211940
>=65 years13316
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)COPD Assessment and Management RecommendationsUsual CareTotal
Mean60.3 ± 10.157.0 ± 6.958.9 ± 7.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)COPD Assessment and Management RecommendationsUsual CareTotal
Female221739
Male12517
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)COPD Assessment and Management RecommendationsUsual CareTotal
United States342256
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Illinois
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: World Health Organization and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 2011
  • Akinbami LJ, Liu X. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults aged 18 and over in the United States, 1998-2009. NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Jun;(63):1-8. PubMed 22142836 ↗
  • Sullivan SD, Ramsey SD, Lee TA. The economic burden of COPD. Chest. 2000 Feb;117(2 Suppl):5S-9S. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.2_suppl.5s. PubMed 10673466 ↗
  • Mapel DW, Hurley JS, Frost FJ, Petersen HV, Picchi MA, Coultas DB. Health care utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A case-control study in a health maintenance organization. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Sep 25;160(17):2653-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.17.2653. PubMed 10999980 ↗
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease data fact sheet: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 2003
  • Morbidity and mortality: 2009 chartbook on cardiovascular, lung and blood diseases: National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, 2009
  • Han MK, Kim MG, Mardon R, Renner P, Sullivan S, Diette GB, Martinez FJ. Spirometry utilization for COPD: how do we measure up? Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):403-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2846. Epub 2007 Jun 5. PubMed 17550936 ↗
  • Joo MJ, Lee TA, Weiss KB. Geographic variation of spirometry use in newly diagnosed COPD. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):38-45. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0013. Epub 2008 Mar 17. PubMed 18347201 ↗
  • Lee TA, Bartle B, Weiss KB. Spirometry use in clinical practice following diagnosis of COPD. Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1509. PubMed 16778268 ↗
  • Damarla M, Celli BR, Mullerova HX, Pinto-Plata VM. Discrepancy in the use of confirmatory tests in patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure. Respir Care. 2006 Oct;51(10):1120-4. PubMed 17005056 ↗
  • Joo MJ, Au DH, Fitzgibbon ML, McKell J, Lee TA. Determinants of spirometry use and accuracy of COPD diagnosis in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1272-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1770-1. Epub 2011 Jun 29. PubMed 21713542 ↗
  • Badgett RG, Tanaka DJ, Hunt DK, Jelley MJ, Feinberg LE, Steiner JF, Petty TL. The clinical evaluation for diagnosing obstructive airways disease in high-risk patients. Chest. 1994 Nov;106(5):1427-31. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.5.1427. PubMed 7956395 ↗
  • Buffels J, Degryse J, Heyrman J, Decramer M; DIDASCO Study. Office spirometry significantly improves early detection of COPD in general practice: the DIDASCO Study. Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1394-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1394. PubMed 15078751 ↗
  • Straus SE, McAlister FA, Sackett DL, Deeks JJ; CARE-COAD2 Group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease. Accuracy of history, wheezing, and forced expiratory time in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Sep;17(9):684-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.20102.x. PubMed 12220364 ↗
  • van Schayck CP, van Weel C, Harbers HJ, van Herwaarden CL. Do physical signs reflect the degree of airflow obstruction in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Scand J Prim Health Care. 1991 Dec;9(4):232-8. doi: 10.3109/02813439109018525. PubMed 1792447 ↗
  • Straus SE, McAlister FA, Sackett DL, Deeks JJ. The accuracy of patient history, wheezing, and laryngeal measurements in diagnosing obstructive airway disease. CARE-COAD1 Group. Clinical Assessment of the Reliability of the Examination-Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease. JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1853-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.14.1853. Erratum In: JAMA 2000 Jul 12;284(2):181. PubMed 10770147 ↗
  • Holleman DR Jr, Simel DL. Does the clinical examination predict airflow limitation? JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):313-9. No abstract available. Erratum In: JAMA 1995 May 3;273(17):1334. PubMed 7815660 ↗
  • Bolton CE, Ionescu AA, Edwards PH, Faulkner TA, Edwards SM, Shale DJ. Attaining a correct diagnosis of COPD in general practice. Respir Med. 2005 Apr;99(4):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.09.015. Epub 2004 Nov 11. PubMed 15763457 ↗
  • Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Ford ES, Redd SC. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease surveillance--United States, 1971-2000. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Aug 2;51(6):1-16. PubMed 12198919 ↗
  • Mannino DM, Gagnon RC, Petty TL, Lydick E. Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 12;160(11):1683-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1683. PubMed 10847262 ↗
  • Tinkelman DG, Price DB, Nordyke RJ, Halbert RJ. Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over. J Asthma. 2006 Jan-Feb;43(1):75-80. doi: 10.1080/02770900500448738. PubMed 16448970 ↗
  • Walker PP, Mitchell P, Diamantea F, Warburton CJ, Davies L. Effect of primary-care spirometry on the diagnosis and management of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2006 Nov;28(5):945-52. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00019306. Epub 2006 Jul 26. PubMed 16870668 ↗
  • Mapel DW, Dutro MP, Marton JP, Woodruff K, Make B. Identifying and characterizing COPD patients in US managed care. A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of administrative claims data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb 23;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-43. PubMed 21345188 ↗
  • Schnell K, Weiss CO, Lee T, Krishnan JA, Leff B, Wolff JL, Boyd C. The prevalence of clinically-relevant comorbid conditions in patients with physician-diagnosed COPD: a cross-sectional study using data from NHANES 1999-2008. BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Jul 9;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-26. PubMed 22695054 ↗
  • Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, Ferguson GT, Jenkins C, Jones PW, Yates JC, Vestbo J; TORCH investigators. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 22;356(8):775-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063070. PubMed 17314337 ↗
  • Ernst P, Gonzalez AV, Brassard P, Suissa S. Inhaled corticosteroid use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the risk of hospitalization for pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jul 15;176(2):162-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200611-1630OC. Epub 2007 Mar 30. PubMed 17400730 ↗
  • Kardos P, Wencker M, Glaab T, Vogelmeier C. Impact of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus salmeterol on exacerbations in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan 15;175(2):144-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200602-244OC. Epub 2006 Oct 19. PubMed 17053207 ↗
  • Lee TA, Pickard AS, Au DH, Bartle B, Weiss KB. Risk for death associated with medications for recently diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Sep 16;149(6):380-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00004. PubMed 18794557 ↗
  • Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Inhaled anticholinergics and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1439-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.12.1439. Erratum In: JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1227-30. PubMed 18812535 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01833026
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Min Joo, MD MPH (Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 16, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Dec 24, 2019
Last update
Dec 24, 2019

Study contacts

Min Joo, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion